Published online Jul 31, 2006.
https://doi.org/10.4111/kju.2006.47.7.734
The Results of Performing the SPARC Procedure for Treating Female Stress Urinary Incontinence: A 14 Month Study
Abstract
Purpose
The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of performing the suprapubic arc (SPARC) procedure during 14 months at our hospital for treating female stress urinary incontinence.
Materials and Methods
Between October 2002 and December 2003, 114 consecutive women who suffered with stress urinary incontinence underwent the SPARC procedure. All the patients were followed up for at least 1 year. The patients were preoperatively evaluated via taking their medical history, physical examinations, and conducting urinalysis and voiding cystourethrography and urodynamic studies, including determining the Valsalva leak point pressure (VLPP). Evaluations were conducted by questionnaires and interviews for determining the surgical outcome and the patients' satisfaction.
Results
The mean age was 48.6 years (30-70), the mean follow-up period was 16.4 months (12-25), the mean hospital stay was 3.8 days (2-10) and the mean operation time was 38.7 minutes. For 114 patients, 92 (80.7%) were cured and 17 (14.9%) were significantly improved. 99 patients (86.8%) were satisfied with the SPARC procedure, and 95 patients (83.3%) would like to recommend the SPARC procedure to others. Intraoperative complications included 9 (7.9%) bladder perforations and 1 (0.9%) urethral injury. Postoperative complications showed 14 cases (12.3%) of urinary retention, 2 cases (1.8%) of vaginal wound infections and 1 case (0.9%) of vaginal erosion due to tape. De novo urge incontinence was noted in 3 patients (2.6%).
Conclusions
Favorable results were obtained from the SPARC procedure. This procedure is an effective and safe technique for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence in terms of the low morbidity and the high success rate.
Table 1
Characteristics of the patients undergoing the suprapubic arc (SPARC) procedure
Table 2
Operative procedures combined with SPARC
Table 3
Clinical outcomes of the SPARC procedures
Table 4
Comparison of the postoperative result according to the VLPP
Table 5
Comparison of the postoperative result according to the duration of follow-up
Table 6
Complications of the SPARC procedure
References
-
Siddiqui K, Grainger R. Preliminary experience with SPARC pubovaginal sling in treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int 2004;94 Suppl 2:252–253.abstract 3.
-
-
Primus G. SPARC-sling system for the treatment of female urodynamic stress urinary incontinence an unicenter prospective study with 2 years follow-up. BJU Int 2004;94 Suppl 2:250.abstract 13.
-
-
Tseng LH, Wang AC, Lin YH, Li SJ, Ko YJ. Randomized comparison of the suprapubic arc sling procedure vs tension-free vaginal taping for stress incontinent women. Int Urogyncol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct 2005;16:230–235.
-
-
Dupont MC. Comparison of SPARC™ with tension-free vaginal tape in treating stress urinary incontinence. BJU Int 2003;91 Suppl 2:91.abstract 124.
-
-
DeTayrac R, Deffieux X, Droupy S, Chauveaud-Lambling A, Calvanese-Benamour L, Fernadez H. A prospective randomized trial comparing tension-free vaginal tape and transobturator suburethral tape for surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2004;190:602–608.
-
-
Park SC, Hong BS, Choo MS. Risk factors related to immediate urinary retention after tension-free vaginal tape procedure. Korean J Urol 2003;44:503–508.
-
-
Stanford E, Dell J. Physician satisfaction with the SPARC™ suprapubic sling system: an opinion-based survey. J Pelv Med Surg 2005;11 Suppl:77–78.abstract 23.
-