Research article

When Attribution of Consistency Depends on Group Value: Social Valorization of Preference for Consistency in Equivalent and Asymmetric Intergroup Relations

Authors:

Abstract

The social valorization of Preference For Consistency (PFC) was examined via a minimal group paradigm activating either equivalent or asymmetric intergroup relations. After an aesthetic judgment task and assignment to one of two groups, participants (N = 298) completed the PFC scale according to three instructions: on their own behalf, as an ingroup member, or as an outgroup member (order counter-balanced). Results showed that in equivalent intergroup relations, participants attributed greater PFC to the ingroup and to the self than to the outgroup. In asymmetric intergroup relations, participants attributed greater PFC to the high-status group and to the self than to the low-status group, and this was independent of the participants’ group membership. We discuss the contribution the minimal group paradigm can make to revealing the social valorization of psychological constructs and the mechanisms underlying the social value accorded to PFC.

Keywords:

Preference for ConsistencySocial ValorizationEquivalent and Asymmetric Intergroup RelationsMinimal Group Paradigm
  • Year: 2016
  • Volume: 29 Issue: 1
  • Page/Article: 127-135
  • DOI: 10.5334/irsp.13
  • Published on 21 Dec 2016
  • Peer Reviewed