何坚, 杨佳现. 智能手机多传感器融合的人体活动识别技术[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2020, 46(11): 1222-1229. DOI: 10.11936/bjutxb2019070026
    引用本文: 何坚, 杨佳现. 智能手机多传感器融合的人体活动识别技术[J]. 北京工业大学学报, 2020, 46(11): 1222-1229. DOI: 10.11936/bjutxb2019070026
    HE Jian, YANG Jiaxian. Human Activity Recognition Technology Based on Multi-sensor Fusion of Smart Phones[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2020, 46(11): 1222-1229. DOI: 10.11936/bjutxb2019070026
    Citation: HE Jian, YANG Jiaxian. Human Activity Recognition Technology Based on Multi-sensor Fusion of Smart Phones[J]. Journal of Beijing University of Technology, 2020, 46(11): 1222-1229. DOI: 10.11936/bjutxb2019070026

    智能手机多传感器融合的人体活动识别技术

    Human Activity Recognition Technology Based on Multi-sensor Fusion of Smart Phones

    • 摘要: 为了解决人体活动识别类别和准确度的预测方法中对传感器类型因素和识别方法考虑不足的问题,利用智能手机集成的惯性传感器、磁力计、气压计等多模态传感器,提出了融合智能手机多模态传感器的人体活动识别方法,并采用Stacking融合传统随机森林、支持向量机、K最近邻和朴素贝叶斯算法,通过学习训练集数据形成优化的人体活动识别分类器.实验显示系统的准确率达到99.0%,同时系统的敏感度和特异性分别达到99.0%和99.8%,很好地区分了走路、上楼和下楼这3种比较相似的动作.与传统单传感器活动识别系统相比,本系统的准确率、平均敏感度和平均特异性均为最高,比支持向量机算法分别高出14.0%、11.4%和2.1%,比K最近邻算法分别高出3.4%、3.3%和2.0%,比随机森林算法分别高出1.8%、2.0%和0.6%.

       

      Abstract: To solve the problem of insufficient consideration of sensor type factors and recognition methods in prediction methods of human activity recognition categories and accuracy, a human activity recognition method based on multi-modal sensors of smart phones was proposed, which includes inertial sensors, magnetometers and barometers. In addition, Stacking was used to fuse traditional random forest, support vector machine (SVM), K-nearest neighbor (KNN) and naive Bayesian algorithm, which forms an optimized human activity recognition classifier by learning training set data. Experiments show that the accuracy of the system is 99.0%, and the sensitivity and specificity of the system are 99.0% and 99.8% respectively. It can distinguish three similar movements including walking, upstairs and downstairs. Compared with the traditional single sensor activity recognition system, the system has the highest accuracy, sensitivity and specificity, 14.0%, 11.4% and 2.1% higher than the SVM algorithm; 3.4%, 3.3% and 2.0% higher than the KNN algorithm; and 1.8%, 2.0% and 0.6% higher than the random forest algorithm, respectively.

       

    /

    返回文章
    返回