ChatGPT:生成式人工智能引发人的异化危机及其反思
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

B03;A81;TP18

基金项目:

国家社会科学基金项目"5G时代网络意识形态的传播变革及治理路径研究"(20BKS197)


ChatGPT: Human alienation crisis and reflection caused by generative artificial intelligence
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    ChatGPT作为生成式人工智能的典型代表,是由美国人工智能研究实验室OpenAI研发并推出的一款基于自然语言处理和机器学习的大型语言模型,该应用一经问世便风靡全球,掀起一场广泛且深刻的大讨论。以ChatGPT为代表的生成式人工智能作为人工智能发展的最新成果,进一步向有感情和通用人工智能的发展目标迈出了一大步。随着生成式人工智能发展及其广泛应用,被认为正在重塑着人和人类社会,人类在享受新技术带来的便利时,也将遭受前所未有的挑战,突出地表现为生成式人工智能对于人的异化,重塑人的交往、人的思维和人的劳动。信息时代人的异化问题的研究,需要从马克思关于人的本质的规定出发,用历史唯物主义的方法深入分析人的异化现象,并为应对人工智能引发的危机寻找突破口。人的本质具有三重内涵,即交往、思维和劳动,交往是人的本质的独特体现,思维是人的本质的现实表现,劳动是人的本质的内在规定。随着认知技术与神经科学的迅猛发展,生成式人工智能以其独特的模拟能力,表现出对马克思所描述人的本质的异化的确证,即人的创造物威胁着人的主体性发展。包括:人-机交往、数据化交往、数字化生存引发的人的交往异化;人机结合、依赖智能、机器生产带来"超越"的人、"弱化"的人、"虚无"的人;人与物、人自身的劳动异化等。面对生成式人工智能引发的人的异化危机,亟须价值理性在智能时代的回归与复兴,亟须正确认识生成式人工智能的价值与限度,亟须重视对人的生命的终极关怀,因此深化生成式人工智能引发人的异化的反思,一是要重构生成式人工智能的工具属性,即认识到人工智能不过是人类的"新工具"、认识到"新工具"的与众不同、用好人工智能这个"新工具";二是审视生成式人工智能的价值与限度,即必须回归人类自我价值审视、实现人工智能自我价值塑造、重视人工智能的发展限度;三是生成式人工智能发展的应然归旨,即构建可控的、安全的、可靠的人工智能。

    Abstract:

    As a typical representative of generative artificial intelligence, Chat Generative Pre-trained Transformer (ChatGPT) is a natural language processing and machine learning developed model, which is launched by OpenAI, an American artificial intelligence research laboratory. Hardly had ChatGPT swept the world and generated a profound discussion around the world when it first appeared. Generative AI, represented by ChatGPT, as the latest achievement in AI development, is a significant step further toward, aiming the goal of designing sentient and general artificial intelligence. With the development of generative AI and its extensive application, it is believed to be reshaping human beings and human society, and humans will suffer unprecedented challenges while enjoying the convenience brought by the new technology, prominently manifested in the alienation of human beings by generative AI, reshaping human interactions, human thinking, and human labor. The study of human alienation in the information age requires an in-depth analysis of the phenomenon of human alienation with a historical materialist approach, starting from Marx's prescriptions on the nature of human beings, and finding a breakthrough to deal with the crisis caused by artificial intelligence. Human nature has a threefold connotation:first, interaction is a unique manifestation of human nature, second, thinking is a realistic expression of human nature, and third, labor is an intrinsic provision of human nature. With the rapid development of cognitive technology and neuroscience, generative artificial intelligence, with its unique simulation ability, exhibits a corroboration of the alienation of human nature as described by Marx, that is, human creations threaten the development of human subjectivity, including:the alienation of human interaction triggered by human-machine interaction, data-based interaction, and digital existence; human-machine combination, reliance on intelligence, and machine production bring about "transcendent" human beings, "weakened" human beings, and "void" human beings; the alienation of human and object, human labor, etc. In the face of the crisis of human alienation caused by generative AI, there is an urgent need for the return and revival of value rationality in the age of intelligence, an urgent need to correctly understand the value and limits of generative AI, and an urgent need to pay attention to the ultimate care for human life. Therefore, to deepen the reflection on human alienation caused by generative AI, one is to reconstruct the instrumental properties of generative AI, that is, to recognize that AI is only a human tool, to recognize the uniqueness of the tool, and to make good use of artificial intelligence as a tool. The second is to examine the value and limits of generative AI, that is, we must return to human self-value, realize the self-value of AI, and pay attention to the limit of AI development. The third is the natural purpose of generative AI development, that is, to build a controllable, safe and reliable AI.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

谢俊,刘睿林. ChatGPT:生成式人工智能引发人的异化危机及其反思[J].重庆大学学报社会科学版,2023,29(5):111-124. DOI:10.11835/j. issn.1008-5831. pj.2023.08.005

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-10-24
  • 出版日期: