Education, Science, Technology, Innovation and Life
Open Access
Sign In

Relationship between Mastery Goal Orientation and ICT Use Outside School: Moderation Role of ICT Self-efficacy

Download as PDF

DOI: 10.23977/aetp.2023.070912 | Downloads: 15 | Views: 417

Author(s)

Lin Ma 1, Gan Jin 2

Affiliation(s)

1 School of Education, Fujian Polytechnic Normal University, Fuqing, Fujian, China
2 Washington State University, Washington, America

Corresponding Author

Gan Jin

ABSTRACT

During the Covid-19 pandemic, the role of learning outside of school has become increasingly important due to the extensive closures of schools. Using of Information and communication technology (ICT) can be an effective way to promote students' learning outcomes when they stay at home. The achievement goal theory emphasizes the importance of mastery goal orientation in students' self-regulated learning. To date, little is known about the effect of goal orientation on stduents' using of ICT outside of school for school work. Besides, their ICT self-efficacy is another important factor in using of ICT. Thus, the present study investigated the relationship among these factors by using PISA 2018 cycle data in the US. Results showed that students' mastery goal orientation and ICT self-efficacy significantly influence using of ICT outside school for schoolwork. ICT self-efficacy also moderated the relationship between students' mastery goal orientation and using of ICT outside school for schoolwork.

KEYWORDS

Using of ICT outside school, ICT self-efficacy, mastery goal orientation, PISA

CITE THIS PAPER

Lin Ma, Gan Jin, Relationship between Mastery Goal Orientation and ICT Use Outside School: Moderation Role of ICT Self-efficacy. Advances in Educational Technology and Psychology (2023) Vol. 7: 81-86. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.23977/aetp.2023.070912.

REFERENCES

[1] Al-Ansi, A. M., Garad, A., (2021). ICT-Based Learning During Covid-19 Outbreak: Advantages, Opportunities and Challenges [J]. Gagasan Pendidikan Indonesia, 2(1), 10–26. 
[2] UN. (2020). Education during Covid-19 and beyound. August.
[3] Ziemba, & Eisenbardt, M. (n.d.). (2021). The effect of the covid-19 pandemic on ICT usage by academics [J]. The Journal of Computer Information Systems, ahead-of-print (ahead-of-print), 1–15. 
[4] Rodríguez, P., Nussbaum, M., & Dombrovskaia, L. (2012). ICT for education: a conceptual framework for the sustainable adoption of technology-enhanced learning environments in schools [J]. Technology, Pedagogy and Education, 21(3), 291-315. 
[5] Tondeur, J, van Braak, J, & Valcke, M. (2007). Curricula and the use of ICT in education: Two worlds apart? [J]. British Journal of Educational Technology, 38(6), 962–976. 
[6] Becker, B. (2022). Educational ICT use outside school in the European Union: disparities by social origin, immigrant background, and gender [J]. Journal of Children and Media, 16(1), 1–20. 
[7] Selwyn, N., & Bullon, K. (2000). Primary school children's use of ICT [J]. British Journal of Educational Technology, 31(4), 321–332. 
[8] Dweck. (1986). Motivational Processes Affecting Learning [J]. The American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040–1048. 
[9] Anderman, E. M., & Wolters, C. (2006). Goals, values and affects: Influences on student motivation. In P. Alexander & P. Winne (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (2nd ed.)[M]. New York: Simon & Schuster.
[10] Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students' learning strategies and motivation processes [J]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260–267. 
[11] Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms [J]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261–271. 
[12] Kim, E. Y., Lim, E. J., & Noh, J. H. (2016). Academic stress, major satisfaction, and academic achievement according to type of achievement goal orientation in nursing students [Z]. International Information Institute (Tokyo). Information, 19(10A), 4557.
[13] Kent, N., & Facer, K. (2004). Different worlds? A comparison of young people's home and school ICT use [J]. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 20(6), 440–455. 
[14] Hussain, I., Suleman, Q., ud Din, M. N., & Shafique, F. (2017). Effects of information and communication technology (ICT) on students' academic achievement and retention in chemistry at secondary level [J]. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 4(1), 73-93. 
[15] Aguinis, H., & Gottfredson, R. K. (2010). Best-practice recommendations for estimating interaction effects using moderated multiple regression [J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31(6), 776-786.
[16] Rohatgi, Scherer, R., & Hatlevik, O. E. (2016). The role of ICT self-efficacy for students' ICT use and their achievement in a computer and information literacy test [J]. Computers and Education, 102, 103–116. 
[17] Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.
[18] Goldhammer, F., Gniewosz, G., & Zylka, J. (2016). ICT engagement in learning environments. In S. Kuger, E. Klieme, N. Jude, & D. Kaplan (Eds.), Assessing contexts of learning: An international perspective [M]. Cham, Switzerland: Springer.
[19] OECD(a). (2019). PISA 2018 results (Volume I) what students know and can do [M]. OECD Publishing.
[20] Hayes, A. F. (2022). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (3rd ed.)[M]. Guilford Publications.
[21] Dawson, J. F. (2014). Moderation in management research: What, why, when, and how [J]. Journal of Business and Psychology, 29(1), 1-19. 
[22] Schweder, S. (2019). Mastery goals, positive emotions and learning behavior in self-directed vs. teacher-directed learning [J]. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 35(1), 205–223. 
[23] Elliot, A. J., & Hulleman, C. S. (2017). Achievment goals. In A. J. Elliot, C. S. Dweck, & D. S. Yeager (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation: theory and application[M]. New York: Guilford.
[24] Marsh, H. W., Dowson, M., Pietsch, J., & Walker, R. (2004). Why multicollinearity matters: A reexamination of relations between self-efficacy, self-concept, and achievement [J]. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 518–522. 

All published work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

Copyright © 2016 - 2031 Clausius Scientific Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.