Fragments and Assemblages Forming Compilations of Medieval London
by Arthur Bahr
University of Chicago Press, 2013
Cloth: 978-0-226-92491-5 | Paper: 978-0-226-26940-5 | Electronic: 978-0-226-92492-2
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226924922.001.0001
ABOUT THIS BOOKAUTHOR BIOGRAPHYREVIEWSTABLE OF CONTENTS

ABOUT THIS BOOK

In Fragments and Assemblages, Arthur Bahr expands the ways in which we interpret medieval manuscripts, examining the formal characteristics of both physical manuscripts and literary works. Specifically, Bahr argues that manuscript compilations from fourteenth-century London reward interpretation as both assemblages and fragments: as meaningfully constructed objects whose forms and textual contents shed light on the city’s literary, social, and political cultures, but also as artifacts whose physical fragmentation invites forms of literary criticism that were unintended by their medieval makers. Such compilations are not simply repositories of data to be used for the reconstruction of the distant past; their physical forms reward literary and aesthetic analysis in their own right. The compilations analyzed reflect the full vibrancy of fourteenth-century London’s literary cultures: the multilingual codices of Edwardian civil servant Andrew Horn and Ricardian poet John Gower, the famous Auchinleck manuscript of texts in Middle English, and Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales. By reading these compilations as both formal shapes and historical occurrences, Bahr uncovers neglected literary histories specific to the time and place of their production. The book offers a less empiricist way of interpreting the relationship between textual and physical form that will be of interest to a wide range of literary critics and manuscript scholars.

AUTHOR BIOGRAPHY

Arthur Bahr is associate professor of literature at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

REVIEWS

“Arthur Bahr’s scholarship is deeply learned and technically skillful, as he invests codicology with the larger promises of formalism. But have no fear: Bahr’s prose sparkles with intellectual delicacy, energy, and pleasure. This is scholarship voiced in an especially agreeable and distinctive way. I enjoyed reading Fragments and Assemblages enormously.”

— James Simpson, Harvard University

Fragments and Assemblages makes the striking claim that the standard treatment of Chaucer and other Ricardian poets, as figures who broke with the past in order to inaugurate a new kind of literary writing in English, must be revised in light of textual evidence. Arthur Bahr works carefully with fourteenth-century manuscripts in order to show us connections from Andrew Horn to the Auchinleck manuscript to Chaucer and Gower; he thereby stitches together the divided fourteenth century and demonstrates that literary production during the period was an ongoing and continuous project. At the same time, he also makes an important methodological statement about the significance of formalism to the study of manuscripts and to historical work. All of the texts he discusses are compilations, which he categorizes as either ‘fragments’ or ‘assemblages’ in order to suggest that there is a necessary dialectic between them: the works he describes all betray evidence of being assembled for a larger purpose, but they simultaneously exist as fragments, both physically and in the abstract. This double approach enables Bahr to construct an original and creative new account of fourteenth-century writing, one with which all scholars of late medieval literature will want to engage.”

— Maura Nolan, University of California, Berkeley

“In this remarkably erudite and elegantly argued book, Arthur Bahr makes the compelling case for the meaning of medieval literature in its manuscript environment. Building on much recent scholarship in the study of the handwritten book, Bahr shows how literary value often lies along the fissures of the fragment. Medieval English compilations—whether they be the concatenations of the Auchinleck manuscript, or the various assemblies of Chaucer’s Canterbury Tales—are not as unified as they might seem. Bahr’s powerful analyses of these and other texts as physical objects demonstrates, in his words, how ‘the literary can be found, delighted in and nurtured’ at the intersection of ‘codicological form and textual content.’ Fragments and Assemblages makes a powerful case for medieval literary study grounded equally in the archive and the imagination.”

— Seth Lerer, University of California, San Diego

“Bahr’s Fragments and Assemblages is the realization of a kind of literary codicology that has been long promised but slow to emerge. In this selective, elegant study of late medieval English literature, Bahr re-approaches several important texts and textual communities through the prism of manuscript research. The book weaves together codicological research with literary close readings and connects literary production with historical contexts to produce an exciting re-visioning of literate culture in fourteenth-century London. . . . Bahr cleverly posits critical practice itself as an assemblage, and constructs the readerly community, which includes authors, manuscript makers, readers and critics, as a kind of assemblage akin to the urban community of medieval London. He invites to rest of us to share in the ‘compilational game’ of reading manuscript culture in these expanded and fluid ways, and it is a challenge I hope many other readers will take up.”
— Janine Rogers, Mount Allison University, Review of English Studies

“[E]ngaging and thoroughly enjoyable. . . . Highly recommended.”
— A. L. Kaufman, Auburn University at Montgomery, Choice

“[Bahr’s] attractively written, often witty book, informed by a wide range of scholarship, elegantly demonstrates one way of using material form in the service of critical analysis.”
— Julia Boffey, Times Literary Supplement

"The most exhilarating aspect of [Bahr's] approach is his intelligent alertness to the wide, branching questions raised by any attempt to place books (as opposed to authors or readers) in their social and historical context. Deeply intrigued, rather than merely discouraged, by an old book’s fragmentary, incomplete, often damaged state, Bahr gives full rein to his subtle, probing attempts to understand the assumptions, fantasies, and accidents that caused such miscellaneity to survive, more or less intact, for our curious, speculative examination. He leaves his reader not only eager to open an old book but also more reflective about the extraordinary density of intellectual and imaginative desire that may be represented in the history of its physical state."
— Ardis Butterfield, Yale University, Common Knowledge

"Bahr’s excellent and highly readable new book offers us, in addition to a series of well-argued and fascinating arguments about individual medieval texts, a new methodology for manuscript studies. . . . Bahr urges medievalists to 'read compilationally,' by which he means taking seriously the authorial impulses not only of individual poets, but also of the compilers who set out their works in the larger manuscript contexts in which we now have them. . . . Scholars who are alienated by codicology or the history of the book will find in this book a way of integrating manuscript studies with close readings, historical analysis, and literary theory."
— Eleanor Johnson, Columbia University, Yearbook of Langland Studies

"Bahr's book not only demonstrates the ways in which two traditionally seperate spheres of inquiry, codicology and literary analysis, can work together to refresh well-mined primary sources; it also encourages scholars in other fields to contribute their interdisciplinary expertise to his project. Marshalling a range of critical approaches becomes itself a compilational endeavour."
— Anna Chen, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Journal of English and Germanic Philology

TABLE OF CONTENTS

List of Figures

Acknowledgments

- Arthur Bahr
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226924922.003.0001
[medieval manuscripts, fourteenth century, London, manuscript compilations]
This introductory chapter sets out the book's purpose, which is to explore the interactions between medieval texts and the manuscripts that contain and shape them. It provides a definition of compilation, not as an objective quality of either texts or objects, but rather as a mode of perceiving such forms so as to disclose an interpretably meaningful arrangement, thus bringing into being a text/work that is more than the sum of its parts. It then discusses what the four manuscript compilations examined in the present study reveal about the social, political, and textual life of fourteenth-century London. (pages 1 - 49)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Arthur Bahr
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226924922.003.0002
[medieval manuscripts, london city chamberlain, andrew horn, codicological form, reading culture, civic liberties]
This chapter presents a reading of the corpus of manuscripts overseen by London City chamberlain Andrew Horn. It argues that both the codicological form and the textual contents of the manuscripts participate in and help create an urban, mercantile reading culture in which compilational interpretation formed one crucial facet of a broader textual competence necessary to protect London's civic liberties from abrogation. (pages 50 - 104)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Arthur Bahr
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226924922.003.0003
[medieval manuscripts, codicological elements, fantasies, auchinleck manuscript]
This chapter presents a reading of booklet 3 of the Auchinleck manuscript. It argues that the codicological elements of booklet 3—its internal structure, relation to the rest of the manuscript, and codicological details such as catchwords and page layout—both complement and complicate its texts' literary explorations of fantasies. (pages 105 - 154)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Arthur Bahr
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226924922.003.0004
[medieval manuscripts, knight's tale, threads, fragment I]
This chapter presents a reading of Chaucer's Canterbury Tales. The first section analyzes Chaucer's decision to use one of his earlier, self-standing poems as the Knight's Tale. The second section argues that, even as Fragment I uses the quyting drama of its headlinks to ensure its codicological integrity, it invites us to contemplate the construction of alternate tale orderings, referred to as threads, that would radiate outward from the Knight's Tale if and when the storytelling contest runs aground. The trajectory traced by Fragment I suggests disillusionment with the notion that the idealized, socially reinforcing courtly performances central to the Knight's Tale could be effectively translated into “oure cite” of Chaucer's London. (pages 155 - 207)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

- Arthur Bahr
DOI: 10.7208/chicago/9780226924922.003.0005
[medieval manuscripts, John Gower, trentham manuscript, chaucer, literary histories]
This chapter presents a reading of the Trentham manuscript of works by John Gower. It argues that Trentham's seemingly straightforward presentation of its author and audience is complicated by the architectural complexity of the manuscript's codicological form and its texts' evocation of past history. The manuscript, juxtaposed with Chapter 3's consideration of the Canterbury Tales, also upends some of the more reductive literary histories that Chaucer has been made to serve. By embodying some of the many non-Chaucerian ways in which England's post-Chaucerian literary forms developed, and looking back to elements of literary culture from the 1320s and 1330s that were examined in Chapters 1 and 2, Trentham shows that Chaucer himself need be neither end point nor center of the literary histories seen in medieval England. (pages 208 - 254)
This chapter is available at:
    https://academic.oup.com/chica...

Afterword

Bibliography

Index