Habitat use, preference and utilization distribution of two crane species (Genus: Grus) in Huize National Nature Reserve, Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau, China
- Published
- Accepted
- Subject Areas
- Biogeography, Conservation Biology
- Keywords
- Grus grus, Grus nigricollis, habitat use, spatial distribution, threatened species, coexistence
- Copyright
- © 2017 Kong et al.
- Licence
- This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, reproduction and adaptation in any medium and for any purpose provided that it is properly attributed. For attribution, the original author(s), title, publication source (PeerJ Preprints) and either DOI or URL of the article must be cited.
- Cite this article
- 2017. Habitat use, preference and utilization distribution of two crane species (Genus: Grus) in Huize National Nature Reserve, Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau, China. PeerJ Preprints 5:e3387v1 https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.3387v1
Abstract
Understanding habitat use and spatial distribution of wildlife could help conservationists determine high-priority areas and enhance conservation efforts. In this study, we studied habitat use, preference and utilization distribution of two Gruidae species (Black-necked Cranes Grus nigricollis and Eurasian Cranes G. grus) in Huize National Natural Reserve, Yunnan-Guizhou Plateau, SW China. Line transect method indicated that the anthropogenic habitat of farmland was utilized the most by these two species (>90% of flocks observed for both). But Black-necked Cranes preferred marsh to farmland and grassland while Eurasian Cranes favored grassland in our study. Nearly all the Black-necked Cranes (99.30% of the flocks observed) utilized habitats in the core area of the reserve, covering an area of 283.84 ha close to the common roost. Eurasian Cranes were mostly (55.39% of the flocks observed) distributed in the buffer zone with higher elevation and further distance to the roost, covering an area of 558.73 ha. We believe that our findings could help guide habitat management, functional zoning planning and adjustment in the future. According to our results, we recommended restoration of more wetlands, retain large areas of farmland, and protect the areas that cranes use most frequently.
Author Comment
This is a submission to PeerJ for review.