Published December 31, 2016 | Version v1
Taxonomic treatment Open

Paraleptophlebia falcula Traver 1934

Description

Paraleptophlebia falcula Traver 1934

(Figs 1–37)

Paraleptophlebia falcula Traver 1934: 190 (male imago); Needham et al. 1935: 520 (male imago); Harper & Harper 1986: 1465 (male imago).

Material. RUSSIAN FEDERATION: AMURSKAYA OBLAST’: Zeya River basin: Bolshaya Makcha river, bridge at highway Tygda – Zeya, 28.VI.2013, Coll. T. Tiunova: 1 ♂ im., 1 2♀im. (reared from larvae); same place, 28.VI.2015, coll. T. Tiunova: 1 ♂ im., 3 ♀im. (reared from larvae), 3 larvae; Allinga river (river system Allinga- Tynda-Dep-Zeya), low bridge at highway Zeya – Snezhnogorsk, 14.VII.2012, coll. T. Tiunova: 1 ♂ im., 1 ♀im. (reared from larvae), 8 larvae; same place, 24.VII.2014, coll. T. Tiunova: 10 larvae; Allinga river near mouth, 29– 30.VI.2015, coll. T. Tiunova: 5 ♂ im., 3 ♀im. (reared from larvae), 11 larvae; Amur river basin, Talali river, upper reaches, about 5 km above Gonzha village, 25.VIII.2004, coll. T. Tiunova: 2 ♂ im., 3 ♀im (IBSS). TRANSBAIKAL KRAY, Chasovinka river (tributary of Shilka river) about 300 m above mouth, 24.VII.2005, coll. T. Tiunova: 2 ♂ im., 3 ♀im. (reared from larvae), 2 L (IBSS). SAKHA YAKUTIA, Chulman river basin, Amnunnykta river, about 500 m upper mouth, 28.VII.2010, coll. T. Tiunova: 1 ♂ subim., 1 larva (IBSS). KOMI REPUBLIC, Vorkuta: Ayach Yaga river (tributary of Vorkuta river), 4.VIII.1958, coll. Chernykh: 3 ♂ im.; Sabrey- Yaga river, coll. Iordansky: 1 ♂ im. (only styliger on slide made by O. Chernova) (ZIN).

Description. Mature larva. Length (mm): body 5.3–6.8; cerci 4.6–8.2. Head: Brown with occipit light brown and pale spots around lateral ocelli and anterior to median ocellus (cuticular coloration). Antennae white. Labrum dark brown; dorsal surface covered with long hair-like setae; anterior margin with shallow emargination and several rows of stout setae (Fig. 1). Mandibles dark brown, with broad band extending parallel to outer edge (Figs 2–3). Left mandible with incisor terminated by 4 denticles and kinetodontium terminated by 3 denticles (Fig. 4), right mandible with incisor terminated by 3 denticles and kinetodontium terminated by 3 denticles (Fig. 5). Both mandibles with extensive patches of setae on dorsal surface in middle area. Right mandible with row of long hairlike setae proximal of molar surface (Fig. 3). 1st segment of maxillary palp with several spine-like setae along outer margin and small thin setae along inner margin; 2nd segment with long hair-like setae on both margins; 3rd segment almost completely covered with very long, thin hair-like setae (Fig. 6). Maxillary palp with 2nd and 3rd segments subequal in length, together 1.55 times longer than 1st segment. Labium as in Fig. 7; apical part of dorsal surface of glossae densely covered with stout hair-like setae; among them small stout setae located nearer to inner edge; dorsal surface of paraglossae covered with small stout setae and long hair-like lateral setae (Fig. 7); 3rd segment of labial palp with rows of stout variably spaced setae (Fig. 8). Labial palp with 2nd segment shorter than 3rd segment, 2nd and 3rd segments together longer than 1st segment. Hypopharynx slightly emarginated apically (Fig. 9). Thorax: Pronotum brown with white lateral margins and wide pale stripe along posterior margin; mesonotum brown with diffuse pale spots anteriorly and between protoptera (cuticular coloration) (Fig. 14). Legs grayish. Forefemora with row of stout setae on inner edge; anterior side of forefemora covered with stout setae of identical form and size (Fig. 10). Claw with single row of denticles, reaching middle of claw; apex of claw elongate (Fig. 11). Ratio of length femur/tibia and tibia/tarsus: fore and middle legs 1.3–1.2 and 1.4–1.5; hind leg 1.4–1.2 and 1.4–1.7. Abdomen: Terga brown with light spots; lateral edges pale; terga II–III with small triangular light spot on median part of posterior margin; terga IV–VI with a toothed light spot occupying about half of tergum length, on terga VII–IX reaching anterior margin; tergum X light with brown lateral edges (cuticular coloration) (Fig. 14). Abdominal terga III–IX with regular row of triangular stout spines on posterior margin and irregular rows of small spines anteriad of it (Fig. 12). Posterolateral spines on abdominal segment IX longer than on segment VIII. Abdominal sterna light brown with brown band on anterior margin, lateral edges pale; sterna VIII–IX pale, yellowish; sternum X pale, yellowish with brown lateral angles (cuticular coloration) (Fig. 15). Sterna I–VII with ganglion spots. Sternum IX of female with postero-median emargination (Fig. 13). All tergalii hairy (Figs 16–22); hairs very thin, pale, and break off easily; well visible only on a dark background. Cerci pale, grayish, darker at base.

Male imago (in alcohol). Length (mm): body 6.0–8.5; forewings 6.8–8.5; cerci 7.7–9.5. Head: General color dark brown to dark. Antennae brown; ocelli whitish apically and black basally. Upper portion of compound eyes light brown to yellowish or grayish-brown; low portion dark (Figs 23–24); compound eyes contiguous (Fig. 24). Thorax: General color dark brown. Medioscutum and submedioscutum dark brown (Fig. 24); posterior scutal protuberance dark with small light spot on lateral sides; sublateroscutum brown to light brown. Wings pale, hyaline; all veins pale, almost invisible; veins C and Sc slightly darker and visible; pterostigma milky (Fig. 23). Femora and tibia of forelegs whitish or yellowish, joints brown; tarsal segments pale or whitish. Middle and hind legs grayish, femur slightly darker. Ratio of length of femur/tibia 0.8–0.9; ratio of tarsal segments length 0.95:1.5:2.8:3.3. Abdomen: Terga with contrasting pattern (Fig. 24): tergum I dark brown; tergum II light brown or brownish; terga III–VI dirty yellowish, translucent, posterior margins darker; lateral sides with dark tracheal trunk; tergum VII dirty brownish with pair of darker stripes in middle area, with posterior margin dark brown; terga VIII– IX dark. Abdominal sterna with contrasting pattern: sternum I dark brown; sternum II brownish; sterna II–VI yellowish, translucent; sternum VIII dirty gray or dark brown; sternum IX dark brown with light central area. Nerve ganglia brown, visible on segments II–VII (Fig. 25). Cerci white. Genitalia: Styliger brown, somewhat lighter in posterior area, gonostyli yellowish. Styliger deeply concave medially, with U-shaped incision and two long slightly curved processes reaching bases of ventral processes of penis (Figs 26, 29, 30). Gonostylus with 1st+2nd segment widest at middle, bent ventrally near base; 3rd segment slightly widened apically; 4th segment smallest (Fig. 26). Penis lobes separated by U-shaped cleft reaching middle of penis length; each penis lobe with triangular widening, with apex pointed and curved inwards, ventrally with long crescent-shaped pointed process directed proximally and reaching proximal 1/3 of penis (Figs 27, 30).

Female imago (in alcohol). Length (mm): body 7.3–8.1; forewing 8.0–9.0; cerci 7.5–8.5. Head: General color dark brown. Antennae brown; ocelli whitish apically, black basally. Thorax: General color dark brown (Fig. 31). Medioscutum and submedioscutum from brown; posterior scutal protuberance dark; sublateroscutum brown with white maculation; scuto-scutellar impression dirty brownish or dirty whitish. Wings pale, hyaline; longitudinal veins of forewing light brown, visible; hind wing colorless; all cross veins colorless, poorly visible. Legs light brown, femur slightly darker. Ratio of length femur/tibia and tibia/tarsus on forelegs 1.0–0.9 and 1.3–1.4. Abdomen: Terga and sterna dark brown (Fig. 31). Subanal plate with deep V-shaped incision (Fig. 32). Cerci yellowish or whitish.

Eggs. General form oval 190–214 µm length and 85–118 µm width (Fig. 33). Chorion rugose, with broad and deep folds (Fig. 34), with small flower-shape KCT sparsely arranged (Figs 33, 35). Two or three small round micropyles in middle area (Fig. 33). Sperm guide absent (Figs 36–37).

Comparison. Male imago of P. falcula differs from all other species by presence of long processes on styliger (Figs 26, 29, 30).

Among species of Paraleptophlebia with available larval descriptions, P. falcula differs from Nearctic species P. bicornuta (McDunnough 1926), P. helena Day 1952, P. packii (Needham 1927) and P. z a y a nt e Day 1952 by absence of tusk-like elongation of mandibular incisor; from P. altana Kilgore & Allen 1973 and P. cachea Day 1954 it differs by non-widened lobes of tergalii without dark lateral branches of main trachea. The same is known for the following species of Paraleptophlebia: P. calcarica Rowbotham & Allen 1988 (Jacobus & McCafferty 2004), P. c i nc t a (Retzius 1783) (Macan 1952; Landa 1969), P. debilis (Walker 1853) (Ide 1930; Gordon 1933), P. guttata (McDunnough 1924a) (Ide 1930; Gordon 1933), P. jeanae Berner 1955 (Randolph & McCafferty 1996), P. lacustris Ikonomov 1962 (Ikonomov 1962), P. moerens (McDunnough 1924a) (Gordon 1933; Burks 1953), P. ontario (McDunnough 1926) (Needham, Traver & Hsu 1935; Burks 1953), P. praepedita (Eaton 1884) (Gordon 1933; Burks 1953), P. quisquilia Day 1952 (Day 1952), P. ruffoi Biancheri 1956 (Belfiore & Giangrande 1979), P. strandii (Eaton 1901) (Tiensuu 1939), P. strigula McDunnough 1932 (McDunnough 1932), P. submarginata (Stephens 1835) (Komarek 1921; Macan 1952; Landa 1969; Belfiore & Giangrande 1979), P. volitans (McDunnough 1924a) (Ide 1930; Gordon 1933), P. w e r n e r i Ulmer 1920 (Landa 1969) and P. w e s t on i Imanishi 1937 (Gose 1979 –1980).

Mature larvae of P. falcula can be distinguished by the following features: thorax is not hairy (in contrast to P. volitans); hypopharynx is slightly emarginated apically (Fig. 9) (P. strandii has medioapical cleft); maxillary palp segments 2 and 3 are subequal in length, and together 1.55 times longer than segment 1 (Fig. 6) (in P. de b i l i s and P. moerens segments 2 and 3 together are equal to segment 1); labial palp segments 2 is shorter than segment 3, and together are longer than segment 1 (Figs 7, 8) (in P. calcarica, P. lacustris and P. strandii segments 2 and 3 together are shorter or equal to segment 1); legs have no brown band (Figs 14, 15) (in contrast to P. debilis and P. jeanae); row of denticles reaches middle of claw (Fig. 11) (in P. lacustri s, P. submarginata, P. r uf f o i, P. w er n e r i and P. westoni row of denticles occupies more than half of claw); abdominal segment 8 with posterolateral spines, which are shorter than spines on segment 9 (Fig. 15) (in P. gu t t a t a and P. strigula lateral spines are present on segment 9 only).

Habitat. Larvae and adults of P. falcula were collected in the Trans-Baikal Region, Sakha Yakutia and Amurskiy Region at the end of June – beginning of July. The larvae were collected in small rivers (width 10–20 m, average depth 0.15–0.80 m in mean water). The water temperature in this period did not exceed 13ºC. The bottom substratum was rocky and gravel. The rivers of the Bolshaya Makcha and Amnunnykta have aquatic vegetation (Figs 38–39). The larvae inhabited gravel substratum with detritus in the slow flow.

Distribution. Range of P. falcula, as revealed by this study, well agrees with the concept of Amphipacific sector of Holarctic as defined by Levanidova (1982). Area of distribution of P. falcula includes Eastern Palaearctic (known from certain localities in Transbaikal Kray, Sakha Yakutia and Amurskaya Oblast') and West Nearctic (known from certain localities in states Washington, Oregon and Idaho of the USA). As well as areas of some other amphipacific species, area of P. f a l c ul a is stretched to the west at the north, so that includes north of the Urals.

Other

Published as part of Tiunova, Tatiana M. & Kluge, Nikita, 2016, Redescription of Paraleptophlebia falcula Traver 1934 with notes on status and composition of Paraleptophlebia Lestage 1917 and Neoleptophlebia Kluge 1997 (Ephemeroptera: Leptophlebiidae), pp. 369-382 in Zootaxa 4098 (2) on pages 372-378, DOI: 10.11646/zootaxa.4098.2.9, http://zenodo.org/record/266227

Files

Files (12.8 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:8750c1bd7833b1227e7cd41b93e2295c
12.8 kB Download

System files (78.9 kB)

Name Size Download all
md5:c90ee774c2c66e15853d9d9ffa54f037
78.9 kB Download

Linked records

Additional details

Biodiversity

Family
Leptophlebiidae
Genus
Paraleptophlebia
Kingdom
Animalia
Order
Ephemeroptera
Phylum
Arthropoda
Scientific name authorship
Traver
Species
falcula
Taxon rank
species
Taxonomic concept label
Paraleptophlebia falcula Traver, 1934 sec. Tiunova & Kluge, 2016

References

  • Traver, J. R. (1934) New North American species of mayflies (Ephemerida). Journal of the Elisha Mitchell Scientific Society, 50 (1 - 2), 189 - 254, pl. 16.
  • Needham, J. G., Traver, J. R. & Hsu, Y. - C. (1935) The biology of mayflies, with a systematic account Noth American species. Vol. 16. Comstock publishing company, Ithaca, New York, xvi + 759 pp.
  • Harper, F. & Harper, P. P. (1986) An annotated key to the adult males of the northwestern Nearctic species of Paraleptophlebia Lestage (Ephemeroptera: Leptophlebiidae) with descriptions of a new species. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 64, 1460 - 1468. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1139 / z 86 - 218
  • McDunnough, J. (1926) New Canadian Ephemeridae with notes. IV. The Canadian Entomologist, 58 (12), 296 - 303. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.4039 / Ent 58296 - 12
  • Day, W. C. (1952) New species and notes on California mayflies (Ephemeroptera). Pan-Pacific Entomologist, 28 (1), 17 - 39.
  • Kilgore, J. L. & Allen, R. K. (1973) Mayflies of the Southwest: new species, descriptions, and records (Ephemeroptera). Annals of the Entomological Society of America, 66 (2), 321 - 332. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1093 / aesa / 66.2.321
  • Day, W. C. (1954) New species and notes on California mayflies. II (Ephemeroptera). Pan-Pacific Entomologist, 30 (1), 15 - 29.
  • [Rowbotham] Robotham, C. D. & Allen, R. T. (1988) Paraleptophlebia calcarica, n. sp. (Ephemeroptera: Leptophlebiidae) from Western Arkansas. Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 61, 317 - 320.
  • Jacobus, L. M. & McCafferty, W. P. (2004) First larval description of Paraleptophlebia calcarica Rowbotham and Allen (Ephemeroptera: Leptophlebiidae). Journal of the Kansas Entomological Society, 77, 110 - 115. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.2317 / 0307.1
  • Retzius, A. J. (1783) Caroli de Geer. Genera et species insectorum e generosissimi auctoris scriptis. Apud Siegfried Lebrecht Crusium, Lipsiae, 220 pp.
  • Macan, T. T. (1952) Taxonomy of the nymphs of the British species of Leptophlebiidae (Ephem.). Hydrobiologia (Acta Hydrobiologica, Limnologica et Protistologica), 4 (4), 363 - 376. [The Hague] http: // dx. doi. org / 10.1007 / bf 00043549
  • Landa, V. (1969) Jepice - Ephemeroptera. Fauna CSSR, 18, 1 - 350.
  • Walker, F. (1853) Ephemerinae. List of the specimens of neuropterous insects in the collection of the British Museum, Part III (Termitidae - Ephemeridae), 533 - 585.
  • Ide, F. P. (1930) Contribution to the biology of Ontario mayflies with descriptions of new species. The Canadian Entomologist, 62, 204 - 213. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.4039 / Ent 62204 - 9
  • Gordon, E. L. (1933) Notes on the Ephemerid genus Leptophlebia. Bulletin of the Brooklyn Entomological Society, 28, 116 - 134.
  • McDunnough, J. (1924 a) New Canadian Ephemeridae with notes, II. The Canadian Entomologist, 55, 90 - 98, 113 - 122, 128 - 133. [1923]
  • Berner, L. (1955) A new species of Paraleptophlebia from the Southeast (Ephemeroptera, Leptophlebiidae). Proceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington, 57, 245 - 247.
  • Randolph, R. P. & McCafferty, W. P. (1996) First larval descriptions of two species of Paraleptophlebia (Ephemeroptera: Leptophlebiidae). Entomological News, 107 (4), 225 - 229.
  • Ikonomov, P. (1962) Eintagsfliegen (Ephemeroptera) Jugoslavicus. Paraleptophlebia lacustris n. sp. Fragmenta Balcanica, 4 (17), 129 - 138.
  • Burks, B. D. (1953) The mayflies, or Ephemeroptera, of Illinois. Bulletin of the Illinois Natural History Survey, 26 (1), 1 - 216.
  • Biancheri, E. (1956) Note sugli Efemerotteri italiani - V. Una nuova specie della famiglia Leptophlebiidae. Paraleptophlebia ruffoi n. sp. Memorie del Museo Civico di Storia Naturale, Verona, 5, 191 - 194.
  • Belfiore, C. & Giangrande, A. (1979) Descrizione della ninfa de Paraleptophlebia ruffoi Biancheri, 1956 (Ephemeroptera, Leptophlebiidae). Fragmenta Entomologica, 15, 53 - 58.
  • Eaton, A. E. (1901) Ephemeridae collected by Herr E. Strand in South and Arctic Norway. Entomologist's Monthly Magazine, 37, 252 - 255.
  • Tiensuu, L. (1939) A survey of the distribution of mayflies (Ephemerida) in Finland. Suomen Hyonteistieteellinen Aikakauskirja, 5 (2), 97 - 124.
  • McDunnough, J. (1932) New species of North American Ephemeroptera II. The Canadian Entomologist, 64, 209 - 215. http: // dx. doi. org / 10.4039 / Ent 64209 - 9
  • Stephens, J. F. (1835) Family III. - Ephemeridae, Leach. In: Illustrations of British Entomology. Mandibulata, 6, 53 - 70, pl. 29.
  • Komarek, J. (1921) Nymphy Ceskych Jepic. Ephemeridae from Czechoslovaky. Casopis Ceske Spolecnosti Entomologicke, Acta Societatis Entomologicae Bohemiae, 18 (3 - 4), 74 - 81.
  • Ulmer, G. (1920) Neue Ephemeropteren. Archiv fur Naturgeschichte, (A), (1919), 85 (11), 1 - 80.
  • Imanishi, K. (1937) Mayflies from Japanese torrents. VIII. Notes on the genera Paraleptophlebia and Baetis. Annotationes Zoologicae Japonenses, 16 (4), 330 - 339.
  • Gose, K. (1979 - 1981) The mayflies of Japanese. Aquabiology, 1 (1), 38 - 64. [Nara]
  • Levanidova, I. M. (1982) [Amphibiotic insects of mountainous regions of the Far East of the USSR]. Leningrad, Nauka, 214 p. [in Russian]