NOT PEER-REVIEWED
"PeerJ Preprints" is a venue for early communication or feedback before peer review. Data may be preliminary.

A peer-reviewed article of this Preprint also exists.

View peer-reviewed version

Supplemental Information

Table S1 & Table S2. Inferred APP and STK16 modulated triplets and their modulation categories

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26482v1/supp-1

raw code

This file recodes the code we used to process raw data in this study

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26482v1/supp-2

raw data

This raw data is splicing profile of all splicing events.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26482v1/supp-3

raw data

It lists all the targets information of all the transcription factors

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26482v1/supp-4

raw data

It lists all the candidate splicing events of ELK1

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26482v1/supp-5

raw data

It lists all the targets of ELK1

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26482v1/supp-6

raw data

The whole gene expression profile is too big to submit. So we separate it into five sub-files. This is the first part of gene expression profile.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26482v1/supp-7

raw data

The whole gene expression profile is too big to submit. So we separate it into five sub-files. This is the second part of gene expression profile.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26482v1/supp-8

raw data

The whole gene expression profile is too big to submit. So we separate it into five sub-files. This is the thir part of gene expression profile.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26482v1/supp-9

raw data

The whole gene expression profile is too big to submit. So we separate it into five sub-files. This is the fourt part of gene expression profile.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26482v1/supp-10

raw data

The whole gene expression profile is too big to submit. So we separate it into five sub-files. This is the fifth part of gene expression profile.

DOI: 10.7287/peerj.preprints.26482v1/supp-11

Additional Information

Competing Interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author Contributions

Jin Li performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Yang Wang conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, prepared figures and/or tables, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Xianglian Meng analyzed the data, contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Hong Liang conceived and designed the experiments, authored or reviewed drafts of the paper, approved the final draft.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 61773134] and the Youth Science Fund of Heilongjiang Province of China [grant number QC2017079]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.


Add your feedback

Before adding feedback, consider if it can be asked as a question instead, and if so then use the Question tab. Pointing out typos is fine, but authors are encouraged to accept only substantially helpful feedback.

Some Markdown syntax is allowed: _italic_ **bold** ^superscript^ ~subscript~ %%blockquote%% [link text](link URL)
 
By posting this you agree to PeerJ's commenting policies
  Visitors   Views   Downloads