The Effect of Memantine Administration on Anxiety Maintenance in Stressed Male Wistar Rats

authors:

avatar Ahmad Rafia 1 , avatar Shahrbanoo Oryan 2 , avatar Hedayat Sahraei 3 , * , avatar Akram Eidi ORCID 1

Department of Biology, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
Department of Biology, Faculty of Biological Sciences, Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran
Neuroscience Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
Iranian Journal of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences: Vol.13, issue 4; e89526
published online: January 12, 2020
article type: Research Article
received: January 19, 2019
revised: September 21, 2019
accepted: December 21, 2019
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5812/ijpbs.89526

how to cite: Rafia A, Oryan S, Sahraei H, Eidi A. The Effect of Memantine Administration on Anxiety Maintenance in Stressed Male Wistar Rats. Iran J Psychiatry Behav Sci. 2019;13(4):e89526. https://doi.org/10.5812/ijpbs.89526.

Abstract

Background:

Anxiety is considered as a chronic stress complication. The role of N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) glutamate receptors located in basolateral amygdala (BLA) in stress-induced anxiety is hypothesized.

Objectives:

It is unknown how NMDA glutamate receptors located in BLA affect maintenance of chronic stress-induced anxiety. This study investigated the role of these receptors in maintaining anxiety induced by electric foot shock in male Wistar rats.

Methods:

Animals were subjected to stress based on the following protocol: Seven days after bilateral cannulation in BLA, they experienced seven sessions of stress (one session/day). Before each stress session, the animals received different doses of memantine (1, 2.5, and 5 mg/kg) peripherally, or (0.1, 1 and 5 μg/kg) in BLA. Six days after stress termination, the animals were tested for maintenance of anxiety using an open field paradigm. Moreover, the animals’ brains were removed for further assessment of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels in the hippocampus.

Results:

The stressed animals showed anxiety six days after stress termination. Moreover, chronic peripheral and central memantine injection by itself showed both anxiolytic and anxiogenic properties six days after drug administration termination in the non-stressed animals. Memantine preadministration, both peripherally and centrally, reduced the stress-induced maintenance of anxiety in the stressed animals. The BDNF assessment revealed that stress and memantine did not change hippocampal BDNF level six days after drug or stress termination.

Conclusions:

Inhibition of NMDA receptors in BLA can inhibit maintenance of stress-induced anxiety, which is not related to hippocampal BDNF level. In addition, chronic memantine injection induces anxiety.

1. Background

It is now clear that chronic stress can lead to anxiety in human and animal models (1). It is proposed that glucocorticoid hormones released during chronic stress can increase glutamate system activity in the basolateral amygdala (BLA), and ultimately, induce neuronal sensitization in the region (2-5). The resulting synaptic plasticity which can increase BLA glutamatergic and GABAergic outputs to the ventral hippocampus and prefrontal cortex, in fact, leads to anxiety in animals (6, 7).

Previous researches have shown that glutamatergic inputs from different brain areas are projected to BLA pyramidal neurons (8). Glutamate interacts with its inotropic glutamate receptors, e.g. NMDA, and triggers synaptic plasticity processes such as long term potentiation-LTP and/or stimulates BDNF expression in these neurons (9, 10). According to these findings, it is hypothesized that administration of NMDA receptor antagonists in BLA, as well as in areas associated with BLA such as dorsal and ventral hippocampus and prefrontal cortex, may have anxiolytic effect (9, 11, 12). Moreover, both peripheral and central injections of the nonspecific NMDA receptor antagonist, MK-801, in rats reduce anxiety as evaluated by elevated plus maze (EPM) (9, 13, 14). Further, another NMDA receptor antagonist, AP-7, either peripherally (9, 15) or centrally (16), reduces anxiety caused by exposure to the predator or water deprivation in rats. Other studies have shown that administration of memantine as an NMDA receptor antagonist reduces Parkinson’s disease-induced anxiety (17). Consistent with these studies, it has been shown that memantine may be effective in treating patients with treatment-resistant anxiety (18). In one study, it was found that administration of NMDA as an agonist of NMDA glutamate receptors into the periaqueductal gray matter (PAG) induced anxiety-like behaviors in rats (19). Studies have also indicated that administration of glucocorticoids such as dexamethasone and corticosterone, peripherally, intra-hippocampus and intra-BLA, may lead to anxiety-like behaviors or facilitate these behaviors (20-23).

On the other hand, studies have indicated that hippocampal BDNF level is reduced in animal models of anxiety (24-26). It is interesting that BDNF concentration is also reduced in the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of humans suffered from anxiety (27-30). Interestingly, it has been shown that administration of NMDA receptor antagonists can increase BDNF in the hippocampus of stressed rats (31-33). It has also been shown that the plasma and CSF concentration of BDNF is extremely low in patients suffered from major depression, but increases after treatment with fluoxetine or ketamine as another NMDA receptor antagonist (34-36).

2. Objectives

The present study investigated the effect of inhibition of NMDA glutamate receptors on maintenance of anxiety-like behavior and hippocampal BDNF level in rats subjected to electro foot shock stress for seven consecutive days, followed by a six-day interval period. For this purpose, intra-BLA injections of memantine were performed before each stress session either intraperitoneally or intra-BLA. The open field test was chosen because of its validity for evaluation of normal and pathological anxiety (37). It needs to be explained that since BLA is one of the areas which directly receives sensory noxious inputs (38), electric foot shock stress was used for stress induction.

3. Methods

3.1. Drugs

Memantine hydrochloride (Sigma-USA), ketamine hydrochloride (Alphason-Netherlands), and diazepam hydrochloride (Sigma-USA) were used in the study. All the drugs were dissolved in sterile saline and used at a volume of 1 mL/kg (peripheral) or 0.25 μL/side (centrally).

3.2. Animals

Male Wistar rats (W: 180 - 210 g) purchased from the Pasteur Institute (Tehran, Iran) were used in the study (n = 6 - 8/group). The animals were kept in four cages with free access to tap water and rat chow (Pars Animal Food Co., Tehran, Iran), at 12-h light/dark intervals and 21 - 24ºC. Each animal was used once. The procedure time line of the experiments is shown in Figure 1. All the experiments took place between 9:00 and 16:00. The animals were handled and cared for in accordance with the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals (1996, published by National Academy Press, 2101 Constitution Ave. NW, Washington, DC 20055, USA) and approved by the Committee on the Use and Care of Animals of Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, with the approval code #87/381.

The study time line for procedures
The study time line for procedures
Figure 1.

The study time line for procedures

3.3. Surgical Procedures

The animals were anesthetized using diazepam (4 mg/kg; ip) and ketamine (60 mg/kg; ip) anesthesia. Two cannulas (stainless steel gauge 23) were placed in BLA using stereotaxic coordination (L = ±5, AP = -2.7, and D = 8.5 mm) (39). The cannulas were designed to be placed 500 µm above BLA. To avoid the closure of the cannulas, a 0.3 mm diameter stainless steel filament was placed inside each cannula. The animals were left for seven days for recovery before the experiments began. For bilateral intra-BLA memantine injection, a 30-gauge dental needle was used, which was connected to a 1 µL Hamilton syringe via a poly ethylene tubing system. The drug was injected into BLA in a volume of 0.25 µL/side. After completion of the experiments, the animals were deeply anesthetized by ketamine (50 mg/kg; ip) and their brains were removed through a trans-cardiac surgical procedure. The brains were dissected, and the place of injection was verified by a professional experimenter. Only those animals which had the correct place of injection were considered for statistical analysis.

3.4. Stress Induction Procedure

Stress was induced by a communication box (CB) device (Borj-e-Sanat Co, Tehran, Iran). The apparatus consists of nine separate compartments (16 × 16 × 40 cm; length × width × height) made by Plexiglas. The floor of the apparatus was made by stainless steel grids (4 mm diameter and 13 mm spaced). The grids were connected to a computer programmed electrical current generator, which controlled both the intensity and duration of the electrical shock by user (40). The generator provided intermittent electric foot shocks (1.2 mA, 10 Hz and 10 sec duration). Each animal received 100 electrical stimuli in 10 sec. The experiments were carried out between 10:00 - 13:00 for seven consecutive days. For stress induction, the animals were transferred to the test room one hour before the experiment for the purpose of environmental adaptation. Then, each animal was placed in one compartment separately and remained in the compartment for 30 min without electrical shock. Afterward, they experienced the shock for 10 sec and remained in the apparatus for an additional 30 min. The control groups also received the drug or saline and were placed in the compartments for 60 min without inducing shock. Stress induction continued for seven consecutive days.

3.5. Open Field Testing Method

The test began six days after stress termination when the animals were in drug free state. Each open field experimental session lasted for 5 min. The open field device was made from black Plexiglas with dimensions of 36 × 36 × 36 cm (length, width and height, respectively). A video camera connected to the PC recorded and analyzed the animals’ activities using the Auto Vision software (Borj-e-Sanat Co., Tehran, Iran). The software can virtually divide the floor of the apparatus to 16 equal sections (4 central and 12 peripheral zones). Animal locomotion (in cm), number of cases entering the central zone, and time spend in the central zone were recorded. These parameters were considered as the indicators of anxiety in the animals (12). Moreover, thigmotaxis, as an index for definition the influence of tactile sensory inputs on animal preference to spend their time in the periphery with their anxiety was calculated as follows: ratio of (the number of entries into the central part/rat locomotor activity) × 1000. The high value of the score led to low thigmotaxis as well as to the great pronounced anxiolytic-like effect (41-43).

3.6. Study Design

3.6.1. The Effect of Intraperitoneal Memantine Injection on Anxiety-Like Behavior in Stressed Rats

Eight animal groups were used (n = 6 - 8/group), of which three groups received different doses of memantine (1, 2.5, and 5 mg/kg; ip) 30 min before being placed in CB for 60 min while the apparatus was off (44). In addition, three groups received the same memantine doses, were placed in CB and received electric foot shock as described earlier. The procedure was repeated for seven consecutive days. The control groups received saline (1 mL/kg). Maintenance of stress-induced anxiety was tested six days later, as described earlier in this section. Results are shown in Figure 2.

The effect of peripheral memantine injection on locomotor activity (A), elapsed time (B), number of entries into the central zone (C), and the thigmotaxis ratio (D) in the non-stressed and stressed rats. The animals first received different doses of memantine (1, 2.5, and 5 mg/kg; ip) or saline 30 min before stress induction for seven consecutive days. Six days later, their behavior was recorded in the open field apparatus for five min (n = 6 - 8/group). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 different from control groups. +P < 0.05, ++P < 0.01 different from the stress group.
The effect of peripheral memantine injection on locomotor activity (A), elapsed time (B), number of entries into the central zone (C), and the thigmotaxis ratio (D) in the non-stressed and stressed rats. The animals first received different doses of memantine (1, 2.5, and 5 mg/kg; ip) or saline 30 min before stress induction for seven consecutive days. Six days later, their behavior was recorded in the open field apparatus for five min (n = 6 - 8/group). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 different from control groups. +P < 0.05, ++P < 0.01 different from the stress group.
Figure 2.

The effect of peripheral memantine injection on locomotor activity (A), elapsed time (B), number of entries into the central zone (C), and the thigmotaxis ratio (D) in the non-stressed and stressed rats. The animals first received different doses of memantine (1, 2.5, and 5 mg/kg; ip) or saline 30 min before stress induction for seven consecutive days. Six days later, their behavior was recorded in the open field apparatus for five min (n = 6 - 8/group). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 different from control groups. +P < 0.05, ++P < 0.01 different from the stress group.

3.6.2. The Effect of Bilateral Intra-BLA Memantine Injection on Anxiety-Like Behavior in Stressed Rats

Eight groups were selected (n = 6 - 8/group) for this propose. Three groups received different doses of memantine (0.1, 1, 5 and 5 μg/rat; intra-BLA) bilaterally, 5 min before being placed in the apparatus without shock induction for seven consecutive days (44). Moreover, three groups received the same doses of the drug, were placed in CB and received electric foot shock. The control groups received saline (0.25 μL/side). The results are shown in Figure 3.

The effect of intra-BLA memantine injection on locomotor activity (A), elapsed time (B), number of entries into the central zone (C), and the thigmotaxis ratio (D) in the non-stressed and stressed rats. The animals first received different doses of memantine (0.1, 1, and 5 μg/rat) or saline (0.25 μL/side) 5 min before stress induction for seven consecutive days. Six days later, their behavior was recorded in the open field apparatus for 5 min (n = 6 - 8/group). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 different from control groups. +P < 0.05, ++P < 0.01, +++P < 0.001 different from the stress group.
The effect of intra-BLA memantine injection on locomotor activity (A), elapsed time (B), number of entries into the central zone (C), and the thigmotaxis ratio (D) in the non-stressed and stressed rats. The animals first received different doses of memantine (0.1, 1, and 5 μg/rat) or saline (0.25 μL/side) 5 min before stress induction for seven consecutive days. Six days later, their behavior was recorded in the open field apparatus for 5 min (n = 6 - 8/group). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 different from control groups. +P < 0.05, ++P < 0.01, +++P < 0.001 different from the stress group.
Figure 3.

The effect of intra-BLA memantine injection on locomotor activity (A), elapsed time (B), number of entries into the central zone (C), and the thigmotaxis ratio (D) in the non-stressed and stressed rats. The animals first received different doses of memantine (0.1, 1, and 5 μg/rat) or saline (0.25 μL/side) 5 min before stress induction for seven consecutive days. Six days later, their behavior was recorded in the open field apparatus for 5 min (n = 6 - 8/group). *P < 0.05, **P < 0.01, ***P < 0.001 different from control groups. +P < 0.05, ++P < 0.01, +++P < 0.001 different from the stress group.

3.6.3. The Effect of Intraperitoneal and Intra-BLA Memantine Injection on Hippocampal BDNF Level in Stressed and Non-Stressed Rats

Sixteen groups were selected (n = 6/group) for this propose. From the selected groups, six received different doses of memantine (1, 2.5 and 5 mg/kg; ip or 0.1, 1, 5 and 5 μg /rat; intra-BLA) 30 and 5 min, respectively, before being placed in the apparatus for seven consecutive days. Furthermore, six groups received the same doses of the drug, were placed in CB and received electric foot shock. The control groups received saline (1 mL/kg and 0.25 μL/side, respectively). Six days later, the animals were deeply anesthetized and their brains were taken out after cold (4ºC) saline injection via a trans-cardiac operation. The brains were then sectioned in a brain matrix apparatus, and the hippocampus was removed and frozen at -80ºC for BDNF level evaluation. Results are shown in Figure 4.

The effect of peripheral and intra-BLA memantine injection on hippocampal BDNF level in the rats. The animals first received different doses of memantine (1, 2.5 and 5 mg/kg or 0.1, 1, and 5 μg/rat respectively) or saline (0.25 μL/side or 1ml/kg) 5 or 30 min, respectively, before stress induction for seven consecutive days (n = 6/group). +P < 0.05 different from the stress group.
The effect of peripheral and intra-BLA memantine injection on hippocampal BDNF level in the rats. The animals first received different doses of memantine (1, 2.5 and 5 mg/kg or 0.1, 1, and 5 μg/rat respectively) or saline (0.25 μL/side or 1ml/kg) 5 or 30 min, respectively, before stress induction for seven consecutive days (n = 6/group). +P < 0.05 different from the stress group.
Figure 4.

The effect of peripheral and intra-BLA memantine injection on hippocampal BDNF level in the rats. The animals first received different doses of memantine (1, 2.5 and 5 mg/kg or 0.1, 1, and 5 μg/rat respectively) or saline (0.25 μL/side or 1ml/kg) 5 or 30 min, respectively, before stress induction for seven consecutive days (n = 6/group). +P < 0.05 different from the stress group.

3.7. Statistical Analysis

The data were expressed as mean ± standard error of mean (SEM) of the variables. Two-way ANOVA, followed by Newman-Keuls multiple comparisons as the post hoc test, was used to analyze the data using stress and the drug as the variables. A P value of less than 0.05 was considered statistically significant.

4. Results

4.1. The Effect of Intraperitoneal Memantine Injection on Anxiety-Like Behavior in Stressed Animals

The results indicated that stress reduced the total locomotion of the animals, time elapsed in the central zone, number of entries into the central zone and thigmotaxis. In addition, increasing memantine in the non-stressed animals decreased locomotor activity, time elapsed in the central zone, number of entries into the central zone and thigmotaxis in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 2). However, intraperitoneal administration of memantine in the stressed animals neutralized the effects of stress on the above mentioned parameters. The resulted statistical analysis for distance [2-way ANOVA, intra-group comparison: memantine effect: F (7, 40) = 3.22, P < 0.001, stress effect: F (1, 40 ) = 4.1, P < 0.001, memantine × stress interaction: F (7, 40) = 4.32, P < 0.001] (Figure 2A), elapsed time [2-way ANOVA, intra-group comparison: memantine effect: F (7, 40) = 2.75, P < 0.001, stress effect: F (1, 40) = 3.2, P < 0.001, memantine × stress interaction: F (7, 40) = 2.56, P < 0.001] (Figure 2B), frequency of entries into the central part of the device [2-way ANOVA, within-group comparison: memantine effect: F (7, 40) = 4.12, P < 0.001, stress effect: F (1, 40) = 3.2, P < 0.001, memantine × stress interaction: F (7, 40) = 5.17, P < 0.001] (Figure 2C), and thigmotaxis [2-way ANOVA, intra-group comparison: memantine effect: F (7, 40) = 2.38, P < 0.001, stress effect: F (1, 40) = 1.987, P < 0.01, memantine × stress interaction: F (7, 40) = 2.1, P < 0.001] (Figure 2D).

4.2. The Effect of Bilateral Intra-BLA Memantine Injection on Anxiety-Like Behavior in Stressed Rats

The results showed that the increased injection of memantine into BLA in the non-stressed animals decreased locomotor activity, time elapsed in the central zone, number of entries into the central zone, and thigmotaxis in a dose-dependent manner (Figure 3). However, intra-BLA memantine administration in the stressed animals prevented the effects of stress on the above mentioned parameters. The statistical analysis was obtained for locomotor activity [2-way ANOVA, intra-group comparison: memantine effect: F (7, 40) = 2.61, P < 0.001, stress effect: F (1, 40) = 3.9, P < 0.001, memantine × stress interaction: F (7, 40) = 3.76, P < 0.001] (Figure 3A), time elapsed in the central zone [2-way ANOVA, intra-group comparison: memantine effect: F (7, 40) = 3.1, P < 0.001, stress effect: F (1, 40) = 5.21, P < 0.001, memantine × stress interaction: F (7, 40) = 4.52, P < 0.001] (Figure 3B), the frequency of entries into the central part [2-way ANOVA, within-group comparison: memantine effect: F (7, 40) = 4.26, P < 0.001, stress effect: F (1, 40) = 3.78, P < 0.001, memantine × stress interaction: F (7, 40) = 5.23, P < 0.001] (Figure 3C), and thigmotaxis [2-way ANOVA, intra-group comparison: memantine effect: F (7, 40) = 2.01, P < 0.01, stress effect: F (1, 40) = 2.61, P < 0.01, memantine × stress interaction: F (7, 40) = 2.9, P < 0.01] (Figure 3D).

4.3. The Effect of Intraperitoneal and Intra-BLA Memantine Injection on Hippocampal BDNF Levels in Stressed and Non-Stressed Animals

The results also showed that the IP and intra-BLA injections of memantine in the non-stressed and stressed animals had no statistically significant effect on hippocampal BDNF level (Figure 4).

5. Discussion

The present study was conducted to investigate the role of NMDA glutamate receptors located in BLA on maintenance of chronic stress-induced anxiety. To this end, the open field test was performed. The reason for not using EPM for our evaluation is that EPM which is generally used in studies related to anxiety is thought to be influenced by experimental conditions such as pre-exposure to stressful events (37, 45). In this regard, some investigators also believe that the open field method may better show anxiolytic effects of drugs (12, 43), which is better fitted with the aims of this study, i.e. the anxiogenic effects of stress and/or memantine.

In the present study, it was observed that stress could lead to anxiety-like behavior. This was indicated by the increased time spent by the animals in the peripheral zone of the device, the decreased number of entries into the central zone, and the increased distance traveled at the peripheral zone of the device. Interestingly, both peripheral and intra-BLA memantine administrations also increased anxiety in the non-stressed animals. However, the drug reduced maintenance of stress-induced anxiety in the stressed animals when administered both peripherally and centrally. This indicated that the effects of stress and the drug remained on anxiety maintenance at least six days after termination of stress and the drug administration.

Several studies have shown that various stresses can increase release of glucocorticoid hormones (e.g., corticosterone and cortisol) as a result of HPA axis activity (46). These hormones affect their receptors located in the cell cytoplasm of the neurons within CNS for induction of their effects (47). Studies have indicated that receptors for glucocorticoids are abundant in the cytoplasm of BLA neurons, and their activity may result in increasing dendritic arborization of these neurons (4, 5, 48). This activity also increases synaptic spines on dendrites of these neurons (49). Together, these morphological changes are in line with increased function of these neurons (50). In this regard, previous studies have shown that morphological changes induced by stress can be traced in BLA neurons 21 days after stress termination (47). Hypertrophic morphological changes as well as neuronal activity of BLA neurons is postulated to be related to increased anxiety-like behavior observed in chronically stressed animals (51). On the other hand, NMDA glutamate receptors located on the plasma membrane of neurons in the BLA region have been shown to play an important role in neuroplasticity of glutamatergic synapses and, consequently, in synaptic activity enhancement in these regions (52). The current research showed that six days after stress induction, the rats still showed anxiety, which is in agreement with the above mentioned data.

In the next part of this investigation, the findings showed that both peripheral and intra-BLA memantine administrations led to anxiety-like behavior in the non-stressed rats, which was more pronounced in the intra-BLA treated animals. In other words, chronic inhibition of NMDA receptors, especially in BLA, may induce anxiety in animals. According to these data, one can conclude that NMDA receptors within BLA may have a pivotal role in this regard. However, the exact mechanism, by which chronic memantine administration induces anxiety, is not clear. Other studies have shown that acute glutamate NMDA receptor agonist injections in the hippocampus can induce anxiety in rats (52). However, so far, little research has focused on the effects of NMDA receptors located in BLA in this regard. The findings have also a clinical significance, considering that the drug is currently used in humans for treatment of mild to moderate Alzheimer’s disease (17). The findings of the present study may show at least a degree of hazard for chronic memantine use. It is recommend to further investigate anxiety induced by chronic memantine administration by using other methods such as EPM and the dark-light test. Moreover, it might be helpful to study cellular and molecular changes induced by chronic memantine, especially in BLA.

Interestingly, pre-administration of memantine before each stress session reduced maintenance of stress-induced anxiety. At first, it appears to be a controversial result since the data showed that chronic memantine administration induced anxiety. However, the discrepancy may be resolved by considering that the drug induces anxiety by itself when administered in normal animals. However, it can inhibit stress by inhibition of glutamate receptors in the central nervous system when administered before a stress session. Accordingly, some studies have shown that administration of NMDA receptor antagonists can reduce anxiety in animal models. For example, peripheral (13, 14) and/or intra-hippocampal (9, 14) MK-801 (a glutamate NMDA receptor antagonist) injection reduces anxiety in non-stressed rats. In addition, it is shown that AP-7, as another NMDA antagonist, can reduce stress-induced anxiety when administered peripherally (9, 15) or centrally (16). In humans, it is also shown that memantine is useful for treatment of anxiety induced by Parkinson’s disease (17). Based on these data, it is not surprising that administration of NMDA, as an agonist of NMDA glutamate receptors, into PAG can induce anxiety in non-stressed rats (19). However, all relevant experiments use antagonists acutely or chronically, although data is insufficient on effects of these drugs on maintenance of stress-induced anxiety. In this regard, it is recommended to use other NMDA receptor antagonists such as MK-801 or AP-7 with different stress types including restraint stress and immobilization stress for further evaluation of the role of these receptors in maintaining chronic stress-induced anxiety.

In the last part of the experiments, the results showed that stress had no effect on hippocampal BDNF level. Moreover, both peripheral and intra-BLA memantine administrations had no effect on BDNF level in the hippocampus. In previous studies, it was revealed that hippocampal BDNF level decline was associated with anxiety in both human and animal models (29). Other studies indicated that BDNF level was reduced after chronic restraint stress in rats and mice (53, 54). The lack of change in BDNF level in the present study may be due to the time elapsed between termination of the stress sessions and hippocampal BDNF level assessments. In agreement with this hypothesis, studies indicated that stress-induced BDNF reduction in the hippocampus was reversed less than two days after stress termination (55-57). Thus, it is not surprising that we could not track any changes in hippocampal BDNF level six days after stress termination. Of course, it must be noted that the stress session in these studies was acute stress. Accordingly, it is concluded that chronic stress may have large effects on hippocampal BDNF level. Moreover, it is concluded that the time between stress termination and hippocampal BDNF assessments should be shorter than six days. It is suggested to investigate the effects of chronic stress on BDNF level in other brain regions including BLA.

It must be noted that only the NMDA receptor antagonist was used in the present study. Therefore, it is recommended to use the NMDA receptor agonist for further clarification of the role of these receptors in stress mediation.

5.1. Conclusions

Chronic electro foot shock stress or chronic memantine administration may induce anxiety in rats, remaining for at least six days after stress or drug administration termination, and BLA might be the site of stress or memantine action. In addition, memantine can inhibit maintenance of stress-induced anxiety. These results confirm the pivotal role of the NMDA receptor located in BLA in maintenance of anxiety induced by stress and memantine.

Acknowledgements

References

  • 1.

    Pego JM, Sousa JC, Almeida OF, Sousa N. Stress and the neuroendocrinology of anxiety disorders. Curr Top Behav Neurosci. 2010;2:97-117. [PubMed ID: 21309108]. https://doi.org/10.1007/7854_2009_13.

  • 2.

    Popoli M, Yan Z, McEwen BS, Sanacora G. The stressed synapse: The impact of stress and glucocorticoids on glutamate transmission. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2011;13(1):22-37. [PubMed ID: 22127301]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3645314]. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3138.

  • 3.

    Roozendaal B, McEwen BS, Chattarji S. Stress, memory and the amygdala. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10(6):423-33. [PubMed ID: 19469026]. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2651.

  • 4.

    Vyas A, Mitra R, Shankaranarayana Rao BS, Chattarji S. Chronic stress induces contrasting patterns of dendritic remodeling in hippocampal and amygdaloid neurons. J Neurosci. 2002;22(15):6810-8. [PubMed ID: 12151561]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6758130].

  • 5.

    Vyas A, Pillai AG, Chattarji S. Recovery after chronic stress fails to reverse amygdaloid neuronal hypertrophy and enhanced anxiety-like behavior. Neuroscience. 2004;128(4):667-73. [PubMed ID: 15464275]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2004.07.013.

  • 6.

    Shekhar A, Truitt W, Rainnie D, Sajdyk T. Role of stress, corticotrophin releasing factor (CRF) and amygdala plasticity in chronic anxiety. Stress. 2005;8(4):209-19. [PubMed ID: 16423710]. https://doi.org/10.1080/10253890500504557.

  • 7.

    Boyle LM. A neuroplasticity hypothesis of chronic stress in the basolateral amygdala. Yale J Biol Med. 2013;86(2):117-25. [PubMed ID: 23766733]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3670432].

  • 8.

    McGarry LM, Carter AG. Inhibitory gating of basolateral amygdala inputs to the prefrontal cortex. J Neurosci. 2016;36(36):9391-406. [PubMed ID: 27605614]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC5013187]. https://doi.org/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0874-16.2016.

  • 9.

    Jessa M, Nazar M, Plaznik A. Anxiolytic-like action of intra-hippocampally administered NMDA antagonists in rats. Pol J Pharmacol. 1995;47(1):81-4. [PubMed ID: 7550554].

  • 10.

    Zafra F, Castren E, Thoenen H, Lindholm D. Interplay between glutamate and gamma-aminobutyric acid transmitter systems in the physiological regulation of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and nerve growth factor synthesis in hippocampal neurons. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1991;88(22):10037-41. [PubMed ID: 1658793]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC52862]. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.88.22.10037.

  • 11.

    Martinez G, Ropero C, Funes A, Flores E, Blotta C, Landa AI, et al. Effects of selective NMDA and non-NMDA blockade in the nucleus accumbens on the plus-maze test. Physiol Behav. 2002;76(2):219-24. [PubMed ID: 12044594]. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-9384(02)00704-7.

  • 12.

    Prut L, Belzung C. The open field as a paradigm to measure the effects of drugs on anxiety-like behaviors: A review. Eur J Pharmacol. 2003;463(1-3):3-33. [PubMed ID: 12600700]. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0014-2999(03)01272-x.

  • 13.

    Sharma AC, Kulkarni SK. Evidence for benzodiazepine receptor interaction with MK 801 in anxiety related behaviour in rats. Indian J Exp Biol. 1993;31(2):191-3. [PubMed ID: 8388854].

  • 14.

    Xie Z, Commissaris RL. Anxiolytic-like effects of the noncompetitive NMDA antagonist MK 801. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1992;43(2):471-7. [PubMed ID: 1359577]. https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-3057(92)90178-i.

  • 15.

    Plaznik A, Palejko W, Nazar M, Jessa M. Effects of antagonists at the NMDA receptor complex in two models of anxiety. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 1994;4(4):503-12. [PubMed ID: 7894261]. https://doi.org/10.1016/0924-977x(94)90299-2.

  • 16.

    Adamec RE, Burton P, Shallow T, Budgell J. Unilateral block of NMDA receptors in the amygdala prevents predator stress-induced lasting increases in anxiety-like behavior and unconditioned startle--effective hemisphere depends on the behavior. Physiol Behav. 1999;65(4-5):739-51. [PubMed ID: 10073475]. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0031-9384(98)00225-x.

  • 17.

    Parsons CG, Danysz W, Quack G. Memantine is a clinically well tolerated N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist--a review of preclinical data. Neuropharmacology. 1999;38(6):735-67. [PubMed ID: 10465680]. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0028-3908(99)00019-2.

  • 18.

    Schwartz TL, Siddiqui UA, Raza S. Memantine as an augmentation therapy for anxiety disorders. Case Rep Psychiatry. 2012;2012:749796. [PubMed ID: 22937414]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3420624]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/749796.

  • 19.

    Miguel TT, Nunes-de-Souza RL. Anxiogenic-like effects induced by NMDA receptor activation are prevented by inhibition of neuronal nitric oxide synthase in the periaqueductal gray in mice. Brain Res. 2008;1240:39-46. [PubMed ID: 18793618]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2008.08.068.

  • 20.

    Nagano M, Ozawa H, Suzuki H. Prenatal dexamethasone exposure affects anxiety-like behaviour and neuroendocrine systems in an age-dependent manner. Neurosci Res. 2008;60(4):364-71. [PubMed ID: 18243386]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neures.2007.12.005.

  • 21.

    Park DI, Kim HG, Jung WR, Shin MK, Kim KL. Mecamylamine attenuates dexamethasone-induced anxiety-like behavior in association with brain derived neurotrophic factor upregulation in rat brains. Neuropharmacology. 2011;61(1-2):276-82. [PubMed ID: 21530554]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.04.013.

  • 22.

    Skupio U, Tertil M, Sikora M, Golda S, Wawrzczak-Bargiela A, Przewlocki R. Behavioral and molecular alterations in mice resulting from chronic treatment with dexamethasone: Relevance to depression. Neuroscience. 2015;286:141-50. [PubMed ID: 25433240]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.11.035.

  • 23.

    Windle RJ, Shanks N, Lightman SL, Ingram CD. Central oxytocin administration reduces stress-induced corticosterone release and anxiety behavior in rats. Endocrinology. 1997;138(7):2829-34. [PubMed ID: 9202224]. https://doi.org/10.1210/endo.138.7.5255.

  • 24.

    Autry AE, Adachi M, Cheng P, Monteggia LM. Gender-specific impact of brain-derived neurotrophic factor signaling on stress-induced depression-like behavior. Biol Psychiatry. 2009;66(1):84-90. [PubMed ID: 19358977]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2734472]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.02.007.

  • 25.

    Chen ZY, Jing D, Bath KG, Ieraci A, Khan T, Siao CJ, et al. Genetic variant BDNF (Val66Met) polymorphism alters anxiety-related behavior. Science. 2006;314(5796):140-3. [PubMed ID: 17023662]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC1880880]. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1129663.

  • 26.

    Monteggia LM, Luikart B, Barrot M, Theobold D, Malkovska I, Nef S, et al. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor conditional knockouts show gender differences in depression-related behaviors. Biol Psychiatry. 2007;61(2):187-97. [PubMed ID: 16697351]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2006.03.021.

  • 27.

    Frustaci A, Pozzi G, Gianfagna F, Manzoli L, Boccia S. Meta-analysis of the brain-derived neurotrophic factor gene (BDNF) Val66Met polymorphism in anxiety disorders and anxiety-related personality traits. Neuropsychobiology. 2008;58(3-4):163-70. [PubMed ID: 19088493]. https://doi.org/10.1159/000182892.

  • 28.

    Gatt JM, Nemeroff CB, Dobson-Stone C, Paul RH, Bryant RA, Schofield PR, et al. Interactions between BDNF Val66Met polymorphism and early life stress predict brain and arousal pathways to syndromal depression and anxiety. Mol Psychiatry. 2009;14(7):681-95. [PubMed ID: 19153574]. https://doi.org/10.1038/mp.2008.143.

  • 29.

    Autry AE, Monteggia LM. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor and neuropsychiatric disorders. Pharmacol Rev. 2012;64(2):238-58. [PubMed ID: 22407616]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3310485]. https://doi.org/10.1124/pr.111.005108.

  • 30.

    Montag C, Ehrlich A, Neuhaus K, Dziobek I, Heekeren HR, Heinz A, et al. Theory of mind impairments in euthymic bipolar patients. J Affect Disord. 2010;123(1-3):264-9. [PubMed ID: 19748680]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2009.08.017.

  • 31.

    Garcia LS, Comim CM, Valvassori SS, Reus GZ, Barbosa LM, Andreazza AC, et al. Acute administration of ketamine induces antidepressant-like effects in the forced swimming test and increases BDNF levels in the rat hippocampus. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2008;32(1):140-4. [PubMed ID: 17884272]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2007.07.027.

  • 32.

    Garcia LS, Comim CM, Valvassori SS, Reus GZ, Stertz L, Kapczinski F, et al. Ketamine treatment reverses behavioral and physiological alterations induced by chronic mild stress in rats. Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry. 2009;33(3):450-5. [PubMed ID: 19439250]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pnpbp.2009.01.004.

  • 33.

    Li N, Liu RJ, Dwyer JM, Banasr M, Lee B, Son H, et al. Glutamate N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor antagonists rapidly reverse behavioral and synaptic deficits caused by chronic stress exposure. Biol Psychiatry. 2011;69(8):754-61. [PubMed ID: 21292242]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3068225]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.12.015.

  • 34.

    Brunoni AR, Lopes M, Fregni F. A systematic review and meta-analysis of clinical studies on major depression and BDNF levels: Implications for the role of neuroplasticity in depression. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2008;11(8):1169-80. [PubMed ID: 18752720]. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1461145708009309.

  • 35.

    Piccinni A, Marazziti D, Catena M, Domenici L, Del Debbio A, Bianchi C, et al. Plasma and serum brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in depressed patients during 1 year of antidepressant treatments. J Affect Disord. 2008;105(1-3):279-83. [PubMed ID: 17553570]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jad.2007.05.005.

  • 36.

    Shimizu E, Hashimoto K, Okamura N, Koike K, Komatsu N, Kumakiri C, et al. Alterations of serum levels of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) in depressed patients with or without antidepressants. Biol Psychiatry. 2003;54(1):70-5. [PubMed ID: 12842310]. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-3223(03)00181-1.

  • 37.

    Belzung C, Griebel G. Measuring normal and pathological anxiety-like behaviour in mice: A review. Behav Brain Res. 2001;125(1-2):141-9. [PubMed ID: 11682105]. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0166-4328(01)00291-1.

  • 38.

    Sewards TV, Sewards MA. The medial pain system: Neural representations of the motivational aspect of pain. Brain Res Bull. 2002;59(3):163-80. [PubMed ID: 12431746]. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0361-9230(02)00864-x.

  • 39.

    Paxinos G, Watson C. The rat brain in stereotaxic coordinates. 6th ed. United States: Elsevier; 2007.

  • 40.

    Bali A, Jaggi AS. Electric foot shock stress adaptation: Does it exist or not? Life Sci. 2015;130:97-102. [PubMed ID: 25817228]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lfs.2015.03.004.

  • 41.

    Treit D, Fundytus M. Thigmotaxis as a test for anxiolytic activity in rats. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1988;31(4):959-62. [PubMed ID: 3252289]. https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-3057(88)90413-3.

  • 42.

    Jeanson R, Blanco S, Fournier R, Deneubourg JL, Fourcassie V, Theraulaz G. A model of animal movements in a bounded space. J Theor Biol. 2003;225(4):443-51. [PubMed ID: 14615202]. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-5193(03)00277-7.

  • 43.

    Bourin M, Petit-Demouliere B, Dhonnchadha BN, Hascoet M. Animal models of anxiety in mice. Fundam Clin Pharmacol. 2007;21(6):567-74. [PubMed ID: 18034657]. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1472-8206.2007.00526.x.

  • 44.

    Nasihatkon ZS, Khosravi M, Bourbour Z, Sahraei H, Ranjbaran M, Hassantash SM, et al. Inhibitory effect of NMDA receptors in the ventral tegmental area on hormonal and eating behavior responses to stress in rats. Behav Neurol. 2014;2014:294149. [PubMed ID: 25177106]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4143587]. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/294149.

  • 45.

    Hogg S. A review of the validity and variability of the elevated plus-maze as an animal model of anxiety. Pharmacol Biochem Behav. 1996;54(1):21-30. [PubMed ID: 8728535]. https://doi.org/10.1016/0091-3057(95)02126-4.

  • 46.

    McEwen BS. Protective and damaging effects of stress mediators. N Engl J Med. 1998;338(3):171-9. [PubMed ID: 9428819]. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM199801153380307.

  • 47.

    McEwen BS, Eiland L, Hunter RG, Miller MM. Stress and anxiety: Structural plasticity and epigenetic regulation as a consequence of stress. Neuropharmacology. 2012;62(1):3-12. [PubMed ID: 21807003]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3196296]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropharm.2011.07.014.

  • 48.

    Vyas A, Bernal S, Chattarji S. Effects of chronic stress on dendritic arborization in the central and extended amygdala. Brain Res. 2003;965(1-2):290-4. [PubMed ID: 12591150]. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-8993(02)04162-8.

  • 49.

    Vyas A, Jadhav S, Chattarji S. Prolonged behavioral stress enhances synaptic connectivity in the basolateral amygdala. Neuroscience. 2006;143(2):387-93. [PubMed ID: 16962717]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2006.08.003.

  • 50.

    Lupien SJ, McEwen BS, Gunnar MR, Heim C. Effects of stress throughout the lifespan on the brain, behaviour and cognition. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2009;10(6):434-45. [PubMed ID: 19401723]. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2639.

  • 51.

    Gilabert-Juan J, Castillo-Gomez E, Perez-Rando M, Molto MD, Nacher J. Chronic stress induces changes in the structure of interneurons and in the expression of molecules related to neuronal structural plasticity and inhibitory neurotransmission in the amygdala of adult mice. Exp Neurol. 2011;232(1):33-40. [PubMed ID: 21819983]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expneurol.2011.07.009.

  • 52.

    Sajdyk TJ, Shekhar A. Excitatory amino acid receptors in the basolateral amygdala regulate anxiety responses in the social interaction test. Brain Res. 1997;764(1-2):262-4. [PubMed ID: 9295221]. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0006-8993(97)00594-5.

  • 53.

    Magarinos AM, Li CJ, Gal Toth J, Bath KG, Jing D, Lee FS, et al. Effect of brain-derived neurotrophic factor haploinsufficiency on stress-induced remodeling of hippocampal neurons. Hippocampus. 2011;21(3):253-64. [PubMed ID: 20095008]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC2888762]. https://doi.org/10.1002/hipo.20744.

  • 54.

    Smith MA, Makino S, Kvetnansky R, Post RM. Stress and glucocorticoids affect the expression of brain-derived neurotrophic factor and neurotrophin-3 mRNAs in the hippocampus. J Neurosci. 1995;15(3 Pt 1):1768-77. [PubMed ID: 7891134]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC6578156].

  • 55.

    Lakshminarasimhan H, Chattarji S. Stress leads to contrasting effects on the levels of brain derived neurotrophic factor in the hippocampus and amygdala. PLoS One. 2012;7(1). e30481. [PubMed ID: 22272355]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC3260293]. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0030481.

  • 56.

    Leuner B, Shors TJ. Stress, anxiety, and dendritic spines: What are the connections? Neuroscience. 2013;251:108-19. [PubMed ID: 22522470]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2012.04.021.

  • 57.

    McEwen BS, Nasca C, Gray JD. Stress effects on neuronal structure: Hippocampus, amygdala, and prefrontal cortex. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016;41(1):3-23. [PubMed ID: 26076834]. [PubMed Central ID: PMC4677120]. https://doi.org/10.1038/npp.2015.171.