1. INTRODUCTION
The first postage stamp became available for purchase in Great Britain during 1 May 1840. From then, what is depicted on postage stamps has become one of the faces of what a particular State wants to show to the rest of the world 1-3. Some stamp drawings, such as maps, can be used as a form of propaganda, especially when some foreign territories are coveted 4. One of the stamp components is the denomination (the inscribed value of a stamp). This inscribed value is of interest because sometimes it is changed by overprinting the stamp with a new value. The reasons can be several: military occupation, inflation, change of currency, change of political regime, taxes, etc. Overprints have been a fertile area of work for counterfeiters 5. The first postage stamps were not printed for last forever. Even that stamp collection began little after 1840 6, the known number of some of them is so small that their commercial value is very high. During the 19th century a group of expert forgers printed many stamps of almost the entire world (for example Giovanni de Sperati printed-forged so top quality stamps that they were declared by experts to be genuine). The interest of science in the analysis of postage stamps is probably a derivation of the general analysis of parchments and papers for restoration and conservation 7-11. Stamps adhesive was the object of earlier studies 12,13. The first papers employed non-destructive techniques to analyze expensive stamps or to build databases 14-22. Nevertheless, there is another way to approach the study of stamps: the use of destructive methods. Many collectors, due to a mishandling of postage stamps, damage them in such a way that they cease to be a collectable object and are usually thrown away. This is the material that can be used with destructive methods. With these kinds of materials or of stamps that are known to exist millions of copies we carried out our first investigations 6,23,24. One of our papers dealt with an infrared and SEM study of the margins of some German hyperinflation postage stamps 6. This contribution deals with the identification of colors in inks of postage stamps produced during the hyperinflation period in the Weimar Republic (Germany), by using the Raman and XRF techniques. In order to have an idea of such period it is interesting to consign that, for example, for a domestic letter of less than 20 grams, a citizen must pay 20 Marks in January 15, 1923 and 50,000,000,000 Marks in December 12, 1923 25. Raman microscopy allows establishing the authenticity or forgeries of postage stamps; this spectroscopic technique is non-invasive, rapid and effective and then useful to identify and structurally characterize ink pigments, papers and eventually cancel marks. A general profile of the elements in the analyzed stamps is obtained from a portable XRF apparatus.
2. EXPERIMENTAL
Stamps collection
Eight stamps of a definitive series of hyperinflation stamps were selected. The samples corresponded to mint never hinged stamps. Fig. 1 shows the stamps along with their identification following the Michel Deutschland Spezial Katalog 26.
Raman measurements
Stamps were placed onto a microscopy slide and the Raman spectrum was recorded using a Renishaw Raman Microscope System RM1000 equipped with a diode laser providing the 785 nm line, a Leica microscope, an electrically cooled CCD (charge coupled device) detector and an edge filter to eliminate elastic scattering. Several places in each stamp were scanned; several of them displayed huge fluorescence hiding the Raman spectrum. The most representative spectrum with the best signal/noise ratio was chosen. No baseline corrections or spectral smoothing procedures were performed. The spectra were obtained using a 50x objective. The laser power was set 1-10 mW; with a resolution of 4 cm-1 collecting 1-5 scans of 10-30 s each. Spectra were recorded in the 150-3200 cm-1 region. Spectral scanning conditions were chosen to avoid sample degradation and photodecomposition. Spectra are displayed in Figures 2 to 9.
XRF measurements
XRF spectra were recorded with a portable XRF Bruker Tracer III-SD apparatus with a detector fitted 10 mm2 XFlash® SDD, Peltier cooled and equipped with an X-ray Tube Rh target; max voltage 40 keV. The specifications for this study were high voltage 40 keV of energy, 37.8 μA of intensity, an acquisition time of 200 seconds. Data were collected and plotted using Tracer software S1PXRF 3.8.3 and ARTAX7. All results obtained were semi-quantitative. For comparison all results were standardized as areas of each element. Standardization was performed through the following formula: S=A/ΣA, where S= Net Standarized, A= Net and ΣA = Sum of Net. Table 1 contains the XRF data. Stamps were placed directly on the electron beam of the XRF apparatus. The spot of the laser has a 0.8 cm diameter. Measurements were performed directly in the centre of the stamp were the colour was intense the most.
Stamp | Al | Si | P | S | K | Ca | Ti | Cr |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
S1 | 0.00468 | 0.00879 | 0.00482 | 0.02523 | 0.02208 | 0.03898 | n.d.* | 0.03800 |
S2 | 0.00348 | n. d. | n.d. | n.d. | 0.01480 | 0.09438 | 0.01672 | 0.06680 |
S3 | 0.00947 | 0.01821 | n.d. | n.d. | 0.03540 | 0.06900 | n.d. | 0.22656 |
S4 | 0.01044 | n.d. | 0.01307 | n.d. | 0.02833 | 0.28398 | n.d. | 0.14402 |
S5 | 0.00674 | n.d. | n. d. | n.d. | 0.02544 | 0.17963 | 0.02689 | 0.13432 |
S6 | 0.00618 | 0.01153 | 0.00507 | 0.02226 | 0.02253 | 0.05231 | n.d. | n. d. |
S7 | 0.01255 | 0.02746 | n.d. | n.d. | 0.04256 | 0.10005 | n.d. | 0.15937 |
S8 | 0.00955 | n.d. | 0.01379 | n.d. | 0.03063 | 0.24278 | 0.03993 | 0.15876 |
Stamp | Mn | Fe | Ni | Cu | Zn | Pb | Sr | Ba |
S1 | 0.02645 | 0.08826 | 0.04205 | 0.03656 | 0.4181 | 0.02837 | 0.01135 | 0.04085 |
S2 | n.d. | 0.07860 | 0.03403 | 0.03162 | 0.58885 | 0.05766 | n.d. | n.d. |
S3 | n.d. | 0.10810 | 0.07168 | 0.06308 | 0.04312 | 0.20802 | 0.02389 | 0.09516 |
S4 | n.d. | 0.08823 | 0.07691 | 0.07795 | 0.05434 | 0.15322 | n.d. | 0.03907 |
S5 | n.d. | 0.12674 | 0.05437 | 0.05194 | 0.22560 | 0.14681 | n.d. | n. d. |
S6 | n.d. | 0.0670975 | 0.0461309 | 0.04197 | 0.63517 | 0.01514 | 0.01327 | 0.04334 |
S7 | n.d. | 0.10886 | 0.08984 | 0.09433 | 0.05398 | 0.15716 | 0.02727 | 0.09112 |
S8 | n.d. | 0.08398 | 0.0842 | 0.07413 | 0.05000 | 0.17853 | n.d. | n.d. |
*Standardized data of the area under the curve of each element.
*n.d.= not detected.
3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION
Raman spectra
The code sample, color and pigments found in the stamps are displayed in Fig.1. The wavenumbers and the bands assignment are collected in Table 2. The Raman bands assignment of the samples is based on general Raman data 27-29, and mainly from related works by Imperio et al 18,30,31. The spectra are shown as obtained and are illustrated with the stamp picture in Figs. 2 to 9.
S1 | S2 | S3 | S4 | S5 | S6 | S7 | S8 | Assignment |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
215 | 217 | 221 | Prussian blue | |||||
274 | 274 | 277 | 280 | 274 | 278 | 274 | 277 | Prussian blue |
332 | PbCrO4 | |||||||
359 | 360 | PbCrO4 | ||||||
371 | 373 | Azopigment | ||||||
407 | Azopigment | |||||||
412 | 413 | 414 | Azopigment | |||||
534 | 534 | 533 | 529 | 533 | 532 | 535 | Prussian blue | |
762 | 760 | 765 | Naphthalene | |||||
844 | 845 | 845 | PbCrO4 | |||||
957 | 953 | 956 | Prussian blue | |||||
1111 | 1112 | 1113 | 1114 | Azopigment | ||||
1146 | 1146 | 1148 | Azopigment | |||||
1174 | 1173 | 1174 | Azopigment | |||||
1210 | 1213 | 1213 | 1213 | Azopigment | ||||
1288 | 1285 | 1288 | Azopigment | |||||
1331 | 1331 | 1332 | 1332 | Azopigment | ||||
1450 | νN=N | |||||||
1594 | 1595 | 1597 | Benzene | |||||
2104 | 2104 | 2104 | 2105 | 2103 | 2103 | 2104 | 2104 | Prussian blue |
2137 | 2138 | 2135 | 2129 | 2132 | 2133 | 2132 | Prussian blue | |
2166 | 2165 | 2166 | 2170 | 2164 | 2165 | 2165 | 2168 | Prussian blue |
S1
1 Million. This stamp displays a blue color, Fig. 2. Strong bands at 2166, 534 and 274 cm-1, the medium band at 2104 cm-1 and the weak bands at 2137, 957 and 215 cm-1 are ascribed to Prussian blue (PB, Fe4[Fe(CN)6]3). The bands at 2166 and 2104 cm-1 are due to C≡N vibrations. The XRF data, in Table 1, are consistent with the presence of Fe; however, the Zn element is abundant which suggests that it could be used as filler in the oxide form. If it is ZnO the corresponding E2 and A1 bands should appear at around 433 and 574 cm−1, respectively 32, which are not evident in the spectrum of the stamp.
S2
2 Milliarden. Raman data were obtained only for the number 2 character area (denomination value) of this stamp, Fig. 3; this area displays a bluish green colour and the registered spectrum indicates the presence mainly of Prussian blue. The XRF data, Table 1, obtained from the background indicate the presence of Zn, Ca, Fe, Cr and Pb. No Raman spectrum was obtained for the yellow-orange coloration area.
S3
4 Millionen. The stamp displays a green color, Fig. 4. The Raman signals of Prussian blue are clearly observed in the spectrum. Other bands particularly those at 844 and 332 cm-1 are ascribed to the yellow/orange pigment Pb2OCrO4 or PbCrO414; both bands are due to vibrations of the chromate ion CrO42-. The database from RRUFF 29 indicates that both bands are coincident with the crocoite salt that is PbCrO4. XRF data, Table 1, indicates the presence of Cr, Pb and Fe, thus supporting the proposed molecular systems. The observed green colour is the result of the human low optical resolution when combining yellow and blue colours. By using the 100X microscope we have identified small orange and blue particles which Raman spectra indicated the presence of chrome orange and Prussian blue, respectively.
S4
5 Milliarden. Yellow components dominate the stamp colour Fig. 5. The spectrum displays general weak signals. Prussian blue profile is recognized through the bands at 2170, 2105 and about 280 cm-1. The medium and weak medium bands at 845 and 359 cm-1 are consistent with the presence of the yellow/orange pigment PbCrO4. Additional very weak bands at 1331, 1210 and 1111 cm-1 could correspond to a monoazopigment β-naphthol 1-(4-methyl-2-nitrophenylazo)-2-naphthol following Scherrer et al 28. The band at 407 cm-1 should correspond to the azopigment. XRF data, Table 1, indicate Pb, Cr and Fe consistent with the proposed molecular systems. Ca is also determined by XRF which could be associated with the stamp support or the lake condition of the monoazopigment. However, Raman signals of any pigment or extender based on calcium were not observed.
S5
50 Millionen. This stamp displays a light green color, Fig. 6. The Raman signals indicate the existence of Prussian blue and the monoazopigment β-naphthol type with the already discussed bands at 1331, 1213 and 1112 cm-1 and the additional now clearly observed bands at 762, 412 and 371 cm-1; these additional bands could be a new information to precise the real monoazopigment involved. If the azopigment is a β-naphthol compound, then one should observe the amide III band at 1258 cm-1 (discriminate signal) which is not the case in the present research. Thus, a probable structure could be the naphthol azopigment lake with Ca2+30.
Ca is found (XRF, Table 1) in all stamps where this azopigment is identified. Then, the stamp light green colour observed should be originated from a yellow and blue components combination, being the blue color corresponding definitely to Prussian blue.
The yellow component should necessarily come from a yellow β-naphthol lake monoazopigment 28. Raman signals corresponding to the possible presence of the yellow PbCrO4 pigment at about 850 and 360 cm-1 are not observed, even though the XRF data indicate the presence of Cr and Pb.
S6
100 Millionen. This stamp, Fig. 7, displays a green dark color. The Raman signals are rather weak profile indicating only the presence of Prussian blue. The XRF data, Table 1, indicates mainly Zn, probably the filler used as ZnO.
S7 200 Millionen. The stamp is brown, Fig. 8. This sample displays the clearest spectrum of the series, being Prussian blue, PbCrO4 and an azopigment easily recognized. In relation to the azopigment, the bands at 1595 and 760 cm-1 are assigned to the benzene quadrant stretching and the naphthalene moiety, respectively. The strong signal at 1332 cm-1 is attributed to an aromatic nitro fragment; the symCN mode corresponds to the band at 1113 cm-1. The very weak band around 1450 cm-1 is attributable to the N=N mode. Pb, Cr and Fe are the most abundant components in the XRF data, Table 1. Zn as component of the filler is less abundant.
S8
500 Millionen. This stamp displays a light green color, Fig. 9. Only Prussian blue and a yellow β-naphthol lake monoazopigment were identified. Pb and Ca are indicated in the XRF data, Table 1. No signals from Pb CrO4 were observed.
Finally, a résumé of the Raman bands wavenumbers of each stamp and the molecular systems or chemical moieties associated to the observed different colours is given in Table 2.
4. CONCLUSIONS
Coloured molecular components were identified in stamps belonging to the collection set of German postage stamps dated 1923 from the microRaman technique. X ray fluorescence (XRF) data allowed complement the identification of the chemical elements of the colouring molecular systems used; the Zn element is abundant in stamps S1, S2, S5, S6 which suggests that it could be used as filler in the oxide form. The expected ZnO Raman bands are not evident in the spectrum of the stamp. There are differences among all stamps depending on the shade of the color, i.e. on the amount of ink used in the manufacturing process and or on the ageing natural processes. Green colour resulted to be a combination of Prussian blue (Fe4[Fe(CN)6]3) and the yellowish pigment (PbCrO4), and in some cases a yellow β-naphthol lake monoazopigment. In all the samples the main element of the ink is iron (Fe) and in some stamps there is a significant amount of calcium (Ca). In fact, iron and calcium showed a direct and strong correlation in the analysis.