Volume 22, Issue 8 (11-2023)
JRUMS 2023, 22(8): 873-896 |
Back to browse issues page
Ethics code: مروری
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Moradimokhles H, Pourjamshidi M, Mozafari O. Study of Ethics in the E-Learning of Medical Education:
A Systematic Literature Review. JRUMS 2023; 22 (8) :873-896
URL: http://journal.rums.ac.ir/article-1-6991-en.html
URL: http://journal.rums.ac.ir/article-1-6991-en.html
Bu-Ali Sina University
Abstract: (345 Views)
Background and Objectives: The introduction of digital technologies into medical education systems has introduced new challenges in this field. The issue of ethics in medical education is one of the essential elements in this field. Therefore, the purpose of this research was to investigate the place of ethics in the field of electronic learning in medical education.
Materials and Methods: This study is a systematic review which presents the findings obtained from a systematic review of researches on using ethical standards in e-learning in medicine. Systematic search according to the keywords of the systematic search was extracted and exploited in 4 external databases: Scopus, Springer, PubMed, and Web of Science, and 3 internal databases: SID, Magiran, and Irandoc. A systematic search was conducted in November 2022 and updated in March 2023, and reached 36 studies, and finally, 14 studies meeting the criteria for in-depth analysis were determined.
Results: The analysis of the selected researches based on specific criteria showed that compliance with professional ethics had a positive effect on the field of electronic learning in the field of medicine. It has also made this field more efficient, and people trust it more.
Conclusion: The results of the present study showed that e-learning based on professional ethics standards in the field of medical education provides a suitable platform for effective learning and improving the performance of the learners.
Key words: Ethics, E-learning, Medical Education, Systematic literature review
Funding: This study was funded by Bu-Ali Sina University.
Conflict of interest: None declared.
Ethical approval: Not applicable.
How to cite this article: Moradimokhles Hossein, Pourjamshidi Maryam, Mozafari Omid. Study of Ethics in the E-Learning of Medical Education: A Systematic Literature Review. J Rafsanjan Univ Med Sci 2023; 22 (8): 873-96. [Farsi]
Materials and Methods: This study is a systematic review which presents the findings obtained from a systematic review of researches on using ethical standards in e-learning in medicine. Systematic search according to the keywords of the systematic search was extracted and exploited in 4 external databases: Scopus, Springer, PubMed, and Web of Science, and 3 internal databases: SID, Magiran, and Irandoc. A systematic search was conducted in November 2022 and updated in March 2023, and reached 36 studies, and finally, 14 studies meeting the criteria for in-depth analysis were determined.
Results: The analysis of the selected researches based on specific criteria showed that compliance with professional ethics had a positive effect on the field of electronic learning in the field of medicine. It has also made this field more efficient, and people trust it more.
Conclusion: The results of the present study showed that e-learning based on professional ethics standards in the field of medical education provides a suitable platform for effective learning and improving the performance of the learners.
Key words: Ethics, E-learning, Medical Education, Systematic literature review
Funding: This study was funded by Bu-Ali Sina University.
Conflict of interest: None declared.
Ethical approval: Not applicable.
How to cite this article: Moradimokhles Hossein, Pourjamshidi Maryam, Mozafari Omid. Study of Ethics in the E-Learning of Medical Education: A Systematic Literature Review. J Rafsanjan Univ Med Sci 2023; 22 (8): 873-96. [Farsi]
Type of Study: Research |
Subject:
آموزش پزشكي
Received: 2023/05/24 | Accepted: 2023/10/18 | Published: 2023/11/19
Received: 2023/05/24 | Accepted: 2023/10/18 | Published: 2023/11/19
References
1. Shrivastava S, Shrivastava P. Need of E-learning in medical education and strategies for its implementation in medical colleges in India. Indian Health Sci Biomed Res kleu 2019; 12: 264–5.
2. Leadership R, Saadatmand Z .Functional comparison of education in Indonesia, China, Australia and Germany during the corona virus epidemic and school closures. Q Mag of N Dev Educ Manag 2021; 1(4): 43-52. ]Farsi [
3. Gachanja F, Mwangi N, Gicheru W. E-learning in medical education during COVID-19 pandemic: experiences of a research course at Kenya Medical Training College. BMC Med Educ 2021; 21(1): 1-8.
4. Keykha B. Moral Training in Cyberspace (Case Study: Alzahra University Students). J N Thoughts Educ 2020; 16(1): 241-72. ]Farsi[
5. Seghatoleslami A. Comparative Analysis of Two Conceptual Frameworks for E-learning Ethics. Iran J Inf Manage 2016; 1(1): 104-21. ]Farsi[
6. Ali A J, Azim A. Work ethic and loyalty in Canada. J Soc Psychol 1995; 135(1): 31–7.
7. Moradimokhles H, Gholipour N. The relationship between media literacy and information literacy with teachers' professional ethics, J Ethics Sci Technol 2022; 17 (2):74-80.
8. Alipour A, Shalbaf O. The ethics of virtual education. J Ethics Sci Technol 2008; 3(1): 43-50. [Farsi [
9. Merzouk A, Kurosinski P. Kostikas K. E-Learning for the medical team: the present and future of ERS Learning Resources. Breathe 2014; 10(4): 296-304.
10. Srivastava M, Shrivastava S, Srivastava P, Srivastava RK, Jaiswal S. Teaching ethics to medical faculties: An E-learning intervention. J Marine Med Soc 2022; 24(1): 53-56.
11. Sahi P, Mishra K D, Singh T. Medical education amid the COVID-19 pandemic. Indian Pediatr 2020; 57: 652–7.
12. Nurchis MC, Pascucci D, Sapienza M, Villani LD, Ambrosio F, Castrini F, Specchia M L, Laurenti P,Damiani G. Impact of the Burden of COVID-19 in Italy. Results Disabil Adjusted Life Years 2020; 17: 4233.
13. Cerezo R, Bogarin A, Esteban M, Romero C. Process mining for self-regulated learning assessment in e-learning. J Comput High Educ 2020; 32: 74–88.
14. Wu A, Leask B, Choi E, Unangst L, de WH. Internationalization of Medical Education-Ascoping review of the current status in the United States. Med Sci Edu 2020; 30: 1693-705.
15. Hutchison E. Toward an ethic of care and inclusivity in emergency e-learning. PS Polit Sci Polit 2021; 54(1): 185-7.
16. McMahon CJ, Tretter JT, Faulkner T, Kumar R K, Redington AN, Windram JD. Are e-learning Webinars the future of medical education? An exploratory study of a disruptive innovation in the COVID-19 era. Cardiology Young 2021; 31(5): 734-43.
17. Zavareh T, Yarmohamadzadeh P, Arami A. The Role of Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning on Personnel Organizational Immorality. J Ethics Sci Technol 2019; 14(4): 68-77. ]Farsi[
18. Hill S, Dennick R, Amoaku W. Present and future of the undergraduate ophthalmology curriculum: a survey of UK medical schools. Int J Med Educ 2017; 2(8): 389-95.
19. Iyer P, Aziz K, Ojcius D M.Impact of COVID-19 on dental education in the United States. J Dent Educ 2020; 84(6): 718–22.
20. Alhabeeb A, Rowley J. E-learning critical success factors: Comparing perspectives from academic sta and students. Comput Educ 2018; 127: 1–12.
21. Muianga X, Klomsri T, Tedre M, Mutimucuio I. From teacher-oriented to student-centred learning: Developing an ict-supported learning approach at the Eduardo Mondlane university, Mozambique Turk Online J Educ Technol 2018; 17: 46–54.
22. Muhammad A. Integration of ethics in e-Learning through Virtual Academic Counsellor. Paper presented Int Conf on Innovation Intelligence Informatics Computing Technol 2018. ]Farsi[
23. Bali S, Liu MC. Students’ perceptions toward online learning and face-to-face learning courses. J Phys Conf Ser 2018; 1108: 012094.
24. Lunny C, McKenzie JE, McDonald S. Retrieval of overviews of systematic reviews in MEDLINE was improved by the development of an objectively derived and validated search strategy. J Clin Epidemiol 2016; 74: 107-118.
25. Tondeur J, Van Braak J, Sang G, Voogt J, Fisser P, Ottenbreit LA. Preparing pre-service teachers to integrate technology in education: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Comput Educ 2018; 59(1): 134-44.
26. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG. PRISMA Group. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 2019; 62: 1006-1017.
27. Batten G, Oakes PM, Alexander T. Factors associated with social interactions between deaf children and their hearing peers: A systematic literature review. J deaf Stud Deaf Educ 2014; 19(3): 285-302.
28. Subhangi G, Aashima D, Swarnim S, Devendra M. Medical education during COVID-19 associated lockdown: faculty and students’ perspective. Med J Armed Forces India 2021; 77: 79-84.
29. Masters K, Ellaway R. E-Learning in medical education Guide 32 Part 2: Technology, management and design. Med Teach 2018; 30(5): 474-89.
30. Al-Balas M, Al-Balas HI, Jaber HM, Obeidat K, Al-Balas H, Aborajooh EA, Al-Balas B. Distance learning in clinical medical education amid COVID-19 pandemic in Jordan: current situation, challenges, and perspectives. BMC Med Educ 2020; 20(1): 1-7.
31. O’Doherty1 D, Dromey M, Lougheed J, Hannigan A, Last J, McGrath D. Barriers and solutions to online learning in medical education–an integrative review. BMC Med Educ 2018; 18(1): 1-11.
32. Al-Fraihat D, Joy M, Sinclair J. Evaluating E-learning systems success: An empirical study. Comput Human Behav 2020; 102: 67-86.
33. Anwar A, Mansoor H, Faisal D, Khan HS. E-Learning amid the COVID-19 lockdown: standpoint of medical and dental undergraduates. Pakistan J Med Sci 2021; 37(1): 217-22.
34. Alqahtani AY. Rajkhan AA. E-learning critical success factors during the covid-19 pandemic: A comprehensive analysis of e-learning managerial perspectives. Educ Sci 2020; 10(9): 216.
35. Baticulon RE, Sy JJ, Alberto NRI, Baron MBC, Mabulay REC, Rizada LGT, Reyes JCB. Barriers to online learning in the time of COVID-19: A national survey of medical students in the Philippines. Med Scie Educ 2021; 31: 615-26.
36. Kirkwood A. E‐learning: you don't always get what you hope for. Technol Pedagogy Educ 2009; 18(2): 107-21.
37. Zehry Kh, Halder N, Theodosiou L. E-Learning in medical education in the United Kingdom. Proc Soc Behav Sci 2011; 15: 3163-7.
38. Ruitenberg CW. The overlapping spheres of medical professionalism and medical ethics: A conceptual inquiry. Ethics Prof Educ 2019; 79-90.
39. Alikhani F, Sarmadi MR, Saeidipor B, Masomifard M, Goodarzi M. Identifying the components of professional ethics in order to design a model of professional ethics in the context of electronic learning and distance education. Res Sch Virtual Learn 2021; 9(2): 87-99. ]Farsi[
40. Loda T, Loffler T, Erschens R, Zipfel S, Herrmann WA. Medical education in times of COVID-19: German students’ expectations – A cross-sectional study. Plos One 2020; 15(11): e0241660.
41. Ramos-Morcillo AJ, Leal-Costa C, Moral-Garcia JE, Ruzafa-Martinez M. Experiences of nursing students during the abrupt change from face-to-face to e-learning education during the first month of confinement due to COVID-19 in Spain. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020; 17(15): 5519.
42. Phadermrod B, Crowder RM, Wills GB. Importance-performance analysis based SWOT analysis. Int J Inf Manage 2019; 44: 194-203.
43. Benzaghta MA, Elwalda A, Mousa MM, Erkan I, Rahman M. SWOT analysis applications: An integrative literature review. J Glob Bus Insights 2021; 6(1): 55-73.
44. Longhurst GJ, Stone DM, Dulohery K, Scully D, Campbell T, Smith CF. Strength, weakness, opportunity, threat (SWOT) analysis of the adaptations to anatomical education in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland in response to the Covid‐19 pandemic. Anat Sci Educ 2020; 13(3): 301-11.
45. Laukkanen L, Suhonen R, Loyttyniemi E, Leino-Kilpi H. The usability, feasibility and fidelity of the Ethics Quarter e-learning intervention for nurse managers. BMC Med Educ 2022; 22(1): 1-12.
46. Aldehayyat JS, Anchor JR. Strategic planning tools and techniques in Jordan: Awareness and use. Strateg Change 2018; 17(7‐8): 281-93.
Send email to the article author
| Rights and permissions | |
 |
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License. |
