Comparison of an antioxidant system in tolerant and susceptible wheat seedlings in response to salt stress

  • Kaouthar Feki University of Carthage-Tunis, Centre of Biotechnology Bordj Cedria, Laboratory of Legumes, BP 901, 2050 Hammam Lif. University of Sfax, Centre of Biotechnology of Sfax, Biotechnology and Plant Improvement Laboratory, B.P 1177, 3018 Sfax
  • Sana Tounsi University of Sfax, Centre of Biotechnology of Sfax, Biotechnology and Plant Improvement Laboratory, B.P 1177, 3018 Sfax
  • Faiçal Brini University of Sfax, Centre of Biotechnology of Sfax, Biotechnology and Plant Improvement Laboratory, B.P 1177, 3018 Sfax
Keywords: antioxidant, oxidant, reactive oxygen species, salinity, Triticum durum

Abstract

It has been demonstrated previously that the physiological and molecular analysis of seedlings of the tolerant (Om Rabia3) and susceptible (Mahmoudi) Tunisian wheat genotypes were different at short and long-term response to salinity. In this study, we examined the antioxidant defence system in seedlings of these two cultivars at short-term response to different NaCl concentrations. The findings showed that high salinity tolerance of cv. Om Rabia3, as manifested by lower decrease in its dry biomass, was associated with lower malondialdehyde and hydrogen peroxide contents, lower accumulation of the superoxide (O2) in the roots and the shoots, and also lower decrease in ascorbate content than those in cv. Mahmoudi. Moreover, the expression of some genes coding for antioxidant enzymes such as the catalase, the superoxide dismutase and the peroxidase were enhanced by NaCl stress especially in the salt-tolerant cultivar. In parallel, their activities were  increased in response to the same condition of stress and especially in the cv. Om Rabia3. Taken together, these data suggested that the capacity to limit oxidative damage is important for NaCl tolerance of durum wheat.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aebi H, 1984. Catalase in vitro. Method Enzymol 105: 121-126. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0076-6879(84)05016-3

Ahmad P, Sarwat M, Sharma S, 2008. Reactive oxygen species, antioxidants and signaling in plants. J Plant Biol 51: 167-173. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF03030694

Alscher RG, Erturk N, Heath LS, 2002. Role of superoxide dismutases in controlling oxidative stress in plants. J Exp Bot 53: 1331-1341. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/53.372.1331

Ashraf M, 2009. Biotechnological approach of improving plant salt tolerance using antioxidants as markers. Biotechnol Adv 27: 84-93. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biotechadv.2008.09.003

Athar HUR, Khan A, Ashraf M, 2008. Exogenously applied ascorbic acid alleviates salt-induced oxidative stress in wheat. Environ Exp Bot 63: 224-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.10.018

Azevedo Neto AD, Prico JT, Eneas-Filho J, Braga de Abreu CE, Gomes-Filho E, 2006. Effect of salt stres on antioxidative enzymes and lipid peroxidation in leaves and roots of salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive maize genotypes. Environ Exp Bot 56: 235-241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2005.01.008

Ben Amor N, Ben Hamed K, Debez A, Grignon C, Abdelly C, 2005. Physiological and antioxidant responses of the perennial halophyte Crithmum maritimum to salinity. Plant Sci 168: 889-899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plantsci.2004.11.002

Bowler C, Slooten L, Vandenbranden S, Rycke RD, Botterman J, Sybesma C, Montagu MV, Inze D, 1991. Manganese superoxide dismutase can reduce cellular damage mediated by oxygen radicals in transgenic plants. EMBO J 10: 1723-1732.

Bradford MM, 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantification of microgram quantities of proteins utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72: 248-254. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-2697(76)90527-3

Breusegem FV, Slooten L, Stassart JM, Moens T, Botterman J, Van Montagu M, Inze D, 1999. Overproduction of Arabidopsis thaliana FeSOD confers oxidative stress tolerance to transgenic maize. Plant Cell Physiol 40: 515-523. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029572

Brini F, Amara I, Feki K, Hanin M, Khoudi H, Masmoudi K, 2009. Physiological and molecular analyses of seedlings of two Tunisian durum wheat (Triticum turgidum L. subsp. Durum [Desf.]) varieties showing contrasting tolerance to salt stress. Acta Physiol Plant 31: 145-154. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11738-008-0215-x

Chaoui A, Mazhoudi S, Ghorbal MH, El Ferjani E, 1997. Cadmium and zinc induction of lipid peroxidation and effects on antioxidant enzyme activities in bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Plant Sci 127: 139-147. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(97)00115-5

Choudhury S, Panda P, Sahoo L, Panda SK, 2013. Reactive oxygen species signaling in plants under abiotic stress. Plant Signal Behav 8:23681 https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.23681

Desikan R, Mackerness S, Hancock JT, Neill SJ, 2001. Regulation of the Arabidopsis transcriptome by oxidative stress. Plant Physio1 127: 159-72.

Distelbarth H, Nägele T, Heyer AG, 2012. Responses of antioxidant enzymes to cold and high light are not correlated to freezing tolerance in natural accessions of Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Biol 15: 982-990. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.2012.00718.x

Dvorák J, Noaman MM, Goyal S, Gorham J, 1994. Enhancement of the salt tolerance of Triticum turgidum L by the Kna1 locus transferred from Triticum aestivum L. chromosome 4D by homoeologous recombination. Theor Appl Genet 87: 872-877. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00221141

Ellouzi H, Ben Hamed K, Cela J, Munné-Bosch S, Abdelly C, 2011. Early effects of salt stress on the physiological and oxidative status of Cakile maritima (halophyte) and Arabidopsis thaliana (glycophyte). Physiol Plant 142: 128-143. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2011.01450.x

Epstein E, 1972. Mineral nutrition of plants: Principles and perspectives. John Wiley & Sons, NY.

Feki K, Kamoun Y, Mahmoud RB, Farhat-Khemakhem A, Gargouri A, Brini F, 2015. Multiple abiotic stress tolerance of the transformants yeast cells and the transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing a novel durum wheat catalase. Plant Physiol Biochem 97: 420-431. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2015.10.034

Feki K, Farhat-Khemakhem A, Kamoun Y, Saibi W, Gargouri A, Brini F, 2016. Responses of transgenic Arabidopsis plants and recombinant yeast cells expressing a novel durum wheat manganese superoxide dismutase TdMnSOD to various abiotic stresses. J Plant Physiol 198: 56-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2016.03.019

Foyer CH, Noctor G, 2011. Ascorbate and glutathione: the heart of the redox hub. Plant Physiol 155: 2-18. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.110.167569

Foyer CH, Souriau N, Perret S, Lelandais M, Kunert KJ, Pruvost C, Jouanin L, 1995. Overexpression of glutathione reductase but not glutathione synthetase leads to increases in antioxidant capacity and resistance to photoinhibition in poplar trees. Plant Physiol 109: 1047-1057. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.109.3.1047

Giannopolitis CN, Ries SK, 1977. Superoxide dismutases II: Purification and quantitative relationship with water soluble protein in seedlings. Plant Physiol 59: 315-318. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.59.2.315

Gómez JM, Hernández JA, Jiménez A, del Rio LA, Sevilla F, 1999. Differential response of antioxidative enzymes of chloroplasts and mitochondria to long-term NaCl stress of pea plants. Free Radic Res 31: 11-18. https://doi.org/10.1080/10715769900301261

Gorham J, Wyn Jones RG, Bristol A, 1990. Partial characterization of the trait for enhanced K+-Na+ discrimination in the D genome of wheat. Planta 180: 590-597. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02411458

Gossett DR, Millhollon EP, Lucas MC, Banks SW, Marney MM, 1994. The effects of NaCl on antioxidant enzyme activities in callus tissue of salt-tolerant and salt-sensitive cultivars of cotton. Plant Cell Rep 13: 498-503. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00232944

Greenway H, Munns R, 1980. Mechanisms of salt tolerance in nonhalophytes. Annu Rev Plant Physiol 31: 149-190. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.pp.31.060180.001053

Hernández JA, Ferrer MA, Jiménez A, Barcelo AR, Sevilla F, 2001. Antioxidant systems and O2–/H2O2 production in the apoplast of pea leaves: its relation with salt-induced necrotic lesions in minor veins. Plant Physiol 127: 817-831. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.010188

Hossain MA, Bhattacharjee S, Armin SM, Qian P, Xin W, Li HY, Burritt DJ, Fujita M, Tran LSP, 2015. Hydrogen peroxide priming modulates abiotic oxidative stress tolerance: insights from ROS detoxification and scavenging. Front Plant Sci 420: 16-6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2015.00420

Husain S, Munns R, Condon AG, 2003. Effect of sodium exclusion trait on chlorophyll retention and growth of durum wheat in saline soil. Aust J Agric Res 54: 589-597. https://doi.org/10.1071/AR03032

Jabs T, Dietrich RA, Dangl JL, 1996. Initiation of runaway cell death in an Arabidopsis mutant by extracellular superoxide. Sci 273: 1853-1856. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.273.5283.1853

Koca H, Bor M, Özdemir F, Türkan İ, 2007. The effect of salt stress on lipid peroxidation, antioxidative enzymes and proline content of sesame cultivars. Environ Exp Bot 60: 344-351. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2006.12.005

Lee DH, Kim YS, Lee CB, 2001. The inductive responses of the antioxidant enzymes by salt stress in the rice (Oryza sativa L.). J Plant Physiol 158: 737-745. https://doi.org/10.1078/0176-1617-00174

Liang Y, Chen Q, Liu Q, Zhang W, Ding R, 2003. Exogenous silicon (Si) increases antioxidant enzyme activity and reduces lipid peroxidation in roots of salt-stressed barley (Hordeum vulgare L.). J Plant Physiol 160: 1157-1164. https://doi.org/10.1078/0176-1617-01065

Maehly AC, Chance B, 1954. The assay of catalase and peroxidase. Meth Anal Biochem 1: 357-424.

Mandhania S, Madan S, Sawhney V, 2006. Antioxidant defense mechanism under salt stress in wheat seedlings. Biol Plant 227: 227-231. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-006-0011-7

Mhamdi A, Queval G, Chaouch S, Vanderauwera S, Van Breusegem F, Noctor G, 2010. Catalase function in plants: a focus on Arabidopsis mutants as stress-mimic models. J Exp Bot 61: 4197-4220. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erq282

Mittler R, Zilinskas BA, 1992. Molecular cloning and characterization of a gene encoding pea cytosolic ascorbate peroxidase. J Biol Chem 267: 21802-21807.

Mittler R, Vanderauwera S, Gollery M, Van Breusegem F, 2004. Reactive oxygen gene network of plants. Trends Plant Sci 9: 1360-1385. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2004.08.009

Mittova V, Tal M, Volokita M, Guy M, 2003. Up-regulation of the leaf mitochondrial and peroxisomal antioxidative systems in responses to salt-induced oxidative stress in the wild salt-tolerant tomato species Lycopersicon pennellii. Plant Cell Environ 26: 845-856. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-3040.2003.01016.x

Mukherjee SP, Choudhuri MA, 1983. Implications of water stress-induced changes in the levels of endogenous ascorbic acid and hydrogen peroxide in Vigna seedlings. Physiol Plant 58: 166-170. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.1983.tb04162.x

Munné-Bosch S, 2005. The role of alpha-tocopherol in plant stress tolerance. J Plant Physiol 162: 743-748. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jplph.2005.04.022

Nakano Y, Asada K, 1981. Hydrogen peroxide is scavenged by ascorbate-specific peroxidase in spinach chloroplasts. Plant Cell Physiol 22: 867-880.

Noctor G, Foyer CH, 1998. Ascorbate and gluthatione: keeping active oxygen under control. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 49: 249-279. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.arplant.49.1.249

Pardo JM, 2010. Biotechnology of water and salinity stress tolerance. Curr Opin Biotechnol 21: 185-196. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2010.02.005

Roxas VP, Smith JRK, Allen ER, Allen RD, 1997. Overexpression of glutathione S-transferase/glutathione peroxidase enhances the growth of transgenic tobacco seedlings during stress. Nat Biotechnol 15: 988-991. https://doi.org/10.1038/nbt1097-988

Roxas VP, Lodhi SA, Garrett DK, Mahan JR, Allen RD, 2000. Stress tolerance in transgenic tobacco seedlings that overexpress glutathione S-transferase/ glutathione peroxidase. Plant Cell Physiol 41: 1229-1234. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcd051

Ruiz JM, Blasco B, Rivero RM, Romero L, 2005. Nicotine-free and salt tolerant tobacco plants obtained by grafting to salinity-resistant rootstocks of tomato. Physiol Plant 124: 465-475. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1399-3054.2005.00532.x

Sairam RK, Rao KV, Srivastava GC, 2002. Differential response of wheat genotypes to long-term salinity stress in relation to oxidative stress, antioxidant activity and osmolyte concentration. Plant Sci 163: 1037-1046. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00278-9

Sairam RK, Srivastava GC, Agarwal S, Meena RC, 2005. Differences in antioxidant activity in response to salinity stress in tolerant and susceptible wheat genotypes. Biol Plant 49: 85-91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10535-005-5091-2

Schafer RQ, Wang HP, Kelley EE, Cueno KL, Martin SM, Buettner GR, 2002. Comparing carotene, vitamin E and nitric oxide as membrane antioxidants. Biol Chem 383: 671-81. https://doi.org/10.1515/BC.2002.069

Shigeoka S, Ishikawa T, Tamoi M, Miyagawa Y, Takeda T, Yabuta Y, Yoshimura K, 2002. Regulation and function of ascorbate peroxidase isoenzymes. J Exp Bot 53: 1305-1319. https://doi.org/10.1093/jexbot/53.372.1305

Shao HB, Chu LY, Wu G, Zhang JH, Lu ZH, Hu YC, 2007. Changes of some anti-oxidative physiological indices under soil water deficits among 10 wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes at tillering stage. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 59: 113-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2006.09.004

Sreenivasulu N, Grimm B, Wobus U, Weschke W, 2000. Differential response of antioxidant compounds to salinity stress in salt-tolerant and saltsensitive seedlings of foxtail millet (Setaria italica). Physiol Plant 109: 435-442. https://doi.org/10.1034/j.1399-3054.2000.100410.x

Suzuki N, Koussevitzky S, Mittler R, Miller G, 2012. ROS and redox signalling inthe response of plants to abiotic stress. Plant Cell Environ 35: 259-270. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02336.x

Türkan I, Demiral T, 2009. Recent developments in understanding salinity tolerance. Environ Exp Bot 67: 2-9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2009.05.008

Uchida A, Jagendorf AT, Hibino T, Takabe T, Takabe T, 2002. Effects of hydrogen peroxide and nitric oxide on both salt and heat stress tolerance in rice. Plant Sci 163: 515-523. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(02)00159-0

Vallejos CE, 1983. Enzyme activity staining. In: Isozymes in plant genetics and breeding Part B, Tanksley SD and Orton TJ. (eds), pp. 469-516. Elsevier Sci Publ, Amsterdam.

Van Camp W, Capiau K, Van Montagu M, Inzé D, Slooten L, 1996. Enhancement of oxidative stress tolerance in transgenic tobacco plants overproducing Fe-superoxide dismutase in chloroplasts. Plant Physiol 112: 1703-1714. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.112.4.1703

Velikova V, Yordanov I, Edreva A, 2000. Oxidative stress and some antioxidant system in acid rain treated bean plants: Protective role of exogenous polyamines. Plant Sci 151: 59-66. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9452(99)00197-1

Venkatesh J, Park SW, 2014. Role of L-ascorbate in alleviating abiotic stresses in crop plants. Bot Studies 55: 38. https://doi.org/10.1186/1999-3110-55-38

Wang J, Zhang H, Allen RD, 1999. Overexpression of an Arabidopsis peroxisomal ascorbate peroxidase gene in tobacco increases protection against oxidative stress. Plant Cell Physiol 40: 725-732. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a029599

Willekens H, Inze D, Van Montagu M, Van Camp W, 1995. Catalase in plants. Mol Breed 1: 207-228. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02277422

Wu G, Wei ZK, Shao HB, 2007. The mutual responses of higher plants to environment: physiological and microbiological aspects. Colloids Surf B Biointerfaces 59: 113-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2007.05.003

Zhu D, Scandalios JG, 1994. Differential accumulation of manganese-superoxide dismutase transcripts in maize in response to abscisic acid and high osmoticum. Plant Physiol 106: 177-176. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.106.1.173

Published
2018-02-07
How to Cite
Feki, K., Tounsi, S., & Brini, F. (2018). Comparison of an antioxidant system in tolerant and susceptible wheat seedlings in response to salt stress. Spanish Journal of Agricultural Research, 15(4), e0805. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/2017154-11507
Section
Plant physiology