NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Additional Information

Competing Interests

Marta Matos Lopes is currently employed by Hearbase Ltd, Hearing Specialist, Kent, United Kingdom.

Author Contributions

Leanne Nagels conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, approved the final draft.

Etienne Gaudrain conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Debi Vickers authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Marta Matos Lopes performed the experiments, approved the final draft.

Petra Hendriks authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Deniz Başkent conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

Ethical approval of the study was given by the Medical Ethical Review Committee of the University Medical Center Groningen (METc 2016.689).

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

Data will be made available via Dataverse NL.

Funding

This work was funded by the Center for Language Cognition Groningen (CLCG), a VICI Grant from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) and the Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) (Grant No. 918-17-603), the Medical Research Council (Senior Fellowship Grant S002537/1), and framework of the LabEx CeLyA (“Centre Lyonnais d’Acoustique”, ANR-10-LABX-0060/ANR-11-IDEX-0007), and the French National Research Agency The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads