NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Study 1 - Minimal Group Design: rejection rates etc

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27564v1/supp-1

Study 2 - Political Party Supporters: rejection rates etc

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27564v1/supp-2

Study 2 - restructured rejection rates for trend analysis

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.27564v1/supp-3

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Luise Reimers conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Eli Kappo performed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Lucas Stadler performed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Mostafa Yaqubi performed the experiments, analyzed the data, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Esther K Diekhof conceived and designed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Human Ethics

The following information was supplied relating to ethical approvals (i.e., approving body and any reference numbers):

This study was approved by the local ethics committee (Aerztekammer Hamburg; Ethical Application Ref: PV3948).

Data Deposition

The following information was supplied regarding data availability:

The raw data are provided in the supplementary files

This includes 3 files:

- Study1_RejectionsratesETC_MinimalGroupDesign

- Study2_Rejectionrates_RestructuredForTrendanalysis

- Study2_RejectionRatesETC_PoliticalPartySupporters

Funding

The authors received no funding for this work.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads