The purpose of this study is to compare the physical characteristics and visibility of high-resolution and conventional images acquired with the same X-ray dose, and to investigate the superiority of super high-resolution imaging. A Catphan phantom was scanned in the normal resolution (NR), high-resolution (HR), and super high-resolution (SHR) modes of ultra-high-resolution computed tomography at 120 kV and 75 mAs. All images were reconstructed into a 5-mm thick image slices with filtered back-projection (FBP) and hybrid image reconstruction (HIR), which included normal and enhanced adaptive iterative dose reduction 3D (AIDR and eAIDR, respectively). The modulation transfer function (MTF) and noise power spectrum (NPS) were measured using the circular edge method and radial frequency method, respectively. The signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) was then calculated. High-contrast resolution and low-contrast detectability were evaluated visually by five radiological technologists. The MTFs of HR_eAIDR and HR_FBP images were higher than those of NR_FBP images. However, the NPSs of HR_eAIDR and HR_FBP images were larger than those of NR_FBP images. The SNR of HR_eAIDR images was higher than that of NR_FBP and HR_FBP images. The scores of high-contrast resolution of HR_eAIDR, NR_FBP, and HR_FBP images were 13, 8, and 13 cycles/cm, respectively, and the scores of low-contrast detectability were 5, 5, and 6 mm, respectively. Hence, an improvement in high-contrast resolution of signal more than 400 HU in the axial section can be achieved without increasing the radiation dose and decreasing low-contrast detectability with 10 HU using the HR mode and eAIDR.