Quantum Hamiltonian learning using imperfect quantum resources

Nathan Wiebe, Christopher Granade, Christopher Ferrie, and David Cory
Phys. Rev. A 89, 042314 – Published 17 April 2014

Abstract

Identifying an accurate model for the dynamics of a quantum system is a vexing problem that underlies a range of problems in experimental physics and quantum information theory. Recently, a method called quantum Hamiltonian learning has been proposed by the present authors that uses quantum simulation as a resource for modeling an unknown quantum system. This approach can, under certain circumstances, allow such models to be efficiently identified. A major caveat of that work is the assumption of that all elements of the protocol are noise free. Here we show that quantum Hamiltonian learning can tolerate substantial amounts of depolarizing noise and show numerical evidence that it can tolerate noise drawn from other realistic models. We further provide evidence that the learning algorithm will find a model that is maximally close to the true model in cases where the hypothetical model lacks terms present in the true model. Finally, we also provide numerical evidence that the algorithm works for noncommuting models. This work illustrates that quantum Hamiltonian learning can be performed using realistic resources and suggests that even imperfect quantum resources may be valuable for characterizing quantum systems.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
4 More
  • Received 26 November 2013

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.89.042314

©2014 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Nathan Wiebe1,2,3, Christopher Granade3,4, Christopher Ferrie5, and David Cory3,6,7

  • 1Quantum Architectures and Computation Group, Microsoft Research, Redmond, Washington 98052, USA
  • 2Department of Combinatorics & Optimization, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1
  • 3Institute for Quantum Computing, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1
  • 4Department of Physics, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1
  • 5Center for Quantum Information and Control, University of New Mexico, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87131-0001, USA
  • 6Department of Chemistry, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 3G1
  • 7Perimeter Institute, University of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada N2L 2Y5

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 89, Iss. 4 — April 2014

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review A

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×