Self-cleaning and de-pollution efficacies of photocatalytic architectural membranes

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2020.119260Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Two photocatalytic architectural membranes were exposed alongside a control sample.

  • Specimens exposed at three California sites with different weather & pollution levels.

  • Photocatalytic samples showed excellent self-cleaning performance after two years.

  • De-NOx efficacy depended on weather, pollution, and type of photocatalytic material.

  • De-NOx efficacy showed seasonal effects associated with raining/dry periods.

Abstract

Photocatalytic self-cleaning “cool” roofs and walls can maintain high albedos, saving building cooling energy, reducing peak power demand, and mitigating the urban heat island effect. Other environmental benefits result from their de-polluting properties. Specimens from two different photocatalytic architectural membranes and a non-photocatalytic control were exposed alongside vertically, facing west, for two years at three California sites, and retrieved quarterly for testing. Photocatalytic materials showed excellent self-cleaning performance, retaining albedos of 0.74 – 0.75. By contrast, the control material exhibited an albedo loss of up to 0.10, with appreciable soiling observed by scanning electron microscopy. De-pollution capacity was assessed by quantifying NO removal and NOx deposition rates at 60 °C. Efficacy varied with exposure location, weather conditions, and the nature of the photocatalytic material. Seasonal effects were observed, with partial inhibition during the dry season and reactivation during the rainy season.

Introduction

Highly reflective “cool” roofs and walls can save HVAC energy, reduce afternoon peak power demand, and improve thermal comfort [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]]. Environmental benefits include lowering outdoor air temperature, which mitigates the urban heat island effect and slows the temperature-dependent formation of smog [[9], [10], [11], [12]], and global cooling [13]. Another benefit of cool building envelope surfaces is improving material durability by reducing damage induced by surface-temperature cycles [14]. However, those benefits can be significantly diminished over time as the albedo (solar reflectance) of building envelopes is reduced due to soiling deposition and biological growth [[15], [16], [17], [18]]. For example, an evaluation of 586 roofing materials exposed in Miami (Florida) over a 3-year period showed that the mean albedo of aged products that had an initial albedo of 0.80 or higher decreased to around 0.60, losing approximately 25 % of the initial value. In the most extreme cases, aged albedo could be as low as 0.25, corresponding to a loss of up to 70 % of the initial value [19].

Photocatalytic self-cleaning materials make building envelopes cooler by maintaining their initially high albedo values over long periods. Several photocatalytic products are used in construction, including cementitious coatings (such as mortar, plaster and stucco) [[20], [21], [22]], limestone surface treatments [23], coated metal composite siding [24], architectural membranes [25], and various roofing materials (e.g., tiles, shingles, and precast panels) [26]. These represent a growing sector of the construction market. The global sales of photocatalytic products increased from US$740 M in 2009 to US$1.5 billion in 2014, and are predicted to reach approximately US$2.9 billion by 2020 [27]. For these reasons, a closer examination of photocatalytic building envelope materials is warranted, to identify and quantify benefits and limitations.

The self-cleaning effect is due to the ultraviolet (UV) light catalyzed oxidation of deposited soiling, in combination with its physical removal due to enhanced surface hydrophilicity activated by sunlight [28,29]. Self-cleaning activity has been documented primarily in laboratory tests—e.g., by measuring the loss of deposited soot [30,31] or bleaching of a dye applied on the surface [32,33] as a function of UV irradiation. Tracking the dye bleaching rate is the basis for standardized methods that quantify the self-cleaning effect [34,35]. Superhydrophilicity (very low water contact angle) has been observed in TiO2-coated materials under UV irradiation [[36], [37], [38]]. This property is used in ISO Standard 27448 to test the self-cleaning performance of photocatalytic materials [39].

An environmental benefit that has been well documented in laboratory tests is the photocatalytic elimination of atmospheric pollutants in contact with the catalyst surface, including volatile organic compounds (VOCs) [[40], [41], [42]] and atmospheric nitrogen oxides (NO = NO + NO2) [43]. In the case of NOx, photocatalytic oxidation enables a net removal of these species from the atmosphere through their irreversible conversion to the non-volatile oxidation byproducts nitrate (NO3) and nitric acid (HNO3). The final stable oxidation byproducts can be washed off the surface by rain or dew. Various test methods have been developed to evaluate the air purification efficiency of photocatalytic materials by following NOx elimination [[44], [45], [46]]. One of the most commonly used is ISO Standard 22197-1, which relies on quantifying nitric oxide (NO) elimination under controlled air flow, temperature, humidity and illumination conditions [47].

Both self-cleaning and de-polluting properties of photocatalytic construction materials have been evaluated in a number of field demonstrations. The effective removal of NOx from urban air was demonstrated using a cement-based photocatalytic coating [22], a mineral-based paint [48], and paving materials [49,50]. However, other studies found a significantly weaker effect [51,52]. Photocatalytic performance can be affected by soiling deposition and loss of photocatalyst due to abrasion and material weathering [53,54]. Some studies report a limited depletion of the photocatalyst, with at least 80 % retention after a prolonged exposure to the environment of up to two years [55,56]. By contrast, materials in which the photocatalyst was deposited as a coating without a strong attachment to the substrate yielded higher catalyst depletion rates [54,57].

This study investigated the performance of photocatalytic architectural membranes exposed under real-world conditions. Architectural membranes are highly versatile materials used in building envelopes as energy-efficient roofs, façades, canopies, and skylights that provide diffuse natural daylight to indoor environments. Soiling of translucent membranes can reduce both albedo and the fraction of light transmitted through the material [58,59]. For that reason, photocatalytic TiO2 coatings are promising, as they have been shown to impart self-cleaning functionalities to fabrics [60]. Membranes based on fluoropolymer materials, such as those studied here, have been used as substrates for photoactive additives that imparted self-cleaning and anti-microbial activity [[61], [62], [63]]. The main goal of this study was to quantify the performance of photocatalytic membrane specimens that had been aged alongside a non-photocatalytic control material. Self-cleaning properties were quantified in terms of albedo loss, and de-polluting properties were evaluated by following NO removal rate and the NOx deposition rate as a function of exposure time. Specimens were exposed to the environment over a two-year period at three locations in California: Berkeley, downtown Los Angeles, and Fresno.

Section snippets

Exposed materials

The architectural membrane samples used in this study, manufactured under the Sheerfill® brand name, were provided by Saint Gobain. Non-photocatalytic versions of this product, made of polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE)-coated fiberglass, have been in use for over 45 years as roofing and façade membranes. TiO2-coated photocatalytic membranes have been in the market for about 10 years. The two different photocatalytic materials tested here were labeled “P1” and “P2”, and corresponded to standard and

Weather and air pollution measurements at each site

Seasonal rain patterns at the three sites were similar, and are presented in Fig. 2. Across the three sites we observed a dry season from April to October, followed by rainy season through the late fall, winter, and early spring. Additional descriptions of weather patterns at the sites are included in the Supporting Information. We also provide air pollution results in Fig. S2 (Supporting Information).

Contact angle measurements

The water contact angle was measured on unexposed samples and on specimens retrieved after two

Conclusions

This study illustrated the performance of advanced building materials under realistic conditions over a duration sufficient to assess initial changes and seasonal effects. The materials were exposed at three sites with varying levels and chemical composition of atmospheric pollution. Both photocatalytic samples (P1 and P2) showed excellent self-cleaning performance in all three California sites and during all seasons. The photocatalyst additives can successfully protect the surface from soiling

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Xiaochen Tang: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Visualization, Writing - original draft. Olivier Rosseler: Resources, Investigation, Visualization. Sharon Chen: Investigation, Visualization. Sébastien Houzé de l’Aulnoit: Investigation. Michael J. Lussier: Resources. Jiachen Zhang: Investigation. George Ban-Weiss: Investigation. Haley Gilbert: Project administration. Ronnen Levinson: Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing - review & editing. Hugo Destaillats: Conceptualization,

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the California Energy Commission under contract EPC-14-010. This work was also supported by the Assistant Secretary for Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, Building Technologies Office of the U.S. Department of Energy under Contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231. The authors thank David Speiser (industrial partner) and Trevor Krasowsky (University of Southern California) for assistance in specimen exposure and retrieval.

References (82)

  • S.E. Bretz et al.

    Long-term performance of high-albedo roof coatings

    Energy Build.

    (1997)
  • M. Sleiman et al.

    Soiling of building envelope surfaces and its effect on solar reflectance—part I: analysis of roofing product databases

    Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells

    (2011)
  • M.V. Diamanti et al.

    Characterization of photocatalytic and superhydrophilic properties of mortars containing titanium dioxide

    Cem. Concr. Res.

    (2008)
  • A. Folli et al.

    TiO2photocatalysis in cementitious systems: Insights into self-cleaning and depollution chemistry

    Cem. Concr. Res.

    (2012)
  • G.L. Guerrini

    Photocatalytic performances in a city tunnel in Rome: NOx monitoring results

    Constr. Build. Mater.

    (2012)
  • D. Colangiuli et al.

    Field study in an urban environment of simultaneous self-cleaning and hydrophobic nanosized TiO2-based coatings on stone for the protection of building surface

    Sci. Total Environ.

    (2019)
  • X. Tang et al.

    De-pollution efficacy of photocatalytic roofing granules

    Build. Environ.

    (2019)
  • M.V. Diamanti et al.

    Photocatalytic and self-cleaning activity of colored mortars containing TiO2

    Constr. Build. Mater.

    (2013)
  • K. Guan

    Relationship between photocatalytic activity, hydrophilicity and self-cleaning effect of TiO2/SiO2 films

    Surf. Coat. Technol.

    (2005)
  • S.-K. Lee et al.

    Visible illustration of the direct, lateral and remote photocatalytic destruction of soot by titania

    J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem.

    (2004)
  • M. Janus et al.

    Self-cleaning properties of cement plates loaded with N,C-modified TiO2 photocatalysts

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2015)
  • E. Jimenez-Relinque et al.

    Characteristics and efficiency of photocatalytic cementitious materials: type of binder, roughness and microstructure

    Cem. Concr. Res.

    (2015)
  • S. Banerjee et al.

    Self-cleaning applications of TiO2 by photo-induced hydrophilicity and photocatalysis

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2015)
  • D. Ollis

    Connecting contact angle evolution to photocatalytic kinetics of self cleaning surfaces

    Catal. Today

    (2018)
  • Y. Yin et al.

    Dynamically modifiable wettability comparisons of the hydrophilic and hydrophobic substrates coated with F/TiO2 hybrid sol by UV irradiation

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2013)
  • A.H. Aïssa et al.

    Characterization and photocatalytic performance in air of cementitious materials containing TiO2. Case study of formaldehyde removal

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2011)
  • A. Strini et al.

    Measurement of benzene, toluene, ethylbenzene and o-xylene gas phase photodegradation by titanium dioxide dispersed in cementitious materials using a mixed flow reactor

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2005)
  • A. Strini et al.

    Low irradiance toluene degradation activity of a cementitious photocatalytic material measured at constant pollutant concentration by a successive approximation method

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2011)
  • M. Hunger et al.

    Photocatalytic degradation of air pollutants — from modeling to large scale application

    Cem. Concr. Res.

    (2010)
  • R. Dillert et al.

    Influence of inlet concentration and light intensity on the photocatalytic oxidation of nitrogen(II) oxide at the surface of Aeroxide(R) TiO2 P25

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2012)
  • A. Mills et al.

    Overview of the current ISO tests for photocatalytic materials

    J. Photochem. Photobiol. A: Chem.

    (2012)
  • Q.L. Yu et al.

    Field study of NOx degradation by a mineral-based air purifying paint

    Build. Environ.

    (2018)
  • M.M. Ballari et al.

    Full scale demonstration of air-purifying pavement

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2013)
  • A. Folli et al.

    Field study of air purifying paving elements containing TiO2

    Atmos. Environ.

    (2015)
  • M. Gallus et al.

    Photocatalytic de-pollution in the Leopold II tunnel in Brussels: NOx abatement results

    Build. Environ.

    (2015)
  • M.V. Diamanti et al.

    Long term self-cleaning and photocatalytic performance of anatase added mortars exposed to the urban environment

    Constr. Build. Mater.

    (2015)
  • M. Lettieri et al.

    Field performances of nanosized TiO2 coated limestone for a self-cleaning building surface in an urban environment

    Build. Environ.

    (2019)
  • M.M. Hassan et al.

    Evaluation of the durability of titanium dioxide photocatalyst coating for concrete pavement

    Constr. Build. Mater.

    (2010)
  • R. Zouzelka et al.

    Photocatalytic abatement of NOx pollutants in the air using commercial functional coating with porous morphology

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2017)
  • A. Maury-Ramirez et al.

    Photocatalytic activity of titanium dioxide nanoparticle coatings applied on autoclaved aerated concrete: effect of weathering on coating physical characteristics and gaseous toluene removal

    J. Hazard. Mater.

    (2012)
  • H. Liu et al.

    Solar radiation properties of common membrane roofs used in building structures

    Mater. Des.

    (2016)
  • Cited by (19)

    • Pilot-scale NO<inf>x</inf> removal efficacy of photocatalytic roofing granules under urban environmental conditions

      2022, Solar Energy Materials and Solar Cells
      Citation Excerpt :

      A longer exposure period of 235 days led to further loss of NO reactivity which, combined with a higher NO2 yield, resulted in a decreased NOx deposition rate. These results are consistent with those observed for aged photocatalytic PTFE-coated fiberglass architectural fabrics, which also lost some NOx-abatement performance while retaining their initial solar reflectance practically unchanged [10]. The NOx removal efficiency and NO deposition velocity of the BWP specimen slightly recovered at the end of the 12-month exposure, most likely resulting from the 17 cm precipitation accumulated between Dec 2020 and Mar 2021, before the specimen was retrieved on 2021-03-26.

    • Challenges of photocatalysis and their coping strategies

      2022, Chem Catalysis
      Citation Excerpt :

      These coating photocatalysts can effectively absorb and degrade organic pollutants, which can keep the walls or pavements clean and hygienic. Meanwhile, it can also improve the surrounding air quality.132,133 The application of self-cleaning coating has been commercial buildings, hospitals, stadiums, commercial streets, highway surfaces, and other important areas related to people’s livelihoods and health.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text