Biomed. Papers 147(2), 131-135 (2003) | DOI: 10.5507/bp.2003.018

Approaches to messenger RNA detection - comparison of methods

Zdeněk Dvořáka, Jean-Marc Pascussib, Martin Modrianskýa
a Institute of Medical Chemistry and Biochemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Palacký University Olomouc, Olomouc, Czech Republic.
b CNRS -, INSERM -, U128, 1919 Route de Mende, 34293 Montpellier, France.

Detection of messenger RNA is an important part of current biomedical research, although utilized for decades. This communication endeavors to compare three most commonly used techniques of mRNA detection, i.e. Northern blot, ribonuclease protection assay (RPA), and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). Principles and general procedures of these methods are described, and advantages and weaknesses of each are discussed in terms of their specificity, sensitivity, difficulty, time and material demands as well as health and environmental risks. We conclude that choice of any method discussed depends on particular purpose, experience of the researcher, and on laboratory equipment and organization.

Keywords: Messenger RNA, Northern blot, Ribonuclease protection assay, Real time polymerase chain reaction

Received: September 23, 2003; Accepted: October 15, 2003; Published: December 1, 2003  Show citation

ACS AIP APA ASA Harvard Chicago IEEE ISO690 MLA NLM Turabian Vancouver
Dvořák, Z., Pascussi, J., & Modrianský, M. (2003). Approaches to messenger RNA detection - comparison of methods. Biomedical papers147(2), 131-135. doi: 10.5507/bp.2003.018
Download citation

References

  1. Chomczynski P, Sacchi N. (1993) Single-step method of RNA isolation by acid guanidinium thiocyanate-phenol-chloroform extraction. Anal Biochem 162, 156-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  2. Kingston RE. (1993) Preparation of Poly(A)+RNA. In: Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (Eds.: Ausubel EM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Siedman JG, Smith JA, Struhl K), p 4.5.1.-4.5.3. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, 1993.
  3. Brown T. (1993) Analysis of RNA by Northern and Slot Blot Hybridization. In: Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (Eds.: Ausubel EM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Siedman JG, Smith JA, Struhl K), p 4.9.1.-4.9.14. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, 1993.
  4. Gilman M. (1993) Ribonuclease protection assay. In: Current Protocols in Molecular Biology (Eds.: Ausubel EM, Brent R, Kingston RE, Moore DD, Siedman JG, Smith JA, Struhl K), p 4.7.1.-4.7.8. John Wiley and Sons, New York, NY, 1993.
  5. Melton DA, Krieg PA, Rebagliati MR, Maniatis T, Zinn K, Green MR. (1984) Efficient in vitro synthesis of biologically active RNA and RNA hybridization probes from plasmids containing a bacteriophage SP6 promoter. Nucleic Acids Res 12, 7035-56. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  6. Rottman JB. (2002) The ribonuclease protection assay: a powerful tool for the veterinary pathologist. Vet Pathol 39, 2-9. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  7. Erlich HA. (ed.) (1989) PCR Technology: Principles and Applications for DNA amplification. Stockton Press, London. Go to original source...
  8. Wilkening S, Bader A. (2003) Influence of culture time on the expression of drug-metabolizing enzymes in primary human hepatocytes and hepatoma cell line HepG2. J Biochem Mol Toxicol 17, 207-13. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...
  9. Wilkening S, Stahl F, Bader A. (2003) Comparison of primary human hepatocytes and hepatoma cell line HepG2 with regard to their biotransformation properties. Drug Metab Dispos 31, 1035-42. Go to original source... Go to PubMed...