INTRODUCTION
Age estimation in forensic contexts is one of the procedures of greater attention in recent years due to the needs to identify victims of disasters, the increase in migratory phenomena, the intensity of crimes involving human trafficking or smuggling, or more specifically in children, the possibility that they are victims of crimes of sexual abuse (Franklin et al., 2015; Sironi et al., 2021). “Humanitarian forensic action”, term proposed by the International Committee of the Red Cross, is defined as “the application of forensic science to humanitarian activities”, which involves “a range of activities of that seek to alleviate human suffering and protect the dignity of all victims” (Smitha et al., 2019). Forensic dentistry has proven to play a fundamental role by offering information not only for the comparison of ante- and post-mortem data, but also for confirming the age, sex, stature, pathological conditions or habits based on well-studied dental morphological characters as traits for the reconstructive identification of the indivi- dual (Sengupta et al., 2020). Specifically, in children and adolescents, dental age estimation involves the application of different methodologies where the radiographic evaluation of dental maturation is the basis of many techniques recommended for their reliability for both living and deceased individuals (Franklin et al., 2015; Smitha et al., 2019).
It has been conveniently reported that there is a need for population-specific data if reliability is sought in the application of a method for age estimation (Franklin et al., 2015). Many standards in current use are based on analyses of other populations, sometimes formulated several generations ago or even on archaeological, military or cadaveric samples (Franklin et al., 2015). It has been asserted that forensic dentists and oral health professionals can help prevent human rights violations through the application of best practice in human identification, and that human identification without complete post-mortem assessment can lead to delayed identifications thereby representing a violation of human rights and international humanitarian law (Smitha et al., 2019). Considering that Chile, a South American country with a long history of natural disasters (Rojas-Torres et al., 2019), has shown an unprecedented increase in the number of migrants in recent years with significant percentages of individuals under 18 years of age (Servicio Jesuita a Migrantes, 2019), the objective of this scoping review is to identify original studies describing radiographic methods for estimation dental age applied in Chilean children. The need to apply specific standards for this population as well as to update this information based on current populations to validate these methodologies are discussed.
MATERIAL AND METHOD
A scoping review of the literature was carried out following the methodology for the Joanna Briggs Institute scoping reviews (Peters et al., 2015) and PRISMA guidelines (Moher et al., 2009). Scoping reviews have been referred as an appropriate methodology when seeking to answer broad research questions and to obtain an appreciation of the nature of the available evidence. Although scoping reviews do not assess the quality of the included studies (unlike systematic reviews), they can identify areas not yet covered in knowledge, define the scope of systematic reviews, or guide the development of focused research questions (Armstrong et al., 2011). A specific search strategy "age estimation" AND ("child" OR "infant") AND ("dental" OR "teeth") AND ("Chile” OR "Chilean") was implemented in PubMed/ Medline database, with complementary use of the Google Scholar website searching for full articles in English and Spanish, which were independently analyzed by two researchers between December 02, 2020 and December 15, 2020. Only original studies as primary sources were included, with no time limit, describing radiographic methods for estimating dental age whose samples partially or totally include Chilean living children and minors, that is, individuals up to 18 years of age residing in Chile. Studies on samples of individuals with pathological or nutritional deficient conditions or of historical or archaeological populations were excluded. The search identified 5 documents (Fig. 1), and the relevant data was extracted and analyzed according to specific categories: information from the publication, characteristics of the sample, type of radiographic study performed and its outcomes.
RESULTS
Table I provides an overview of the data in the reviewed documents. A total of 5 documents responded to the search objective, of which only 3 were published in refereed journals. The documents were published between 2007 and 2018. Two documents focused their study on the maturation of upper and lower third molars, one on the maturation of the second and lower third molars, and two documents on the maturation of the seven mandibular teeth according to the classical methodology of Demirjian et al. (1973). In all cases, the radiographs used were orthopantomographs (OPGs), and the sample sizes were between 159 and 1,236 individuals, not coinciding in any case in the age ranges included. Only one document, a mas- ter thesis, exceeded a sample of 1,000 individuals (Pinares Toledo, 2015). The outcomes were reported in a very heterogeneous way, making their contrasts difficult.
DISCUSSION
By August 2019, age estimation was by far the most cited topic in forensic dentistry, also proportionally composing the most cited source of original research (Sengupta et al., 2020). An updated informal search of the term "dental age estimation" in the last 5 years reveals 173 results in PubMed, while in Google Scholar more than 1,800 results, which highlights the interest of the scientific community on this topic. Thus, the almost null presence of properly validated standards for estimating the dental age of Chileans under 18 years of age is surprising, taking into account the specific conditions of this country. Only 5 documents, 2 of them thesis (one undergraduate), only 1 article validating a current recommendation method (Cameriere et al., 2018) but hardly focused on a specific age range to discriminate between minors and adults, accounts for a necessary forensic research approach to this topic. It has already been reported that the Chilean population has a different ethnic characterization compared to the native population of other regions of the world, and a higher frequency of Amerindians, which reaches 80 % of the population (Rodríguez-Niklitschek et al., 2015). This underlines the need to validate standards in this population to obtain population-specific dental maturation data that can be contrasted with those reported worldwide.
Chile is a country prone to natural disasters (Rojas- Torres et al., 2019); Moreno-Pascual (2010), regarding the earthquake and tsunami that devastated the Chilean coasts in February 2010, reported 5 cases in which individuals between 2 and 17 years old had to be identified through estimates of their ages and radiographic analysis. In two of those cases, the ranges of the estimates spanned more than 3 years (Moreno-Pascual, 2010). Likewise, Chilean criminal legislation has become more complex for individuals in these age ranges: the implementation of the Law of Adolescent's Criminal Responsibility, which establishes a system of responsibility for adolescents between 14 and 18 years of age who violate criminal law, distinguishing two segments: 14 to 16 and 16 to 18 years for penalties (Ministerio de Justicia de Chile, 2011); the Chilean Penal Code sanctions the different types of sexual crimes against minors, establishing the range of 14 to 18 years of age for the figure of statutory rape to be configured (Fonseca et al., 2018); marriage is granted at age 16 with the consent of a legal guardian; work is not allowed before the age of 18 but from the age of 15 it can be accepted depending on the type of work (Cameriere et al., 2018).
Although these circumstances have already been mentioned above, probably the most critical point is the very recent and unprecedented Chilean immigration phenomenon. By the end of 2019, 79.5 million people around the world have been forcibly displaced from their homes as a result of war, persecution, internal conflict or natural disasters (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, 2021a). Configuring the largest exodus in the region, by the end of 2019, about 4.5 million Venezuelans left their country, traveling mostly to other countries in Latin America and the Caribbean. Only 53 % have remained in neighboring countries; the rest have moved to other countries in the region, including Ecuador, Peru, Argentina, Panama and, of course, Chile (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, 2021a). According to the UNHCR, by mid-2020, Chile has received more than 450,000 migrants due to forced displacement, almost half of them in the last 2 years alone (United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, 2021b). Almost half of these people are children below 18 years of age, which places them at special risk of abuse, neglect, violence, exploitation, and harmful practices (Franklin et al., 2015).
However, the migratory phenomenon towards Chile does only include the forcibly displaced population: By December 2020, the total migrant population (including professionals, students and volunteer migrants for labor issues), totals almost 1.5 million people, approximately 7.8 % of the total population of the country (Servicio Jesuita a Migrantes, 2022). Since the 1990s with the return of democracy and one of the largest regional economic growths, the migrant population increase has namely been from neighboring countries, (Peru, Argentina and Bolivia), to then diversify as of 2010 with the arrival of Colombians and Dominicans the early years; and Haitians and Venezuelans since 2014 (Servicio Jesuita a Migrantes, 2019). An unprecedented increase has been reported in Chile both in the number of migrants and in the percentage they represent in relation to the total population (Fig. 2), and approximately 15 % of these migrants are individuals under the age of 19 (Fig. 3) (Servicio Jesuita a Migrantes, 2019).
The development of human dentition follows a reliable and predictable sequence, which helps in both clinical and forensic settings. In children, the application of radiographic methodologies has proven to be very useful and reliable for estimating age, being considered more definitive and useful than other indicators (Fonseca et al., 2015). However, the effect of applying “foreign standards” to estimate biological attributes has been suggested to revisit given the decrease in expected accuracy, according to Franklin et al. (2015), proportionally related to the increasing biological distance between the originally sampled population and the one to be evaluated. The authors assert that appropriate population-specific standards should be used on statistical bases, which will emerge from research carried out by duly qualified entities, with an established back-ground, and appropriate human and technological resources (Franklin et al., 2015). Even though Latin Americans are usually considered as the same group, they do not constitute a homogeneous ethnic group as they present a great genetic, cultural, social, environmental, economic, educational and demographic diversity, with bases that unquestionably result in biological variations of great clinical, health and legal significance (Fonseca et al., 2015).
Population specific standards are few for Latin Americans (Fonseca et al., 2015; Iscan & Olivera, 2000), and more specifically in Chile in the field of age estimation, what little has been done has been focused on the study of historical or sub-actual populations or in archaeological contexts (Ericksen, 1997; Herrera & Retamal, 2017; González-Ramírez et al., 2019). The situation of dental age estimation is not different, for which methodologies have been applied out of context or with small sample sizes (Cadenas et al., 2014; Fonseca et al., 2015). Recent Chilean history has revalued the role of forensic sciences for the identification of victims of human rights violations that occurred during the military dictatorship (1973-1990) (Quinn, 2014), for which the age estimation has seen the most current validations of different methodologies, but focused on individuals over the age of 18 (Retamal & Ubelaker, 2011; Aguilera-Muñoz et al., 2019, 2020). This review agrees with what was previously reported by Fonseca et al. (2015) regarding the fact that there is a striking scarcity of dental age estimation studies in current Chilean and Latin American children, even more so considering the complex processes of genetic miscegenation, secular changes and environment. For the authors, the best methodological alternative to apply will be the one that arises from comparative, cross-sectional and ethno-dependent studies that include the greatest number of variables (Fonseca et al., 2015). Clearly the classic models are insufficient and decontextualized, and subject to large margins of overestimation or underestimation of dental age. Beyond what is reasonably acceptable as a range of estimation in a controlled scientific research environment, authorities and the courts may request these procedures in real cases and, like other expert reports, they must guarantee a well- functioning legal state, including clear statements on the age estimation reliability to allow the decision-maker to consider any doubt in a way that leads to a legal result that is as favo- rable as possible for the affected people (Schmeling et al., 2016).
Age estimation is one of the forensic evaluations that can involve opinions of different experts, with different scientific backgrounds and different methods to answer the same question; according to Lidén & Dror (2021), this heterogenicity can have consequences that may affect communication between experts, so the reliability of their reports is both complex and multifaceted. The decision of the judicial or administrative authorities that a person be tried as an adult depends largely on the legal framework and a reliable expert report, for which the use and consideration of a normative approach that offers an appropriate structure of reasoning to support the decision-making process in forensic age estimation. Sironi et al. (2021) affirms that, although it does not protect against unfavorable results, this framework allows the decision-maker to make a coherent decision, according to a structured and explicit thought process. Legal decision-makers, even though they may not have the necessary experience to make sound decisions, must identify and address scientifically complex issues, on which even scientific experts have not reached a consensus. The proposal to appoint more than one expert, not only from the same discipline but also from different disciplines to answer the same question, will incorporate a healthy “uncertainty" in the case, which will give the decision-maker a more feasible approach "to be aware of the possibility of expert disagreement and exercise the sort of damage control”: to the extent that the disagreement can be reduced, the level of objectivity of the domain can be reflected (Lidén & Dror, 2021). Professional organizations and scientific societies have been encouraged to provide guidance to their members on medical, legal and ethical issues inherent in age estimation to help educate other stakeholders -for example, immigration judges- on common difficulties to use images to estimate age, as well as the most appropriate methodologies for it, their scope and limitations (Mishori, 2019).
CONCLUSIONS
This review exposes the insufficient response of researchers to estimate dental age in children, the limited availability of validated methodologies on current Chilean populations and the consequent insufficient knowledge of the courts in this regard. The evident and unprecedented increases in migratory phenomena in a country prone to natural disasters such as Chile, as well as the potential challenges in all areas of children's rights, emphasize an imminent need for support from all participants system to resolve this situation.