Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-13T03:57:29.483Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

SOME CHARACTERISTICS OF THE SPATIAL ARRANGEMENT OF ATTACKS BY THE MOUNTAIN PINE BEETLE, DENDROCTONUS PONDEROSAE (COLEOPTERA: SCOLYTIDAE), ON LODGEPOLE PINE1: APPENDIX: STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF THE "HOLE-PAIRS" EXPERIMENT

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

L. Safranyik
Affiliation:
Forest Research Laboratory, Department of Fisheries and Forestry, Edmonton, Alberta
C. Vithayasai
Affiliation:
Biometrics and Computer Science Branch, Department of Fisheries and Forestry, Ottawa, Ontario

Abstract

Evidence is given in support of the hypothesis that the spatial arrangement of attacks by the mountain pine beetle (Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopk.) on its host, lodgepole pine (Pinus contorta Dougl. var. latifolia Engelm.), is largely determined by the pattern of bark niches suitable for attack initiation. Density of attack sites and bark thickness are important in determining the attack-harbouring potential of the bark and in determining the upper limit of attacks, thus, the potential area available for attack on the bark surface of lodgepole pine trees. At fixed levels on the clear bole of naturally infested trees, attack pattern tends to be regular owing to the regular spatial pattern of suitable attack sites. The regularity of the attack pattern is disturbed by the presence of an attack-density gradient around the stem circumference. The vertical attack-density gradient over the host is well described in terms of a relation between attack density and bark thickness. This relation is asymptotic and rests on the assumption that the density of bark niches suitable for attack initiation approaches an upper limit with increasing bark thickness on lodgepole pine trees.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1971

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Batschelet, E. 1965. Statistical methods for the analysis of problems in animal orientation and certain biological rhythms. Am. Inst. Biol. Sci., Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Carlson, R. W. and Cole, W. E.. 1965. A technique for sampling populations of the mountain pine beetle. U.S. Dep. Agric. Res. Pap. INT-20, 13 pp.Google Scholar
Cochran, W. G. 1954. Some methods for strengthening the common χ 2 tests. Biometrics 10: 417451.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holling, C. S. 1966. Functional response of invertebrate predators to prey density. Mem. ent. Soc. Can., No. 48.Google Scholar
Ivlev, V. S. 1961. Experimental ecology of the feeding of fishes. Yale Univ. Press, New Haven.Google Scholar
McCambridge, W. F. 1967. Nature of induced attacks by the Black Hills beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopk. (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Ann. ent. Soc. Am. 60: 920928.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Morisita, M. 1959. Measuring the dispersion of individuals and analysis of the distributional patterns. Mem. Fac. Sci., Kyushu Univ. (Ser. E) 2: 215235.Google Scholar
Pitman, G. B., Vité, J. P., Kinzer, G. W., and Fentiman, A. F.. 1969. Specificity of population aggregating pheromones in Dendroctonus. J. Insect Physiol. 15: 363366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reid, R. W. 1960. Studies on the biology of the mountain pine beetle. Ph.D. Thesis, Montana St. Univ., Bozeman, 98 pp.Google Scholar
Reid, R. W. 1963. Biology of the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus monticolae Hopkins, in the East Kootenay region of British Columbia. III: Interaction between the beetle and its hist, with emphasis on brood mortality and survival. Can. Ent. 95: 225238.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rudinsky, J. A. 1968. Pheromone-mask by the female Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopk., an attraction regulator (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Pan-Pacif. Ent. 44: 248250.Google Scholar
Safranyik, L. 1968. Development of a technique for sampling mountain pine beetle populations in lodgepole pine. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of British Columbia, Vancouver, 195 pp.Google Scholar
Shepherd, R. F. 1960. Distribution of the Black Hills beetle over the host tree and factors controlling the attraction and behaviour of the adult. Ph.D. Thesis, Univ. of Minnesota, St. Paul, 81 pp.Google Scholar
Shepherd, R. F. 1965. Distribution of attacks by Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopk. on Pinus contorta Dougl. var. latifolia Engelm. Can. Ent. 97: 207215.Google Scholar
Watt, K. E. F. 1961. Mathematical models for use in insect pest control. Can. Ent. Suppl. 19.Google Scholar
Vithayasai, C.Exact critical values of the Hardy-Weinberg test statistic for two alleles. Unpublished report. Biometrics and Computer Service Branch, Dept. of Fisheries and Forestry, Ottawa.Google Scholar