Hardness and modulus of elasticity of primary and permanent teeth after wear against different dental materials

 

PDF Download Permissions and Reprints

ABSTRACT

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to determine the Young's modulus and the hardness of deciduous and permanent teeth following wear challenges using different dental materials. Materials and Methods: Wear challenges were performed against four dental materials: A resin-based fissure sealant (Fluoroshield^®), a glass ionomer based fissure sealant (Vitremer^®), and two microhybrid composite resins (Filtek Z250 and P90^®). Using the pin-on-plate design, a deciduous or a permanent tooth was made into a pin (4 mm × 4 mm × 2 mm) working at a 3 N vertical load, 1 Hz frequency, and 900 cycles (15 min) with Fusayama artificial saliva as a lubricant. Before and after the tribological tests, the hardness and elasticity modulus of the tooth samples were measured by creating a nanoindentation at load forces up to 50 mN and 150 mN. All of the results were statistically analyzed using ANOVA and post-hoc Duncan's tests (P < 0.05). Results: No difference in hardness was encountered between deciduous and permanent teeth (P < 0.05) or modulus of elasticity (P < 0.05) before or after the wear challenges for all of the dental materials tested. Conclusions: Wear challenges against the studied dental materials did not alter the properties of permanent or deciduous teeth after the application of a 3 N load.

• REFERENCES

• 1 Ramalho A, Antunes P. Reciprocating wear test of dental composites against human teeth and glass. Wear 2007; 263: 1095-104
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 2 Cuy JL, Mann AB, Livi KJ, Teaford MF, Weihs TP. Nanoindentation mapping of the mechanical properties of human molar tooth enamel. Arch Oral Biol 2002; 47: 281-91
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 3 Habelitz S, Marshall SJ, Marshall Jr GW, Balooch M. Mechanical properties of human dental enamel on the nanometre scale. Arch Oral Biol 2001; 46: 173-83
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 4 Sajewicz E. On evaluation of wear resistance of tooth enamel and dental materials. Wear 2006; 260: 1256-61
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 5 Lee A, He LH, Lyons K, Swain MV. Tooth wear and wear investigations in dentistry. J Oral Rehabil 2012; 39: 217-25
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 6 Söderholm KJ, Lambrechts P, Sarrett D, Abe Y, Yang MC, Labella R. et al. Clinical wear performance of eight experimental dental composites over three years determined by two measuring methods. Eur J Oral Sci 2001; 109: 273-81
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 7 Roy S, Basu B. Mechanical and tribological characterization of human tooth. Mater Charact 2008; 59: 747-56
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 8 Spears IR. A three-dimensional finite element model of prismatic enamel: A re-appraisal of the data on the Young's modulus of enamel. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 1690-7
  Google Scholar
• 9 Oliver W, Pharr G. Improved technique for determining hardness and elastic modulus using load and displacement sensing indentation experiments. J Mater Res 1992; 7: 1564-83
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 10 Willems G, Celis JP, Lambrechts P, Braem M, Vanherle G. Hardness and Young's modulus determined by nanoindentation technique of filler particles of dental restorative materials compared with human enamel. J Biomed Mater Res 1993; 27: 747-55
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 11 Mahoney E, Holt A, Swain M, Kilpatrick N. The hardness and modulus of elasticity of primary molar teeth: An ultra-micro-indentation study. J Dent 2000; 28: 589-94
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 12 Zheng J, Zhou Z, Zhang J, Li H, Yu H. On the friction and wear behaviour of human tooth enamel and dentin. Wear 2003; 255: 967-74
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 13 Galo R, Contente MM, Borsatto MC. Wear of two pit and fissure sealants in contact with primary teeth. Eur J Dent 2014; 8: 241-8
  Article in Thieme ConnectPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 14 Kaidonis JA, Richards LC, Townsend GC, Tansley GD. Wear of human enamel: A quantitative in vitro assessment. J Dent Res 1998; 77: 1983-90
  Google Scholar
• 15 Katz JL. Hard tissue as a composite material. I. Bounds on the elastic behavior. J Biomech 1971; 4: 455-73
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 16 Chung SM, Yap AU, Koh WK, Tsai KT, Lim CT. Measurement of Poisson's ratio of dental composite restorative materials. Biomaterials 2004; 25: 2455-60
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 17 Ramalho A, Antunes PV. Reciprocating wear test of dental composites: Effect on the antagonist. Wear 2005; 259: 1005-11
  CrossrefGoogle Scholar
• 18 Condon JR, Ferracane JL. Factors effecting dental composite wear in vitro . J Biomed Mater Res 1997; 38: 303-13
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 19 Braly A, Darnell LA, Mann AB, Teaford MF, Weihs TP. The effect of prism orientation on the indentation testing of human molar enamel. Arch Oral Biol 2007; 52: 856-60
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 20 Caldwell RC, Muntz ML, Gilmore RW, Pigman W. Microhardness studies of intact surface enamel. J Dent Res 1957; 36: 732-8
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 21 Xu HH, Smith DT, Jahanmir S, Romberg E, Kelly JR, Thompson VP. et al. Indentation damage and mechanical properties of human enamel and dentin. J Dent Res 1998; 77: 472-80
  CrossrefPubMedGoogle Scholar
• 22 Topcu FT, Erdemir U, Sahinkesen G, Yildiz E, Uslan I, Acikel C. Evaluation of microhardness, surface roughness, and wear behavior of different types of resin composites polymerized with two different light sources. J Biomed Mater Res B Appl Biomater 2010; 92: 470-8
  Google Scholar