J Vet Sci. 2020 Jan;21(1):e11. English.
Published online Dec 10, 2019.
© 2020 The Korean Society of Veterinary Science
Brief Communication

Complete genome sequence of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus schleiferi strain from canine otitis externa in Korea

Gi Yong Lee and Soo-Jin Yang
    • School of Bioresources and Bioscience, Chung-Ang University, Anseong 17546, Korea.
Received August 21, 2019; Revised October 16, 2019; Accepted October 23, 2019.

This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Abstract

The increase in canine skin and soft tissue infections, such as pyoderma and otitis, caused by Staphylococcus schleiferi strains, is of significant zoonotic concern. In this study, we report the first complete genome sequence for a methicillin-resistant clinical isolate of S. schleiferi (MRSS) designated as SS4, obtained from a dog with otitis externa, in Korea. The genome of SS4 strain was of 2,539,409 bp and presented high G+C content ratio (35.90%) with no plasmid. Comparative analysis of SS4 genome revealed that it is closely related to 2142-05 and 5909-02 strains isolated from the canine skin infections in the USA.

Keywords
Staphylococcus schleiferi; dogs; genomics; otitis

INTRODUCTION

Staphylococcus schleiferi subsp. schleiferi (S. schleiferi) was initially described in 1988 and has been reported to be associated with a number of infections in companion animals and humans [1]. Although coagulase-positive Staphylococcus pseudintermedius has most frequently caused canine otitis externa and skin and soft tissue infections [2], recent studies reported that coagulase-negative S. schleiferi is becoming more prevalent in canine otitis externa and pyoderma cases [2, 3, 4]. Furthermore, the increased frequency of methicillin-resistance in S. schleiferi (MRSS) is of significant public health concern worldwide [4, 5, 6]. A recent study in our laboratory has indicated that ~26% of S. schleiferi strains of the canine origin were MRSS, often presenting increased levels of multiple drug resistance phenotype [6]. Genotypic characterization of these canine-associated MRSS strains revealed that the methicillin resistance was frequently conferred by staphylococcal cassette chromosome mec type V (SCCmec V) [6]. The widespread occurrence of SCCmec V has been reported in other methicillin-resistance staphylococci, in particular, in livestock-associated methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) [7], indicating dissemination of the SCCmec V among various staphylococcal species. Although MRSS strains have been increasingly isolated from the infected dogs over the past decades worldwide [3, 4], complete whole-genome sequences are available for only several S. schleiferi strains isolated in the USA and Japan. Thus, a representative canine-associated MRSS strain with SCCmec V isolated from Korea was selected for complete genome sequence analysis in order to understand its prevalence, genetic repertoire, and relationship to the previously sequenced MRSS strains.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A SCCmec V-MRSS strain designated as SS4 was isolated from an ear swab sample of a dog with otitis externa in Seongnam, Korea, in 2017 [6]. The strain was identified as S. schleiferi using the Vitek 2 system (BioMérieux, France), sequencing of 16S rRNA and tuf gene (Cosmogenetech, Korea), and coagulase production test. This strain was resistant to several antimicrobial agents, including ampicillin, enrofloxacin, kanamycin, and oxacillin. Genotypic analyses revealed that this strain possessed SCCmec V and five of the staphylococcal enterotoxin genes (seg, sei, sell, selm, and selq). This strain had oxacillin MIC of 8 μg/mL. The S. schleiferi strain was grown in tryptic soy broth (TSB, Difco Laboratories).

Genomic DNA (gDNA) of S. schleiferi SS4 strain was extracted using the Wizard genomic DNA Isolation Kit (Promega, USA), according to the manufacturer's protocols. Quantity and quality of the extracted gDNA was assessed via fluorescence-based quantification and NanoDrop 2000c spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA), respectively.

Whole genome sequence data of S. schleiferi SS4 strain were generated by a combination of PacBio RS II (Pacific Biosciences, USA) and Illumina HiSeq platform (Illumina, USA). Library preparation of de novo genome assembly was carried out by PacBio reads under the Hierarchical Genome Assembly protocol (version 3.0) in SMRT Portal version (2.3.0). PacBio sequencing yielded 136,862 reads covering 1,305,140,901 bp with genome coverage of 514X. After the de novo assembly, Illumina HiSeq generating 150 bp paired-end reads was applied for rectifying the error using the Pilon program (version 1.21). Following the hybrid assembly, 5,277,928 reads covering 796,967,128 bp with 313X coverage were generated from Illumina sequencing. Genome annotation was performed using Prokka 1.12b.

For comparative genomic analyses, the previously published genome sequences of five S. schleiferi strains were obtained from NCBI. The five S. schleiferi strains were all isolated from canine skin infections (accession numbers of the five S. schleiferi strains were 1360-13; CP009470, 2142-05; CP009762, 5909-02; CP009676, 2317-03; CP010309 and TSCC54; AP014944, respectively) [8, 9].

Functional genome analysis of S. schleiferi strains was performed via genome-wide approach, such as proteomics and metabolomics. Gene annotation based on orthology and functionality was done by Cluster of Orthologous Groups and RAST server of SEED databases (http://rast.theseed.org/FIG/rast.cgi) [10]. The presence of virulence genes and antimicrobial resistance genes was confirmed by using BLAST algorithm and Center for Genomic Epidemiology (CGE) (http://www.genomicepidemiology.org/). For identification of antimicrobial resistance genes, ResFinder of CGE and the Comprehensive Antibiotic Resistance Database (https://card.mcmaster.ca/) were integrated. Mobile genetic elements (MGEs), such as insertion sequences (ISs) and prophages, were detected by using the IS Finder database (https://isfinder.biotoul.fr/) and PHAST (http://phast.wishartlab.com/), respectively.

Phylogenetic analyses of S. schleiferi strains relied on two comparative parameters: average nucleotide identity (ANI) values and 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The ANI values were calculated based on BLAST algorithm (ANIb) using JSpecies [11], and modified ANI was calculated using OrthoANI (version 0.93) [12]. A phylogenic tree of 16S rRNA sequences was generated using the MEGA-X software, and these sequences were aligned with ClustalW. The phylogenic tree was constructed using maximum likelihood analysis implemented with general time reversible model. Pan-genomic analysis of S. schleiferi strains was also performed using the Roary [13].

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

The complete genome of MRSS SS4 strain comprised a single circular chromosome of 2,539,409 bp with a guanine-cytosine (GC) content of 35.90% and no plasmid. We identified 2310 open reading frames (ORFs), 59 tRNAs, and 16 rRNAs in this genome. The genome size and GC content of the SS4 were similar to those of the five S. schleiferi strains sequenced previously (Supplementary Table 1).

As presented in Fig. 1A and B, the functional categorization of the SS4 genome revealed that categories E (amino acid transport and metabolism), P (inorganic ion transport and metabolism), and J (translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis) were most abundant (Fig. 1A). SEED data also revealed that 1708 ORFs (70%) encode proteins with known functions, whereas 741 ORFs (30%) produce proteins with unknown functions (Fig. 1B). Among the predicted ORFs, genes involved in the metabolism of amino acids and their derivatives (256 ORFs) were most abundant, followed by those involved in carbohydrate (213 ORFs) and protein (171 ORFs) metabolism. Interestingly, the number of phages, prophages, and transposable elements was higher in the SS4 strain than the other S. schleiferi strains (data not shown). Correlating with the higher number of MGEs, five different enterotoxin genes (seg, sei, sell, selm, and selq), which is usually carried by phages, were identified in the SS4 strains [6]. Different host factors and environmental conditions affecting staphylococcal/microbial communities on canine hosts may have caused the differences in prevalence of phages among the six S. schleiferi strains.

Fig. 1
Functional categorization of annotated genes in the Staphylococcus schleiferi SS4 strain using (A) Cluster of Orthologous Group and (B) SEED databases.

In accordance with the previous publication [6], the SS4 strain harbored mecA gene within SCCmec type V. Although the phenotypic antimicrobial susceptibility profiles of the five S. schleiferi strains were unavailable, three of the five S. schleiferi strains (2317-03, 5909-02, and TSCC54) also had mecA in their genome. Notably, the 2317-03 and TSCC54 strains isolated from dogs in the USA and Japan, respectively, carried SCCmec V, and 5909-2 strain from the USA had SCCmec IVa for methicillin resistance. Analyses of antimicrobial resistant genes in the SS4 and five S. schleiferi genomes revealed that SS4 and 2713-03 strains carried two aminoglycoside resistant gene cassettes, AAC(6′)-Ie-APH(2′′)-Ia and ANT(4′)-Ib. Furthermore, another beta-lactam resistant gene, blaZ, was identified only in the 2317-03 strain (Supplementary Table 2). The three antimicrobial resistance genes identified in the SS4 strain (Table 1) were all located within MGEs.

Table 1
Antimicrobial resistance genes and virulence genes of Staphylococcus schleiferi SS4 strain

CGE and genome BLAST search revealed that the MRSS strain SS4 comprises various virulence factors associated with its potential pathogenicity. As presented in Table 1, three heavy metal resistance genes, eight adhesion-associated genes, four toxin genes, and two exoenzyme genes were identified in the SS4 strain. Of these virulence-related genes, multiple copies of sdrD, hldB, lukS, and lip genes were identified in the SS4 strain. Sequence analysis around the sdrD, hldB, lukS, and lip genes revealed that there are no MGEs or characteristics of translocatable sequences, suggesting that homologous recombination may have caused the amplification of the genes.

Phylogenomic analysis of S. schleiferi strains based on 16S rRNA sequences revealed that all the six S. schleiferi strains were genetically identical (data not shown). In the Roary analysis, S. schleiferi strain SS4 exhibited a close relationship to the 5909-02 strain isolated from infected dogs in the USA (Fig. 2A). Correlating with the Roaryanalysis result, OrthoANI values also indicated that SS4, 2142-05, and 5909-02 are closely related. These data suggested that the MRSS SS4 strain is more closely related to the S. schleiferi strains isolated from the USA than to the TSCC54 strain isolated from Japan. Multiple genome alignment of the six S. schleiferi strains using Mauve algorithm [14] also identified two distinct blocks of genome only in SS4 and 2317-03 strains comprising aminoglycoside resistant gene cassette and cell division-associated proteins, respectively (data not shown).

Fig. 2
Phylogenetic analysis of six genomes of Staphylococcus schleiferi strains based on the pangenomes with Roary (A) and OrthoANI (B).
*Methicillin-resistant S. schleiferi strains: TSCC54, SS4, and 2317-03 had SCCmec V and 5909-02 strain had SCCmec IVa.

To our knowledge, this is the first report of complete genome sequence of an MRSS-SCCmec V strain isolated from a dog with otitis externa in Korea. This whole genome sequence information will contribute to the understanding of genetic features of canine-associated MRSS strains, such as antimicrobial resistance and virulence-related genes. More detailed comparative analysis of the S. schleiferi genomes to those of other staphylococcal species, such as MRSA and methicillin-resistant S. pseudintermedius (MRSP) is necessary for future investigation.

The complete genome sequence of methicillin-resistant S. schleiferi strain SS4 has been deposited in GenBank under the accession number CP035007.

SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIALS

Supplementary Table 1

Genomic features of Staphylococcus schleiferi isolates

Click here to view.(29K, xls)

Supplementary Table 2

Antimicrobial resistance genes of Staphylococcus schleiferi strains isolated from dogs with otitis externa

Click here to view.(29K, xls)

Notes

Funding:This work was supported by the Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science & Technology Development (Grant No. PJ012811) funded by Rural Development Administration, Republic of Korea.

Conflict of Interest:The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Author Contributions:

  • Conceptualization: Yang SJ.

  • Data curation: Yang SJ, Lee GY.

  • Formal analysis: Yang SJ, Lee GY.

  • Funding acquisition: Yang SJ.

  • Investigation: Lee GY.

  • Methodology: Yang SJ, Lee GY.

  • Project administration: Yang SJ, Lee GY.

  • Writing - original draft: Yang SJ, Lee GY.

  • Writing - review & editing: Yang SJ.

References

    1. Freney J, Brun Y, Bes M, Meugnier H, Grimont F, Grimont PA, Nervi C, Fleurette J. Staphylococcus lugdunensis sp. nov. and Staphylococcus schleiferi sp. nov., two species from human clinical specimens. Int J Syst Bacteriol 1988;38:168–172.
    1. Penna B, Varges R, Medeiros L, Martins GM, Martins RR, Lilenbaum W. Species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility of staphylococci isolated from canine otitis externa. Vet Dermatol 2010;21:292–296.
    1. May ER, Kinyon JM, Noxon JO. Nasal carriage of Staphylococcus schleiferi from healthy dogs and dogs with otitis, pyoderma or both. Vet Microbiol 2012;160:443–448.
    1. Penna B, Mendes W, Rabello R, Lilenbaum W. Carriage of methicillin susceptible and resistant Staphylococcus schleiferi among dog with or without topic infections. Vet Microbiol 2013;162:298–299.
    1. Cain CL, Morris DO, Rankin SC. Clinical characterization of Staphylococcus schleiferi infections and identification of risk factors for acquisition of oxacillin-resistant strains in dogs: 225 cases (2003–2009). J Am Vet Med Assoc 2011;239:1566–1573.
    1. Lee GY, Lee HH, Hwang SY, Hong J, Lyoo KS, Yang SJ. Carriage of Staphylococcus schleiferi from canine otitis externa: antimicrobial resistance profiles and virulence factors associated with skin infection. J Vet Sci 2019;20:e6
    1. Hau SJ, Frana T, Sun J, Davies PR, Nicholson TL. Zinc resistance within swine-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates in the United States is associated with multilocus sequence type lineage. Appl Environ Microbiol 2017;83:83.
    1. Misic AM, Cain CL, Morris DO, Rankin SC, Beiting DP. Complete genome sequence and methylome of Staphylococcus schleiferi, an important cause of skin and ear infections in veterinary medicine. Genome Announc 2015;3:3.
    1. Sasaki T, Tsubakishita S, Kuwahara-Arai K, Matsuo M, Lu YJ, Tanaka Y, Hiramatsu K. Complete genome sequence of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus schleiferi strain TSCC54 of canine origin. Genome Announc 2015;3:3.
    1. Aziz RK, Bartels D, Best AA, DeJongh M, Disz T, Edwards RA, Formsma K, Gerdes S, Glass EM, Kubal M, Meyer F, Olsen GJ, Olson R, Osterman AL, Overbeek RA, McNeil LK, Paarmann D, Paczian T, Parrello B, Pusch GD, Reich C, Stevens R, Vassieva O, Vonstein V, Wilke A, Zagnitko O. The RAST server: rapid annotations using subsystems technology. BMC Genomics 2008;9:75.
    1. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P, Tiedje JM. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2007;57:81–91.
    1. Lee I, Ouk Kim Y, Park SC, Chun J. OrthoANI: an improved algorithm and software for calculating average nucleotide identity. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 2016;66:1100–1103.
    1. Page AJ, Cummins CA, Hunt M, Wong VK, Reuter S, Holden MT, Fookes M, Falush D, Keane JA, Parkhill J. Roary: rapid large-scale prokaryote pan genome analysis. Bioinformatics 2015;31:3691–3693.
    1. Darling AC, Mau B, Blattner FR, Perna NT. Mauve: multiple alignment of conserved genomic sequence with rearrangements. Genome Res 2004;14:1394–1403.

Metrics
Share
Figures

1 / 2

Tables

1 / 1

Funding Information
PERMALINK