NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

The statistical file for doing One-Way ANOVA

The numbers from 1 to 29 present the mobile apps. From 1 to 5 in the second column present the anti-patterns group in each app with order (Attributes anti-patterns, Namespace anti-Patterns, Operation anti-patterns, Association anti-patterns, and Class anti-patterns). This table is for doing the one-way ANOVA test using SPSS.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27633v1/supp-1

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Eman K. Elsayed conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, performed the computation work, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Kamal A. ElDahshan conceived and designed the experiments, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Enas E. El-Sharawy conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, performed the computation work.

Naglaa E. Ghannam conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, performed the computation work.

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The features of the downloaded mobile apps and the detected anti-patterns are provided in the supplementary statistical file. The file shows the relation between the detected anti-patterns and the detection tools. Also, the relation between anti-patterns groups and the detection tools

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads