No CrossRef data available.
Article contents
An E8 Correspondence for Multiplicative Eta-Products
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 20 November 2018
Abstract
Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
We describe an 
${{E}_{8}}$ correspondence for the multiplicative eta-products of weight at least 4.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © Canadian Mathematical Society 2012
References
[1] Atkin, A. O. L. and Lehner, J., Hecke operators on Γ0
(m). Math. Ann.
185(1970), 134–160. doi:10.1007/BF01359701Google Scholar
[2] Conway, J. H., A simple construction for the Fischer-Griess monster group. Invent. Math.
79(1985), no. 3, 513–540. doi:10.1007/BF01388521Google Scholar
[3] Conway, J. H., Understanding groups like Γ0
(N). In: Groups, Difference Sets, and the Monster. Ohio State Univ. Math. Res. Inst. Publ. 4, de Gruyter, Berlin, 1996, pp. 327–343.Google Scholar
[4] Conway, J. H. and Norton, S. P., Monstrous moonshine. Bull. London Math. Soc.
11(1979), no. 3, 308–339. doi:10.1112/blms/11.3.308Google Scholar
[5] Dummit, D., Kisilevsky, H., and McKay, J., Multiplicative products of η-functions. In: Finite groups—coming of age. Contemp. Math. 45, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 1985, pp. 89–98. See Mathematical Reviews MR822235 (87j:11036) for an important correction of a typesetting error.Google Scholar
[6] Duncan, J. F., Arithmetic groups and the affine E
8
Dynkin diagram. In: Groups and Symmetries. CRM Proc. Lecture Notes 47. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2009.Google Scholar
[7] Glauberman, G. and Norton, S. P., On McKay's connection between the affine E
8
diagram and the Monster. In: Proceedings on Moonshine and Related Topics. CRM Proc. Lecture Notes 30, American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, 2001, pp. 37–42.Google Scholar
[8] Helling, H., Bestimmung der Kommensurabilitätsklasse der Hilbertschen Modulgruppe. Math. Z.
92(1966), 269–280. doi:10.1007/BF01112194Google Scholar
[9] Helling, H., On the commensurability class of the rational modular group. J. London Math. Soc.
2(1970), 67–72. doi:10.1112/jlms/s2-2.1.67Google Scholar
[10] Knopp, M. I., Polynomial automorphic forms and nondiscontinuous groups. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.
123(1966), 506–520. doi:10.1090/S0002-9947-1966-0200447-7Google Scholar
[11] Kondo, T. and Tasaka, T., The theta functions of sublattices of the Leech lattice. Nagoya Math. J.
101(1986), 151–179.Google Scholar
[12] Lam, C. H. and Shimakura, H., Ising vectors in the vertex operator algebra 
associated with the Leech lattice Λ. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2007, no. 24.Google Scholar
associated with the Leech lattice Λ. Int. Math. Res. Not. IMRN 2007, no. 24.Google Scholar[13] Lam, C. H., Yamada, H., and Yamauchi, H., McKay's observation and vertex operator algebras generated by two conformal vectors of central charge 1/2. IMRP Int. Math. Res. Pap.
2005, no. 3, 117–181.Google Scholar
[14] Lam, C. H., Yamada, H., and Yamauchi, H., Vertex operator algebras, extended E
8
diagram, and McKay's observation on the Monster simple group. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc.
359(2007), no. 9, 4107–4123. doi:10.1090/S0002-9947-07-04002-0Google Scholar
[15] McKay, J., Graphs, singularities, and finite groups. In: The Santa Cruz Conference on Finite Groups Proc. Sympos. Pure Math. 37. American Mathematical Society, Providence, RI, pp. 183–186.Google Scholar
[16] Newman, M., Construction and application of a class of modular functions. II. Proc. London Math. Soc.
9(1959), 373–387. doi:10.1112/plms/s3-9.3.373Google Scholar
[17] Siegel, C. L., Some remarks on discontinuous groups. Ann. of Math.
46(1945), 708–718. doi:10.2307/1969206Google Scholar
You have
Access