Biodiversity Literature Repository
Published December 31, 2006 | Version v1
Journal article Restricted

Revision of the pentacrinid stalked crinoids of the genus Endoxocrinus (Echinodermata, Crinoidea), with a study of environmental control of characters and its consequences for taxonomy

Creators

Description

David, Jerome, Roux, Michel, Messing, Charles G., Ameziane, Nadia (2006): Revision of the pentacrinid stalked crinoids of the genus Endoxocrinus (Echinodermata, Crinoidea), with a study of environmental control of characters and its consequences for taxonomy. Zootaxa 1156: 1-50, DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.172265

Files

Restricted

The record is publicly accessible, but files are restricted to users with access.

Linked records

Additional details

Identifiers

LSID
urn:lsid:plazi.org:pub:BA423918FF92FB62FF9E6A3358780577
URL
http://publication.plazi.org/id/BA423918FF92FB62FF9E6A3358780577

Has part
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.6260981 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/467B4160FF8DFB7DFE9668C259290149 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.6260983 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/467B4160FF8DFB7DFE966E475932021E (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.6260985 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/467B4160FFB2FB43FE966BD0593207E9 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.6260989 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/467B4160FFB3FB40FE9668CF59E20159 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.6260991 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/467B4160FFB0FB41FE966EBF5CD407E9 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.6260993 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/467B4160FFB1FB41FE9668CF5A87023B (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.6260995 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/467B4160FFB6FB46FE966B2F59BB014B (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.6260997 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/467B4160FFB6FB47FE966F0A5D730441 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.6260999 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/467B4160FFB7FB44FE9668075CBF0739 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.6261001 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/467B4160FFB4FB45FE96689F5CF50751 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.6261003 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/467B4160FFB5FB4AFE9668B75CA806C1 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.6261005 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/467B4160FFBAFB4BFE966E275A1404D9 (URL)
Taxonomic treatment: 10.5281/zenodo.6261007 (DOI)
Taxonomic treatment: http://treatment.plazi.org/id/467B4160FFBBFB4BFE96683F5C3300AE (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.172266 (DOI)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/9AADA0FEFF97FB67FE9668C85BA106B7 (URL)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/9AADA0FEFF97FB67FE966C2D5D77032F (URL)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/9AADA0FEFF94FB64FE966B285A6E0422 (URL)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/9AADA0FEFF94FB64FE9668E25CFE067C (URL)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/9AADA0FEFF94FB64FE966E685A3B01E2 (URL)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/9AADA0FEFF95FB65FE966B285A6E0422 (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.172267 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.172268 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.172269 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.172270 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.172271 (DOI)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/9AADA0FEFF9FFB6FFE966F3C5CF20038 (URL)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/9AADA0FEFF9CFB6CFE966B285C2B0752 (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.172272 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.172273 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.172274 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.172275 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.172276 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.172277 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.172278 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.172279 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.172280 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.172281 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.172282 (DOI)
Dataset: http://table.plazi.org/id/9AADA0FEFF8AFB7AFE9669A8592A01BF (URL)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.172283 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.172284 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.172285 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.172286 (DOI)
Figure: 10.5281/zenodo.172287 (DOI)
Is source of
Dataset: http://www.gbif.org/dataset/20ced0ab-42ec-4de6-bab0-b3da6529bae9 (URL)

References

  • Agassiz J.L.R. (1836) Prodrome d'une monographie des Radiaires ou Echinodermes. Societe de Sciences naturelles de Neuchatel, Memoires, 1, 168-199.
  • Ameziane N., Eleaume M. & Min Chao S. (2006) New record of stalked crinoid fauna (Echinodermata: Crinoidea) from Taiwan. Systematics and Biodiversity, in press
  • Ameziane N. & Roux M. (1997) Biodiversity and historical biogeography of stalked crinoids (Echinodermata) in the deep sea. Biodiversity and Conservation, 6, 1557-1570.
  • Ameziane N. & Roux M. (2005) Environmental control versus phylogenic fingerprint in ontogeny : the example of the development of the stalk in the genus Guillecrinus (stalked crinoids, Echinodermata). Natural History, 39 (30) : 2815-2860.
  • Ameziane-Cominardi N. (1991) Distribution bathymetrique des pentacrines du Pacifique occidental. Essai de modelisation et d'application aux faunes du Lias (problemes de tectono-eustatisme au cours du rifting tethysien). Documents du Laboratoire de Geologie, Lyon, 116, 1-253.
  • Ameziane-Cominardi N. & Roux M. (1994) Ontogenese de la structure en mosaique du squelette des crinoides pedoncules actuels. Consequences pour la biologie evolutive et la taxonomie. In David B., Guille A., Feral, J.P. & Roux M. (Ed.), Echinoderms through Time. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 185-190.
  • Ausich W.I. (1980) A model for niche differentiation in Lower Mississipian crinoid communities. Journal of Paleontology, 54, 273-288.
  • Barrier P., Di Geronimo I., Montenat C., Roux M. & Zibrowius H. (1989) Presence de faunes bathyales atlantiques dans le Pliocene et le Pleistocene de Mediterranee (detroit de Messine, Italie). Bulletin de la Societe geologique de France, 8, 5, 787-796.
  • Bather F.A. (1898) Pentacrinus: a name and its history. Natural science, 12, 245.
  • Baumiller, T.K. & Rome, E.F. (1998) The interference avoidance hypothesis and the spatial distribution of Endoxocrinus parrae (Crinoidea, Echinodermata). In Mooi, R. & Telford, M. (Ed.), Echinoderms: San Francisco. Balkema, Rotterdam, 133-137.
  • Blumenbach, 1804 Abbildungen naturhistorischer Gegenstande. Gottingen, 7, 70, 4 pp.
  • Bourseau J.P., Ameziane-Cominardi N., Avocat, R. & Roux M. (1991) Echinodermata : Les crinoides pedoncules de Nouvelle-Caledonie. In Crosnier, A. (Ed.), Resultats des campagnes MUSORSTOM, 8, Memoires du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, A, 151, 229-333.
  • Bourseau J.P., Cominardi N. & Roux M. (1988) La zonation bathymetrique des crinoides pedoncules actuels: un modele de reference pour les reconstitutions paleobathymetriques. Geologie Mediterraneenne, Marseille, 15, 1, 83-89.
  • Bourseau J.P. & Roux M. (1989) Echinodermes : Crinoides Pentacrinidae (MUSORSTOM 2 & CORINDON 2). In : Forest, J. (Ed.), Resultats des campagnes MUSORSTOM, 4, Memoires du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, A,143, 113-201.
  • Carpenter P.H. (1882) The stalked crinoids of the Caribbean Sea. In: Reports on the results of dredging under the supervision of Alexander Agassiz, in the gulf of Mexico (1877-78), and in the Carribbean Sea (1878-79), by the U.S. Coast Survey Steamer "Blake", Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology, Cambridge, USA, 10, 4, 165-181.
  • Carpenter P.H. (1884) Report upon the crinoidea collected during the voyage of H.M.S. "Challenger" during the years 1873-1876, Part I, General morphology, with description of the stalked crinoids, 11, 1-442.
  • Clark A.H. (1908a) The crinoid genus Comatula Lamarck, with a note on the Encrinus parrae of Guerin. Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum, 33, 1585, 683-688.
  • Clark A.H. (1908b) Two new crinoid genera. Proceedings of the Biological Society of Washington, 21, 149-152.
  • Clark A.H. (1909) Description of seventeen new species of recent crinoids. Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum, 36, 633-651.
  • Clark A.H. (1910) Proisocrinus, a new genus of recent crinoids. Proceedings of the U.S. National Museum, 38, 387-390.
  • Clark A.H. (1912) The crinoids of the Indian Ocean. Echinodermata of the Indian Museum, Part VII, Crinoidea, Calcutta, 325 pp.
  • Clark A.H. (1923) A revision of the recent representatives of the crinoid family Pentacrinidae, with the diagnoses of two new genera. Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences, 13, 1, 8-12.
  • Clark A.H. (1934) Two new crinoids. Report on the collections obtained by the first Johnson- Smithsonian deep-sea expedition to the Puerto Rican deep. Smithsonian Miscellaneous Collections, Washington , 91, 4, 1-5.
  • Clark H.L. (1941) Reports on the scientific results of the Atlantis expeditions to the West Indies under the joint auspices of the University of Havana and Harvard University. Memorias del Sociedad Cubana de Historia Natural "Felipe Poey", 15, 1, 1-154.
  • Conan G., Roux M. & Sibuet M. (1981) A photographic survey of a population of the stalked crinoid Diplocrinus (Annacrinus) wyvillethomsoni (Echinodermata) from the bathyal slope of the Bay of Biscay. Deep-sea Research, 28A, 5, 441-453.
  • David J. (1998) Adaptation morphologique, croissance et production bioclastique chez les crinoides pedoncules actuels et fossiles (Pentacrines et Millericrinina). Application paleoecologique aux gisements du Jurassique superieur des Charentes et du Nord-Est du Bassin de Paris. These, Universite de Reims, Sciences de la Terre, 2 vol., 551 pp.
  • David J., Messing C.G., Baumiller T., Ameziane N. & Roux M. (1998) Mesures directes et modelisation de la croissance rapide d'un crinoide pedoncule bathyal (Echinodermata) au large des Bahamas. Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences, Paris, 3, 321, 771-775.
  • David J. & Roux M. (2000) Convergence phenotypique chez les pentacrines Endoxocrinus et Diplocrinus (Crinoides pedoncules, Echinodermes) liees aux contraintes environnementales.
  • Doderlein L. (1907) Die gestielten Crinoiden der Siboga-Expedition: Siboga expeditie. Uitkomsten op zoologish, botanish, oceanographish Oost-Indie (1899-1900), Leiden, 42a, 1-54.
  • Doderlein L. (1912) Die gestielten Crinoiden der deutschen Tiefsee-Expedition. Wissenschaftl. E rgebnisse deutsche Tiefsee-Expedition auf dem Dampfer "Valvidia" (1898-1899), Gustav Fisher (Ed.) Jena, 17, 1, 1-34.
  • Donovan S.K. (2001) Evolution of Caribbean echinoderms during the Cenozoic : moving towards a complete picture using all the fossils. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology, Paleoecolog y, 166, 177-192.
  • Featherstone, C. M., Messing, C.G. & McClintock, J. B. (1998) Dietary composition of two bathyal stalked crinoids: Neocrinus decorus and Endoxocrinus parrae (Echinodermata: Crinoidea: Isocrinidae). In: Mooi, R. & Telford, M. (Ed.) Echinoderms: San Francisco. Balkema, Rotterdam, 155-160.
  • Foote M. (1997) Sampling, taxonomic description and out evolving knowledge of morphological diversity. Paleobiology, 23, 2: 181-206.
  • Gervais F.L.P. (1835) Encrines. In: Guerin, Dictionnaire pittoresque d'histoire naturelle et des phenomenes de la nature, Lenormand (Ed.), Paris, 3, 48-49.
  • Gislen T. (1924) Echinoderm studies. Zoologiska bidrag fran Uppsala, 9, 1-316.
  • Gould S.J. (1977) Ontogeny and Phylogeny. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 501 pp.
  • Gray J.E. (1842) Synopsis of the contents of the British Museum. 44th ed., London, 308 pp.
  • Guettard, J.E. (1761) Memoire sur les Encrinites et les pierres Etoilees, dans lequel on traitera aussi des Entroques. Memoires de Mathematique et de Physique tires des Registres de l'Acad e mie Royale des Sciences de l'annee MDCCLV, Paris, 224-263.
  • Jeffreys G.J. (1870) Preliminary report of the scientific exploration of the deep-sea in H.M.S. "Porcupine" during the summer of 1869. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, 19, 157.
  • Koehler R. & Vaney C. (1910) Note preliminaire sur les crinoides du " Travailleur " et du " Talisman ". Bulletin du Museum National d'Histoire Naturelle, Paris, 16, 26-32.
  • Kogo I. (1998) Crinoids from Japan and adjacent waters. Special Publications from Osaka Museum of Natural History, 30, 1-148.
  • Lamarck, J.B.P.A. de M. de. (1816) Histoire naturelle des animaux sans vertebres. Paris, 2, 568 pp.
  • Leaman, K.D., Molinari, R.L. & Vertes, P.S. (1987) Structure and variability of the Florida Current at 27o N: April 1982-July 1984. Journal of Physical Oceanogaphy., 17, 5, 565-583.
  • Linnaeus, C. (1767) Systema Naturae. 12th ed., 1, Part 2, Laurentius Salvius, Holmiae, Stockholm, 533-1327.
  • Llewellyn G. & Messing C.G. (1993) Compositional and taphonomic variations in modern crinoidrich sediments from the deep-water margin of a carbonate bank. Palaios, 8, 554-573.
  • Lutken C. (1865) On Vestindiens Pentacriner, med nogle Bemaerkninger om Pentacriner og Solilier i Almindelighed. Videnskabelige Meddellser gra den Danske naturhistorisk Forening i Kjobenhavn, 13-16, 195-245.
  • Macurda D.B. & Meyer D.L. (1974) Feeding posture of modern stalked crinoids. Nature, 247, 394-396.
  • Macurda D.B. & Meyer D.L. (1975) The microstructure of the crinod endoskeleton. The University of Kansas Paleontological Contributions, 74, 1-22.
  • Macurda D.B. & Meyer D.L. (1976) The identification and interpretation of stalked crinoids (Echinodermata) from deep-water photographs. Bulletin of Marine Science, 26, 2, 205-215.
  • Macurda D.B., Meyer D.L. & Roux M. (1978) The crinoid stereom. In: Moore, R.C. & Teichert, C., Treatise on invertebrate palaeontology, Part T, 1, Echinodermata 2, Geological Society of America (Ed.), Boulder, and University of Kansas, Lawrence, T217-229.
  • Macurda D.B. & Roux M. (1981) The skeletal morphology of the isocrinid crinoids Annacrinus wyvillethomsoni and Diplocrinus maclearanus. Contribution from the Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 25, 9, 169-219.
  • McKinney M.L. (1988) Heterochrony in Evolution. A multidisciplinary approach. Topics in Geobiology, Plenum Press, New York, 7, 348 pp.
  • McNamara K.J. (1995) Evolutionary change and heterochrony. John Wiley & Sons, 286 pp.
  • Messing C.G. (1985) Submersible observations of deep-water crinoid assemblages in the tropical western Atlantic Ocean. In: Keegan, B.F. & O'Connor, B.D.S. (Ed.), Echinodermata, A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 185-193.
  • Messing C.G. (1993) Depth, current flow and morphological variations among living crinoids. Geological Society of America, Annual Meeting, Abstracts, 25, 6, 104.
  • Messing C.G. (1994a) Crinoid meadows of the West Indies: distribution, response to flow, disarticulation, sediment production and taphonomy. In: David, B., Guille, A., Feral, J.P. & Roux, M. (Ed.), Echinoderms through Time. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 245.
  • Messing, C.G. (1994b) In situ stalk growth and sediment production rates in a living stalked crinoid (Chladocrinus decorus) (Echinodermata). Geological Society of America, Annual Meeting, Abstracts, 26, 7:A428.
  • Messing C.G. (2001) Stalk growth rates of Isocrinidae: a summary of a decade of in situ experiments. In: Baker, M. (Ed.), Echinoderms 2000, Sweets & Zellinger, Lisse : 125.
  • Messing C.G. (2004) Biozonation on deep-water carbonate mounds and associated hardgrounds along the western margin of Little Bahama Bank, with notes on the Caicos Platform island slope. In: Lewis, R.D. & Panuska, B.C. (Ed.), 11th Symposium on the Geology of the Bahamas and other Carbonate Regions, Gerace Research Center, San Salvador, Bahamas, 107-115.
  • Messing C.G., RoseSmyth C., Mailer S.R. & Miller J.E. (1988) Relocation movement in a stalked crinoid (Echinodermata). Bulletin of Marine Science, 42, 3, 480-487.
  • Messing C.G. & Lewellyn G. (1991) Variations in posture, morphology and distribution relative to current flow and topography in an assemblage of living stalked crinoids. Geological Society of America, Annual Meeting, Abstracts, 23, 5, 343-344.
  • Messing C.G., Neumann A.C. & Lang J.C. (1990) Biozonation of deep-water lithoherms and associated hardgrounds in the Northeastern Straits of Florida. Palaios, 5, 15-33.
  • Meyer D.L., Messing C.G. & D.B. Macurda (1978) Zoogeography of tropical western Atlantic Crinoidea (Echinodermata). Bulletin of Marine Science, 28, 3, 412-441.
  • Meyer H. von (1836) Mittheilungen an Professor Bronngerchtet. Neues Jahrbuch fur Mineralogie, Geognosie, Geologie und Petrefaktenkunde, 55-61.
  • Miller J.S. (1821) A natural history of crinoidea or lily-shaped animals with observations on the genera Asteria, Euryale, Comatula and Marsupites. Frost (Ed.), Bristol, 150 pp.
  • Muller J. (1843) Uber den Bau des Pentacrinus caput-medusae. Abhandlungen Der Koniger Akademie Der Wissenscghaften, 177-248.
  • Neumann, A.C., Kofoed, J.W. & Keller, G.H. (1977) Lithoherms in the Straits of Florida, Geology, 5, 1, 4-10.
  • New T.R. (1999) Descriptive taxonomy as a facilitating discipline in invertebrate conservation. In: Ponder, W. & Lunney, D. (Ed.). The other 99%. The conservation and biodiversity of invertebrates, Mosma, Transactions of the Royal Society of New South Wales, 154-158.
  • Oersted (1857) Efter at nogle Skrive eller Trykfeil ere rettede, lyder Diagnosen saaledes. Skand. Naturforsk, 7de Mode i Christiana, Forhandlung, 202-203.
  • Oji T. (1989) Distribution of the stalked crinoids from Japanese and nearby waters. In: Science and Culture, University Museum, University of Tokyo, 27-43.
  • Oji T. (1990a) Dimorphism and geographic distribution of two phenotypes of a west Atlantic stalked crinoid Endoxocrinus parrae (Gervais). Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, new series, 159, 603-606.
  • Oji T. (1990b) Miocene Isocrinidae (stalked crinoids) from Japan and their biogeographic implication. Transactions and Proceedings of the Palaeontological Society of Japan, new series, 157, 412-429.
  • Oji T. (1996) Is predation intensity reduced with increasing depth? Evidence from the west Atlantic stalked crinoid Endoxocrinus parrae (Gervais) and implications for the Mesozoic marine revolution. Paleobiology, 22, 3: 339-351.
  • Orbigny A. d' (1851) Cours elementaire de paleontologie et de geologie stratigraphique. Masson (Ed.), Paris, 2, 1, 382 pp.
  • Parra A. (1787) Decripcion de differentes piezas de historia natural las mas del ramo maritimo, representadas en sententa y cinco laminas, Cuba, 191 pp.
  • Rasmussen H.W. (1961) A monograph on cretaceous Crinoidea. Kongelige Danske Videnskabernes Selskab, Biologiske Skrifter, 12, 1, 1-428.
  • Rasmussen H.W. & Sieverts-Doreck H. (1978) Articulata, Classification. In: Moore, R.C. & Teichert, C., Treatise on invertebrate palaeontology, Part T, Echinodermata 2, Geological Society of America (Ed.), Boulder, Colorado and Univiversity of Kansas, Lawrence, T813-928.
  • Rodgers A.D. (1994) The biology of seamounts. Advance in Marine Biology, 40, 305-350.
  • Roux M. (1970) Introduction a l'etude des microstructures des tiges de crinoides. Geobios, Lyon, 3, 3, 79-98.
  • Roux M. (1976) Aspects de la variabilite et de la croissance au sein d'une population de la pentacrine actuelle: Annacrinus wyvillethomsoni Jeffreys (Crinoidea). Thallassia Jugoslavica, 12, 1, 307-320.
  • Roux M. (1977) The stalk-joints of recent Isocrinidae (Crinoidea). Bulletin of the British Museum (Natural History), Zoology, 32, 3, 45-64.
  • Roux M. (1978) Ontogenese et evolution des crinoides pedoncules depuis le Trias. Implications oceanographiques. These d'etat - Universite Paris-Sud (centre d'Orsay), 167 pp.
  • Roux M. (1980) Decouverte de sites a Crinoides pedoncules (genres Diplocrinus et Proisocrinus) au large de Tahiti. Comptes Rendus de l'Academie des Sciences, Paris, D, 290, 119-122.
  • Roux M. (1981) Echinodermes: Crinoides Isocrinidae. In: Forest, J. (Ed.), Resultats des Campagnes MUSORTOM I - Philippines (18-28 mars 1976). Memoires O.R.S.T.O.M., Paris, 91, 477-543.
  • Roux M. (1987) Evolutionary ecology and biogeography of recent stalked crinoids as a model for the fossil record. In: Jangoux, M. & Lawrence, J.M. (Ed.), Echinoderm Studies. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, 2, 1-53.
  • Roux M., Ameziane N. & David J. (1997) Compromis adaptatifs et ontogenese chez les Crinoides pedoncules. Geobios, Lyon, Memoires Speciaux, 21, 319-327.
  • Roux M., Messing C.G. & Ameziane N. (2002) Artificial keys to the genera of living stalked crinoids (Echinodermata). Bulletin of Marine Science, 70, 3, 799-830.
  • Roux M. & Plaziat J.C. (1978) Inventaire des crinoides et interpretation paleobathymetrique de gisements du Paleogene pyreneen franco-espagnol. Bulletin de la Societe geologique de France, 7, 20, 299-308.
  • Sieverts-Doreck H. (1971) Uber Chladocrinus Agassiz (Isocrinidae) und die nomenklatorishe Verankerung dieser Gattung. Neues Jahrbuch fur Geologie, Palaontologie, Monatsh., 34-320.
  • Simms M.J. (1988) The phylogeny of post paleozoic crinoids. In: Paul, C.R.C. & Smith, A.B. (Ed.), Echinoderm phylogeny and evolutionary biology. Clarendon Press, Oxford, 269-284.
  • Tommasi L.R. (1969) Nova contribuceao a lista dos crinoides recentes do Brasil. Contrubucoes Instituto Oceanografico Univiversidade Sao Paulo, Oceanografia Biologica, 17, 1-8.
  • Tommasi L.R. (1971) Equinodermos da regiao entre o Amapa (Brasil) e a Florida (E.U.A.). Crinoidea. Contrubucoes Instituto Oceanografico Univiversidade Sao Paulo, Oceanografia Biologica, 23, 1-8.
  • Thomson C.W. (1864) Sea lilies. The Intellectual Observer, 6, 1-11.
  • Thomson C.W. (1872a) The depths of the sea. London, 442 pp.
  • Thomson C.W. (1872b) On the crinoids of the "Porcupine" deep sea dredging expedition. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, 7, 764-773.
  • Thomson C.W. (1877) The Atlantic. A preliminary account of the general results of the exploring voyage of H.M.S. "Challenger" (1873-1876), 2, London, 123-126.
  • Webster G.D. & Jell P.A. (1999) New Permian crinoids from Australia. Memoirs Queensland Museum, 43, 1, 279-339.