Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Calcar femorale grafting in the hemiarthroplasty of the hip for unstable inter trochanteric fractures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Orthopaedics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The sliding screw–plate devices and cephalo–medullary nail devices have performed well in stable inter–trochanteric fractures in patients with reasonably good quality of bone. However, their suboptimal performance in comminuted fractures in the presence of osteoporotic bone has prompted many surgeons to consider bipolar hemiarthroplasty as the primary modality of management of comminuted inter–trochanteric fractures in elderly patients. However, long term stability of the hemiarthroplasty implant also may be compromised due to the presence of postero–medial bone loss at the area of the calcar.

Materials and Methods

We have presented a simple and effective technique of calcar grafting by harvesting cortical bone strut from the neck of the fractured femur. A total of 34 patients with inter–trochanteric fractures of the femur were treated with calcar grafting. The mean age was 79.2 years. The graft was harvested from the calcar region of the head and neck fragment of the femur and wedged between the medial femoral cortex and medial edge of the prosthesis. The mean followup period was 54.5 months.

Results

In 32 of 34 (94%) patients in our series, the calcar graft healed well without dislodgement. There was graft resorption in two patients associated with subsidence of the implant and loosening.

Conclusion

Calcar grafting using this technique provides stability to the implant in the presence of comminution and incorporates well in the majority of patients. Donor site morbidity of graft harvesting is also avoided.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kannus P, Parkkari J, Sievδnen H, Heinonen A, Vuori I, Jδrvinen M. Epidemiology of hip fractures. Bone 1996;18:57S–63.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Cooper C, Campion G, Melton LJ 3rd. Hip fractures in the elderly: a world-wide projection. Osteoporos Int 1992;2:285–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gupta A. Osteoporosis in India–the nutritional hypothesis. Natl Med J India 1996;9:268–74.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Radford PJ, Needoff M, Webb JK. A prospective randomised comparison of the dynamic hip screw and the gamma locking nail. J Bone Joint Surg Br 1993;75:789–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Saudan M, Lübbeke A, Sadowski C, Riand N, Stern R, Hoffmeyer P. Pertrochanteric fractures: Is there an advantage to an intramedullary nail?: A randomized, prospective study of 206 patients comparing the dynamic hip screw and proximal femoral nail. J Orthop Trauma 2002;16:386–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Adams CI, Robinson CM, Court- Brown CM, McQueen MM. Prospective randomized controlled trial of an intramedullary nail versus dynamic screw and plate for intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. J Orthop Trauma 2001;15:394–400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ahrengart L, Törnkvist H, Fornander P, Thorngren KG, Pasanen L, Wahlström P, et al. A randomized study of the compression hip screw and Gamma nail in 426 fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2002;401 209–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Utrilla AL, Reig JS, Muñoz FM, Tufanisco CB. Trochanteric gamma nail and compression hip screw for trochanteric fractures: A randomized, prospective, comparative study in 210 elderly patients with a new design of the gamma nail. J Orthop Trauma 2005;19 (4):229–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Wolfgang GL, Bryant MH, O’Neill JP. Treatment of intertrochanteric fracture of the femur using sliding screw plate fixation. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1982;163:148–58.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Hsueh KK, Fang CK, Chen CM, Su YP, Wu HF, Chiu FY. Risk factors in cutout of sliding hip screw in intertrochanteric fractures: An evaluation of 937 patients. Int Orthop 2010;34:1273–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Palm H, Lysén C, Krasheninnikoff M, Holck K, Jacobsen S, Gebuhr P. Intramedullary nailing appears to be superior in pertrochanteric hip fractures with a detached greater trochanter: 311 consecutive patients followed for 1 year. Acta Orthop 2011;82:166–70.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Bendo JA, Weiner LS, Strauss E, Yang E. Collapse of intertrochanteric hip fractures fixed with sliding screws. Orthop Rev 1994;Suppl: 30–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Steinber GG, Desai SS, Kornwitz NA, Sullivan TJ. The intertrochanteric hip fracture. A retrospective analysis. Orthopedics 1988;11:265–73.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Sinno K, Sakr M, Girard J, Khatib H. The effectiveness of primary bipolar arthroplasty in treatment of unstable intertrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. N Am J Med Sci 2010;2:561–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Crawford CH, Malkani AL, Cordray S, Roberts CS, Sligar W. The trochanteric nail versus the sliding hip screw for intertrochanteric hip fractures: A review of 93 cases. J Trauma 2006;60:325–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Tyllianakis M, Panagopoulos A, Papadopoulos A, Papasimos S, Mousafiris K. Treatment of extracapsular hip fractures with the proximal femoral nail (PFN): Long term results in 45 patients. Acta Orthop Belg 2004;70:444–54.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Norris R, Bhattacharjee D, Parker MJ. Occurrence of secondary fracture around intramedullary nails used for trochanteric hip fractures: A systematic review of 13,568 patients. Injury 2012;43:706–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Parker MJ, Handoll HH. Gamma and other cephalocondylic intramedullary nails versus extramedullary implants for extracapsular hip fractures in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2010; Sep 8;(9) CD000093; doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000093.pub5

    Google Scholar 

  19. Parker MJ, Bowers TR, Pryor GA. Sliding hip screw versus the Targon PF nail in the treatment of trochanteric fractures of the hip: A randomised trial of 600 fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2012;94:391–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Broos PL, Rommens PM, Deleyn PR, Geens VR, Stappaerts KH. Pertrochanteric fractures in the elderly: Are there indications for primary prosthetic replacement? J Orthop Trauma 1991;5:446–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Green S, Moore T, Proano F. Bipolar prosthetic replacement for the management of unstable intertrochanteric hip fractures in the elderly. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987;224 169–77.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Chan KC, Gill GS. Cemented hemiarthroplasties for elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2000;371 206–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Kim SY, Kim YG, Hwang JK. Cementless calcar-replacement hemiarthroplasty compared with intramedullary fixation of unstable intertrochanteric fractures. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2005;87:2186–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Haentjens P, Casteleyn PP, De Boeck H, Handelberg F, Opdecam P. Treatment of unstable intertrochanteric and subtrochanteric fractures in elderly patients. Primary bipolar arthroplasty compared with internal fixation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1989;71:1214–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhang B, Chiu KY, Wang M. Hip arthroplasty for failed internal fixation of intertrochanteric fractures. J Arthroplasty 2004;19:329–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Singh M, Nagrath AR, Maini PS. Changes in trabecular pattern of the upper end of the femur as an index of osteoporosis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1970;52:457–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Harris WH. Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fracture treated by mold arthroplasty. An end result survey using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1969;51:737–55.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Gingras MB, Clarke J, Evarts MC. Prosthetic replacement in femoral neck fractures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1980;152:147–57.

    Google Scholar 

  29. Haidukewych GJ, Berry JB. Hip arthroplasty for salvage of failed treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2003;85:899–903.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Stern MB, Angerman A. Comminuted intertrochanteric fractures treated with a Leinbach prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1987;218 75–80.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Stappaerts KH, Deldycke J, Broos PL, Staes FF, Rommens PM, Claes P. Treatment of unstable peritrochanteric fractures in elderly patients with a compression hip screw or with the Vandeputte (VDP) endoprosthesis: A prospective randomized study. J Orthop Trauma 1995;9:292–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Stern MB, Goldstein TB. The use of the Leinbach prosthesis in intertrochanteric fractures of the hip. Clin Orthop Relat Res 1977;128 325–31.

    Google Scholar 

  33. Rodop O, Kiral A, Kaplan H, Akmaz I. Primary bipolar hemiprosthesis for unstable fractures of the hip. Int Orthop 2002;26:233–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chandrashekar J. Thakkar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thakkar, C.J., Thakkar, S., Kathalgere, R.T. et al. Calcar femorale grafting in the hemiarthroplasty of the hip for unstable inter trochanteric fractures. IJOO 49, 602–609 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.168762

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0019-5413.168762

Key words

MeSH terms

Navigation