Abstract
C. West Churchman and Humberto Maturana share similar cultural traditions involving frustrations with applying conventional systematic methods in domains of social systems design (Churchman) and neurobiology (Maturana). They have independently of each other developed a rich systemic framework of analysis based on a constructivist epistemology. But there appears to have been little correspondence between the two traditions. This paper explores six possible areas of congruence between the critical systemic perspective associated with Churchman and Maturana’s autopoiesis. This initial sketch reveals possible ways forward in applying ideas of autopoiesis to our social world through a more constructive and adaptive conversation with the works of Churchman.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Armson, R., and Ison, R.(2003). Block 1: Juggling With Complexity: Searching for a System. T306 Managing Complexity: A Systems Approach, Milton Keynes, The Open University.
Banathy, B. H.(2003). Editorial: Our challenge in the 21st century: Conscious, self-guided evolution; and self-guided/conscious evolution. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 20(4), 307–323.
Bell, S., and Morse, S.(1999). Sustainability Indicators: Measuring the Immeasurable, Earthscan, London.
Capra, F.(2002). The Hidden Connections: A Science for Sustainable Living, HarperCollins, London.
Churchman, C. W. (1971). The Design of Inquiring Systems: Basic Concepts of Systems and Organizations, Basic Books, New York.
Churchman, C. W. (1979). The Systems Approach and Its Enemies, Basic Books, New York.
Churchman, C. W. (1984). Churchman’s conversations. Syst. Res. 1(2), 89–90.
Espejo, R. (2002). Self-construction and restricted conversations. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 19(6), 517–530.
Flood, R. L. (1999). Rethinking the Fifth Discipline: Learning Within the Unknowable, Routledge, London/ New York.
Flood, R. L., and Jackson, M. C. (1991). Creative Problem Solving: Total Systems Intervention, Wiley, Chichester.
Flood, R. L., and Ulrich, W. (1990). Testament to conversations on critical systems theory between two systems practitioners. Syst. Pract. 3, 7–29.
Jackson, M. C. (2000). Systems Approaches to Management, Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, London.
Luhmann, N. (1986). The autopoiesis of social systems. Sociocybernetic Paradoxes. F. Geyer and v. d. Zouwen. Sage, London.
Madron, R., and Jopling, J. (2004). The web of democracy. New Internat. 360, 16–18.
Maturana, H. (2002). Autopoiesis, structural coupling and cognition: A history of these and other notions in the biology of cognition. Cybern. Hum. Knowing 9(3–4), 5–34.
Maturana, H. R., and Varela, F. J. (1980). Autopoieses and Cognition: The Realization of the Living, Reidel, Dordrecht.
Maturana, H. R., and Varela, F. J. (1992). The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding, Shambhala Publications, Boston and London.
McIntyre, J. (2003). Participatory democracy: Drawing on C. West Churchman’s thinking when making public policy. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 20(6), 489–498.
McIntyre, J. (2004). Facilitating Critical Systemic Praxis (CSP) by means of experiential learning and conceptual tools. Syst. Res. Behav. Sci. 21(1), 37–61.
Midgley, G. (2000). Systemic Intervention: Philosophy, Methodology and Practice, Kluwer/Plenum, New York.
Mingers, J. (1995). Self-Producing Systems: Implications and Applications of Autopoiesis, Plenum, New York.
Reynolds, M. (1998). “Unfolding” Natural resource information systems: Fieldwork in Botswana. Syst. Practice Action Res. 11(2), 127–152.
Reynolds, M. (2001). Co-guarantor attributes: A systemic approach to evaluating expert support. In Eighth European Conference on Information Technology Evaluation: Conference Proceedings, Oriel College, Oxford.
Reynolds, M. (2003). Towards Systemic Evaluation: A Framework of Co-guarantor Attributes. Evaluating Regional Sustainable Development submission to Workshop of the EU Thematic Network project REGIONET “Evaluation methods and tools for regional sustainable development,” University of Manchester, UK, 11–13 June 2003.
SLIM (2004). SLIM Framework: Social Learning as a Policy Approach for Sustainable Use of Water. Available from http://slim.open.ac.uk, 41 p.
Ulrich, W. (1983). Critical Heuristics of Social Planning: A New Approach to Practical Philosophy, Stuttgart (Chichester), Haupt (John Wiley—paperback version).
Ulrich, W. (2000). Reflective practice in the civil society: The contribution of critically systemic thinking. Reflective Pract. 1(2), 247–268.
Van Wyk, G. (2003). A Systems Approach to Social and Organisational Planning, Victoria, Canada, Trafford.
Winograd, T., and Flores, F. (1993). Understanding Computers and Cognition: A New Foundation for Design, Adison-Wesley, MA.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Reynolds, M. Churchman and Maturana: Enriching the Notion of Self-Organization for Social Design. Syst Pract Act Res 17, 539–556 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-005-1228-7
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11213-005-1228-7