Ponte Academic Journal Mar 2017, Volume 73, Issue 3 |
THE INFLUENCE OF MULTIPLE FIRINGS AND LUTING AGENTS ON SHEAR BOND STRENGTH OF LUTING AGENTS TO LITHIUM SILICATE CERAMICS Author(s): Fehmi Gonuldas , Burcu Batak, Ece Irem Oguz, Caner Ozturk J. Ponte - Mar 2017 - Volume 73 - Issue 3 doi: 10.21506/j.ponte.2017.3.17 Abstract: Background: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of the multiple firings and luting agents on the shear bond strength between lithium disilicate ceramics (LDCs) and luting agents.
Materials and Methods: In this study, 120 disc-shaped specimens were fabricated from lithium disilicate-reinforced glass ceramic. All specimens were divided into 12 subgroups (n:10) according to repeated firing procedures (1st, 3rd, 5th, 7th, 9th firings and control group) and type of the luting agent (Variolink N and Rely X Unicem). The specimens were loaded axially in the universal testing machine and the shear bond tests were carried out. Statistical analysis was performed with using one-way ANOVA and Tukey Test (a=.05).
Results: The highest and the lowest shear bond stress values were obtained at 5th and control firing step for group A; 3rd and 1st firing step for group B. But these differences were not statistically significant.
Conclusions: The limited data indicated that type of the luting agent have no effect on the shear bond strength between lithium disilicate ceramics and luting agent. Also multiple firings have no effect on the shear bond strength of all ceramic restorations.
Key Words: Multiple Firings, Lithium Disilicate Ceramics, Shear Bond Strength, Adhesive Luting Agents
|
Download full text: Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution |
|
Guide for Authors
This guideline has been prepared for the authors to new submissions and after their manuscripts have been accepted |
Authors Login
We welcome refrees who would be willing to act as reviewers |
Paper Tracking
You can track your submitted article from this tab |
Editorial Board
The international editorial board is headed by Dr. Maria E. Boschi |
General Policies
Papers that are published or held by the Journal may not be published elsewhere |
Peer Review Process
Papers will be sent to three peer reviewers for evaluation |