제품 설계를 위한 국내외 인체치수 비교 연구: 한국과 미국 인체측정치를 중심으로

박재규; 임영재

doi:10.5143/JESK.2022.41.4.317

주제분류

...

저널정보

대한인간공학회
대한인간공학회지 학술저널
대한인간공학회지 제41권 제4호
2022.8 317 - 325 (9page)
DOI : 10.5143/JESK.2022.41.4.317

저자정보

박재규 (LG전자)
임영재 (동의대학교)

이용수
내서재: 2

내서재에 추가
되었습니다. 내서재에서
삭제되었습니다.

이 논문의 연구 히스토리 (2)

2022

제품 설계를 위한 국내외 인체치수 비교 연구: 한국과 미국 인체측정치를 중심으로

박재규 , 임영재 대한인간공학회지 2022.08 학술저널

2019

너비 변수의 국내외 인체치수 비교에 대한 연구 : 한국과 미국 인체측정치수 중심으로

박재규 , 임영재 대한인간공학회 학술대회논문집 2019.10 학술대회자료

이 논문의 후속연구가 궁금하신가요?
연관 학술논문 또는 학술발표를 통해 보다 발전된 연구결과를 확인하실 수 있습니다.
이 논문의 연구 히스토리 확인하기

초록·키워드

오류제보하기

Objective: This study aims to identify how height and width-related variables change among Korean and American anthropometric data, and to find out whether width-related variables are suitable for product design.
Background: Although domestic human dimensional surveys are continuously conducted, the reflection of width and clearance according to the westernized body is insufficient. Therefore, users who use the products are complaining. Especially, width-related variables have safety problems as well as convenience, so it is necessary to consider whether they are appropriate for anthropometric aspects.
Method: Korean data were analyzed based on the 6th and 7th human dimension surveys of Size Korea. American data were collected based on anthropometric values of MIL-STD-1472H and NATICK/TR-15/007. In order to analyze width-related product design elements, the sitting hip breadth and bideltoid breadth were investigated. In addition, the corresponding U.S. human body dimensions, hip breadth and bideltoid breadth, were extracted.
Results: The acceptance of human dimension was analyzed through case study on the design of airplane and train. The width of seat for both airplane and train was acceptable up to 95^th percentile Korean. However, it is difficult for 95^th percentile American to accept the width of seat. In case of airplane, the width of aisle was acceptable up to 95^th percentile Korean. The width of aisle for train was not acceptable up to 95^th percentile Korean and American.
Conclusion: The 95^th percentile standard for domestic and foreign human dimension is steadily increasing. Therefore, average or minimum design due to product cost or spatial constraint can be reduced the usability and user satisfaction.
Application: It is expected that domestic and foreign human dimension can be appropriately used when designing the width and clearance of the product.

#Human dimension #Anthropometric data #Product design #Ergonomic guideline