References
4PickettBD, WallaceEM, RidgePG Lingering taxonomic challenges hinder conservation and management of global bonefishes. Fisheries, 2020; 45(7): 347–358. doi:10.1002/fsh.10438. 5JörgerKM, SchrödlM. How to describe a cryptic species? Practical challenges of molecular taxonomy. Front. Zool., 2013; 10(1): 59. doi:10.1186/1742-9994-10-59. 6WallaceEM. Assessing biodiversity, evolution, and biogeography in bonefishes (albuliformes): resolving relationships and aiding management. Doctoral dissertation, University of Minnesota, St. Paul, MN, USA; 2014. https://hdl.handle.net/11299/165842. 7AdamsAJ, HorodyskyAZ, McBrideRS Global conservation status and research needs for tarpons (Megalopidae), ladyfishes (Elopidae) and bonefishes (Albulidae). Fish Fish., 2014; 15(2): 280–311. doi:10.1111/faf.12017. 8LinnaeusC. Systema Naturæ. 10 ed., Stockholm, Sweden, 1758.
9ColbornJ, CrabtreeRE, ShakleeJB The evolutionary enigma of bonefishes (Albula spp.): cryptic species and ancient separations in a globally distributed shorefish. Evolution, 2001; 55: 807–820. doi:10.1111/j.0014-3820.2001.tb00816.x. 10BowenBW, KarlSA, PfeilerE. Resolving evolutionary lineages and taxonomy of bonefishes (Albula spp.). In:
AultJS (ed.), Biology and Management of the World Tarpon and Bonefish Fisheries. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 2008; pp. 147–154.
11WhiteheadPJP. The Synonymy of Albula vulpes (Linnaeus, 1758) (Teleostei, Albulidae). Cybium, 1986; 10: 211–230.
12FowlerHW. A new albuloid fish from Santo Domingo. Proc. Acad. Nat. Sci. Philadelphia, 1911; 62: 651–654.
13RivasLR, WarlenSM. Systematics and biology of the bonefish Albula Nemoptera (Fowler). Fish. Bull., 1967; 66(2): 251–258.
14ShakleeJB, TamaruCS. Biochemical and morphological evolution of Hawaiian bonefishes (Albula). Syst. Zool., 1981; 30: 125–146. doi:10.2307/2992412. 15SeyoumS, WallaceEM, TringaliMD. PERMANENT GENETIC RESOURCES: Twelve polymorphic microsatellite markers for the bonefish, Albula vulpes and two congeners. Mol. Ecol. Resour., 2008; 8: 354–356. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01954.x. 16WallaceEM, TringaliMD. Identification of a novel member in the family Albulidae (bonefishes). J. Fish Biol., 2010; 76: 1972–1983. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2010.02639.x. 17ForsskålP. Descriptiones Animalium: Avium, Amphibiorum, Piscium, Insectorum. Vermium: Hauniæ, 1775.
18HidakaK, IwatsukiY, RandallJE. A review of the Indo-Pacific bonefishes of the Albula argentea complex, with a description of a new species. Ichthyol. Res., 2008; 55: 53–64. doi:10.1007/s10228-007-0010-5. 19KwunHJ, KimJK. A new species of bonefish, Albula koreana (Albuliformes: Albulidae) from Korea and Taiwan. Zootaxa, 2011; 63: 57–63.
20DonovanMK, FriedlanderAM, HardingKK Ecology and niche specialization of two bonefish species in Hawai‘i. Environ. Biol. Fishes, 2015; 98: 2159–2171. doi:10.1007/s10641-015-0427-z. 21FilousA, LennoxRJ, CluaEEG Fisheries selectivity and annual exploitation of the principal species harvested in a data-limited artisanal fishery at a remote atoll in French Polynesia. Ocean Coast. Manage., 2019; 178: 1–13. doi:10.1016/j.ocecoaman.2019.104818. 22FilousA, LennoxRJ, ColemanRR Life-history characteristics of an exploited bonefish Albula glossodonta population in a remote South Pacific atoll. J. Fish Biol., 2019; 95(2): 562–574. doi:10.1111/jfb.14057. 23JohannesRE, YeetingB. I-Kiribati knowledge and management of Tarawa’s Lagoon resources. Atoll Res. Bull., 2000; 489: 1–24. doi:10.5479/si.00775630.489.1. 24Ram-BidesiV. An economic assessment of destructive fishing methods in Kiribati: A case study of te ororo fishing in Tarawa. SPC Fish. Newsl., 2011; 135(May/August): 21–27.
25Ram-BidesiV, PetaiaS. Socio-economic assessment of fishing practices by North and South Tarawa fishers in Kiribati; 2010.
26PfeilerE, ColbornJ, DouglasMR Systematic status of bonefishes (Albula spp.) from the eastern Pacific Ocean inferred from analyses of allozymes and mitochondrial DNA. Environ. Biol. Fishes, 2002; 63: 151–159. doi:10.1023/A:1014263528547. 27PfeilerE. Resurrection of the name Albula pacifica (Beebe, 1942) for the shafted bonefish (Albuliformes: Albulidae) from the eastern Pacific. Rev. Biol. Trop., 2008; 56: 839–844.
28PfeilerE, BitlerBG, UlloaR. Phylogenetic relationships of the shafted bonefish Albula nemoptera (Albuliformes: Albulidae) from the Eastern Pacific based on cytochrome b sequence analyses. Copeia, 2006; 2006: 778–784. doi:10.1643/0045-8511(2006)6[778:PROTSB]2.0.CO;2. 29KwunHJ, KimJK, DoiuchiR Molecular and morphological evidence for the taxonomic status of a newly reported species of Albula (Albuliformes: Albulidae) from Korea and Taiwan. Animal Cells Syst., 2011; 15: 45–51. doi:10.1080/19768354.2011.555151. 30Valdez-MorenoM, Vásquez-YeomansL, Elías-GutiérrezM Using DNA barcodes to connect adults and early life stages of marine fishes from the Yucatan Peninsula, Mexico: potential in fisheries management. Mar. Freshw. Res., 2010; 61: 655–671. doi:10.1071/MF09222. 31WallaceEM. High intraspecific genetic connectivity in the Indo-Pacific bonefishes: implications for conservation and management. Environ. Biol. Fishes, 2015; 98: 2173–2186. doi:10.1007/s10641-015-0416-2. 32Díaz-ViloriaN, Sánchez-VelascoL, Perez-EnriquezR Morphological description of genetically identified Cortez bonefish (Albula gilberti, Pfeiler and van der Heiden 2011) leptocephali from the southern Gulf of California. Mitochondrial DNA Part A, 2017; 28: 717–724. doi:10.3109/24701394.2016.1174226. 33WallaceEM, TringaliMD. Fishery composition and evidence of population structure and hybridization in the Atlantic bonefish species complex (Albula spp.). Mar. Biol., 2016; 163: 142. doi:10.1007/s00227-016-2915-x. 36SongH, BuhayJE, WhitingMF Many species in one: DNA barcoding overestimates the number of species when nuclear mitochondrial pseudogenes are coamplified. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 2008; 105(36): 13486–13491. doi:10.1073/pnas.0803076105. 37PickettBD, TalmaS, GlassJR Supporting data for “genome assembly of the roundjaw bonefish (Albula glossodonta), a vulnerable circumtropical sportfish”. GigaScience Database. 2022; http://dx.doi.org/10.5524/100949. 38Pacific Biosciences. Procedure & Checklist – Preparing >30 kb SMRTbell Libraries Using Megaruptor Shearing and BluePippin Size-Selection for PacBio RS II and Sequel Systems. California: Pacific Biosciences, 2017.
39PetersonBK, WeberJN, KayEH Double digest RADseq: an inexpensive method for De Novo SNP discovery and genotyping in model and non-model species. PLoS One, 2012; 7(5): e37135. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0037135. 40KelleyDR, SchatzMC, SalzbergSL. Quake: quality-aware detection and correction of sequencing errors. Genome Biol., 2010; 11: R116. doi:10.1186/gb-2010-11-11-r116. 41R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. 2021.
43Yee, TW and Moler, C. VGAM: Vector generalized additive models. The Comprehensive R Archive Network. 2009; v0.7-8.
44MarcaisG, KingsfordC. A fast, lock-free approach for efficient parallel counting of occurrences of k-mers. Bioinformatics, 2011; 27(6): 764–770. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr011. 45MelstedP, PritchardJK. Efficient counting of k-mers in DNA sequences using a bloom filter. BMC Bioinform., 2011; 12: 333. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-333. 46HamidM, KhanH, BirolI. ntCard: a streaming algorithm for the cardinality estimation of genomics data. Bioinformatics, 2017; 33(9): 1324–1330. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw832. 47SongL, FloreaL. Rcorrector: efficient and accurate error correction for Illumina RNA-seq reads. GigaScience, 2015; 4: 48. doi:10.1186/s13742-015-0089-y. 48KorenS, WalenzBP, BerlinK Canu: scalable and accurate long-read assembly via adaptive k-mer weighting and repeat separation. Genome Res., 2017; 27(5): 722–736. doi:10.1101/gr.215087.116. 49HaghshenasE, HachF, SahinalpSC CoLoRMap: Correcting Long Reads by Mapping short reads. Bioinformatics, 2016; 32: i545–i551. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btw463. 50VaserR, SovićI, NagarajanN Fast and accurate de novo genome assembly from long uncorrected reads. Genome Res., 2017; 27(5): 737–746. doi:10.1101/gr.214270.116. 54DanecekP, BonfieldJK, LiddleJ Twelve years of SAMtools and BCFtools. Gigascience, 2021; 10(2): giab008. doi:10.1093/gigascience/giab008. 55QuinlanAR, HallIM. BEDTools: a flexible suite of utilities for comparing genomic features. Bioinformatics, 2010; 26(6): 841–842. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btq033. 56KimD, LangmeadB, SalzbergSL. HISAT: a fast spliced aligner with low memory requirements. Nat. Methods, 2015; 12(4): 357–360. doi:10.1038/nmeth.3317. 57GhuryeJ, PopM, KorenS Scaffolding of long read assemblies using long range contact information. BMC Genom., 2017; 18(1): 1–11. doi:10.1186/s12864-017-3879-z. 58GhuryeJ, RhieA, WalenzBP Integrating Hi-C links with assembly graphs for chromosome-scale assembly. PLoS Comput. Biol., 2019; 15(8): e1007273. doi:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1007273. 59SongL, ShankarDS, FloreaL. Rascaf: improving genome assembly with RNA sequencing data. Plant Genome, 2016; 9(3): 1–12. doi:10.3835/plantgenome2016.03.0027. 61SalzbergSL, PhillippyAM, ZiminA GAGE: A critical evaluation of genome assemblies and assembly algorithms. Genome Res., 2012; 22(3): 557–567. doi:10.1101/gr.131383.111. 63SimãoFA, WaterhouseRM, IoannidisP BUSCO: assessing genome assembly and annotation completeness with single-copy orthologs. Bioinformatics, 2015; 31(19): 3210–3212. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btv351. 64KriventsevaEV, KuznetsovD, TegenfeldtF OrthoDB v10: sampling the diversity of animal, plant, fungal, protist, bacterial and viral genomes for evolutionary and functional annotations of orthologs. Nucleic Acids Res., 2019; 47(D1): D807–D811. doi:10.1093/nar/gky1053. 65GrabherrMG, HaasBJ, YassourM Full-length transcriptome assembly from RNA-Seq data without a reference genome. Nat. Biotechnol., 2011; 29(7): 644–652. doi:10.1038/nbt.1883. 66LangmeadB, SalzbergSL. Fast gapped-read alignment with Bowtie 2. Nat. Methods, 2012; 9(4): 357–359.
67PatroR, DuggalG, LoveMI Salmon provides fast and bias-aware quantification of transcript expression. Nat. Methods, 2017; 14(4): 417–419.
68EatonDAR. PyRAD: assembly of de novo RADseq loci for phylogenetic analyses. Bioinformatics, 2014; 30(13): 1844–1849. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu121. 70O’LearySJ, PuritzJB, WillisSC These aren’t the loci you’re looking for: Principles of effective SNP filtering for molecular ecologists. Mol. Ecol., 2018; 27(16): 3193–3206. doi:10.1111/mec.14792. 71PurcellS, NealeB, Todd-BrownK PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 2007; 81(3): 559–575. doi:10.1086/519795. 72HillWG, RobertsonA. Linkage disequilibrium in finite populations. Theoret. Appl. Genet., 1968; 38(6): 226–231. doi:10.1007/BF01245622. 73HoltC, YandellM. MAKER2: an annotation pipeline and genome-database management tool for second-generation genome projects. BMC Bioinform., 2011; 12: 491. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-12-491. 77The Uniprot Consortium. UniProt: a worldwide hub of protein knowledge. Nucleic Acids Res., 2019; 47(D1): D506–D515. doi:10.1093/nar/gky1049. 78BoutetE, LieberherrD, TognolliM UniProtKB/Swiss-Prot: The Manually Annotated Section of the UniProt KnowledgeBase. In:
EdwardsD (ed.), Plant Bioinformatics: Methods and Protocols. Totowa, NJ: Humana Press, 2007; pp. 89–112.
79StankeM, SchöffmannO, MorgensternB Gene prediction in eukaryotes with a generalized hidden Markov model that uses hints from external sources. BMC Bioinform., 2006; 7: 62. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-7-62. 80StankeM, WaackS. Gene prediction with a hidden Markov model and a new intron submodel. Bioinformatics, 2003; 19(Suppl. 2): ii215–ii225. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btg1080. 81KorfI. Gene finding in novel genomes. BMC Bioinform., 2004; 5: 59.
82LomsadzeA, Ter-HovhannisyanV, ChernoffYO Gene identification in novel eukaryotic genomes by self-training algorithm. Nucleic Acids Res., 2005; 33(20): 6964–6506. doi:10.1093/nar/gki937. 83BrůnaT, LomsadzeA, BorodovskyM. GeneMark-EP+: eukaryotic gene prediction with self-training in the space of genes and proteins. NAR Genom. Bioinform., 2020; 2(2): lqaa026. doi:10.1093/nargab/lqaa026. 84LomsadzeA, BurnsPD, BorodovskyM. Integration of mapped RNA-Seq reads into automatic training of eukaryotic gene finding algorithm. Nucleic Acids Res., 2014; 42(15): e119. doi:10.1093/nar/gku557. 85HaasBJ, SalzbergSL, ZhuW Automated eukaryotic gene structure annotation using EVidenceModeler and the Program to Assemble Spliced Alignments. Genome Biol., 2008; 9(1): R7. doi:10.1186/gb-2008-9-1-r7. 86CaballeroM, WegrzynJ. gFACs: gene filtering, analysis, and conversion to unify genome annotations across alignment and gene prediction frameworks. Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics, 2019; 17(3): 305–310. doi:10.1016/j.gpb.2019.04.002. 87ChanPP, LoweTM. tRNAscan-SE: searching for tRNA genes in genomic sequences. Methods Mol. Biol., 2019; 1962: 1–14. doi:10.1007/978-1-4939-9173-0_1. 88CamachoC, CoulourisG, AvagyanV BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinform., 2009; 10: 421. doi:10.1186/1471-2105-10-421. 90JonesP, BinnsD, ChangH-Y InterProScan 5: genome-scale protein function classification. Bioinformatics, 2014; 30(9): 1236–1240. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btu031. 91MitchellAL, AttwoodTK, BabbittPC InterPro in 2019: improving coverage, classification and access to protein sequence annotations. Nucleic Acids Res., 2019; 47(D1): D351–D360. doi:10.1093/nar/gky1100. 92GremmeG, SteinbissS, KurtzS. GenomeTools: a comprehensive software library for efficient processing of structured genome annotations. IEEE/ACM Trans. Comput. Biol. Bioinform., 2013; 10(3): 645–656. doi:10.1109/TCBB.2013.68. 94StorerJ, HubleyR, RosenJ The Dfam community resource of transposable element families, sequence models, and genome annotations. Mobile DNA, 2021; 12(1): 2. doi:10.1186/s13100-020-00230-y. 95BaoW, KojimaKK, KohanyO. Repbase update, a database of repetitive elements in eukaryotic genomes. Mobile DNA, 2015; 6(1): 11. doi:10.1186/s13100-015-0041-9. 97LuuK, BazinE, BlumMGB. pcadapt: an R package to perform genome scans for selection based on principal component analysis. Mol. Ecol. Resour., 2017; 17(1): 67–77. doi:10.1111/1755-0998.12592. 98FollM, GaggiottiO. A genome-scan method to identify selected loci appropriate for both dominant and codominant markers: a Bayesian perspective. Genetics, 2008; 180(2): 977–993. doi:10.1534/genetics.108.092221. 99MartinsH, CayeK, LuuK Identifying outlier loci in admixed and in continuous populations using ancestral population differentiation statistics. Mol. Ecol., 2016; 25(20): 5029–5042. doi:10.1111/mec.13822. 100StoreyJD, BassAJ, DabneyA qvalue: Q-value estimation for false discovery rate control. The Comprehensive R Archive Network. 2017; v2.15.0.
101BeaumontMA, BaldingDJ. Identifying adaptive genetic divergence among populations from genome scans. Mol. Ecol., 2004; 13(4): 969–980. doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2004.02125.x. 102VitalisR, DawsonK, BoursotP. Interpretation of variation across marker loci as evidence of selection. Genetics, 2001; 158(4): 1811–1823. doi:10.1093/genetics/158.4.1811. 104CingolaniP, PlattsA, WangLL A program for annotating and predicting the effects of single nucleotide polymorphisms, SnpEff. Fly, 2012; 6(2): 80–92. doi:10.4161/fly.19695. 105FrichotE, FrançoisO. LEA: An R package for landscape and ecological association studies. Methods Ecol. Evol., 2015; 6(8): 925–929. doi:10.1111/2041-210x.12382. 106ShryockDF, HavrillaCA, DefalcoLA Landscape genetic approaches to guide native plant restoration in the Mojave Desert. Ecol. Appl., 2017; 27(2): 429–445. doi:10.1002/eap.1447. 107PembletonLW, CoganNOI, ForsterJW. StAMPP: an R package for calculation of genetic differentiation and structure of mixed-ploidy level populations. Mol. Ecol. Resour., 2013; 13(5): 946–952. doi:10.1111/1755-0998.12129. 108JombartT, AhmedI. adegenet 1.3-1: new tools for the analysis of genome-wide SNP data. Bioinformatics, 2011; 27(21): 3070–3071. doi:10.1093/bioinformatics/btr521. 109GoudetJ. hierfstat, a package for r to compute and test hierarchical F-statistics. Mol. Ecology Notes, 2005; 5(1): 184–186. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00828.x. 110HardieDC, HebertPDN. Genome-size evolution in fishes. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 2004; 61(9): 1636–1646. doi:10.1139/F04-106. 111HinegardnerRR, DonnE. Cellular DNA content and the evolution of teleostean fishes. Am. Nat., 1972; 106(951): 621–644.
112EarlD, BradnamK, St. JohnJ Assemblathon 1: A competitive assessment of de novo short read assembly methods. Genome Res., 2011; 21(12): 2224–2241. doi:10.1101/gr.126599.111. 115KamikawaKT, FriedlanderAM, HardingKK Bonefishes in Hawai‘i and the importance of angler-based data to inform fisheries management. Environ. Biol. Fishes, 2015; 98: 2147–2157. doi:10.1007/s10641-015-0421-5. 116MoxhamEJ, CowleyPD, BennettRH Movement and predation: a catch-and-release study on the acoustic tracking of bonefish in the Indian Ocean. Environ. Biol. Fishes, 2019; 102(2): 365–381. doi:10.1007/s10641-019-00850-1. 117AdamsA, GuindonK, HorodyskyA Albula glossodonta, Shortjaw Bonefish. Report no. T194299A2310398, 2012. The International Union for Conservation of Nature.
118WilliamsCT, McivorAJ, WallaceEM Genetic diversity and life-history traits of bonefish Albula spp. from the Red Sea. J. Fish Biol., 2020; 1–10. doi:10.1111/jfb.14638. 119LarkinMF. Assessment of South Florida’s Bonefish Stock. Dissertation, University of Miami, Coral Gables, Florida, USA, 2011.
120PerezAU, Schmitter-SotoJJ, AdamsAJ Connectivity mediated by seasonal bonefish (Albula vulpes) migration between the Caribbean Sea and a tropical estuary of Belize and Mexico. Environ. Biol. Fishes, 2019; 102(2): 197–207. doi:10.1007/s10641-018-0834-z. 121ZengX, AdamsA, RofferM Potential connectivity among spatially distinct management zones for Bonefish (Albula vulpes) via larval dispersal. Environ. Biol. Fishes, 2019; 102: 233–252. doi:10.1007/s10641-018-0826-z. 122DanylchukAJ, CookeSJ, GoldbergTL Aggregations and offshore movements as indicators of spawning activity of bonefish (Albula vulpes) in The Bahamas. Mar. Biol., 2011; 158(9): 1981–1999. doi:10.1007/s00227-011-1707-6. 123FriedlanderA, CaselleJE, BeetsJ Biology and ecology of the recreational bonefish fishery at palmyra atoll national wildlife refuge with comparisons to other Pacific Islands. In:
AultJS (ed.), Biology and Management of the World Tarpon and Bonefish Fisheries. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press, 2008; pp. 27–56.
124CrocheletE, RobertsJ, LagabrielleE A model-based assessment of reef larvae dispersal in the Western Indian Ocean reveals regional connectivity patterns — Potential implications for conservation policies. Reg. Stud. Marine Sci., 2016; 7(September): 159–167. doi:10.1016/j.rsma.2016.06.007. 125BadalMR, RughooputhS, RydbergL Eddy formation around South West Mascarene Plateau (Indian Ocean) as evidenced by satellite “global ocean colour” data. West. Indian Ocean J. Mar. Sci., 2010; 8(2): 139–145. doi:10.4314/wiojms.v8i2.56969. 126GagnaireP-A, MinegishiY, ZenboudjiSWithin-population structure highlighted by differential introgression across semipermeable barriers to gene flow in Anguilla marmorata. Evolution, 2011; 65(12): 3413–3427. doi:10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01404.x. 127DonovanS, PezoldF, ChenYPhylogeography of Anguilla marmorata (Teleostei: Anguilliformes) from the eastern Caroline Islands. Ichthyol. Res., 2012; 59(1): 70–76. doi:10.1007/s10228-011-0245-z. 128MuthsD, GouwsG, MwaleMGenetic connectivity of the reef fish Lutjanus kasmira at the scale of the western Indian Ocean. Can. J. Fish. Aquat. Sci., 2012; 69(5): 842–853. doi:10.1139/f2012-012. 129HealeyAJE, GouwsG, FennessySTGenetic analysis reveals harvested Lethrinus nebulosus in the Southwest Indian Ocean comprise two cryptic species. ICES J. Marine Sci., 2018; 75(4): 1465–1472. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsx245. 130MzingirwaFA, MkareTK, NyingiDWGenetic diversity and spatial population structure of a deepwater snapper, Pristipomoides filamentosus in the south-west Indian Ocean. Mol. Biol. Rep., 2019; 46(5): 5079–5088. doi:10.1007/s11033-019-04962-w. 131MuthsD, GreweP, JeanCGenetic population structure of the Swordfish (Xiphias gladius) in the southwest Indian Ocean: Sex-biased differentiation, congruency between markers and its incidence in a way of stock assessment. Fish Res., 2009; 97(3): 263–269. doi:10.1016/j.fishres.2009.03.004. 132OburaD. The diversity and biogeography of Western Indian ocean reef-building corals. PLoS One, 2012; 7(9): e45013. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0045013. 133GamoyoM, OburaD, ReasonCJC. Estimating connectivity through larval dispersal in the Western Indian ocean. J. Geophys. Res.: Biogeosci., 2019; 124(8): 2446–2459. doi:10.1029/2019JG005128. 134OtwomaLM, ReuterH, TimmJGenetic connectivity in a herbivorous coral reef fish (Acanthurus leucosternon Bennet, 1833) in the Eastern African region. Hydrobiologia, 2018; 806(1): 237–250. doi:10.1007/s10750-017-3363-4. 135ChangY-LK, MillerMJ, TsukamotoK Effect of larval swimming in the western North Pacific subtropical gyre on the recruitment success of the Japanese eel. PLoS One, 2018; 13(12): e0208704. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0208704. 136KudoK. Larval vertical-migration strategy of Japanese eel. In: MTS/IEEE Oceans 2001 An Ocean Odyssey Honolulu, HI, USA, 5–8 November 2001. Escondido, CA, USA: Marine Technology Society, 2001; pp. 870–875.
137ShinodaA, AoyamaJ, MillerMJ Evaluation of the larval distribution and migration of the Japanese eel in the western North Pacific. Rev. Fish Biol. Fish., 2011; 21(3): 591–611. doi:10.1007/s11160-010-9195-1. 138PfeilerE. Inshore migration, seasonal distribution and sizes of larval bonefish, Albula, in the Gulf of California. Environ. Biol. Fishes, 1984; 10(1/2): 117–122. doi:10.1007/BF00001668. 139MojicaRJ, ShenkerJM, HarndenCW Recruitment of bonefish, Albula vulpes, around Lee Stocking Island, Bahamas. Fish Bull., 1994; 93(4): 666–674.
140LemopoulosA, ProkkolaJM, Uusi-HeikkiläS Comparing RADseq and microsatellites for estimating genetic diversity and relatedness — Implications for brown trout conservation. Ecol. Evol., 2019; 9(4): 2106–2120. doi:10.1002/ece3.4905. 141WilletteDA, AllendorfFW, BarberPH So, you want to use next-generation sequencing in marine systems? Insight from the Pan-Pacific Advanced Studies Institute. Bull. Mar. Sci., 2014; 90(1): 79–122. doi:10.5343/bms.2013.1008. 142MullinsRB, McKeownNJ, SauerWHHGenomic analysis reveals multiple mismatches between biological and management units in yellowfin tuna (Thunnus albacares). ICES J. Marine Sci., 2018; 75(6): 2145–2152. doi:10.1093/icesjms/fsy102. 143BabinC, GagnaireP-A, PaveySARAD-Seq Reveals Patterns of Additive Polygenic Variation Caused by Spatially-Varying Selection in the American Eel (Anguilla rostrata). Genome Biol. Evolution, 2017; 9(11): 2974–2986. doi:10.1093/gbe/evx226. 144BenestanL, QuinnBK, MaaroufiHSeascape genomics provides evidence for thermal adaptation and current-mediated population structure in American lobster (Homarus americanus). Mol. Ecol., 2016; 25(20): 5073–5092. doi:10.1111/mec.13811. 145Valenzuela-QuiñonezF. How fisheries management can benefit from genomics? Briefings Funct. Genom., 2016; 15(5): 352–357. doi:10.1093/bfgp/elw006.