Write your message
Volume 6, Issue 4 ( Iranian Journal of Ergonomics 2019)                   Iran J Ergon 2019, 6(4): 1-8 | Back to browse issues page


XML Persian Abstract Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Ghasemi F, Gholamizadeh K, Doosti-Irani A, Ramin R. Comparison of Strain Index (SI) and ACGIH-HAL in Assessing the Risk of Upper Extremities Disorders and Prediction of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome in Butchers. Iran J Ergon 2019; 6 (4) :1-8
URL: http://journal.iehfs.ir/article-1-607-en.html
1- Assistant Professor, Department of Ergonomics, Occupational Health and Safety Research Center, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
2- MSc Student, Department of Occupational Health Engineering, Student Research Committee, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran , kamrangholamizade1373@gmail.com
3- Assistant Professor, Department of Epidemiology, Health Sciences Research Center, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
4- MSc Student, Department of Occupational Health Engineering, Student Research Committee, School of Public Health, Hamadan University of Medical Sciences, Hamadan, Iran
Abstract:   (9119 Views)
Background and Objectives: Upper extremities are very vulnerable to work-related musculoskeletal disorders and selecting the best technique for assessing their exposure to ergonomic risk factors is of pivotal importance. This study aimed to compare two techniques of SI and ACGIH-HAL and assess their relationship with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) among butchers.
Methods: The study population was all butchers in Hamadan, Iran. After observing the activities, the assessments were conducted using both techniques. The severity of CTS syndromes was assessed using Boston questionnaire. The agreement between the techniques was investigated using Kappa coefficient. The association between the risk levels obtained from the techniques with the severity of CTS syndromes were assessed by regression analysis and fixing the effect of personal factors such as age, body mass index, and wrist ratio index.
Results: a total number of 152 butchers were evaluated. SI and ACGIH-HAL techniques respectively recognized 76 and 102 cases as low risk (agreement in 69 cases), 40 and 27 cases as moderate risk (agreement in 8 cases), and 36 and 23 cases as high risk (agreement in 18 cases). The Kappa coefficient between two techniques was 0.36 (P<0.001). By fixing the effects of age, body mass index, and wrist ratio index, both techniques had significant association with the severity of CTS syndromes. However, the association between SI and severity of CTS syndrome was higher than that of ACGIH-HAL.
Conclusion: SI had a higher estimate of risk than ACGIH-HAL. It seems that the predictive ability of SI for the severity of CTS syndrome is better than that of ACGIH-HAL.
Full-Text [PDF 344 kb]   (8531 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Research | Subject: Other Cases
Received: 2019/02/5 | Accepted: 2019/03/12 | ePublished: 2019/06/8

References
1. Bevan S. Economic impact of musculoskeletal disorders (MSDs) on work in Europe. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2015;29(3):356-73. [DOI:10.1016/j.berh.2015.08.002] [PMID]
2. Takala E-P, Pehkonen I, Forsman M, Hansson G-Å, Mathiassen SE, Neumann WP, et al. Systematic evaluation of observational methods assessing biomechanical exposures at work. Scand J Work Environ Heal. 2010;36(1):3-24. [DOI:10.5271/sjweh.2876]
3. Work related musculoskeletal disorders in Great Britain (WRMSDs), 2018, Annual Statistics, Health and Safety Executive.
4. Buckle PW, Devereux Jason J. The nature of work-related neck and upper limbmusculoskeletal disorders. Appl Ergon. 2002;33:207-17. [DOI:10.1016/S0003-6870(02)00014-5]
5. Cooke ME, Duncan SF. History of carpal tunnel syndrome. InCarpal tunnel syndrome and related median neuropathies 2017 (pp. 7-11). Springer, Cham. [DOI:10.1007/978-3-319-57010-5_2] [PMCID]
6. Silverstein BA, Fine LJ, Armstrong TJ. Occupational factors and carpal tunnel syndrome. Am J Ind Med. 1987;11(3):343-58. [DOI:10.1002/ajim.4700110310] [PMID]
7. Ozcakir S, Sigirli D, Avsaroglu H. High wrist ratio is a risk factor for carpal tunnel syndrome. Clin Anat. 2018;31(5):698-701. [DOI:10.1002/ca.23198] [PMID]
8. Shiri R, Pourmemari MH, Falah-Hassani K, Viikari-Juntura E. The effect of excess body mass on the risk of carpal tunnel syndrome: A meta-analysis of 58 studies. Obes Rev. 2015;16(12):1094-104. [DOI:10.1111/obr.12324] [PMID]
9. Padua L, Coraci D, Erra C, Pazzaglia C, Paolasso I, Loreti C, et al. Carpal tunnel syndrome: clinical features, diagnosis, and management. Lancet Neurol [Internet]. 2016;15(12):1273-84. [DOI:10.1016/S1474-4422(16)30231-9]
10. Moore JS, Garg A. The Strain Index: A Proposed Method to Analyze Jobs For Risk of Distal Upper Extremity Disorders. Am Ind Hyg Assoc J. 1995;56(5):443-58. [DOI:10.1080/15428119591016863] [PMID]
11. American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists (ACGIH), 2002. Hand Activity Level (HAL). Threshold Limit Values for Chemical Substances and Physical Agents & Biological Exposure Indices. ACGIH, Cincinnati, pp. 112e114.
12. Chiasson M ève, Imbeau D, Aubry K, Delisle A. Comparing the results of eight methods used to evaluate risk factors associated with musculoskeletal disorders. Int J Ind Ergon. 2012;42(5):478-88. [DOI:10.1016/j.ergon.2012.07.003]
13. Levine D, Simmons B, Koris M, Daltroy L, Hohl G, Fossel A, et al. A self-administered questionnaire for the assessment of severity of symptoms and functional status in carpal tunnel syndrome. J Bone Jt Surg. 1993;75(11):1585-92. [DOI:10.2106/00004623-199311000-00002] [PMID]
14. Lue YJ, Lu YM, Lin GT, Liu YF. Validation of the Chinese version of the boston carpal tunnel questionnaire. J Occup Rehabil. 2014;24(1):139-45. [DOI:10.1007/s10926-013-9438-9] [PMID]
15. Mondelli M, Reale F, Sicurelli F, Padua L, Senese AO. Relationship between the self-administered Boston questionnaire and electrophysiological findings in follow-up of surgically-treated carpal tunnel syndrome. J Hand Surg Am. 2000;25(2):128-34. [DOI:10.1054/jhsb.2000.0361] [PMID]
16. Foroozanfar Z, Ebrahimi H, Khanjani N. Validity and Reliability of the Persian Boston Questionnaire in Diabetic Patients with Carpal Tunnel Syndrome. J Neyshabur Univ Med Sci. 2015;2(5):50-6. [Article] [Google Scholar]
17. Kapellusch JM, Bao SS, Silverstein BA, Merryweather AS, Thiese MS, Hegmann KT, et al. Risk assessments using the strain index and the TLV for HAL, part I: Task and multi-task job exposure classifications. J Occup Environ Hyg. 2017;14(12):1011-9. [DOI:10.1080/15459624.2017.1366037] [PMID]
18. Garg A, Kapellusch J, Hegmann K, Wertsch J, Merryweather A, Deckow-Schaefer G, et al. The Strain Index (SI) and Threshold Limit Value (TLV) for Hand Activity Level (HAL): Risk of carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) in a prospective cohort. Ergonomics. 2012;55(4):396-414. [DOI:10.1080/00140139.2011.644328] [PMID]
19. Kapellusch JM, Garg A, Hegmann KT, Thiese MS, Malloy EJ. The strain index and ACGIH TLV for HAL: Risk of trigger digit in the WISTAH prospective cohort. Hum Factors. 2014;56(1):98-111. [DOI:10.1177/0018720813493115] [PMID]
20. Garg A, Kapellusch JM, Hegmann KT, Thiese MS, Merryweather AS, Wang YC, et al. The Strain Index and TLV for HAL: Risk of lateral epicondylitis in a prospective cohort. Am J Ind Med. 2014;57(3):286-302. [DOI:10.1002/ajim.22279] [PMID]
21. Jones T, Kumar S. Comparison of ergonomic risk assessments in a repetitive high-risk sawmill occupation: Saw-filer. Int J Ind Ergon. 2007;37(9-10):744-53. [DOI:10.1016/j.ergon.2007.05.005]

Add your comments about this article : Your username or Email:
CAPTCHA

Send email to the article author


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.

© 2024 CC BY-NC 4.0 | Iranian Journal of Ergonomics

Designed & Developed by : Yektaweb |