Next Article in Journal
Influence of Bronchoscopy on Nitric Oxide in Exhaled Air
Previous Article in Journal
The Role of Fiberoptic Bronchoscopy in the Diagnostic Algorithmof Solitary Pulmonary Nodule
 
 
Advances in Respiratory Medicine is published by MDPI from Volume 90 Issue 4 (2022). Previous articles were published by another publisher in Open Access under a CC-BY (or CC-BY-NC-ND) licence, and they are hosted by MDPI on mdpi.com as a courtesy and upon agreement with Via Medica.
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Exhaled Nitric Oxide in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome

by
Tadeusz Przybyłowski
*,
Piotr Bielicki
,
Marta Kumor
,
Katarzyna Hildebrand
,
Marta Maskey-Warzęchowska
,
Adam Frangrat
,
Katarzyna Górska
,
Piotr Korczyński
and
Ryszarda Chazan
Katedra i Klinika Chorób Wewnętrznych, Pneumonologii i Alergologii, AM w Warszawie, Warsaw, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Adv. Respir. Med. 2006, 74(1), 21-25; https://doi.org/10.5603/ARM.28064
Submission received: 1 March 2006 / Revised: 1 March 2006 / Accepted: 1 March 2006 / Published: 1 March 2006

Abstract

Exhaled nitric oxide has been extensively investigated as a non-invasive marker of airway inflammation. Some authors have suggested that morning FENO in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (OSAS) patients is elevated due to inflammation of upper airways, while others have not found any differences between patients and healthy subjects. The purpose of this study was to analyze concentration of exhaled nitric oxide (FENO) in OSAS patients. Methods: 119 (99 M, 20 F) consecutive patients of sleep laboratory participated in this study. Standard overnight sleep studies with polysomnography or portable screening device were carried out in the whole group: OSAS was diagnosed in 66 patients and 53 no-OSAS served as controls. FENO was measured on-line with a flow rate kept at 0.045–0.055 l/s, according to the recommendations of ATS using a chemiluminescence analyzer twice: before the sleep study (8–10 p.m.) and after termination of data collection (6–8 a.m.). There were no differences in age between patients and controls. Respiratory disturbance index (RDI) was 40.3 ± 24.9 in patients and 3.7 ± 2.8 in con-trols (p < 0.001). In OSAS patients both evening and morning FENO was significantly higher compared to controls(23.1 ± 14.8 ppb vs. 16.8 ± 9.8 ppb and 22.4 ± 13.2 ppb vs. 15.3 ± 8.1 ppb respectively, p < 0.05). Weak but statistically significant correlations for the whole group between morning FENO and mean and minimum arterial oxygen saturation (SaO2) during sleep and number of study minutes with SaO2 < 90% were observed. Lower evening FENO in OSAS patients with coexisting arterial hypertension when compared to normotensive OSAS patients was also noticed (19.1 ± 10.8 ppb vs. 27.1 ± 19.1 ppb; p < 0.05). Conclusions: The increase in FENO in OSAS patents may be caused by repetitive apneas and hypoxemia during sleep.
Keywords: obstructive sleep apnea; exhaled nitric oxide; polysomnography obstructive sleep apnea; exhaled nitric oxide; polysomnography

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Przybyłowski, T.; Bielicki, P.; Kumor, M.; Hildebrand, K.; Maskey-Warzęchowska, M.; Frangrat, A.; Górska, K.; Korczyński, P.; Chazan, R. Exhaled Nitric Oxide in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome. Adv. Respir. Med. 2006, 74, 21-25. https://doi.org/10.5603/ARM.28064

AMA Style

Przybyłowski T, Bielicki P, Kumor M, Hildebrand K, Maskey-Warzęchowska M, Frangrat A, Górska K, Korczyński P, Chazan R. Exhaled Nitric Oxide in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome. Advances in Respiratory Medicine. 2006; 74(1):21-25. https://doi.org/10.5603/ARM.28064

Chicago/Turabian Style

Przybyłowski, Tadeusz, Piotr Bielicki, Marta Kumor, Katarzyna Hildebrand, Marta Maskey-Warzęchowska, Adam Frangrat, Katarzyna Górska, Piotr Korczyński, and Ryszarda Chazan. 2006. "Exhaled Nitric Oxide in Patients with Obstructive Sleep Apnea Syndrome" Advances in Respiratory Medicine 74, no. 1: 21-25. https://doi.org/10.5603/ARM.28064

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop