Hostname: page-component-cb9f654ff-9knnw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-08-26T08:00:42.408Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Sampling Populations of Pine Leaf Adelgid Pineus pinifoliae (Fitch): I. The Gall and Associated Insects1

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

Gordon M. Howse  and
John B. Dimond
Gordon M. Howse
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Maine, Orono
John B. Dimond
Affiliation:
Department of Entomology, University of Maine, Orono
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

In population studies of the pine leaf adelgid, sampling techniques are required. Procedures for sampling galls on spruce and for associated adelgid stages are described. Gall distributions both within trees and between trees are non-random, following the negative-binomial series. Aggregation within trees arises from a disproportionate number of galls occurring on the upper crown branches. Between trees, gall populations are more dense on the larger trees, and red spruce is more heavily infested where red spruce and black spruce are mixed. The proposed sampling unit is composed of one branch from each of the upper two vertical crown quarters, and one longitudinally halved branch from each of the lower crown quarters. The examination of sample units from 50 trees will provide a reliable estimate of stand populations except where low gall densities or heterogeneous spruce stands make a larger sample mandatory. Additional details of sampling and the biological significance of the findings are discussed.

Information

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 97 , Issue 9 , September 1965 , pp. 952 - 961
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1965

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Article purchase

Temporarily unavailable

References

Annand, P. N. 1928. A contribution towards a monograph of the Adelginae (Phylloxeridae) of North America. Stanford Univ. Press Pub., Univ. Ser. Biol. Sci. 6: 1–46.Google Scholar
Anscombe, F. J. 1949. The statistical analysis of insect counts based on the negative binomial distribution. Biometrics 5: 165–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balch, R. E., and Underwood, G. R.. 1950. The life-history of Pineus pinifoliae (Fitch) (Homoptera: Phylloxeridae) and its effect on white pine. Canad. Ent. 82: 117–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birnbaum, Z. W. 1953. Distribution free tests of fit for continuous distribution functions. Ann. Math. Stat. 24: 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bliss, C. I., and Fisher, R. A.. 1953. Fitting the negative binomial distribution to biological data and note on the efficient fitting of the negative binomial. Biometrics 9: 176–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
DeBoo, R. F., Dimond, J. B., and Lowe, J. H. Jr., 1964. Impact of pine leaf aphid, Pineus pinifoliae (Chermidae) on its secondary host, eastern white pine. Canad. Ent. 96: 765–772.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Harcourt, D. G. 1963. Population dynamics of Leptinotarsa decemlineata (Say) in eastern Ontario. I. Spatial pattern and transformation of field counts. Canad. Ent. 95: 813–820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ives, W. G. H. 1954. Sampling of insect populations. Forestry Chron. 30: 287–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Massey, F. J. Jr., 1951. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov test for goodness of fit. J. Amer. Stat. Assoc. 46: 68–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R. F. 1954. A sequential sampling technique for spruce budworm egg surveys. Canad. J. Zool. 32: 302–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R. F. 1955. The development of sampling techniques for forest insect defoliators. Canad. J. Zool. 33: 225–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R. F. 1960. Sampling insect populations. Annu. Rev. Ent. 5: 243–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morris, R. F., and Reeks, W. A.. 1954. A larval population technique for the winter moth (Operophtera brumata L) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Canad. Ent. 86: 433–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oakland, G. B. 1951. Sequential analysis. Can. Dept. Agric., Biometrics Unit, 8 pp.Google Scholar
Ostle, B. 1963. Statistics in research. Iowa State Univ. Press. rev. 2nd ed., 640 pp.Google Scholar
Patch, E. M. 1909. Chermes of Maine conifers. Maine Agric. Exp. Sta. Bull. 173, 277–308.Google Scholar
Reeks, W. A. 1956. Sequential sampling for larvae of the winter moth, Operophtera brumata (Linn.) (Lepidoptera: Geometridae). Canad. Ent. 88: 241–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stark, R. W. 1952. Analysis of a population sampling method for the lodgepole needle miner in Canadian Rocky Mountain parks. Canad. Ent. 84: 316–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, L. R. 1961. Aggregation, variance and the mean. Nature, Lond. 189: 732–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waters, W. E. 1955. Sequential sampling in forest insect surveys. For. Sci. 1: 68–79.Google Scholar
Waters, W. E., and Henson, W. R.. 1959. Some sampling attributes of the negative binomial distribution with special reference to forest insects. For. Sci. 5: 397–412.Google Scholar