Hostname: page-component-8448b6f56d-qsmjn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-18T16:30:03.578Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Was There a National Labor Market at the End of the Nineteenth Century? New Evidence on Earnings in Manufacturing

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  03 March 2009

Joshua L. Rosenbloom
Joshua L. Rosenbloom
Affiliation:
Associate Professor, Department of Economics, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045 and Faculty Research Fellow, National Bureau of Economic Research.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Average annual earnings calculated from the census of manufactures are used to extend previous research on labor market integration in the United States. In contrast to earlier research examining occupational wage rates, census average earnings indicate that a well-integrated labor market had emerged in the Northeast and North Central regions as early as 1879. They also reveal substantial convergence within the South Atlantic and South Central regions, suggesting the emergence of a unified southern labor market. Large and persistent North-South differentials indicate, however, that a unified national labor market did not develop before World War I.

Type
Articles
Information
The Journal of Economic History , Volume 56 , Issue 3 , September 1996 , pp. 626 - 656
Copyright
Copyright © The Economic History Association 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Atack, Jeremy, and Bateman, Fred. “How Long Was the Workday in 1880?” this Journal 52, no. 1 (1992): 129–60.Google Scholar
Brisendon, Paul F.Earnings of Factory Workers, 1899–1927. Census Monograph 10. Washington, DC: GPO, 1929.Google Scholar
Brown, John C. “The Condition of England and the Standard of Living: Cotton Textiles in the Northwest, 1806–1850.” this Journal 50, no. 3 (1990): 591–614.Google Scholar
Carter, Susan B., and Savoca, Elizabeth. “Labor Mobility and Lengthy Jobs in Nineteenth-Century America.” this Journal 50, no. 1 (1990): 1–16.Google Scholar
Chandler, Alfred D. JrThe Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business. Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Clark, David, Kahn, James, and Ofek, Haim. “City Size, Quality of Life, and the Urbanization Deflator of the GNP: 1910–1984.” Southern Economic Journal 54, no. 3 (1988): 701–14.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Coelho, Philip R., and James, F. Shepherd. “Regional Differences in Real Wages: The United States, 1851–1880.” Explorations in Economic History 13, no. 2 (1974): 551–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coelho, Philip R. P., and James, F. Shepherd. “The Impact of Regional Differences in Real Wages: The United States in 1890.” this Journal 39, no. 1 (1979): 69–85.Google Scholar
Davis, Lance E. “The Investment Market, 1870–1914: The Evolution of a National Market.” this Journal 25, no. 3 (1965), 355–99.Google Scholar
Duboff, Richard B. “The Telegraph and the Structure of Markets in the United States, 1845–1890.” Research in Economic History. Vol. 8. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Dunlevy, James A., and Richard, P. Saba. “Nineteenth-Century European Immigration to the United States: Intended versus Lifetime Settlement Patterns.” Economic Development and Cultural Change 29, no. 1 (1980): 77–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Easterlin, Richard A. “Estimates of Manufacturing Activity.” In Methodological Considerations and Reference Tables, by Everett, S. Lee et al. Vol. 1 of Population Redistribution and Economic Growth, United States, 1870–1950, edited by Kuznets, Simon and Dorothy, Swaine Thomas, 635–702. Philadelphia: American Philosophical Society, 1957.Google Scholar
Eldridge, Hope T., and Dorothy, Swaine Thomas. Demographic Analyses and Interrelationships. Vol. 3 of Population Redistribution and Economic Growth, United States, 1870–1950, edited by Kuznets, Simon and Dorothy, Swaine Thomas. Philadelphia: The American Philosophical Society, 1964.Google Scholar
Engerman, Stanley, and Goldin, Claudia. “Seasonality in Nineteenth-Century Labor Markets.” In American Economic Development in Historical Perspective, edited by Weiss, Thomas and Schaefer, Donald, 99–126. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press, 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Field, Alexander James. “The Magnetic Telegraph, Price and Quantity Data, and the New Management of Capital.” this Journal 52, no. 2 (1992): 401–14.Google Scholar
Gallaway, Lowell E., Richard, K. Vedder, and Vishwa, Shukla. “The Distribution of the Immigrant Population in the United States: An Economic Analysis.” Explorations in Economic History 40, no. 1 (1980): 143–50.Google Scholar
Goldin, Claudia. Understanding the Gender Gap: An Economic History of American Women. New York and Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1990.Google Scholar
Goldin, Claudia. “Labor Markets in the Twentieth Century.” NBER Historical Working Paper No. 58, Cambridge, MA, 06 1994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gordon, David M., Richard, Edwards, and Michael, Reich. Segmented Work Divided Workers: The Historical Transformation of Labor in the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1982.Google Scholar
Haines, Michael R. “A State and Local Consumer Price Index for the United States in 1890.” Historical Methods 22, no. 3 (1989):97–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hall, Robert. “Why is the Unemployment Rate so High at Full Employment?” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity 2 (1970): 369–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatton, Timothy, and Jeffrey, G. Williamson. “What Drove the Mass Migrations from Europe in the Late Nineteenth Century.” Population and Development Review 20, no. 3 (1994): 533–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hatton, Timothy, and Jeffrey, G. Williamson. “International Migration 1850–1939: An Economic Survey.” In Migration and the International Labor Market, 1850–1939, edited by Hatton, Timothy J. and Williamson, Jeffrey G., 3–32. London and New York: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Jacoby, Sanford M., and Sunil, Sharma. “Employment Duration and Industrial Labor Mobility in the United States, 1880–1980.” this Journal, 52, no. 1 (1992): 161–79.Google Scholar
James, John A.Money and Capital Markets in Postbellum America. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
James, John A. “Job Tenure in the Gilded Age.” In Labour Market Evolution: The Economic History of Market Integration, Wage Flexibility, and the Employment Relationship, edited by Grantham, George and MacKinnon, Mary, 185–205. London and New York: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Long, Clarence D.Wages and Earnings in the United States, 1860–1890. NBER General Series No. 67. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1960.Google Scholar
McCloskey, Donald N. The Extent of the Market and the Faculty of Speech. Photocopy, University of Iowa, Department of History (n.d.).Google Scholar
Marshall, Alfred. Principles of Economics, 9th (variorum) ed. Annotated by Guillebaud, C. W.. London: Macmillan and Co., 1961.Google Scholar
Montgomery, Edward. “Evidence on Metropolitan Wage Differences across Industries and over Time.” Journal of Urban Economics 31, no. 1 (1992): 69–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nelson, Daniel. Managers and Workers: Origins of the New Factory System in the United States, 1880–1920. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Piore, Michael J.Birds of Passage: Migrant Labor in Industrial Societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rees, Albert. Real Wages in Manufacturing, 1890–1914. NBER, General Series No. 70, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1961.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Roback, Jennifer. “Wages, Rents, and the Quality of Life.” Journal of Political Economy 90, no. 6 (1982): 1257–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rosenbloom, Joshua L. “One Market or Many? Labor Market Integration in the Late Nineteenth-Century United States.” this Journal 50, no. 1 (1990): 85–107.Google Scholar
Rosenbloom, Joshua L. “Occupational Differences in Labor Market Integration: The United States in 1890.” this Journal 51, no. 2 (1991): 427–39.Google Scholar
Rosenbloom, Joshua L., and William, A. Sundstrom. “The Decline in Hours of Work in US Labour Markets.” In Labour Market Evolution: The Economic History of Market Integration, Wage Flexibility and the Employment Relationship, edited by Grantham, George and MacKinnon, Mary, 161–84. London and New York: Routledge, 1994.Google Scholar
Snowden, Kenneth A. “Mortgage Rates and American Capital Market Development in the Late Nineteenth Century.” this Journal 47, no. 3 (1987): 671–92.Google Scholar
Stover, John F.American Railroads. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1961.Google Scholar
Sundstrom, William A. “Internal Labor Markets Before World War I: On-the-Job Training and Employee Promotion.” Explorations in Economic History 25, no. 4 (1988): 424–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sundstrom, William A., and Joshua, L. Rosenbloom. “Occupational Differences in the Dispersion of Wages and Working Hours: Labor Market Integration in the United States, 1890–1903.” Explorations in Economic History 30, no. 4 (1993): 379–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, George Rogers, and Iren, D. Neu. The American Railroad Network, 1861–1890. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
U.S. Congress. House of Representatives. Report on the Statistics of Wages in Manufacturing with Supplementary Reports, by Joseph, D. Weeks. House Misc. Doc. 42. Vol. 13, Pt. 20. 47th Cong., 2nd sess. Washington, DC: GPO, 1886.Google Scholar
U.S. Congress. Senate. Retail Prices and Wages. Senate Report no. 986. 52nd Cong., 1st sess., 3 parts. Washington, DC: GPO, 1892.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce. Historical Statistics of the United States: Colonial Times to 1957. Washington, DC: GPO, 1960.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce and Labor. Nineteenth Annual Report of the Commissioner of Labor, 1904: Wages and Hours of Labor. Washington, DC: GPO, 1904.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce and Labor. Bureau of the Census. Manufactures, 1905. Pt. 2. States and Territories. Washington, DC: GPO, 1907.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce and Labor. Bureau of the Census. Thirteenth Census of the United States, 1910. Vol. 10. Manufactures, 1909. Reports by States with Statistics for Principal Cities. Washington, DC: GPO, 1912.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce and Labor. Bureau of the Census. Census of Manufactures, 1914. Vol. 1. Reports by States with Statistics for Principal Cities and Metropolitan Districts. Washington, DC: GPO, 1918.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce and Labor. Bureau of the Census. Fourteenth Census of the United States, 1920. Vol. 9. Manufactures, 1919. Reports for States, with Statistics for Principal Cities. Washington, DC: GPO, 1923.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Interior. Census Office. Twelfth Census, 1900. Population. Pt. 1. Washington, DC: GPO, 1901.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Interior. Twelfth Census of the United States, 1900. Manufactures. Pt. 2. States and Territories. Washington, DC: GPO, 1902.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Labor. “Wages in the United States and Europe, 1870–1898.” Bulletin no. 18. Washington, DC: GPO, 1898: 665–93.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Labor. “Retail Prices 1890 to June 1912.” Bulletin no. 106. Washington, DC: GPO, 1912.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Labor. “Retail Prices, 1907 to December 1914.” Bulletin no. 156. Washington, DC: GPO, 1915.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Labor. “Retail Prices, 1913 to December 1920.” Bulletin no. 300. Washington, DC: GPO, 1922.Google Scholar
Williamson, Jeffrey G. “Was the Industrial Revolution Worth It? Disamenities and Death in 19th Century British Towns.” Explorations in Economic History 19, no. 3 (1982), 221–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wilson, Lonny L. “Intercity Wage and Cost of Living Differentials in the United States, 1889–1939.” Ph.D. diss., University of Iowa, 1973.Google Scholar
Wright, Gavin. Old South, New South: Revolutions in the Southern Economy Since the Civil War. New York: Basic Books, 1986.Google Scholar
Wright, Gavin. “Labor History and Labor Economics.” In The Future of Economic History, edited by Field, Alexander J., 313–48. Boston: Kluwer-Nijhoff, 1987.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Gavin. “Postbellum Southern Labor Markets.” In Quantity and Quiddity: Essays in U.S. Economic History, edited by Kilby, Peter, 93–134. Middletown, CT: Wesleyan University Press, 1987.Google Scholar