Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-ndmmz Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-05T12:26:24.737Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

SPRUCE CONE INSECTS IN BRITISH COLUMBIA AND THEIR CONTROL

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

A. F. Hedlin
A. F. Hedlin
Affiliation:
Pacific Forest Research Centre, Canadian Forestry Service, Victoria, British Columbia
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Insects cause considerable loss of seed in white spruce, Picea glauca (Moench) Voss, and Engelmann spruce, P. engelmannii Parry, in British Columbia. The most important species are a maggot, Hylemya anthracina (Cz.), and a seed moth, Laspeyresia youngana (Kit.). Other insects are: a seed chalcid, Megastigmus piceae Roh., a cone axis midge, Dasineura rachiphaga Tripp, a gall midge, D. canadensis Felt, a seed midge, Mayetiola carpophaga Tripp, and a scale-feeding midge. These insects also occur in cones of Sitka spruce, P. sitchensis (Bong.) Carr., and black spruce, P. mariana (Mill.) BSP.

The systemic insecticides dimethoate and formothion proved to be effective against these insects when applied as sprays following pollination in mid-June.

Résumé

Les insectes causent des pertes considérables de graines chez l’Epinette blanche [Picea glauca (Moench) Voss.] et l’Epinette d’Engelmann (P. engelmannii Parry) dans la Colombie Britannique. Les plus importantes espèces entomologiques impliquées sont un asticot, Hylemya anthracina (Cz.) et un papillon des graines, Laspeyresia youngana (Kft.). Puis viennent : un chalcis des graines (Megastigmus piceae Roh.), une cécidomyie gallicole (D. canadensis Felt), une cécidomyie des graines (Mayetiola carpophaga Tripp) et une cécidomyie qui se nourrit des écailles. Ces insectes se retrouvent également dans les cônes de l’Epinette de Sitka [P. sitchensis (Bong.) Carr.] et de l’Epinette noire [P. mariana (Mill.) BSP.].

Vaporisés à la mi-juin, consécutivement à la pollinisation, les insecticides par ingestion dimethoate et formothion se sont avérés efficaces contre ces insectes.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 105 , Issue 1 , January 1973 , pp. 113 - 122
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1973

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bakke, A. 1963. Studies on spruce-cone insects Laspeyresia strobilella (L.) (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae), Kaltenbachiola strobi (Winn.) (Diptera: Itonidae) and their parasites (Hymenoptera) in Norway. Rep. Norwegian For. Res. Inst. 67, pp. 1–151.Google Scholar
Barnes, W. and McDunnough, J. H.. 1917. Check list of the Lepidoptera of Boreal America. Herald Press, Decatur, Ill.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunnett, C. W. 1964. New tables for multiple comparison with a control. Biometrics 20: 482–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Haig, R. A. and McPhee, H. G.. 1969. Black spruce cone insect control trials Longlac, Ontario, 1967–68. Can. Dep. Fisheries and Forestry, Sault Ste. Marie, Ont. Inf. Rep. 0-X-110.Google Scholar
Hedlin, A. F. and Hovey, C. Y.. 1955. An investigation of insects infesting cones with special reference to Laspeyresia youngana (Kft.) in white spruce. Can. Dep. Agric. Interim Rep. For. Biol. Lab., Indian Head, Sask.Google Scholar
Huckett, H. C. 1965. The Muscidae of northern Canada, Alaska and Greenland (Diptera). Mem. ent. Soc. Can., No. 42. 369 pp.Google Scholar
Johnson, N. E. and Hedlin, A. F.. 1967. Douglas-fir cone insects and their control. Can. Dep. For. Rural Dev., For. Br. Dep. Publ. 1168.Google Scholar
Kangas, Esko and Leskinen, K.. 1943. Pegohylemyia anthracina Czerny (Dipt.: Muscidae) as a pest of spruce cones. Ann. Ent. Fenn., pp. 1–21. (Translated.)Google Scholar
Kearfott, W. D. 1907. New micro-lepidoptera. Can. Ent. 39(1): 1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keen, F. P. 1958. Cone and seed insects of western forest trees. U.S. Dep. Agric. tech. Bull. 1169.Google Scholar
Ruth, D. S. and Hedlin, A. F.. 1970. Germination tests on white spruce and Douglas-fir seed from cones treated with systemic insecticides. Bi-moll. Res. Notes 26: 41–42.Google Scholar
Siegel, S. 1956. Non parametric statistics for the behavioral sciences. McGraw-Hill, New York.Google Scholar
Stadnitsky, G. W. 1969. The entomoloaical fauna of spruce cones (Picea abies (L.) Karst., Norway spruce) of the European of the USSR. Anz. Schädlingsk. Pflanz. 42(10): 145–150.Google Scholar
Trägärdh, I. 1939. Sväriges skogsinsekter. Andra, omarbetade och utvidgade upplagan. Stockholm.Google Scholar
Tripp, H. A. 1954 a. Instars of a maggot (Pegohylemyia) inhabiting white spruce cones. Can. Ent. 86: 185–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripp, H. A. 1954 b. Description of habits of the spruce seedworm, Laspeyresia youngana (Kft.) (Lepidoptera: Olethreutidae). Can. Ent. 86: 385–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripp, H. A. 1955. Descriptions and habits of Cecidomyiidae (Diptera) from white spruce cones. Can. Ent. 87: 253–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tripp, H. A. and Hedlin, A. F.. 1956. An ecological study and damage appraisal of white spruce cone insects. For. Chron. 32: 400–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Waldron, R. M. 1965. Annual cone crops of white spruce in Saskatchewan and Manitoba 1923–1964. Can. Dep. For., For. Res. Br., Prog. Rep. MS — 158, 34 pp.Google Scholar
Werner, R. A. 1964. White spruce seed loss caused by insects in interior Alaska. Can. Ent. 96: 1462–1464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar