Résumés
Abstract
Based on self-determination theory, this research presents the development of a scale to assess motivation for engineering studies in a Francophone context. Three phases of data collection were conducted (N = 462, 545 and 864) for a total of 1871 engineering students (59.2% female). Results from both exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses support a seven-factor structure for the scale: 1) intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivations characterised by 2) identified regulation – altruism, 3) introjected regulation – ego, 4) introjected regulation – conscience, 5) external regulation – security, 6) external regulation – social prestige and, finally, 7) amotivation. The dimensions of altruism and security are specific to engineering studies. The scale meets generally accepted criteria for reliability and verifies different types of validity evidence.
Keywords:
- engineering studies,
- academic motivation scale,
- self-determination theory
Résumé
En prenant appui sur la théorie de l’autodétermination, cette recherche présente l’élaboration d’une échelle de mesure de la motivation aux études d’ingénieurs en contexte francophone. Trois collectes de données ont été menées (N = 462, 545 et 864) auprès d’un total de 1871 élèves ingénieurs (59,2 % de sexe féminin). Les résultats des analyses factorielles exploratoires et confirmatoires appuient une structure à sept dimensions : 1) la motivation intrinsèque, les motivations extrinsèques par régulation 2) identifiée – altruisme, 3) introjectée – ego, 4) introjectée – conscience, 5) externe – sécurité, 6) externe – prestige social et, enfin, 7) l’amotivation. Les dimensions altruisme et sécurité sont spécifiques aux études d’ingénieurs. L’échelle proposée satisfait aux critères de fiabilité communément admis et réunit plusieurs éléments de preuves de validité.
Mots-clés :
- études d’ingénieurs,
- échelle de motivation scolaire,
- théorie de l’autodétermination
Resumo
A partir da teoria da autodeterminação, esta investigação apresenta a elaboração de uma escala de medida da motivação nos estudos de engenharia no contexto francófono. Foram realizadas três recolhas de dados (N = 462, 545 e 864) num total de 1871 estudantes de engenharia (59,2% do sexo feminino). Os resultados das análises fatoriais exploratórias e confirmatórias sustentam uma estrutura com sete dimensões: 1) a motivação intrínseca, as motivações extrínsecas caracterizadas pela 2) regulação identificada – altruísmo, 3) regulação introjetiva – ego, 4) regulação introjetiva – consciência, 5) regulação externa – segurança, 6) regulação externa – prestígio social e, finalmente, 7) desmotivação. As dimensões altruísmo e segurança são específicas aos estudos de engenharia. A escala proposta satisfaz os critérios de fiabilidade comummente aceites e contém várias provas de validade.
Palavras chaves:
- estudos de engenharia,
- escala de motivação escolar,
- teoria da autodeterminação
Veuillez télécharger l’article en PDF pour le lire.
Télécharger
Parties annexes
Références
- Akaike, H. (1987). Factor analysis and AIC. Psychometrika, 52(3), 317-332. doi: 10.1007/BF02294359
- Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 411-423. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411
- Association pour l’emploi des cadres (APEC). (2017). L’insertion professionnelle des jeunes diplômés : promotion 2014 (no 2017-02). Paris: APEC.
- Arbuckle, J. L. (2013). IBM SPSS AMOS 22 user’s guide. Crawfordville, FL: Amos Development Corporation.
- Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1989). On the use of structural equation models in experimental designs. Journal of Marketing Research, 26(3), 271-284. doi: 10.2307/3172900
- Bagozzi, R. P., Yi, Y., & Phillips, L. W. (1991). Assessing construct validity in organizational research. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36(3), 421-458. doi: 10.2307/2393203
- Baker, S. R. (2004). Intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivational orientations: Their role in university adjustment, stress, well-being, and subsequent academic performance. Current Psychology, 23(3), 189-202. doi: 10.1007/s12144-004-1019-9
- Barret, C., Ryk, F. et Volle, N. (2014). Enquête 2013 auprès de la Génération 2010 : face à la crise, le fossé se creuse entre niveaux de diplôme. Bref du Céreq, 319. Marseille : Centre d’études et de recherches sur les qualifications. Repéré à www.cereq.fr/publications/Cereq-Bref/Enquete-2013-aupres-de-la-Generation-2010-Face-a-la-crise-le-fosse-se-creuse-entre-niveaux-de-diplome
- Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238-246. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238
- Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual (vol. 6). Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
- Bentler, P. M., & Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychological Bulletin, 88(3), 588-606. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588
- Black, A. E., & Deci, E. L. (2000). The effects of instructors’ autonomy support and students’ autonomous motivation on learning organic chemistry: A self- determination theory perspective. Science Education, 84(6), 740-756. doi: 10.1002/1098-237X(200011)84:6<740::AID-SCE4>3.0.CO;2-3
- Blais, M. R., Brière, N. M., Lachance, L., Riddle, A. S. et Vallerand, R. J. (1993). L’inventaire des motivations au travail de Blais. Revue québécoise de psychologie, 14(3), 185-215.
- Blanchard, C., Pelletier, L., Otis, N. et Sharp, E. (2004). Rôle de l’autodétermination et des aptitudes scolaires dans la prédiction des absences scolaires et l’intention de décrocher. Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 30(1), 105-123. doi: 10.7202/011772ar
- Bourque, J., Poulin, N. et Cleaver, A. F. (2006). Évaluation de l’utilisation et de la présentation des résultats d’analyses factorielles et d’analyses en composantes principales en éducation. Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 32(2), 325-344. doi: 10.7202/014411ar
- Brown, T. A. (2015). Confirmatory factor analysis for applied research (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
- Campbell, D. T., & Fiske, D. W. (1959). Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix. Psychological Bulletin, 56(2), 81-105. doi: 10.1037/h0046016
- Conférence des directeurs des écoles françaises d’ingénieurs (CDEFI). (2009). La motivation des élèves ingénieurs dans le choix de leurs études. Paris: CDEFI. Repéré à www.romainsimon.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/11/Etude_CDEFI.pdf
- Conférence des grandes écoles (CGE). (2016). L’insertion des diplômés des grandes écoles : résultats de l’enquête 2016. Paris : CGE. Repéré à www.cge.asso.fr/wp-content/uploads/2017/06/enquete-insertion-cge-2018.pdf
- Chédru, M. (2015). Impact de la motivation et des styles d’apprentissage sur la performance scolaire d’élèves-ingénieurs. Revue des sciences de l’éducation, 41(3), 457-482. doi: 10.7202/1035313ar
- Churchill, G. A. (1979). A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. Journal of Marketing Research, 16(1), 64-73. doi: 10.2307/3150876
- Compeyron, A., Baillé, J. et Fruchard, E. (2010). La diversité des élèves ingénieurs de l’INSA de Lyon: données et problèmes. Lausanne : Presses polytechniques et universitaires romandes.
- Conway, J. M., & Huffcutt, A. I. (2003). A review and evaluation of exploratory factor analysis practices in organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 6(2), 147-168. doi: 10.1177/1094428103251541
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York, NY: Plenum.
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The «what» and «why» of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268. doi: 10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
- DeVellis, R. F. (2017). Scale development: Theory and applications (4th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications.
- Downing, S. M. (2003). Validity: On the meaningful interpretation of assessment data.Medical Education, 37(9), 830-837. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2923.2003.01594.x
- Eloy, A. (2008). Les élèves des écoles d’ingénieurs. OVE Infos, 19. Repéré à www.ove-national.education.fr/publication/ove-infos-n19-les-eleves-des-ecoles-dingenieurs
- European Commission. (2006). Creating cultures of success for women engineers: Womeng– Final report: Project HPSE-CT-2002-00109 funded under the key action «Improving the socioeconomic knowledge base» of FP5 (no EUR 21938). Luxembourg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.
- Fenouillet, F., Heutte, J., & Vallerand, R. J. (2015, June). Validation of the adult education motivation scale. Paper presented at the Fourth World Congress on Positive Psychology of the International Positive Psychology Association, Orlando, FL.
- Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39-50. doi: 10.2307/3151312
- Fortier, M. S., Vallerand, R. J., & Guay, F. (1995). Academic motivation and school performance: Toward a structural model. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20(3), 257-274. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1995.1017
- Guay, F., Mageau, G. A., & Vallerand, R. J. (2003). On the hierarchical structure of self-determined motivation: A test of top-down, bottom-up, reciprocal, and horizontal effects. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29(8), 992-1004. doi: 10.1177/0146167203253297
- Guay, F., Ratelle, C. F., & Chanal, J. (2008). Optimal learning in optimal contexts: The role of self-determination in education. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie canadienne, 49(3), 233-240. doi: 10.1037/a0012758
- Guttman, L. (1954). A new approach to factor analysis: The Radex. In P. F. Lazarsfeld (Ed.), Mathematical thinking in the social sciences (pp. 258-348). New York, NY: Free Press.
- Hair, J. F., Anderson, R. E., Tatham, R. L., & Black, W. C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
- Hardre, P. L., & Reeve, J. (2003). A motivational model of rural students’ intentions to persist in, versus drop out of, high school. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 347-356. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.347
- Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1), 1-55. doi: 10.1080/10705519909540118
- Hulland, J. (1999). Use of partial least squares (PLS) in strategic management research: A review of four recent studies. Strategic Management Journal, 20(2), 195-204. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199902)20:2<195::AID-SMJ13>3.0.CO;2-7
- Société des ingénieurs et scientifiques de France (IESF). (2018). 29e enquête nationale sur les ingénieurs. Paris: IESF.
- Institut national de la statistique et des études économiques (Insee). (2013). Population active (15 à 64 ans) selon la catégorie socioprofessionnelle en 2013. Paris: Insee.
- Jöreskog, K. G. (1969). A general approach to confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 34(2), 183-202. doi: 10.1007/BF02289343
- Jöreskog, K. G. (1971). Statistical analysis of sets of congeneric tests. Psychometrika, 36(2), 109-133. doi: 10.1007/BF02291393
- Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1984). LISREL VI: User’s guide (3rd ed.). Mooresville, IN: Scientific Software.
- Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: User’s reference guide. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
- Kaufman, J. C., Agars, M. D., & Lopez-Wagner, M. C. (2008). The role of personality and motivation in predicting early college academic success in non-traditional students at a Hispanic-serving institution. Learning and Individual Differences, 18(4), 492-496. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2007.11.004
- Kline, R. B. (2016). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (4th ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
- Komarraju, M., Karau, S. J., & Schmeck, R. R. (2009). Role of the Big Five personality traits in predicting college students’ academic motivation and achievement. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(1), 47-52. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.07.001
- Kusurkar, R. A., Ten Cate, T. J., Vos, C. M. P., Westers, P., & Croiset, G. (2013). How motivation affects academic performance: A structural equation modelling analysis. Advances in Health Sciences Education, 18(1), 57-69. doi: 10.1007/s10459-012-9354-3
- Litalien, D., Guay, F., & Morin, A. J. S. (2015). Motivation for PhD studies: Scale development and validation. Learning and Individual Differences, 41, 1-13. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2015.05.006
- Marcoulides, G. A., & Schumacker, R. E. (Eds.). (1996). Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Messick, S. (1995). Validity of psychological assessment: Validation of inferences from persons’ responses and performances as scientific inquiry into score meaning. American Psychologist, 50(9), 741-749. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.50.9.741
- Ministère de l’Enseignement supérieur, de la Recherche et de l’Innovation (MESRI). (2018). L’état de l’emploi scientifique en France : rapport 2018. Paris : MESRI. Repéré à http://cache.media.enseignementsup-recherche.gouv.fr/file/2018/08/4/Etat_emploi_scientifique_2018_1012084.pdf
- Netemeyer, R. G., Bearden, W. O., & Sharma, S. (2003). Scaling procedures: Issues and applications. Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
- Nunnnally, J. C. (1967). Psychometric theory. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
- Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667-686. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667
- Ratelle, C. F., Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., Larose, S., & Senécal, C. (2007). Autonomous, controlled, and amotivated types of academic motivation: A person-oriented analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(4), 734-746. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.99.4.734
- Roussel, P. (2005). Méthodes de développement d’échelles pour questionnaires d’enquête. Dans P. Roussel et F. Wacheux (dir.), Management des ressources humaines : méthodes de recherche en sciences humaines et sociales (pp. 245-276). Bruxelles : De Boeck Supérieur.
- Roussel, P., Durrieu, F., Campoy, E. et El Akremi, A. (2002). Méthodes d’équations structurelles : recherche et applications en gestion. Paris : Economica.
- Ryan, R. M., & Connell, J. P. (1989). Perceived locus of causality and internalization: Examining reasons for acting in two domains. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(5), 749-761. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.5.749
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54-67. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78. doi: 10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2013). Toward a social psychology of assimilation: Self- determination theory in cognitive development and education. In B. W. Sokol, F. M. E. Grouzet & U. Muller (Eds.), Self-Regulation and autonomy (pp. 191-207). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. doi: 10.1017/CBO9781139152198.014
- Sinclair, T. (2016). Opportunités et challenges pour les employeurs européens du secteur des technologies : une analyse du marché de l’emploi high-tech sur un panel choisi de pays européens avec un focus sur le marché français. New York, NY: Indeed. Repéré à https://fr.slideshare.net/frenchweb/opportunits-et-challenges-pour-les-employeurs-europens-du-secteur-des-technologies
- Steiger, J. H. (1990). Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 25(2), 173-180. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4
- Steiger, J. H. (2007). Understanding the limitations of global fit assessment in structural equation modeling. Personality and Individual Differences, 42(5), 893-898. doi: 10.1016/j.paid.2006.09.017
- Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon/Pearson Education.
- Tucker, L. R., & Lewis, C. (1973). A reliability coefficient for maximum likelihood factor analysis. Psychometrika, 38(1), 1-10. doi: 10.1007/BF02291170
- Vallerand, R. J., & Bissonnette, R. (1992). Intrinsic, extrinsic, and amotivational styles as predictors of behavior: A prospective study. Journal of Personality, 60(3), 599-620. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-6494.1992.tb00922.x
- Vallerand, R. J., Blais, M. R., Brière, N. M. et Pelletier, L. G. (1989). Construction et validation de l’Échelle de motivation en éducation (EME). Canadian Journal of Behavioural, 21(3), 323-349. doi: 10.1037/h0079855
- Vallerand, R. J., Fortier, M. S., & Guay, F. (1997). Self-determination and persistence in a real-life setting: Toward a motivational model of high school dropout. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 72(5), 1161-1176. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.72.5.1161
- Vansteenkiste, M., Sierens, E., Soenens, B., Luyckx, K., & Lens, W. (2009). Motivational profiles from a self-determination perspective: The quality of motivation matters. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(3), 671-688. doi: 10.1037/a0015083
- Vansteenkiste, M., Simons, J., Lens, W., Sheldon, K. M., & Deci, E. L. (2004). Motivating learning, performance, and persistence: The synergistic effects of intrinsic goal contents and autonomy-supportive contexts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 87(2), 246-260. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.2.246
- Villers, M.-É. de. (2015). Multidictionnaire de la langue française (6e éd.). Québec, QC : Québec Amérique.
10.7202/011772ar