Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-5nwft Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-02T08:09:59.291Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Orientation of the Males of Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae) to Sound

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

G. Wishart ,
G. R. van Sickle  and
D. F. Riordan
G. Wishart
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Institute for Biological Control, Research Branch, Canada Department of Agriculture, Belleville, Ontario
G. R. van Sickle
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Institute for Biological Control, Research Branch, Canada Department of Agriculture, Belleville, Ontario
D. F. Riordan
Affiliation:
Entomology Research Institute for Biological Control, Research Branch, Canada Department of Agriculture, Belleville, Ontario
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

Many authors noted the attraction of the males of several species of mosquitoes to sound (references summarized by Roth, 1948). The frequencies of sound to which the males respond were investigated by Roth (1948) and the frequencies and intensities by Wishart and Riordan (1959). Tischner (1953) applied electrophysiological methods to the reception of sound in the male of Anopheles subpictus Grassi and advanced a theory to explain the ability of the male of this species to orient itself toward the sound source. In his theory he dismissed the use of phase differences between the two receptors because of the relatively small distance between the two antennae and concluded that each is capable of functioning alone by detecting the relationship bemeen the fundamental and the second harmonic in the microplionics produced by the Johnston's organ. He did not demonstrate this by behaviour experiments nor, do we believe, did he produce sufficient electrophysiological evidence. The present paper is a further examination of this subject in the mosquito Aedes aegypti (L.), in an attempt to reconcile the data from electrophysiological experiments with those of behaviour in an explanation of the orientation of male mosquitoes towards sound.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 94 , Issue 6 , June 1962 , pp. 613 - 626
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1962

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Child, C. M. 1894. Ein bisher wenig beachtetes antennales Sinnesorgan der Insekten, mit besonderer Berücksicktigung der Culiciden und Chironomiden. Zeit. Wiss. Zool. 58: 475–528.Google Scholar
Donaldson, P. E. K. 1958. Electronic Apparatus for Biological Research, London. Butterworths Scientific Publications.Google Scholar
Griffin, D. R. 1958. Listening to the Dark. Yale University Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
Hocking, B. 1960. Sense organs and sensitivity to stimuli in insects and mammals. Paper presented at Ann. Meetings Ent. Soc. Can., Sept. 12. Mimeo. Abs. Quoted with author's permission.Google Scholar
Johnston, Christopher. 1855. Auditory apparatus of the Culex mosquito. Quart. Jour. Microsc. Sci. 3: 97–102.Google Scholar
Mayer, A. M. 1874. Experiments on the supposed auditory apparatus of the mosquito. American Nat. 8: 577–592.Google Scholar
Pumphrey, R. J., and Rawdon-Smith, A. F.. 1936. Hearing in insects: the nature of the response of certain receptors to auditory stimuli. Proc. Roy. Soc. 121: 18–27.Google Scholar
Roth, L. M. 1948. A study of mosquito behaviour. An experimental study of the sexual behaviour of Aedes aegypti (Linnaeus). Am. Midl. Nat. 40: 265–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tischner, H. 1953. Über den Gehörsinn von Stechmücken. Acustica 3: 335–343.Google Scholar
Tischner, H. 1954. Das Horen der Stechmücken. Attempto 4: 23–26.Google Scholar
Wever, E. G., and Bray, C. W.. 1930. The nature of acoustic response: the relation between sound frequency and frequency of impulses in the auditory nerve. Jr. Exp. Psychol. 5: 373–387.Google Scholar
Wever, E. G., and Bray, C. W.. 1933. A new method for the study of hearing in insects. Jr. Cell and Comp. Physiol. 4: 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wishart, G., and Riordan, D. F.. 1959. The flight responses to various sounds by adult males of Aedes aegypti (L.) (Diptera: Culicidae). Canadian Ent. 91: 181–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar