Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회지)

The Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture (한국조경학회)
권호 표지
DOI QR코드

DOI QR Code

A Healing Environment Study focused on Attention Restoration Theory for Healthy Environmental Planning and Design - A Case Study of Cheonggyecheon -

건강환경 조성을 위한 주의회복이론 관점의 치유환경 고찰 - 청계천을 중심으로 -

  • Received : 2016.12.27
  • Accepted : 2017.02.14
  • Published : 2017.02.28
Download PDF
⟨ Previous Next ⟩

Abstract

With the recent increasing interest in preventive medicine, observation has been made regarding the positive relationship between a routinized place that includes activity and health improvement. This study evaluates the effective value of a designed landscape for seeing a healing environment and sees the difference of the effective value of classified physical settings regarding Evidence Based Design. Therefore, the study evaluates the perceived restorativeness scale of Cheonggyceheon's 1.5km section and five type settings in the same section regarding how much it works as a healthy urban park. The research methodology used to study sub-settings' and the research site's restoration effects was observation and questionnaires. A PRS (Perceived Restorativeness Scale) questionnaire survey was the research tool employed. The study drew two major results. Firstly, PRS 6.12 is the score of the whole research site, so the study identifies that Cheonggycheon has a mental fatigue restoration function. Secondly, the sub-setting named 'Near Sidewall' was the most attention restorative, according to the ANOVA results. In conclusion, this study suggests significant information support regarding the reasons for creating green areas in urban settings by identifying a particular designed healing sit.

최근 대체 의학에 대한 관심과 함께 일상적인 공간과 활동을 통한 건강증진에 많은 관심이 일고 있다. 이에 본 연구는 치유환경에 대한 물리적 공간의 효용가치와 구체적인 공간 유형별 차이에 관해 다룸으로 근거중심디자인 관점에서 조경계획 및 설계단계에 유용한 결과를 도출하고자 한다. 이를 위해서 인위적으로 조성된 조경공간의 치유효과가 얼마나 있는지에 대한 평가가 요구되며, 구체적인 공간에 대한 평가가 요구된다. 본 연구는 청계천 1.5km 구간을 대상으로 주의회복 효과와 공간 유형에 대해 논하고자 한다. 연구 방법으로는 공간에 대한 해석과 주의회복환경 정도를 묻기 위한 회복환경 지각척도를 활용하였다. 연구결과는 다음과 같다. 첫째, 청계천 조사 구간의 평균 회복환경지각척도는 6.12로 도출되었다. 이는 선행 연구를 기준으로 옥상 정원이나 언덕 그리고 정원에 비해서는 높은 수치이고, 자연호수가 주는 주의회복효용 정도와 유사한 값을 보였다. 둘째, 공간 유형에 따른 차이를 확인하기 위해 각 5개 공간 유형별로 ANOVA 분석을 실시하였는데, 그 결과로 안쪽 경계부 공간 유형이 치유효과가 높게 나타났다. 이상의 결과는 조경공간의 치유효과에 대한 근거자료가 되며, 세부 공간 유형 설계 시 치유공간 설계에 참고가 될 것으로 기대된다.

Keywords

References

  1. Alexander, C.(Ed.)(1975) The Oregon Experiment (Vol. 3). Oxford University Press.
  2. Bell, P. A., T. C. Greene, J. D. Fisher and A. Baum(2001) Environmental Psychology: Lawrence Erlbaum.
  3. Berto, R.(2005) Exposure to restorative environments helps restore attentional capacity. Journal of Environmental Psychology 25(3): 249-259. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvp.2005.07.001
  4. Cohen, D. A., T. L. McKenzie, A. Sehgal, S. Williamson, D. Golinelli and N. Lurie(2007) Contribution of public parks to physical activity. American Journal of Public Health 97(3): 509-514. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2005.072447
  5. Floyd, M. F., J. O. Spengler, J. E. Maddock, P. H. Gobster and L. J. Suau(2008) Park-based physical activity in diverse communities of two US cities: An observational study. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 34(4): 299-305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2008.01.009
  6. Hartig, T., A. Book, J. Garvil, T. Olsson and T. Garling.(1996) Environmental influences on psychological restoration. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology 37(4): 378-393. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9450.1996.tb00670.x
  7. Hartig, T., F. G. Kaiser and P. A. Bowler(1997) Further development of a measure of perceived environmental restorativeness. Institute of Housing Research, Working paper(5).
  8. Hartig, T., K. Korpela, G. W. Evans and T. Garling(1997) A measure of restorative quality in environments. Scandinavian Housing and Planning Research 14(4): 175-194. https://doi.org/10.1080/02815739708730435
  9. Hill, K.(2001) Design and Planning as Arts: The Broader Context of Health and Environment. Ecology and Design: Frameworks for Learning, 203.
  10. Hwang, J. Y., K. C. Cho and S. W. Yang(2011) Analysis on the behavioral characteristics of visitors to Cheonggyecheon in Seoul. Journal of the Architectural Institute of Korea Planning & Design 27(2): 185-192.
  11. Kang, Y. A., J. Y. Lee and S. Lee(2013) Influences of perceived restorative environment toward leisure satisfaction in a Waterfront Park: Focused on Hangang Park. The Han Academic Society of Tourism Management 28(3): 353-373.
  12. Kaplan, R.(1983) The role of nature in the urban context. In Behavior and the Natural Environment Springer US. pp. 127-161.
  13. Kaplan, R. and S. Kaplan(1989) The Experience of Nature: A Psychological Perspective. CUP Archive.
  14. Kaplan, S.(1995) The restorative benefits of nature: Toward an integrative framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology 15(3): 169-182. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-4944(95)90001-2
  15. Kim, M., J. S. Sung and J. M. Park(2014) Behavior setting theory draws Chonggyecheon. Journal of Urban Design Institute of Korea 15(4): 35-46.
  16. Korpela, K. M., T. Hartig, F. G. Kaiser and U. Fuhrer(2001) Restorative experience and self-regulation in favorite places. Environment and Behavior 33(4): 572-589. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121973133
  17. Korpela, K. and T. Hartig(1996) Restorative qualities of favorite places. Journal of Environmental Psychology 16(3): 221-233. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.1996.0018
  18. Laumann, K., T. Garling and K. M. Stormark(2001) Rating scale measures of restorative components of environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology 21(1): 31-44. https://doi.org/10.1006/jevp.2000.0179
  19. Lavoie, C.(2005) Sketching the landscape: Exploring a sense of place. Landscape Journal, 24(1): 13-31. https://doi.org/10.3368/lj.24.1.13
  20. Lee, S. H. and M. H. Hyun.(2003) The factor structure of the Korean version of the Perceived Restorativeness Scale(PRS). Journal of Korean Psychological Association 8(2): 229-241.
  21. Lee, S. Y. and K. Park.(2014) A study on the utilization and satisfaction of local residents in college campus with the attention restoration theory. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 42(4): 37-47. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2014.42.4.037
  22. Lee, Y. G. and H. S. Kim(2013) Place images affecting the satisfaction and resultant behavior of Cheonggyecheon: A comparative study on Koreans and foreigners. Journal of the Korean Regional Development Association 25(3): 67-89.
  23. Maller, C. J., C. Henderson-Wilson and M. Townsend(2009) Rediscovering nature in everyday settings: Or how to create healthy environments and healthy people. EcoHealth, 6(4): 553-556. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10393-010-0282-5
  24. Moon, S. M. and K. N. Mun(2007) The study on the encounter norm and personal space's influence on perceived crowding focused on the visitors in Cheonggyecheon. Korean Journal of Tourism Research 22(3): 41-63.
  25. Park, S. A. and M. W. Lee(2016) An analysis of the healing effects by types of forest space-Focused on psychological restorativeness and satisfaction. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 44(4): 75-85. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2016.44.4.075
  26. Purcell, T., E. Peron and R Berto(2001) Why do preferences differ between scene types?. Environment and Behavior 33(1): 93-106. https://doi.org/10.1177/00139160121972882
  27. Ruddell, E. J. and W. E. Hammitt(1987) Prospect refuge theory: A psychological orientation for edge effects in recreation environment. Journal of Leisure Research 19(4): 249-260. https://doi.org/10.1080/00222216.1987.11969696
  28. Seamon, D.(1987) Phenomenology and environment-behavior research. Advances in Environment, Behavior, and Design 1: 3-27.
  29. Sema, M., D. Z. Tugba and O. Z. Ali(2010) Prospect and refuge as the predictors of preferences for seating areas. Scientific Research and Essays 5(11): 1223-1233.
  30. Shores, K. A. and S. T. West(2010) Rural and urban park visits and park-based physical activity. Preventive Medicine 50: S13-S17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ypmed.2009.07.023
  31. Sung, J. S.(2014) Green-health topology. Environmental Reserach 53(1): 71-78.
  32. Tenngart Ivarsson, C. and C. M. Hagerhall(2008) The perceived restorativeness of gardens-Assessing the restorativeness of a mixed built and natural scene type. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 7(2): 107-118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2008.01.001
  33. Velarde, M. D., G. Fry and M. Tveit(2007) Health effects of viewing landscapes-Landscape types in environmental psychology. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening 6(4): 199-212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2007.07.001
  34. Yi, Y. G.(2006) Influence of the restorative quality of landscape on the visiting preference and satisfaction for tourist destination: An evaluation of heritage landscape of Kyongju by Americans. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 34(5): 1-13.
  35. Yi, Y. G.(2013) Restorative quality of traditional landscape and visiting experience. Journal of the Korean Institute of Landscape Architecture 41(4): 68-76. https://doi.org/10.9715/KILA.2013.41.4.068