Deep Learning for Heart Attack Prediction Volume 54- Issue 2

Pokkuluri Kiran Sree^1* and Usha Devi N²

• ¹Department of CSE, Shri Vishnu Engineering College for Women, India
• ²Department of CSE, University College of Engineering, JNTU, India

Received: December 11, 2023; Published: December 21, 2023

*Corresponding author: Pokkuluri Kiran Sree, Department of CSE, Shri Vishnu Engineering College for Women, Bhimavaram, India

DOI: 10.26717/BJSTR.2023.54.008522

Abstract PDF

Cardiovascular diseases, including heart attacks, remain a leading cause of mortality worldwide. Early and accurate prediction of heart attacks is of paramount importance for timely intervention and prevention. Deep learning techniques have shown promising results in various medical applications, and their application in heart attack prediction presents an opportunity to enhance diagnostic capabilities. In this study, we propose a deep learning-based approach for heart attack prediction, leveraging a comprehensive dataset comprising demographic information, medical history, lifestyle factors, and clinical measurements. The dataset is preprocessed to handle missing values, normalize numerical features, and encode categorical variables. Feature selection techniques are employed to identify relevant predictors for heart attack risk. A deep neural network architecture is designed and trained using a subset of the data, with careful consideration given to model interpretability and generalization. The model’s performance is evaluated using metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and AUC-ROC on a separate test set. The results demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed deep learning model in predicting heart attacks, showcasing competitive performance compared to traditional methods. Interpretability is enhanced through attention mechanisms, providing insights into the features influencing predictions. The model’s deployment is discussed, addressing ethical considerations and compliance with healthcare regulations. The proposed deep learning model holds promise for integration into clinical decision support systems, offering a valuable tool for healthcare professionals in identifying individuals at higher risk of experiencing a heart attack. Further research is encouraged to validate the model on diverse populations and refine its performance in real-world healthcare settings.

Abbreviations: Cardiovascular Diseases; AI: Artificial Intelligence; MLPs: Multi-Layer Perceptrons; LSTM: Long Short-Term Memory; CNNs: Convolutional Neural Networks; RNNs: Recurrent Neural Networks

Cardiovascular Diseases (CVDs), encompassing conditions such as heart attacks, stroke, and heart failure, continue to exert a substantial toll on global health. Despite significant advancements in medical science and technology, predicting and preventing heart attacks remain paramount challenges. Timely identification of individuals heightened risk can enable proactive interventions, leading to improved patient outcomes. In recent years, deep learning, a subset of Artificial Intelligence (AI) that excels at pattern recognition and complex data analysis, has emerged as a promising avenue for transforming healthcare paradigms. This paper delves into the application of deep learning techniques for heart attack prediction, exploring their potential to revolutionize cardiovascular risk assessment [1,2].

Rising Burden of Cardiovascular Diseases

Cardiovascular diseases constitute a major public health concern globally, contributing to a significant portion of morbidity and mortality. Heart attacks, in particular, are characterized by the sudden interruption of blood flow to a part of the heart, leading to myocardial infarction. Despite advances in medical knowledge, lifestyle modifications, and therapeutic interventions, the prevalence of heart attacks remains alarmingly high. Therefore, there is a pressing need for innovative approaches that can enhance our ability to predict and prevent these life-threatening events [3,4].

Traditional Approaches to Risk Assessment

Traditional methods of cardiovascular risk assessment rely on well-established risk factors such as age, gender, family history, blood pressure, cholesterol levels, and smoking status. While these factors provide valuable insights, they may fall short in capturing the complex interplay of variables influencing heart attack risk. Additionally, these methods often operate on a population level, overlooking individual variations that deep learning models can discern with precision [5,6].

The Promise of Deep Learning

Deep learning, with its ability to automatically learn hierarchical representations from data, has demonstrated remarkable success in diverse domains, including natural language [7] processing, image recognition, and healthcare. The application of deep learning in medical research is particularly promising, given its potential to unravel intricate patterns [8] within vast datasets that may elude traditional analytical approaches. In the context of heart attack prediction, deep learning models can discern subtle correlations and interactions among a multitude of variables, providing a more nuanced understanding of individual risk profiles [9].

Data as the Cornerstone

Central to the success of deep learning models is the availability of comprehensive and diverse datasets. For heart attack prediction, datasets encompassing demographic information, medical history, lifestyle factors, and an array of clinical measurements are essential. The richness of these datasets enables the model to discern intricate patterns [10], uncover hidden risk factors, and adapt to the unique characteristics of different populations [11].

Designing a deep learning model for heart attack prediction involves a systematic approach to handle the complexity of the data and to extract meaningful patterns that contribute to accurate predictions. Below is a step-by-step design process [12,13].

Data Collection and Pre-Processing

Assemble a comprehensive dataset: Gather diverse and representative data including demographic information, medical history, lifestyle factors, and relevant clinical measurements. Implement strategies such as imputation or exclusion based on the extent of missing values. Standardize numerical variables to ensure that the model is not biased towards features with larger scales. Convert categorical variables into numerical representations through techniques like one-hot encoding.

Model Selection

Choose an appropriate deep learning architecture: Consider the nature of the data and the problem. For structured data, feedforward neural networks or variants like Multi-Layer Perceptrons (MLPs) may be suitable. For sequential data, Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) or Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks could be beneficial. Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) may be effective if medical imaging data is involved. Adjust model complexity: Tailor the model's depth, width, and complexity based on the size and nature of the dataset.

Model Architecture

Design the neural network architecture: Define the input layer, hidden layers, activation functions, and output layer. Consider incorporating dropout layers to mitigate overfitting. Experiment with architectures that allow the model to capture complex interactions between features. For instance, consider using attention mechanisms or skip connections.

Model Evaluation

Assess the model's performance on the test set: Evaluate metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, F1 score, and area under the ROC curve. Analyse the confusion matrix to understand false positives and false negatives, which is crucial in a healthcare context.

Accuracy as a Measure of Model Performance

Accuracy serves as a fundamental metric for evaluating the overall correctness of a predictive model. It quantifies the proportion of correctly predicted instances among the total predictions, providing a broad assessment of the model's effectiveness. However, in situations with imbalanced datasets, where one outcome significantly outweighs the other, accuracy alone may not provide a comprehensive understanding of a model's performance.

Specificity: A Measure of True Negative Rate

Specificity is a critical metric in the context of heart attack prediction, especially when the emphasis is on identifying individuals not at risk. It gauges the ability of the model to correctly identify those without heart attack tendencies among the non-afflicted population. High specificity is indicative of a model's proficiency in minimizing false positive predictions, an essential consideration in medical applications where unnecessary interventions carry potential risks as shown in Figures 1 & 2.

Figure 1

Figure 2

F1 Score: Balancing Precision and Recall

F1 score represents the harmonic mean of precision and recall and is particularly valuable in scenarios where there is an imbalance between positive and negative instances. Precision measures the accuracy of positive predictions, while recall (sensitivity) gauges the model's ability to identify true positives. F1 score, by combining these two metrics, provides a balanced assessment of a model's performance, crucial in healthcare applications where both false positives and false negatives can have significant consequences.

In conclusion, the application of deep learning in the realm of heart attack prediction represents a paradigm shift, holding immense potential to transform cardiovascular risk assessment and preventative healthcare strategies. The utilization of sophisticated neural network architectures allows for the nuanced analysis of complex and heterogeneous datasets, facilitating the identification of subtle patterns and interactions that contribute to accurate predictions. Deep learning models, by leveraging the power of artificial intelligence, demonstrate a capacity to discern intricate relationships among a myriad of risk factors, ranging from demographic information to clinical measurements. This comprehensive approach enables the development of predictive systems that surpass the limitations of traditional risk assessment methods, offering a more personalized and precise understanding of an individual's susceptibility to a heart attack.

1. Mangalampalli S, Karri GR, Pokkuluri KS, RajKumar KV, Satish GN (2023) SLA based Workflow Scheduling algorithm in Cloud Computing using Haris Hawks optimization. EAI Endorsed Transactions on Scalable Information Systems 10(6).
2. Kiran Sree, G Srinivasa Rao, P Srinivasa Raju (2023) Crowd Counting and Anomaly Detection from CCTV footages using deep learning augmented with cellular automata. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Information Technology 101(13).
3. Sree PK, Babu IR, Devi NU (2009) Investigating an Artificial Immune System to strengthen protein structure prediction and protein coding region identification using the Cellular Automata classifier. International journal of bioinformatics research and applications 5(6): 647-662.
4. Sree PK, Nedunuri SUD (2020) A novel cellular automata classifier for COVID-19 trend prediction. Journal of Health Sciences 10(1): 34-38.
5. Pokkuluri KS, Inampudi RB, Nedunuri SSSN (2014) IN-MACA-MCC: integrated multiple attractor cellular automata with modified clonal classifier for human protein coding and promoter prediction. Advances in Bioinformatics 2014: 261362.
6. Sree PK, Babu IR, Murty JVR, Ramachandran R, Devi NU (2008) Power-aware hybrid intrusion detection system (PHIDS) using cellular automata in wireless ad hoc networks. WSEAS Transactions on Computers 7(11): 1848-1874.
7. P Kiran Sree, GVS Raju, I Ramesh Babu, S Viswanadha Raju (2008) Improving Quality of Clustering using Cellular Automata for Information retrieval. Journal of Computer Science 4(2): 167-171.
8. Pokkuluri KS, Nedunuri SUD, Devi U (2022) Crop Disease Prediction with Convolution Neural Network (CNN) Augmented with Cellular Automata. Int Arab J Inf Technol 19(5): 765-773.
9. Sree PK, Babu IR, Murty JVR, Ramachandran R, Devi NU (2008) Power-aware hybrid intrusion detection system (PHIDS) using cellular automata in wireless ad hoc networks. WSEAS Transactions on Computers 7(11): 1848-1874.
10. Sree K, Babu R, Devi NU (2010) Identification of Promoter Region in Genomic DNA Using Cellular Automata Based Text Clustering. Int Arab J Inf Technol 7(1): 75-78.
11. Sree PK (2008) Exploring a novel approach for providing software security using soft computing systems. International Journal of Security and Its Applications 2(2): 51-58.
12. Kiran Sree P, Ramesh Babu I, Usha Devi (2008) “NSSN NTCA: A novel text clustering algorithm built on Cellular Automata based Local Search and K-Means algorithm for identifying the protein coding regions in genomic DNA”. Research Journal of Biotechnology 3(3): 38-45.
13. Kiran Sre P, Ramesh Babu I (2008) Identification of Protein Coding Regions in Genomic DNA Using Unsupervised FMACA Based Pattern Classifier. IJCSNS International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security 8(1): 305-309.