Korean J Urol. 2008 Apr;49(4):287-293. Korean.
Published online Apr 30, 2008.
Copyright © 2008 The Korean Urological Association
Original Article

Efficacy of Laparoscopic and Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation of Renal Tumor

Sang Rak Bae, Tae Hyo Kim and Gyung Tak Sung
Received October 02, 2007; Accepted March 12, 2008.

Abstract

Purpose

We report here on the safety and efficacy of nephron-sparing radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for treating renal tumor.

Materials and Methods

Starting June 2004, a total of 14 patients underwent RFA for renal tumor during the following 3 years. Of these, 12 cases were followed up for at least 6 months postoperatively. Eight cases of combined computed tomography (CT) and ultrasonogram-guided percutaneous RFA, and four cases of intraoperative ultrasonography-guided laparoscopic RFA were performed with mean follow-up of 18.2 months (range: 4-27 months). The treatment indications were a localized, small (<4cm), solid renal mass in the elderly patients and those patients with co-morbid conditions. Physical examination, CBC, determining the serum creatinine levels and urine analysis were performed for the follow-up laboratory study and kidney CT was performed at day 1, 1 week, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year after ablation and thereafter semi-annually. The mean follow-up duration was 18.2 months (range: 4-27 months).

Results

All the patients underwent successful RFA without any serious events. Four patients had mild perinephric hematoma on the follow-up CT scan and there was one case of mild gross hematuria postoperatively. With a mean follow-up of 18.2 months, two patients showed residual tumor at 3 months & 22 months, respectively, on the follow-up contrast-enhanced CT after the first tumor ablation. One patient underwent a second RFA and another patient underwent laparoscopic radical nephrectomy, and no residual tumor was seen on the follow-up CT. Distant metastasis was not found in any cases and all the patients are alive on serial follow-up.

Conclusions

Percutaneous or laparoscopic RFA is considered a useful treatment for selected patients who have a small renal mass, and to spare the nephrons. The ultimate role of this modality will continue to evolve and this warrants further studies.

Keywords
Radiofrequency ablation; Nephron-sparing; Laparoscopy

Figures

Fig. 1
(A) The follow up CT scan image 24 hours after radiofrequency ablation (RFA) shows slightly enhanced peripheral lesion. (B) The follow up CT image 1 month after RFA shows no contrast enhancement of the left renal tumor, but a slightly increased size. (C) The follow up CT image 6 month after RFA shows a decreased tumor size compared to that immediately after RFA. (D) The follow up CT image 9 month after RFA shows a more decreased tumor size.

Tables

Table 1
The patient characteristics and pre-operative status of the 12 cases

Table 2
Results of radiofrequency ablation in the 12 patients

References

    1. Moll V, Becht E, Ziegler M. Kidney preserving surgery in renal cell tumors: indications, techniques and results in 152 patients. J Urol 1993;150:319–323.
    1. Livraghi T, Goldberg SN, Lazzaroni S, Meloni F, Ierace T, Solbiati L, et al. Hepatocellular carcinoma: radio-frequency ablation of medium and large lesions. Radiology 2000;214:761–768.
    1. Martin AP, Goldstein RM, Dempster J, Netto GJ, Katabi N, Derrick HC, et al. Radiofrequency thermal ablation of hepatocellular carcinoma before liver transplantation - a clinical and histological examination. Clin Transplant 2006;20:695–705.
    1. Zlotta AR, Wildschutz T, Raviv G, Peny MO, van Gansbeke D, Noel JC, et al. Radiofrequency interstitial tumour ablation (RITA) is a possible new modality for treatment of renal cancer: ex vivo and in vivo experience. J Endourol 1997;11:251–258.
    1. Yohannes P, Pinto P, Rotariu P, Smith AD, Lee BR. Retroperitoneoscopic radiofrequency ablation of a solid renal mass. J Endourol 2001;15:845–849.
    1. Gervais DA, McGovern FJ, Arellano RS, McDougal WS, Mueller PR. Radiofrequency ablation of renal cell carcinoma: part 1, indications, results, and role in patient management over a 6-year period and ablation of 100 tumors. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2005;185:64–71.
    1. Matsumoto ED, Johnson DB, Ogan K, Trimmer C, Sagalowsky A, Margulis V, et al. Short-term efficacy of temperature-based radiofrequency ablation of small renal tumors. Urology 2005;65:877–881.
    1. Jacomides L, Ogan K, Watumull L, Cadeddu JA. Laparoscopic application of radio frequency energy enables in situ renal tumor ablation and partial nephrectomy. J Urol 2003;169:49–53.
    1. Zagoria RJ. Imaging-guided radiofrequency ablation of renal masses. Radiographics 2004;24 Suppl 1:S59–S71.
    1. Uzzo RG, Novick AC. Nephron sparing surgery for renal tumors: indications, techniques and outcomes. J Urol 2001;166:6–18.
    1. Ljungberg B, Alamdari FI, Holmberg G, Granfors T, Duchek M. Radical nephrectomy is still preferable in the treatment of localized renal cell carcinoma. A long-term follow-up study. Eur Urol 1998;33:79–85.
    1. Leach GE, Lieber MM. Partial nephrectomy: Mayo Clinic experience 1957-1977. Urology 1980;15:219–228.
    1. Siqueira TM Jr, Kuo RL, Gardner TA, Paterson RF, Stevens LH, Lingeman JE, et al. Major complications in 213 laparoscopic nephrectomy cases: the Indianapolis experience. J Urol 2002;168:1361–1365.
    1. Delakas D, Karyotis I, Daskalopoulos G, Terhorst B, Lymberopoulos S, Cranidis A. Nephron-sparing surgery for localized renal cell carcinoma with a normal contralateral kidney: a European three-center experience. Urology 2002;60:998–1002.
    1. Mahnken AH, Gunther RW, Tacke J. Radiofrequency ablation of renal tumors. Eur Radiol 2004;14:1449–1455.
    1. Ogan K, Jacomides L, Dolmatch BL, Rivera FJ, Dellaria MF, Josephs SC, et al. Percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of renal tumors: technique, limitations, and morbidity. Urology 2002;60:954–958.
    1. Gervais DA, McGovern FJ, Wood BJ, Goldberg SN, McDougal WS, Mueller PR. Radio-frequency ablation of renal cell carcinoma: early clinical experience. Radiology 2000;217:665–672.
    1. Su LM, Jarrett TW, Chan DY, Kavoussi LR, Solomon SB. Percutaneous computed tomography-guided radiofrequency ablation of renal masses in high surgical risk patients: preliminary results. Urology 2003;61 4 Suppl 1:26–33.
    1. Walther MM, Shawker TH, Libutti SK, Lubensky I, Choyke PL, Venzon D, et al. A phase 2 study of radio frequency interstitial tissue ablation of localized renal tumors. J Urol 2000;163:1424–1427.
    1. Pavlovich CP, Walther MM, Choyke PL, Pautler SE, Chang R, Linehan WM, et al. Percutaneous radio frequency ablation of small renal tumors: initial results. J Urol 2002;167:10–15.
    1. Li QL, Guan HW, Zhang QP, Zhang LZ, Wang FP, Liu YJ. Optimal margin in nephron-sparing surgery for renal cell carcinoma 4cm or less. Eur Urol 2003;44:448–451.
    1. Rendon RA, Kachura JR, Sweet JM, Gertner MR, Sherar MD, Robinette M, et al. The uncertainty of radio frequency treatment of renal cell carcinoma: findings at immediate and delayed nephrectomy. J Urol 2002;167:1587–1592.
    1. Zagoria RJ, Hawkins AD, Clark PE, Hall MC, Matlaga BR, Dyer RB, et al. Percutaneous CT-guided radiofrequency ablation of renal neoplasms: factors influencing success. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:201–207.
    1. McDougal WS, Gervais DA, McGovern FJ, Mueller PR. Long-term followup of patients with renal cell carcinoma treated with radio frequency ablation with curative intent. J Urol 2005;174:61–63.
    1. Weizer AZ, Raj GV, O'Connell M, Robertson CN, Nelson RC, Polascik TJ. Complications after percutaneous radiofrequency ablation of renal tumors. Urology 2005;66:1176–1180.

Metrics
Share
Figures

1 / 1

Tables

1 / 2

PERMALINK