There are many types of treatments for calcaneal fractures, including conservative treatment, conventional surgical treatment, and minimally invasive surgery. The choice of specific treatment options is still controversial. Open reduction and internal fixation are currently the most commonly used surgical procedures in the clinic. A good fracture reduction effect can be achieved by using the lateral extension incision of the calcaneus; however, many studies have reported a high incidence of postoperative incision complications. Although there are many methods for the classification of intra-articular calcaneal fractures, it is generally believed that the computed tomography (CT) classification proposed by Sanders has high application value in the selection of treatment methods and evaluation of prognosis of calcaneal fractures. However, this method has no clear guiding significance for the choice of surgical incision and surgical plan.

To explore the application and clinical efficacy of medial column classification in the treatment of intra-articular calcaneal fractures.

From July 2017 to July 2018, 91 patients, including 60 males and 31 females aged 27 to 60 years, were enrolled. All participants had closed intra-articular calcaneal fracture, and their surgical options were selected under the guidance of medial column classification. The patients’ fractures were classified according to the Sanders classification: Type II, 35 cases; Type III, 33 cases; and Type IV, 23 cases. Among them, 53 patients had medial column displacement (shortened varus) and underwent open reduction and internal fixation with L-lateral incision of the calcaneus; 38 patients had no displacement of the medial column and underwent open reduction and internal fixation with tarsal sinus incision. The calcaneus Böhler angle, Gissane angle, length, width, height, and step thickness of the articular surface were evaluated by X-ray and three-dimensional CT before and after surgery and at the last follow-up. Foot function recovery was assessed by the Maryland foot scoring criteria.

All patients were followed for 5 to 14 mo, with an average of 10.5 ± 2.9 mo. The fractures of all patients healed, and the healing time was 10 to 19 wk, with an average of 10.8 ± 1.5 wk. One patient developed wound infection 1 wk after surgery and was actively debrided and implanted with antibiotic calcium sulfate to control the infection. The patient's fracture healed 5 mo after surgery. One patient developed a sural nerve injury, and the symptoms disappeared 3 mo after surgery. The patients were assessed according to the Maryland foot scoring system: Excellent in 77 cases, good in 10, and fair in 4. The excellent and good rate was 95.6%.

Medial column classification can effectively guide the surgical selection for intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus.

Calcaneal fractures are the most common tarsus fractures, accounting for 2% of body fractures. Twenty-six percent of calcaneal fractures are combined with contralateral limb injuries, 10% are combined with spinal fractures, and approximately 60%-75% are intra-articular fractures[1]. At present, the lateral L incision open reduction and internal fixation technique is the most common and effective method for the treatment of displaced calcaneal fractures. However, the surgical operation causes great damage to soft tissue. Therefore, there has been much controversy about postoperative complications, such as wound infection and nonhealing[2]. With the in-depth development of minimally invasive treatment of calcaneal fractures, many doctors use the tarsal sinus approach to fix calcaneal fractures. However, this method is not effective for the reduction of the medial column, and if necessary, a medial auxiliary incision is required. At present, the choice of surgical incision is still extremely challenging and controversial, and there is currently no uniform standard for the choice of surgical approach[3]. To further improve the overall reduction effect and to explore the surgical options and individualized treatment for intra-articular calcaneal fractures, we selected 91 patients who underwent treatment from July 2017 to July 2018 at the Department of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Central Hospital Affiliated to Shenyang Medical College. According to the displacement of the patient’s medial column, they were divided into two types: Medial column displacement (shortened varus, 53 cases) and nondisplacement (38 cases). Patients with medial column displacement underwent open reduction and internal fixation with an L-lateral incision of the calcaneus; patients with medial column nondisplacement underwent open reduction and internal fixation with a tarsal sinus incision. A satisfactory effect was obtained, and the report is as follows.

All patients were followed for 5 to 14 mo, with an average of 10.5 ± 2.9 mo. The fractures of all patients healed, and the healing time was 10 to 19 wk, with an average of 10.8 ± 1.5 wk. One patient developed wound infection 1 wk after surgery and was actively debrided and implanted with antibiotic calcium sulfate to control the infection. The patient’s fracture healed 5 mo after surgery. One patient developed sural nerve injury, and the symptoms disappeared 3 mo after surgery. The average Bohler angle was 13.3 ± 2.3° preoperatively and 31.5 ± 3.5° postoperatively. The average Gissane angle was 93.8 ± 3.5° preoperatively and 126.5 ± 10.3° postoperatively. The average calcaneal length was 79.5 ± 5.5 mm preoperatively and 77.8 ± 5.5 mm postoperatively; the average calcaneal width was 55.0 ± 10.0 mm preoperatively and 39.5 ± 8.8 mm postoperatively. The average calcaneal height was 32.5 ± 6.0 mm preoperatively and 45.8 ± 4.1 mm postoperatively. The average step thickness of the articular surface was 6.0 ± 3.0 mm preoperatively and 0.4 ± 0.5 mm postoperatively (Table 1). The patients were assessed according to the Maryland foot scoring system: Excellent in 77 cases, good in 10 cases, and acceptable in 4 cases. The excellent and good rate was 95.6%. The Department of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Central Hospital Affiliated with Shenyang Medical College, divides intra-articular calcaneal fractures into two types: Medial column displacement and non-displacement. In this study, there were 53 cases of medial column displacement, and the L-lateral incision of the calcaneus was used. There were 38 cases of medial column nondisplacement. The tarsal sinus incision was used to treat the articular surface and complete fixation (Figure 2). Satisfactory results were obtained. Therefore, this study confirmed that medial column classification can effectively guide the selection of surgical approaches for intra-articular calcaneal fractures, and the clinical efficacy of this classification in the treatment of intra-articular calcaneal fractures is positive.

There are many types of treatments for calcaneal fractures, including conservative treatment, conventional surgical treatment, and minimally invasive surgery. The choice of specific treatment options is still controversial[5-9]. Open reduction and internal fixation are currently the most commonly used surgical procedures in the clinic. A good fracture reduction effect can be achieved by using the lateral extension incision of the calcaneus; however, many studies have reported a higher incidence of postoperative incision complications[10-14]. Some scholars[15,16] analyzed 21 studies including a total of 2046 patients with calcaneal fractures who underwent open reduction and internal fixation, and the average incidence of incision complications was 13.6%. We believe that incision complications depend on a number of factors, especially the surgeon's treatment experience[17]. The Department of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Central Hospital Affiliated to Shenyang Medical College, counted 101 patients with closed intra-articular calcaneal fractures who underwent L-incision treatment from January 2017 to July 2018. Only one case developed skin edge necrosis and was treated by flap transfer. One case developed wound infection and was actively debrided and implanted with antibiotic calcium sulfate to control the infection. The patient's fracture healed 5 mo after surgery.

In recent years, the minimally invasive concept has become a hot issue in the international surgical field. The use of the tarsal sinus incision as a surgical approach for the treatment of calcaneal fractures will become one of the popular trends[18,19].

The approach can effectively avoid damage to the related arteries and their branches[20], has less local damage to the skin, and thereby can reduce the risks of skin necrosis, wound infection, or flap pain after surgery[21] because its position is closer to the dorsum of foot, which has a richer blood supply for the soft tissues and looser surrounding skin. After the injury, it is usually not necessary to wait a long time to reduce swelling to perform surgery. Most patients can undergo surgery within 1 wk after the injury[22].

However, the focus of treatment for intra-articular calcaneal fractures is still the accurate reduction in fractures. Most scholars[23-25] believe that regardless of which treatment plan is adopted, the treatment goal needs a good recovery of the calcaneal anatomy. In most cases, poor calcaneus reduction results from poor reduction in the medial wall (column). Yao et al[26] reported that the poor reduction in the medial column after calcaneus fracture first caused unevenness of the subtalar articular surface. Whether the height of the medial column is lost or the width is not reset, the linear and positional alignment of the subtalar articular surface will be poor, and the biomechanical relationship between the talus and the calcaneus will be changed. Temporary reduction without firm fixation will result in insufficient stability of the medial column force line, often causing secondary reduction loss of the calcaneal medial column and resulting in varus deformity. The medial column is a component of the calcaneal height, width, and length, which also indirectly affects the Bohler angle and the Gissane angle of the calcaneus. Anatomic reduction and firm internal fixation of the medial column can reduce the incidence of varus deformity and facilitate the recovery of the width of the calcaneus. Compared with the height recovery of the lateral wall, the height recovery of the medial wall significantly reduces the incidence of varus deformity. Domestic scholars[27,28] used the medial auxiliary incision and distraction technique to improve the calcaneus width and further improve the postoperative outcome.

The AO Course and Mann's Surgery of the Foot and Ankle clearly indicate the order of reduction during surgical treatment of intra-articular calcaneal fractures (Figure 3): Remove or open the lateral articular surface bone block, loosen the main fracture line from the external upper to the internal lower part, pull the posterior nodule, reset and temporarily fix the posterior nodule and the sustentaculum tali bone block (accurate restoration of the medial column structure: Force line, calcaneus length, and width), and reset the articular surface (Figure 1). If the patient with a shortened medial column first undergoes articular surface reduction, the overall structural reduction is often poor, and this operation is difficult to achieve in the tarsal sinus incision. For patients with no displacement of the medial column, the articular surface can be directly restored, and the tarsal sinus incision is feasible.

Open in New Tab   Full Size Figure   Download Figure

Figure 3 Reduction procedure for calcaneal fractures recommended by AO Course.

Although there are many methods for the classification of intra-articular calcaneal fractures, it is generally believed that[17] the CT classification proposed by Sanders has high application value in the selection of treatment methods and prognosis of calcaneal fractures. However, this method has no clear guiding significance for the choice of surgical incision and surgical plan. At present, most scholars[14] suggest that the tarsal sinus incision can be used for Sanders Types II and III fractures. However, for Sanders Types II and III fractures with medial column shortening, the use of the tarsal sinus incision cannot effectively release the main fracture line and accurately restore the positional relationship between the sustentaculum tali bone block and the posterior nodule backbone.

In view of the above issue, the Department of Foot and Ankle Surgery, Central Hospital Affiliated with Shenyang Medical College preliminarily divided intra-articular calcaneal fractures into two types: Medial column displacement (shortened varus) and nondisplacement. In this study, there were 53 cases of medial column displacement (shortened varus), and the L-lateral incision of the calcaneus was used. First, the main fracture line was released, the posterior nodule and the sustentaculum tali bone block were reset to restore the medial wall (column), and then the articular surface was restored (Figures 1 and 3). There were 38 cases of medial column nondisplacement. The tarsal sinus incision was used to treat the articular surface and complete fixation (Figure 2), because there was no need to remove the articular surface bone block and to release the main fracture line. Satisfactory results were obtained. The patients were followed after initial use of this type of treatment. X-ray and CT examinations showed that the Böhler angle recovered to 31.5 ± 3.5°, the Gissane angle recovered to 126.5 ± 10.3°, the calcaneal length recovered to 77.8 ± 5.5 mm, the width recovered to 39.5 ± 8.8 mm, the height recovered to 45.8 ± 4.1 mm, and the step thickness of the articular surface recovered to 0.4 ± 0.5 mm. The good and excellent rate was 95.6% according to the Maryland foot scoring system. Therefore, medial column classification can effectively guide the surgical selection of intra-articular fractures of the calcaneus.

The main shortcomings of this study are that the number of cases is small and the follow-up time is short. The early efficacy is satisfactory; however, the long-term efficacy needs further follow-up. Second, the authors were good at using the tarsal sinus incision, and the Sanders Types III and IV fractures without medial column displacement were all treated with this incision. Moreover, the classification is only an initial attempt and has not been refined. We will accumulate additional cases, improve the controlled study, and continue to follow the patients to obtain relatively scientific conclusions.