The centrosome is the major microtubule organizing center found in animals, being composed of two microtubule-based cylinders, the centrioles, which are surrounded by an electron-dense proteinaceous pericentriolar material (PCM) that nucleates microtubules. The centriole can also function as a basal body, nucleating cilia formation. Centrioles are normally formed in coordination with the cell cycle, one new centriole forming close to each existing one, within a PCM cloud (Bettencourt-Dias and Glover, 2007; Fu et al., 2015).

The first structure of the centriole to be assembled is the cartwheel, a ninefold symmetrical structure, composed of SAS-6, CEP135/Bld10, STIL/Ana2/SAS-5, amongst others (Kitagawa et al., 2011; Lin et al., 2013; Nakazawa et al., 2007; Tang et al., 2011; van Breugel et al., 2011). This is followed by centriole elongation through the deposition of centriolar microtubules which is dependent on components such as CPAP/SAS-4 (Kohlmaier et al., 2009; Schmidt et al., 2009; Tang et al., 2009). Remarkably, SAS-6 and CEP135/Bld10 can self-assemble in vitro to generate a ninefold symmetrical cartwheel (Guichard et al., 2017). In vivo, active PLK4 is known to recruit and phosphorylate STIL, which then recruits SAS-6 (Arquint et al., 2012; Arquint et al., 2015; Moyer et al., 2015; Ohta et al., 2014). In a process called ‘centriole-to-centrosome conversion’, the centriole recruits centriole-PCM linkers, such as CEP192/SPD2 and CEP152/asterless, which contribute to both centriole biogenesis and PCM recruitment (Cizmecioglu et al., 2010; Dzhindzhev et al., 2010; Hatch et al., 2010; Sonnen et al., 2013). Finally, CDK5RAP2/CNN and pericentrin are recruited, which then recruit and activate γ-tubulin and create an environment favorable for concentrating tubulin, leading to the formation of a proficient matrix for microtubule nucleation and organization (Delaval and Doxsey, 2010; Feng et al., 2017; Megraw et al., 2011; Woodruff et al., 2017).

The cascade of phosphorylation and interaction events between centriole components leading to centriole biogenesis is an intricate succession of positive feedback interactions. That circuit leads to amplification of an original signal present at the centriole, such as the presence of active PLK4, or its substrate STIL, hence perpetuating centriole biogenesis there (Arquint and Nigg, 2016; Lopes et al., 2015; Moyer et al., 2015). Additionally, the already existing ‘older’ centriole is surrounded by PCM, which could help to localize and concentrate centriole components during centriole assembly, reinforcing centriole formation close by. In support of this idea, when centrioles are eliminated in human cells by laser ablation, they form de novo within a PCM cloud (Khodjakov et al., 2002). Moreover, exaggeration of the PCM cloud by overexpressing a PCM component, pericentrin, in S-phase-arrested CHO cells, induces the formation of numerous daughter centrioles (Loncarek et al., 2008). Although pericentrin is not shown to be implicated in centriole biogenesis per se to date, dissociation of another pericentrin-related protein, AKAP450, from the centrosome, interferes with centriole duplication in human cells (Keryer et al., 2003). Moreover, PCM components, γ-tubulin and Spd-5, a functional analogue of Drosophila CNN and Hs Cdk5rap2, contribute to centriole assembly in C. elegans (Dammermann et al., 2004). Downregulation of the PCM in Drosophila, has been shown to lead to: i) fragmented and short centrioles, in the case of pericentrin (PLP) (Martinez-Campos et al., 2004; Roque et al., 2018), ii) disengaged centrioles, in the case of CNN (Lucas and Raff, 2007; Megraw et al., 2001), and iii) centriole disassembly, in the case of the removal of all PCM components (Pimenta-Marques et al., 2016). It is thus likely that the PCM plays critical roles in assembling and/or maintaining centriole structures. Despite the possible importance of the PCM, it is difficult to study its roles on centrioles due to confounding effects of the many centriole-centriole component interactions that exist in centriole-containing animal cells.

To define the contribution of PCM in regulating centriole components, we explored a system that has no endogenous centriole components, taking advantage of the diverged centrosomes observed in nature. While centrioles are ancestral in eukaryotes, they were lost in several branches of the eukaryotic tree, concomitantly with the loss of the flagellar structure (Carvalho-Santos et al., 2010). Instead of a canonical centrosome, yeasts have a spindle pole body (SPB), a layered structure composed of a centriole-less scaffold that similarly recruits γ-tubulin and other PCM components and nucleates microtubules (Cavanaugh and Jaspersen, 2017). The timing and regulation of SPB biogenesis are similar to the one observed in animal centrosomes (Lim et al., 2009; Kilmartin, 2014; Rüthnick and Schiebel, 2016). It is likely that the animal centrosome and yeast SPB evolved from a common ancestral structure that had centrioles (Figure 1A), as early-diverged basal fungi such as chytrids (e.g. Rhizophydium spherotheca) have a centriole-containing centrosome (Powell, 1980). By expressing animal centriole components in fission yeast, we observed that the SPB recruits them. We further demonstrate that the SPB conserved PCM component Pcp1/pericentrin recruits the centriole component SAS-6. We further validated this interaction in animals and show it is important for centriole elongation. Our work reveals an important role for pericentrin in recruiting centriole components and regulating centriole structure in animals.

Figure 1

Download asset Open asset

Figure 1—source data 1

List of the predicted orthologues of the human centrosome and S. pombe SPB components in animal and fungi species.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.41418.003

Download elife-41418-fig1-data1-v1.xlsx

We first investigated the conservation of centrosome components, searching for orthologues of the known animal proteins comprising: components of centrioles that are required for centriole biogenesis (SAS-6, STIL/Ana2/SAS-5, CPAP/SAS-4, CEP135/Bld10 and CEP295/Ana1), linkers of the centriole to the PCM, which are bound to the centriole and are required for PCM recruitment (CEP152 and CEP192), and the PCM itself, which is involved in γ-tubulin recruitment and anchoring (pericentrin, Cdk5rap2 and γ-tubulin itself). In addition, to better understand when the SPB originated, we also searched for orthologs of the fission yeast SPB components: the core scaffold proteins (Ppc89, Sid4, Cdc11, Cut12 and Cam1; Bestul et al., 2017; Chang and Gould, 2000; Krapp et al., 2001; Moser et al., 1997; Rosenberg et al., 2006) and the half-bridge proteins (Sfi1 and Cdc31; Kilmartin, 2003; Paoletti et al., 2003), which are required for SPB duplication.

Consistent with previous studies (Carvalho-Santos et al., 2010; Hodges et al., 2010), the proteins required for centriole biogenesis in animals were not identified in the fungal genomes, with exception of chytrids, which have centrioles (Figure 1B). Centriole-PCM connectors were not found in both chytrids and yeasts. In contrast, when investigating the PCM composition, pericentrin and Cdk5rap2 were found in all fungal species, although the budding yeast Spc110 and Spc72 only share short conserved motifs with pericentrin and Cdk5rap2, respectively (Lin et al., 2014).

Regarding the SPB components, we found that Cam1 and Cdc31 are both highly spread across opisthokonts, which may reflect a conserved module or, alternatively an MTOC-independent conserved function of these proteins. On the other hand, we could only find proteins such as Ppc89 and Sid4 in yeasts, but not in chytrids, suggesting that some of the yeast-specific structural building blocks of the SPB appeared after branching into yeasts (Figure 1B).

Altogether, these results suggest the yeast centrosome is very different from the animal canonical centrosome, not having centriole and centriole-PCM adaptors, and being composed of several yeast-specific SPB components. Our results suggest that different proteins are involved in assembling different modules of the centrosome and that they can be lost when that module is lost, leading to a divergence of the remaining structures. Importantly, while centriole components were lost, the PCM module is conserved in animals and fungi in terms of composition and function, establishing fission yeast as an interesting system to study the interaction between components of the centriole and the PCM. We thus expressed key animal centriole components in fission yeast and asked whether they would interact with the PCM at the SPB or other yeast microtubule organizing centers.

Animal centriole components localize to the fission yeast SPB

We used individual Drosophila centriole components as they are well-characterized and tested their localization when expressed in fission yeast. We chose five critical components, SAS-6, CEP135/Bld10, CPAP/SAS-4, STIL/Ana2/SAS-5 and PLK4 for the test. All genes coding for these proteins are absent from the yeast genomes (Figure 1B). Fission yeast SPBs are easily recognizable under light microscopy with fluorescent protein-tagged SPB marker proteins, such as Sid4 and Sfi1 (Chang and Gould, 2000; Kilmartin, 2003), which show distinct localization as a clear focus. Therefore, we examined if the animal centriole proteins could recognize and thus localize to the SPB.

GFP or YFP-tagged Drosophila centriole proteins were heterologously expressed under control of the constitutive atb2 promoter (Matsuyama et al., 2008) or the inducible nmt1 promoter (Maundrell, 1990) in fission yeast. Despite the one billion years separating yeasts from animals (Douzery et al., 2004; Parfrey et al., 2011), SAS-6-GFP, Bld10-GFP and YFP-SAS-4 co-localized with fission yeast Sid4 to the SPB (Figure 2A and B). In addition to the localization on the SPB, YFP-SAS-4 signal was also weakly observed along interphase cytoplasmic microtubules, likely reflecting its microtubule-binding capacity (Gopalakrishnan et al., 2011). In contrast, GFP-Plk4 and YFP-Ana2 did not localize to the SPB and existed as foci in the cytoplasm (Figure 2A and B). We confirmed the expression of the fusion proteins with the expected sizes (Figure 2—figure supplement 1A). Cells expressing centriole proteins which localize to the SPB grew as well as control cells, which have no centriole protein (Figure 2—figure supplement 1B), suggesting their expression does not impair yeast growth.

Figure 2 with 1 supplement see all

Download asset Open asset

Figure 2—source data 1

The source data to plot the graph in Figure 2B.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.41418.006

Download elife-41418-fig2-data1-v1.xlsx

The surprising result that SAS-6, Bld10 and SAS-4 independently localize to the SPB, suggests that one or more fission yeast SPB component can recruit them. These results indicate that SPBs and canonical centrosomes have diverged less than what would be expected from their diverse morphology and divergent protein composition.

Fission yeast Pcp1 is required for SAS-6 recruitment

Next, we examined if Pcp1 is required for localization of SAS-6, Bld10 and SAS-4 on the SPBs using a temperature-sensitive mutant of Pcp1 (pcp1-14), in which the amount of Pcp1 protein is already reduced, and further reduced when grown at the restrictive temperature (Tang et al., 2014). These cells also arrest in mitosis when at the restrictive temperature. To compare the signal intensity in cells at the same cell cycle stage, mitosis, we introduced the cut7-446 allele both in wild-type and pcp1-14 background. Cut7 is a mitotic kinesin, its mutation fails in interdigitating the mitotic spindle and causes the cells to arrest in early mitosis (Hagan and Yanagida, 1990). Hereafter, we refer to the strains with cut7-446 and pcp1-14 cut7-446 alleles, as the control and pcp1 mutant, respectively. The intensity of SAS-6-GFP per SPB was significantly increased in control cells when arrested in prometaphase (Figure 3A and B). We observed reduced SAS-6-GFP intensity in the pcp1 mutant both at the permissive and restrictive temperatures (Figure 3A and B). This indicates that Pcp1 is required for SAS-6 recruitment to the SPB. Unlike SAS-6, Bld10-GFP intensity was not reduced, but slightly increased in the pcp1 mutant (Figure 3C and D). It is possible that Bld10 is recruited to the SPB by another SPB component(s) which is upregulated in the pcp1 mutant. Although the intensity of SAS-4 was reduced in the pcp1 mutant (Figure 3E and F), we found that the total protein of YFP-SAS-4 was also lower in the pcp1 mutant while that of SAS-6-GFP and Bld10-GFP was comparable in control and pcp1 mutant lysates (Figure 3G). We think that YFP-SAS-4 might be stabilised by Pcp1 in fission yeast cells, and therefore we cannot conclude whether Pcp1 is required for YFP-SAS-4 localization on the SPB. Since SAS-6 is such a critical component in centriole assembly, and its localization is determined by Pcp1, we decided to explore further how SAS-6 is recruited to the SPB by Pcp1.

Figure 3

Download asset Open asset

Figure 3—source data 1

The source data to plot the graphs in Figure 3B,D,F.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.41418.008

Download elife-41418-fig3-data1-v1.xlsx

It is known in Drosophila and human cells that phosphorylation and interaction of PLK4 with STIL/Ana2, facilitates STIL recruitment to the centriole and its interaction and recruitment of SAS-6 (Arquint et al., 2012; Moyer et al., 2015; Ohta et al., 2014; Vulprecht et al., 2012). However, neither Plk4 nor STIL are present in the fission yeast genome (Figure 1B), suggesting that Pcp1/pericentrin is part of an additional and ancestral molecular pathway for SAS-6 recruitment.

SAS-6 interacts with the conserved region of Pcp1, and Pcp1 is sufficient to recruit SAS-6

We reasoned that if the interaction between SAS-6 and Pcp1/pericentrin is an ancient and conserved connection, they should interact through an evolutionarily conserved domain in Pcp1. Subsequently, we determined which part of Pcp1 is required for its interaction with SAS-6. Full-length and truncation mutants of Pcp1 (N, M and C) were co-expressed with SAS-6-GFP (Figure 4A). Only full-length Pcp1 and its C-terminal region containing the conserved PACT domain interacted strongly with SAS-6 (Figure 4B). Given that the Pcp1-M fragment was weakly expressed, we cannot exclude completely the possibility that it also interacts with SAS-6-GFP (Figure 4B). The PACT domain localizes to the centriole wall in animals and is required for MTOC targeting both in animal and fungi (Gillingham and Munro, 2000).

Figure 4 with 3 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Figure 4—source data 1

The source data to plot the graph in Figure 4E.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.41418.016

Download elife-41418-fig4-data1-v1.xlsx

We next asked whether Pcp1 could recruit SAS-6 ectopically. It is known that Pcp1 overexpression forms multiple Pcp1-containing foci in the cytoplasm (Flory et al., 2002). We thus examined if the cytoplasmic Pcp1 foci recruit SAS-6 (illustrated in Figure 4C). Overexpressed mCherry-tagged Pcp1 recruited SAS-6-GFP, but not GFP (control), to such foci (Figure 4D and E), indicating that Pcp1 can ectopically recruit SAS-6.

Though epifluorescence micrographs suggest SAS-6 co-localizes with Sid4 and Pcp1 (Figures 2 and 4), due to the resolution limit of a conventional optical microscope (~200 nm), we failed to conclude precisely where SAS-6 localizes to. To further determine the precise localization of SAS-6, we analyzed the relative position of SAS-6-GFP with respect to core SPB components Pcp1-tdTomato or Sid4-tdTomato (Figure 4—figure supplement 1A) by structured illumination microscopy (SIM). The foci of Pcp1-tdTomato and Sid4-tdTomato within the duplicated SPBs were distinguishably separated (60 ± 10 nm) (Figure 4—figure supplement 1B and C). Importantly, SAS-6-GFP center of mass localizes at ~50 nm distance from both Pcp1-tdTomato and Sid4-tdTomato center of mass. Given that the diameter and height of SPB is 180 nm and 90 nm respectively (Ding et al., 1997), our data suggest that ectopically expressed SAS-6-GFP localizes to the core of the SPB.

Conservation of the Pcp1/pericentrin - SAS-6 interaction

Our experiments suggest that there are conserved interactions between centrioles and pericentrin, whose evolution is constrained. They further suggest that pericentrin has an important role in recruiting centriole components. To test our prediction, we examined in animal cells whether pericentrin interacts with SAS-6 and helps to recruit it to the centriole.

The pericentrin family varies in protein length but contains the conserved PACT domain in the C-terminal region (Figure 5A). Since we observed that fission yeast Pcp1 interacts with SAS-6 through the PACT-domain containing region, we tested whether SAS-6 interacts with the PACT domain of Drosophila pericentrin ortholog, pericentrin-like protein (PLP). EGFP-tagged SAS-6 and HA-tagged PLP fragment containing the conserved PACT domain were co-expressed in Drosophila melanogaster tissue cultured cells (D.Mel cells). Consistent with the results obtained in fission yeast, SAS-6 interacts with the PACT domain (Figure 5B). To verify whether this interaction is direct, we validated this result in vitro, by performing in vitro binding assays using purified GST, GST-tagged SAS-6 and His-tagged PACT. GST-SAS-6 was specifically bound to His-PACT, indicating a direct interaction between these two proteins (Figure 5C).

Figure 5

Download asset Open asset

Figure 5—source data 1

The source data to plot the graphs in Figure 5E and G.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.41418.018

Download elife-41418-fig5-data1-v1.xlsx

SAS-6 is recruited to the centriole by two complementary pathways

In animal cells, it is known that STIL/Ana2/SAS-5 recruits SAS-6 to the centriole (Arquint et al., 2012; Ohta et al., 2014; Moyer et al., 2015). However, it has been observed that STIL depletion does not completely prevent HsSAS-6 recruitment, and contribution of STIL does not fully account for centrosomal targeting of HsSAS-6 during interphase (Arquint et al., 2012; Keller et al., 2014). These results suggest that other factor(s) may also recruit SAS-6 in animals. Since overexpression of PACT recruits more SAS-6, we examined if PLP has a role in recruiting SAS-6 to the centriole in addition to STIL/Ana2. We performed a single depletion of PLP and Ana2 and a co-depletion of both (Ana2 and PLP) in D.Mel cells. We used mCherry depletion as a negative control for this experiment. Firstly, we investigated if SAS-6 recruitment is impaired by Ana2 and PLP RNAi. We focused on mitotic cells to compare all cells at the same cell cycle stage. The intensity of SAS-6 per centrosome was quantified in each RNAi condition. Upon depletion of Ana2 or PLP, SAS-6 intensity per pole was significantly reduced compared to control (Figure 6A and B). Moreover, double depletion of Ana2 and PLP caused an additive reduction of SAS-6 intensity. This result suggests SAS-6 is recruited by two complementary pathways, which depend on Ana2 and PLP. Western blotting analysis confirmed that the targeted proteins were efficiently depleted, while total SAS-6 protein levels were comparable in all conditions (Figure 6C). Considering that depletion of SAS-6 leads to a reduction in centriole number in both D.Mel cells and the fly (Dobbelaere et al., 2008; Rodrigues-Martins et al., 2007), we asked whether altered recruitment of SAS-6 by depleting Ana2 and PLP could also affect centriole biogenesis. We observed that co-depletion of Ana2 and PLP leads to stronger reduction in the number of centrioles as compared to the single depletions, indicating both pathways contribute to centriole biogenesis (Figure 6D,E, and Figure 6—figure supplement 1).

Figure 6 with 2 supplements see all

Download asset Open asset

Figure 6—source data 1

The source data to plot the graph in Figure 6B and E.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.41418.024

Download elife-41418-fig6-data1-v1.xlsx

Furthermore, we asked if the centriole number reduction observed in PLP-depleted cells is attributable to PLP function or is an off-target effect, through a rescue experiment. We first depleted the endogenous PLP using another dsRNA against the 3’UTR region (3’UTR PLP RNAi) and expressed EGFP-tagged full-length PLP. Similar to Figure 4D and E, 3’UTR PLP RNAi efficiently depleted endogenous PLP protein and caused a significant reduction in centriole number (Figure 6—figure supplement 2). Since we treated the cells with 3’UTR PLP RNAi for two rounds aiming at a more efficient protein removal, the percentage of cells with reduced centriole number was slightly higher than in former PLP RNAi used for Figure 6. In contrast, when we expressed full-length PLP after PLP depletion, the centriole number defect was rescued, indicating the specific contribution of PLP for centriole formation (Figure 6—figure supplement 2). Moreover, we noticed that expression of full-length PLP in the presence of endogenous PLP induced centriole amplification similar to PACT overexpression (Figure 6—figure supplement 2).

Drosophila pericentrin is required for SAS-6 recruitment and is important for centriole/basal body (BB) elongation in vivo

It is noteworthy that D.Mel cells are a sensitized system in which depletion of centriole components often shows an enhanced phenotype as compared to what is observed in the whole organism (the fly). For example, depletion of Bld10/CEP135 and CP110 by RNAi in D.Mel cells leads to a reduction in centriole number and length, respectively (Carvalho-Santos et al., 2010; Delgehyr et al., 2012), but the Drosophila mutants of these proteins only exhibit mild centriole defects (Carvalho-Santos et al., 2010; Franz et al., 2013; Roque et al., 2012). In previous studies using PLP-mutant flies, centriole number was not reduced, but centrioles were recently observed to be shorter in wing disc cells (Martinez-Campos et al., 2004; Roque et al., 2018), suggesting an underappreciated generic role of PLP in centriole structure.

To further investigate the role of pericentrin in SAS-6 recruitment and centriole biogenesis we focused on fly spermatogenesis, as centrioles are converted to basal bodies to form cilia and elongate to more than 1 μm, becoming highly visible and easy to study. To investigate this, we depleted PLP during centriole assembly and basal body maturation in spermatocytes (PLPRNAi) using Gal4^Bam (Chen and McKearin, 2003; see the timeline in Figure 7A). We studied its consequences in the localization of basal body components and basal body structure and, subsequently, in male fertility (Figure 7). The knockdown of PLP by RNAi did not affect centriole number in sperm cells (Figure 7B and C), suggesting that the STIL/Ana2 pathway recruits sufficient SAS-6 to initiate centriole biogenesis. However, PLP RNAi led to a decrease in centriole length, as observed with the PLP mutant in somatic cells (Roque et al., 2018), and to male infertility. Our laboratory has recently shown that SAS-6 is important for centriole elongation (Jana et al., 2018). We wondered whether PLP is necessary for recruiting a pool of SAS-6 that is needed for centriole elongation. Remarkably, PLP RNAi affected SAS-6 recruitment to the BBs (Figure 7D and E). Altogether, these results indicate that PLP is involved in sperm BB elongation by recruiting SAS-6, a phenotype that is further accentuated in tissue culture cells.

Figure 7

Download asset Open asset

Figure 7—source data 1

The source data to plot the graph in Figure 7C and E.

https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.41418.026

Download elife-41418-fig7-data1-v1.xlsx

The Calmodulin-PACT conserved interaction is likely to constrain the evolution of the PACT domain

We showed that the PACT domain has the capacity to interact with SAS-6 both in fission yeast and Drosophila cells, and the interaction between SAS-6 and pericentrin through PACT contributes to centriole assembly and elongation. It is possible that this interaction is ancestral, linking the two modules, the centriole and the PCM before the split between animals and fungi occurred one billion years ago. However, given the lack of centrioles and the divergence of the PCM in yeasts, we wondered why the PACT domain has retained the SAS-6 interaction surface. We hypothesized that other protein(s) that interact with the same region of the PACT domain as SAS-6, could be constraining the evolution of the interacting surface.

The PACT domain contains two highly conserved calmodulin (CaM)-binding domains (CBD1 and CBD2) (Galletta et al., 2014, Figure 8A). The interaction of pericentrin with calmodulin at the CaM-binding domain is conserved and is important for its function both in animals and yeasts. In Drosophila, this interaction controls the targeting of PLP to the centrosome and is, therefore, critical for its function (Galletta et al., 2014). The interaction of the budding yeast pericentrin, Spc110, with calmodulin, is required for the SPB to nucleate microtubules and to form the spindle (Kilmartin and Goh, 1996; Spang et al., 1996; Stirling et al., 1994; Stirling et al., 1996). Therefore, we asked whether SAS-6 interacts with a conserved PLP segment, starting just before CBD1 and ending just after CBD2, hereafter called CBD (see Figure 8A in yellow). Similarly, as in Figure 5B, we co-expressed EGFP-tagged SAS-6 and the HA-tagged CBD in D.Mel cells to examine their interaction. Indeed, similar to the PACT domain, CBD interacted with SAS-6-EGFP (Figure 8B). This result indicates that this conserved segment within the PACT domain is sufficient for interaction with SAS-6.

Figure 8

Download asset Open asset

Next, we asked whether SAS-6 is present in the same complex with calmodulin. Intriguingly, we found that SAS-6-EGFP, CBD and calmodulin formed a complex (Figure 8B). Since SAS-6-EGFP and calmodulin did not interact directly, we concluded that the complex forms through the CBD segment. Moreover, we observed that the CBD polypeptide was stabilised in the presence of SAS-6-EGFP, and this was more pronounced with the addition of calmodulin, suggesting that formation of this complex might stabilize pericentrin (Figure 8B). Since the binding of SAS-6 and calmodulin to the CBD was not competitive, it is likely that these two proteins interact with adjacent but distinct amino acids within the CBD. Further biochemical analysis will be necessary to estimate the exact stoichiometry of the protein complex.

Our result suggests that the fact that pericentrin function and stability has always relied on its interaction with calmodulin has constrained the evolution of the pericentrin´s CBD’s local structure, therefore retaining its affinity for SAS-6.

In this study, we examined the relationship between the PCM and centriole components, taking advantage of a heterologous system, the fission yeast, which does not have centrioles, and has lost the coding sequences for its components. Surprisingly, the Drosophila core centriole components SAS-6, Bld10 and SAS-4 localized to the fission yeast SPB. In particular, SAS-6 was specifically recruited to the SPB through its interaction with the conserved PCM component, Pcp1/pericentrin, via its PACT domain. Importantly, this interaction was also observed in animals (Drosophila). Further analysis revealed that pericentrin is required for both SAS-6 recruitment to centrioles in addition to the STIL/Ana2 pathway, and for proper centriole assembly, in particular, centriole elongation. It is estimated that animals and fungi diverged from their common ancestor about one billion years ago (Douzery et al., 2004; Parfrey et al., 2011). Our results reveal an evolutionarily conserved relationship between the centriole and the PCM, in which the PCM is needed for centriole component recruitment (Figure 8C). Therefore, the localization of new centrioles is likely to be dictated not just by positive regulatory feedbacks amongst centriole components, but also through the regulation of centriole component localization by the PCM.

All data generated or analysed during this study are included in the manuscript and supporting files. Source data files are provided for Figure 1, Figures 2, Figure 2-figure supplement 1, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 4-figure supplement 1-3, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 6-figure supplement 1-2, and Figure 7.

1. 1. Altschul SF
   2. Gish W
   3. Miller W
   4. Myers EW
   5. Lipman DJ

   (1990) Basic local alignment search tool

   Journal of Molecular Biology 215:403–410.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-2836(05)80360-2

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
2. 1. Arquint C
   2. Sonnen KF
   3. Stierhof YD
   4. Nigg EA

   (2012) Cell-cycle-regulated expression of STIL controls centriole number in human cells

   Journal of Cell Science 125:1342–1352.

   https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.099887

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
3. 1. Arquint C
   2. Gabryjonczyk A-M
   3. Imseng S
   4. Böhm R
   5. Sauer E
   6. Hiller S
   7. Nigg EA
   8. Maier T

   (2015) STIL binding to Polo-box 3 of PLK4 regulates centriole duplication

   eLife 4:e07888.

   https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.07888

   • Google Scholar
4. 1. Arquint C
   2. Nigg EA

   (2016) The PLK4-STIL-SAS-6 module at the core of centriole duplication

   Biochemical Society Transactions 44:1253–1263.

   https://doi.org/10.1042/BST20160116

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
5. 1. Aydogan MG
   2. Wainman A
   3. Saurya S
   4. Steinacker TL
   5. Caballe A
   6. Novak ZA
   7. Baumbach J
   8. Muschalik N
   9. Raff JW

   (2018) A homeostatic clock sets daughter centriole size in flies

   The Journal of Cell Biology 217:1233–1248.

   https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201801014

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
6. 1. Bestul AJ
   2. Yu Z
   3. Unruh JR
   4. Jaspersen SL

   (2017) Molecular model of fission yeast centrosome assembly determined by superresolution imaging

   The Journal of Cell Biology 216:2409–2424.

   https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201701041

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
7. 1. Bettencourt-Dias M
   2. Rodrigues-Martins A
   3. Carpenter L
   4. Riparbelli M
   5. Lehmann L
   6. Gatt MK
   7. Carmo N
   8. Balloux F
   9. Callaini G
   10. Glover DM

   (2005) SAK/PLK4 is required for centriole duplication and flagella development

   Current Biology 15:2199–2207.

   https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2005.11.042

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
8. 1. Bettencourt-Dias M
   2. Glover DM

   (2007) Centrosome biogenesis and function: centrosomics brings new understanding

   Nature Reviews Molecular Cell Biology 8:451–463.

   https://doi.org/10.1038/nrm2180

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
9. 1. Carvalho-Santos Z
   2. Machado P
   3. Branco P
   4. Tavares-Cadete F
   5. Rodrigues-Martins A
   6. Pereira-Leal JB
   7. Bettencourt-Dias M

   (2010) Stepwise evolution of the centriole-assembly pathway

   Journal of Cell Science 123:1414–1426.

   https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.064931

   • PubMed
   • Google Scholar
10. 1. Cavanaugh AM
    2. Jaspersen SL

    (2017) Big lessons from little yeast: budding and fission yeast centrosome structure, duplication, and function

    Annual Review of Genetics 51:361–383.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-genet-120116-024733

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
11. 1. Chang L
    2. Gould KL

    (2000) Sid4p is required to localize components of the septation initiation pathway to the spindle pole body in fission yeast

    PNAS 97:5249–5254.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.10.5249

    • Google Scholar
12. 1. Chen P
    2. Gao R
    3. Chen S
    4. Pu L
    5. Li P
    6. Huang Y
    7. Lu L

    (2012) A pericentrin-related protein homolog in aspergillus nidulans plays important roles in nucleus positioning and cell polarity by affecting microtubule organization

    Eukaryotic Cell 11:1520–1530.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/EC.00203-12

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
13. 1. Chen D
    2. McKearin DM

    (2003) A discrete transcriptional silencer in the bam gene determines asymmetric division of the Drosophila germline stem cell

    Development 130:1159–1170.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/dev.00325

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
14. 1. Cizmecioglu O
    2. Arnold M
    3. Bahtz R
    4. Settele F
    5. Ehret L
    6. Haselmann-Weiss U
    7. Antony C
    8. Hoffmann I

    (2010) Cep152 acts as a scaffold for recruitment of Plk4 and CPAP to the centrosome

    The Journal of Cell Biology 191:731–739.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201007107

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
15. 1. Cottee MA
    2. Raff JW
    3. Lea SM
    4. Roque H

    (2011) SAS-6 oligomerization: the key to the centriole?

    Nature Chemical Biology 7:650–653.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nchembio.660

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
16. 1. Cottee MA
    2. Muschalik N
    3. Johnson S
    4. Leveson J
    5. Raff JW
    6. Lea SM

    (2015) The homo-oligomerisation of both Sas-6 and Ana2 is required for efficient centriole assembly in flies

    eLife 4:e07236.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.07236

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
17. 1. Crivici A
    2. Ikura M

    (1995) Molecular and structural basis of target recognition by calmodulin

    Annual Review of Biophysics and Biomolecular Structure 24:85–116.

    https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.bb.24.060195.000505

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
18. 1. Cunha-Ferreira I
    2. Bento I
    3. Pimenta-Marques A
    4. Jana SC
    5. Lince-Faria M
    6. Duarte P
    7. Borrego-Pinto J
    8. Gilberto S
    9. Amado T
    10. Brito D
    11. Rodrigues-Martins A
    12. Debski J
    13. Dzhindzhev N
    14. Bettencourt-Dias M

    (2013) Regulation of autophosphorylation controls PLK4 self-destruction and centriole number

    Current Biology 23:2245–2254.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2013.09.037

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
19. 1. Dammermann A
    2. Müller-Reichert T
    3. Pelletier L
    4. Habermann B
    5. Desai A
    6. Oegema K

    (2004) Centriole assembly requires both centriolar and pericentriolar material proteins

    Developmental Cell 7:815–829.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2004.10.015

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
20. 1. Delaval B
    2. Doxsey SJ

    (2010) Pericentrin in cellular function and disease

    The Journal of Cell Biology 188:181–190.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200908114

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
21. 1. Delgehyr N
    2. Rangone H
    3. Fu J
    4. Mao G
    5. Tom B
    6. Riparbelli MG
    7. Callaini G
    8. Glover DM

    (2012) Klp10A, a microtubule-depolymerizing kinesin-13, cooperates with CP110 to control Drosophila centriole length

    Current Biology 22:502–509.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2012.01.046

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
22. 1. Dietzl G
    2. Chen D
    3. Schnorrer F
    4. Su KC
    5. Barinova Y
    6. Fellner M
    7. Gasser B
    8. Kinsey K
    9. Oppel S
    10. Scheiblauer S
    11. Couto A
    12. Marra V
    13. Keleman K
    14. Dickson BJ

    (2007) A genome-wide transgenic RNAi library for conditional gene inactivation in Drosophila

    Nature 448:151–156.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05954

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
23. 1. Ding R
    2. West RR
    3. Morphew DM
    4. Oakley BR
    5. McIntosh JR

    (1997) The spindle pole body of Schizosaccharomyces pombe enters and leaves the nuclear envelope as the cell cycle proceeds

    Molecular Biology of the Cell 8:1461–1479.

    https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.8.8.1461

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
24. 1. Dobbelaere J
    2. Josué F
    3. Suijkerbuijk S
    4. Baum B
    5. Tapon N
    6. Raff J

    (2008) A genome-wide RNAi screen to dissect centriole duplication and centrosome maturation in Drosophila

    PLOS Biology 6:e224.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pbio.0060224

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
25. 1. Douzery EJ
    2. Snell EA
    3. Bapteste E
    4. Delsuc F
    5. Philippe H

    (2004) The timing of eukaryotic evolution: does a relaxed molecular clock reconcile proteins and fossils?

    PNAS 101:15386–15391.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0403984101

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
26. 1. Dzhindzhev NS
    2. Yu QD
    3. Weiskopf K
    4. Tzolovsky G
    5. Cunha-Ferreira I
    6. Riparbelli M
    7. Rodrigues-Martins A
    8. Bettencourt-Dias M
    9. Callaini G
    10. Glover DM

    (2010) Asterless is a scaffold for the onset of centriole assembly

    Nature 467:714–718.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/nature09445

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
27. 1. Dzhindzhev NS
    2. Tzolovsky G
    3. Lipinszki Z
    4. Schneider S
    5. Lattao R
    6. Fu J
    7. Debski J
    8. Dadlez M
    9. Glover DM

    (2014) Plk4 phosphorylates Ana2 to trigger Sas6 recruitment and procentriole formation

    Current Biology 24:2526–2532.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2014.08.061

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
28. 1. Elliott S
    2. Knop M
    3. Schlenstedt G
    4. Schiebel E

    (1999) Spc29p is a component of the Spc110p subcomplex and is essential for spindle pole body duplication

    PNAS 96:6205–6210.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.96.11.6205

    • Google Scholar
29. 1. Feng Z
    2. Caballe A
    3. Wainman A
    4. Johnson S
    5. Haensele AFM
    6. Cottee MA
    7. Conduit PT
    8. Lea SM
    9. Raff JW

    (2017) Structural Basis for Mitotic Centrosome Assembly in Flies

    Cell 169:1078–1089.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.030

    • Google Scholar
30. 1. Finn RD
    2. Clements J
    3. Arndt W
    4. Miller BL
    5. Wheeler TJ
    6. Schreiber F
    7. Bateman A
    8. Eddy SR

    (2015) HMMER web server: 2015 update

    Nucleic Acids Research 43:W30–W38.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkv397

    • Google Scholar
31. 1. Flory MR
    2. Morphew M
    3. Joseph JD
    4. Means AR
    5. Davis TN

    (2002)

    Pcp1p, an Spc110p-related calmodulin target at the centrosome of the fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe

    Cell Growth & Differentiation : The Molecular Biology Journal of the American Association for Cancer Research 13:47–58.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
32. 1. Fong CS
    2. Sato M
    3. Toda T

    (2010) Fission yeast Pcp1 links polo kinase-mediated mitotic entry to gamma-tubulin-dependent spindle formation

    The EMBO Journal 29:120–130.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2009.331

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
33. 1. Franz A
    2. Roque H
    3. Saurya S
    4. Dobbelaere J
    5. Raff JW

    (2013) CP110 exhibits novel regulatory activities during centriole assembly in Drosophila

    The Journal of Cell Biology 203:785–799.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201305109

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
34. 1. Fu J
    2. Hagan IM
    3. Glover DM

    (2015) The centrosome and its duplication cycle

    Cold Spring Harbor Perspectives in Biology 7:a015800.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/cshperspect.a015800

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
35. 1. Galletta BJ
    2. Guillen RX
    3. Fagerstrom CJ
    4. Brownlee CW
    5. Lerit DA
    6. Megraw TL
    7. Rogers GC
    8. Rusan NM

    (2014) Drosophila pericentrin requires interaction with calmodulin for its function at Centrosomes and neuronal basal bodies but not at sperm basal bodies

    Molecular Biology of the Cell 25:2682–2694.

    https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e13-10-0617

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
36. 1. Galletta BJ
    2. Fagerstrom CJ
    3. Schoborg TA
    4. McLamarrah TA
    5. Ryniawec JM
    6. Buster DW
    7. Slep KC
    8. Rogers GC
    9. Rusan NM

    (2016) A centrosome interactome provides insight into organelle assembly and reveals a non-duplication role for Plk4

    Nature Communications 7:12476.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms12476

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
37. 1. Geiser JR
    2. Sundberg HA
    3. Chang BH
    4. Muller EG
    5. Davis TN

    (1993) The essential mitotic target of calmodulin is the 110-kilodalton component of the spindle pole body in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

    Molecular and Cellular Biology 13:7913–7924.

    https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.13.12.7913

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
38. 1. Gillingham AK
    2. Munro S

    (2000) The PACT domain, a conserved centrosomal targeting motif in the coiled-coil proteins AKAP450 and pericentrin

    EMBO Reports 1:524–529.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/embo-reports/kvd105

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
39. 1. Gopalakrishnan J
    2. Mennella V
    3. Blachon S
    4. Zhai B
    5. Smith AH
    6. Megraw TL
    7. Nicastro D
    8. Gygi SP
    9. Agard DA
    10. Avidor-Reiss T

    (2011) Sas-4 provides a scaffold for cytoplasmic complexes and tethers them in a centrosome

    Nature Communications 2:359.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms1367

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
40. 1. Goshima G
    2. Wollman R
    3. Goodwin SS
    4. Zhang N
    5. Scholey JM
    6. Vale RD
    7. Stuurman N

    (2007) Genes required for mitotic spindle assembly in Drosophila S2 cells

    Science 316:417–421.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1141314

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
41. 1. Guichard P
    2. Hamel V
    3. Le Guennec M
    4. Banterle N
    5. Iacovache I
    6. Nemčíková V
    7. Flückiger I
    8. Goldie KN
    9. Stahlberg H
    10. Lévy D
    11. Zuber B
    12. Gönczy P

    (2017) Cell-free reconstitution reveals centriole cartwheel assembly mechanisms

    Nature Communications 8:14813.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms14813

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
42. 1. Hagan I
    2. Yanagida M

    (1990) Novel potential mitotic motor protein encoded by the fission yeast cut7+ gene

    Nature 347:563–566.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/347563a0

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
43. 1. Hatch EM
    2. Kulukian A
    3. Holland AJ
    4. Cleveland DW
    5. Stearns T

    (2010) Cep152 interacts with Plk4 and is required for centriole duplication

    The Journal of Cell Biology 191:721–729.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201006049

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
44. 1. Hilbert M
    2. Noga A
    3. Frey D
    4. Hamel V
    5. Guichard P
    6. Kraatz SH
    7. Pfreundschuh M
    8. Hosner S
    9. Flückiger I
    10. Jaussi R
    11. Wieser MM
    12. Thieltges KM
    13. Deupi X
    14. Müller DJ
    15. Kammerer RA
    16. Gönczy P
    17. Hirono M
    18. Steinmetz MO

    (2016) SAS-6 engineering reveals interdependence between cartwheel and microtubules in determining centriole architecture

    Nature Cell Biology 18:393–403.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb3329

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
45. 1. Hodges ME
    2. Scheumann N
    3. Wickstead B
    4. Langdale JA
    5. Gull K

    (2010) Reconstructing the evolutionary history of the centriole from protein components

    Journal of Cell Science 123:1407–1413.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.064873

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
46. 1. Ito D
    2. Bettencourt-Dias M

    (2018) Centrosome remodelling in evolution

    Cells 7:71.

    https://doi.org/10.3390/cells7070071

    • Google Scholar
47. 1. Izquierdo D
    2. Wang WJ
    3. Uryu K
    4. Tsou MF

    (2014) Stabilization of cartwheel-less centrioles for duplication requires CEP295-mediated centriole-to-centrosome conversion

    Cell Reports 8:957–965.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.celrep.2014.07.022

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
48. 1. Jana SC
    2. Mendonça S
    3. Werner S
    4. Bettencourt-Dias M

    (2016) Methods to study centrosomes and cilia in Drosophila

    Methods in Molecular Biology 1454:215–236.

    https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4939-3789-9_14

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
49. 1. Jana SC
    2. Mendonça S
    3. Machado P
    4. Werner S
    5. Rocha J
    6. Pereira A
    7. Maiato H
    8. Bettencourt-Dias M

    (2018) Differential regulation of transition zone and centriole proteins contributes to ciliary base diversity

    Nature Cell Biology 20:928–941.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/s41556-018-0132-1

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
50. 1. Kachroo AH
    2. Laurent JM
    3. Yellman CM
    4. Meyer AG
    5. Wilke CO
    6. Marcotte EM

    (2015) Evolution. systematic humanization of yeast genes reveals conserved functions and genetic modularity

    Science 348:921–925.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaa0769

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
51. 1. Kantaputra P
    2. Tanpaiboon P
    3. Porntaveetus T
    4. Ohazama A
    5. Sharpe P
    6. Rauch A
    7. Hussadaloy A
    8. Thiel CT

    (2011) The smallest teeth in the world are caused by mutations in the PCNT gene

    American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A 155:1398–1403.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.33984

    • Google Scholar
52. 1. Keller D
    2. Orpinell M
    3. Olivier N
    4. Wachsmuth M
    5. Mahen R
    6. Wyss R
    7. Hachet V
    8. Ellenberg J
    9. Manley S
    10. Gönczy P

    (2014) Mechanisms of HsSAS-6 assembly promoting centriole formation in human cells

    The Journal of Cell Biology 204:697–712.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201307049

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
53. 1. Keryer G
    2. Witczak O
    3. Delouvée A
    4. Kemmner WA
    5. Rouillard D
    6. Tasken K
    7. Bornens M

    (2003) Dissociating the centrosomal matrix protein AKAP450 from centrioles impairs centriole duplication and cell cycle progression

    Molecular Biology of the Cell 14:2436–2446.

    https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e02-09-0614

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
54. 1. Khan MA
    2. Rupp VM
    3. Orpinell M
    4. Hussain MS
    5. Altmüller J
    6. Steinmetz MO
    7. Enzinger C
    8. Thiele H
    9. Höhne W
    10. Nürnberg G
    11. Baig SM
    12. Ansar M
    13. Nürnberg P
    14. Vincent JB
    15. Speicher MR
    16. Gönczy P
    17. Windpassinger C

    (2014) A missense mutation in the PISA domain of HsSAS-6 causes autosomal recessive primary microcephaly in a large consanguineous pakistani family

    Human Molecular Genetics 23:5940–5949.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/hmg/ddu318

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
55. 1. Khodjakov A
    2. Rieder CL
    3. Sluder G
    4. Cassels G
    5. Sibon O
    6. Wang CL

    (2002) De novo formation of centrosomes in vertebrate cells arrested during S phase

    The Journal of Cell Biology 158:1171–1181.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200205102

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
56. 1. Kilmartin JV
    2. Dyos SL
    3. Kershaw D
    4. Finch JT

    (1993) A spacer protein in the Saccharomyces cerevisiae spindle poly body whose transcript is cell cycle-regulated

    The Journal of Cell Biology 123:1175–1184.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.123.5.1175

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
57. 1. Kilmartin JV

    (2003) Sfi1p has conserved centrin-binding sites and an essential function in budding yeast spindle pole body duplication

    The Journal of Cell Biology 162:1211–1221.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200307064

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
58. 1. Kilmartin JV

    (2014) Lessons from yeast: the spindle pole body and the centrosome

    Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 369:20130456.

    https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2013.0456

    • Google Scholar
59. 1. Kilmartin JV
    2. Goh PY

    (1996) Spc110p: assembly properties and role in the connection of nuclear microtubules to the yeast spindle pole body

    The EMBO Journal 15:4592–4602.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1996.tb00837.x

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
60. 1. Kitagawa D
    2. Vakonakis I
    3. Olieric N
    4. Hilbert M
    5. Keller D
    6. Olieric V
    7. Bortfeld M
    8. Erat MC
    9. Flückiger I
    10. Gönczy P
    11. Steinmetz MO

    (2011) Structural basis of the 9-fold symmetry of centrioles

    Cell 144:364–375.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2011.01.008

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
61. 1. Kohlmaier G
    2. Loncarek J
    3. Meng X
    4. McEwen BF
    5. Mogensen MM
    6. Spektor A
    7. Dynlacht BD
    8. Khodjakov A
    9. Gönczy P

    (2009) Overly long centrioles and defective cell division upon excess of the SAS-4-related protein CPAP

    Current Biology 19:1012–1018.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.018

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
62. 1. Krämer A
    2. Neben K
    3. Ho AD

    (2005) Centrosome aberrations in hematological malignancies

    Cell Biology International 29:375–383.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cellbi.2005.03.004

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
63. 1. Krapp A
    2. Schmidt S
    3. Cano E
    4. Simanis V

    (2001) S. pombe cdc11p, together with sid4p, provides an anchor for septation initiation network proteins on the spindle pole body

    Current Biology 11:1559–1568.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00478-X

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
64. 1. Lawo S
    2. Hasegan M
    3. Gupta GD
    4. Pelletier L

    (2012) Subdiffraction imaging of centrosomes reveals higher-order organizational features of pericentriolar material

    Nature Cell Biology 14:1148–1158.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2591

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
65. 1. Lee MG
    2. Nurse P

    (1987) Complementation used to clone a human homologue of the fission yeast cell cycle control gene cdc2

    Nature 327:31–35.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/327031a0

    • Google Scholar
66. 1. Leidel S
    2. Delattre M
    3. Cerutti L
    4. Baumer K
    5. Gönczy P

    (2005) SAS-6 defines a protein family required for centrosome duplication in C. elegans and in human cells

    Nature Cell Biology 7:115–125.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1220

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
67. 1. Lim HH
    2. Zhang T
    3. Surana U

    (2009) Regulation of centrosome separation in yeast and vertebrates: common threads

    Trends in Cell Biology 19:325–333.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2009.03.008

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
68. 1. Lin YC
    2. Chang CW
    3. Hsu WB
    4. Tang CJ
    5. Lin YN
    6. Chou EJ
    7. Wu CT
    8. Tang TK

    (2013) Human microcephaly protein CEP135 binds to hSAS-6 and CPAP, and is required for centriole assembly

    The EMBO Journal 32:1141–1154.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2013.56

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
69. 1. Lin TC
    2. Neuner A
    3. Schlosser YT
    4. Scharf AN
    5. Weber L
    6. Schiebel E

    (2014) Cell-cycle dependent phosphorylation of yeast pericentrin regulates γ-TuSC-mediated microtubule nucleation

    eLife 3:e02208.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.02208

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
70. 1. Loncarek J
    2. Hergert P
    3. Magidson V
    4. Khodjakov A

    (2008) Control of daughter centriole formation by the pericentriolar material

    Nature Cell Biology 10:322–328.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1694

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
71. 1. Lopes CA
    2. Jana SC
    3. Cunha-Ferreira I
    4. Zitouni S
    5. Bento I
    6. Duarte P
    7. Gilberto S
    8. Freixo F
    9. Guerrero A
    10. Francia M
    11. Lince-Faria M
    12. Carneiro J
    13. Bettencourt-Dias M

    (2015) PLK4 trans-Autoactivation controls centriole biogenesis in space

    Developmental Cell 35:222–235.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2015.09.020

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
72. 1. Lucas EP
    2. Raff JW

    (2007) Maintaining the proper connection between the centrioles and the pericentriolar matrix requires Drosophila centrosomin

    The Journal of Cell Biology 178:725–732.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200704081

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
73. 1. Martinez-Campos M
    2. Basto R
    3. Baker J
    4. Kernan M
    5. Raff JW

    (2004) The Drosophila pericentrin-like protein is essential for cilia/flagella function, but appears to be dispensable for mitosis

    The Journal of Cell Biology 165:673–683.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.200402130

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
74. 1. Matsuyama A
    2. Shirai A
    3. Yoshida M

    (2008) A series of promoters for constitutive expression of heterologous genes in fission yeast

    Yeast 25:371–376.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/yea.1593

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
75. 1. Maundrell K

    (1990)

    nmt1 of fission yeast. A highly transcribed gene completely repressed by thiamine

    The Journal of Biological Chemistry 265:10857–10864.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
76. 1. McLaughlin DJ
    2. Healy RA
    3. Celio GJ
    4. Roberson RW
    5. Kumar TK

    (2015) Evolution of zygomycetous spindle pole bodies: evidence from Coemansia reversa mitosis

    American Journal of Botany 102:707–717.

    https://doi.org/10.3732/ajb.1400477

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
77. 1. McWilliam H
    2. Li W
    3. Uludag M
    4. Squizzato S
    5. Park YM
    6. Buso N
    7. Cowley AP
    8. Lopez R

    (2013) Analysis tool web services from the EMBL-EBI

    Nucleic Acids Research 41:W597–W600.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkt376

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
78. 1. Megraw TL
    2. Kao LR
    3. Kaufman TC

    (2001) Zygotic development without functional mitotic centrosomes

    Current Biology 11:116–120.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/S0960-9822(01)00017-3

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
79. 1. Megraw TL
    2. Sharkey JT
    3. Nowakowski RS

    (2011) Cdk5rap2 exposes the centrosomal root of microcephaly syndromes

    Trends in Cell Biology 21:470–480.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcb.2011.04.007

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
80. 1. Mennella V
    2. Keszthelyi B
    3. McDonald KL
    4. Chhun B
    5. Kan F
    6. Rogers GC
    7. Huang B
    8. Agard DA

    (2012) Subdiffraction-resolution fluorescence microscopy reveals a domain of the centrosome critical for pericentriolar material organization

    Nature Cell Biology 14:1159–1168.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb2597

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
81. 1. Moreno S
    2. Klar A
    3. Nurse P

    (1991) Molecular genetic analysis of fission yeast Schizosaccharomyces pombe

    Methods in Enzymology 194:795–823.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/0076-6879(91)94059-l

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
82. 1. Moser MJ
    2. Flory MR
    3. Davis TN

    (1997)

    Calmodulin localizes to the spindle pole body of Schizosaccharomyces pombe and performs an essential function in chromosome segregation

    Journal of Cell Science 110:1805–1812.

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
83. 1. Moyer TC
    2. Clutario KM
    3. Lambrus BG
    4. Daggubati V
    5. Holland AJ

    (2015) Binding of STIL to Plk4 activates kinase activity to promote centriole assembly

    The Journal of Cell Biology 209:863–878.

    https://doi.org/10.1083/jcb.201502088

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
84. 1. Nakazawa Y
    2. Hiraki M
    3. Kamiya R
    4. Hirono M

    (2007) SAS-6 is a cartwheel protein that establishes the 9-fold symmetry of the centriole

    Current Biology 17:2169–2174.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.11.046

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
85. 1. Neben K
    2. Tews B
    3. Wrobel G
    4. Hahn M
    5. Kokocinski F
    6. Giesecke C
    7. Krause U
    8. Ho AD
    9. Krämer A
    10. Lichter P

    (2004) Gene expression patterns in acute myeloid leukemia correlate with centrosome aberrations and numerical chromosome changes

    Oncogene 23:2379–2384.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.onc.1207401

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
86. 1. Ohta M
    2. Ashikawa T
    3. Nozaki Y
    4. Kozuka-Hata H
    5. Goto H
    6. Inagaki M
    7. Oyama M
    8. Kitagawa D

    (2014) Direct interaction of Plk4 with STIL ensures formation of a single procentriole per parental centriole

    Nature Communications 5:5267.

    https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms6267

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
87. 1. Osborn MJ
    2. Miller JR

    (2007) Rescuing yeast mutants with human genes

    Briefings in Functional Genomics and Proteomics 6:104–111.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/bfgp/elm017

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
88. 1. Paoletti A
    2. Bordes N
    3. Haddad R
    4. Schwartz CL
    5. Chang F
    6. Bornens M

    (2003) Fission yeast cdc31p is a component of the half-bridge and controls SPB duplication

    Molecular Biology of the Cell 14:2793–2808.

    https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e02-10-0661

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
89. 1. Parfrey LW
    2. Lahr DJ
    3. Knoll AH
    4. Katz LA

    (2011) Estimating the timing of early eukaryotic diversification with multigene molecular clocks

    PNAS 108:13624–13629.

    https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1110633108

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
90. 1. Peel N
    2. Stevens NR
    3. Basto R
    4. Raff JW

    (2007) Overexpressing centriole-replication proteins in vivo induces centriole overduplication and de novo formation

    Current Biology 17:834–843.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.04.036

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
91. 1. Perkins LA
    2. Holderbaum L
    3. Tao R
    4. Hu Y
    5. Sopko R
    6. McCall K
    7. Yang-Zhou D
    8. Flockhart I
    9. Binari R
    10. Shim HS
    11. Miller A
    12. Housden A
    13. Foos M
    14. Randkelv S
    15. Kelley C
    16. Namgyal P
    17. Villalta C
    18. Liu LP
    19. Jiang X
    20. Huan-Huan Q
    21. Wang X
    22. Fujiyama A
    23. Toyoda A
    24. Ayers K
    25. Blum A
    26. Czech B
    27. Neumuller R
    28. Yan D
    29. Cavallaro A
    30. Hibbard K
    31. Hall D
    32. Cooley L
    33. Hannon GJ
    34. Lehmann R
    35. Parks A
    36. Mohr SE
    37. Ueda R
    38. Kondo S
    39. Ni JQ
    40. Perrimon N

    (2015) The transgenic RNAi project at Harvard medical school: resources and validation

    Genetics 201:843–852.

    https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.115.180208

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
92. 1. Petersen J
    2. Russell P

    (2016) Growth and the environment of Schizosaccharomyces pombe

    Cold Spring Harbor Protocols 2016:pdb.top079764.

    https://doi.org/10.1101/pdb.top079764

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
93. 1. Pimenta-Marques A
    2. Bento I
    3. Lopes CA
    4. Duarte P
    5. Jana SC
    6. Bettencourt-Dias M

    (2016) A mechanism for the elimination of the female gamete centrosome in Drosophila melanogaster

    Science 353:aaf4866.

    https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aaf4866

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
94. 1. Powell MJ

    (1980) Mitosis in the aquatic fungus rhizophydium spherotheca (CHYTRIDIALES)

    American Journal of Botany 67:839–853.

    https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1537-2197.1980.tb07713.x

    • Google Scholar
95. 1. Rodrigues-Martins A
    2. Bettencourt-Dias M
    3. Riparbelli M
    4. Ferreira C
    5. Ferreira I
    6. Callaini G
    7. Glover DM

    (2007) DSAS-6 organizes a tube-like centriole precursor, and its absence suggests modularity in centriole assembly

    Current Biology 17:1465–1472.

    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2007.07.034

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
96. 1. Rogala KB
    2. Dynes NJ
    3. Hatzopoulos GN
    4. Yan J
    5. Pong SK
    6. Robinson CV
    7. Deane CM
    8. Gönczy P
    9. Vakonakis I

    (2015) The Caenorhabditis elegans protein SAS-5 forms large oligomeric assemblies critical for centriole formation

    eLife 4:e07410.

    https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.07410

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
97. 1. Ronquist F
    2. Huelsenbeck JP

    (2003) MrBayes 3: Bayesian phylogenetic inference under mixed models

    Bioinformatics 19:1572–1574.

    https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btg180

    • Google Scholar
98. 1. Roque H
    2. Wainman A
    3. Richens J
    4. Kozyrska K
    5. Franz A
    6. Raff JW

    (2012) Drosophila Cep135/Bld10 maintains proper centriole structure but is dispensable for cartwheel formation

    Journal of Cell Science 125:5881–5886.

    https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.113506

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
99. 1. Roque H
    2. Saurya S
    3. Pratt MB
    4. Johnson E
    5. Raff JW

    (2018) Drosophila PLP assembles pericentriolar clouds that promote centriole stability, cohesion and MT nucleation

    PLOS Genetics 14:e1007198.

    https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgen.1007198

    • PubMed
    • Google Scholar
100. 1. Rosenberg JA
     2. Tomlin GC
     3. McDonald WH
     4. Snydsman BE
     5. Muller EG
     6. Yates JR
     7. Gould KL

     (2006) Ppc89 links multiple proteins, including the septation initiation network, to the core of the fission yeast spindle-pole body

     Molecular Biology of the Cell 17:3793–3805.

     https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.e06-01-0039

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
101. 1. Rüthnick D
     2. Schiebel E

     (2016) Duplication of the yeast spindle pole body once per cell cycle

     Molecular and Cellular Biology 36:1324–1331.

     https://doi.org/10.1128/MCB.00048-16

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
102. 1. Samejima I
     2. Miller VJ
     3. Rincon SA
     4. Sawin KE

     (2010) Fission yeast Mto1 regulates diversity of cytoplasmic microtubule organizing centers

     Current Biology 20:1959–1965.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2010.10.006

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
103. 1. Schmidt TI
     2. Kleylein-Sohn J
     3. Westendorf J
     4. Le Clech M
     5. Lavoie SB
     6. Stierhof YD
     7. Nigg EA

     (2009) Control of centriole length by CPAP and CP110

     Current Biology 19:1005–1011.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.05.016

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
104. 1. Sonnen KF
     2. Gabryjonczyk AM
     3. Anselm E
     4. Stierhof YD
     5. Nigg EA

     (2013) Human Cep192 and Cep152 cooperate in Plk4 recruitment and centriole duplication

     Journal of Cell Science 126:3223–3233.

     https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.129502

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
105. 1. Spang A
     2. Grein K
     3. Schiebel E

     (1996)

     The spacer protein Spc110p targets calmodulin to the central plaque of the yeast spindle pole body

     Journal of Cell Science 109:2229–2237.

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
106. 1. Stevens NR
     2. Roque H
     3. Raff JW

     (2010) DSas-6 and Ana2 coassemble into tubules to promote centriole duplication and engagement

     Developmental Cell 19:913–919.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2010.11.010

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
107. 1. Stirling DA
     2. Welch KA
     3. Stark MJ

     (1994) Interaction with calmodulin is required for the function of Spc110p, an essential component of the yeast spindle pole body

     The EMBO Journal 13:4329–4342.

     https://doi.org/10.1002/j.1460-2075.1994.tb06753.x

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
108. 1. Stirling DA
     2. Rayner TF
     3. Prescott AR
     4. Stark MJ

     (1996)

     Mutations which block the binding of calmodulin to Spc110p cause multiple mitotic defects

     Journal of Cell Science 109:1297–1310.

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
109. 1. Strnad P
     2. Leidel S
     3. Vinogradova T
     4. Euteneuer U
     5. Khodjakov A
     6. Gönczy P

     (2007) Regulated HsSAS-6 levels ensure formation of a single procentriole per centriole during the centrosome duplication cycle

     Developmental Cell 13:203–213.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.devcel.2007.07.004

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
110. 1. Tang CJ
     2. Fu RH
     3. Wu KS
     4. Hsu WB
     5. Tang TK

     (2009) CPAP is a cell-cycle regulated protein that controls centriole length

     Nature Cell Biology 11:825–831.

     https://doi.org/10.1038/ncb1889

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
111. 1. Tang CJ
     2. Lin SY
     3. Hsu WB
     4. Lin YN
     5. Wu CT
     6. Lin YC
     7. Chang CW
     8. Wu KS
     9. Tang TK

     (2011) The human microcephaly protein STIL interacts with CPAP and is required for procentriole formation

     The EMBO Journal 30:4790–4804.

     https://doi.org/10.1038/emboj.2011.378

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
112. 1. Tang NH
     2. Okada N
     3. Fong CS
     4. Arai K
     5. Sato M
     6. Toda T

     (2014) Targeting Alp7/TACC to the spindle pole body is essential for mitotic spindle assembly in fission yeast

     FEBS Letters 588:2814–2821.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.febslet.2014.06.027

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
113. 1. van Breugel M
     2. Hirono M
     3. Andreeva A
     4. Yanagisawa HA
     5. Yamaguchi S
     6. Nakazawa Y
     7. Morgner N
     8. Petrovich M
     9. Ebong IO
     10. Robinson CV
     11. Johnson CM
     12. Veprintsev D
     13. Zuber B

     (2011) Structures of SAS-6 suggest its organization in centrioles

     Science 331:1196–1199.

     https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1199325

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
114. 1. Vulprecht J
     2. David A
     3. Tibelius A
     4. Castiel A
     5. Konotop G
     6. Liu F
     7. Bestvater F
     8. Raab MS
     9. Zentgraf H
     10. Izraeli S
     11. Krämer A

     (2012) STIL is required for centriole duplication in human cells

     Journal of Cell Science 125:1353–1362.

     https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.104109

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
115. 1. Wälde S
     2. King MC

     (2014) The KASH protein Kms2 coordinates mitotic remodeling of the spindle pole body

     Journal of Cell Science 127:3625–3640.

     https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.154997

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
116. 1. Waterhouse AM
     2. Procter JB
     3. Martin DM
     4. Clamp M
     5. Barton GJ

     (2009) Jalview version 2--a multiple sequence alignment editor and analysis workbench

     Bioinformatics 25:1189–1191.

     https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btp033

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar
117. 1. Woodruff JB
     2. Ferreira Gomes B
     3. Widlund PO
     4. Mahamid J
     5. Honigmann A
     6. Hyman AA

     (2017) The centrosome is a selective condensate that nucleates microtubules by concentrating tubulin

     Cell 169:1066–1077.

     https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cell.2017.05.028

     • PubMed
     • Google Scholar

Author details

1. Daisuke Ito

   Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Validation, Investigation, Visualization, Methodology, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing, Created fission yeast strains, Performed fission yeast experiments, Performed bioinformatics analyses, Performed cell biology in D.Mel cells and biochemistry experiments, Performed super-resolution imaging, Conceived the study, Analyzed data

   For correspondence

   itodaisuke1982@gmail.com

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-6759-0901

2. Sihem Zitouni

   Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal

   Contribution

   Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Performed cell biology in D.Mel cells and biochemistry experiments

   Contributed equally with

   Swadhin Chandra Jana

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

3. Swadhin Chandra Jana

   Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal

   Contribution

   Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Performed super-resolution imaging, Performed Drosophila experiments

   Contributed equally with

   Sihem Zitouni

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8311-3849

4. Paulo Duarte

   Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal

   Contribution

   Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Created fission yeast strains

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

5. Jaroslaw Surkont

   Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal

   Contribution

   Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Performed bioinformatics analyses

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

6. Zita Carvalho-Santos

   Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal

   Present address

   Champalimaud Centre for the Unknown, Lisbon, Portugal

   Contribution

   Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Created fission yeast strains, Contributed to the conception

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

7. José B Pereira-Leal

   1. Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal
   2. Ophiomics, Precision Medicine, Lisboa, Portugal

   Contribution

   Supervision, Contributed to the conception

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

8. Miguel Godinho Ferreira

   1. Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal
   2. Institute for Research on Cancer and Aging of Nice (IRCAN), INSERM U1081 UMR7284 CNRS, Nice, France

   Contribution

   Supervision, Contributed to the conception

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0002-8363-7183

9. Mónica Bettencourt-Dias

   Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciência, Oeiras, Portugal

   Contribution

   Conceptualization, Supervision, Funding acquisition, Writing—original draft, Writing—review and editing, Conceived the study, Analyzed data

   For correspondence

   mdias@igc.gulbenkian.pt

   Competing interests

   No competing interests declared

   "This ORCID iD identifies the author of this article:" 0000-0003-1987-5598

• 2,633

  views

• 352

  downloads

• 21

  citations

Views, downloads and citations are aggregated across all versions of this paper published by eLife.