Hostname: page-component-848d4c4894-hfldf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-05-07T20:17:09.603Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Studies on the Canadian and Alaskan Fulgoromorpha (Hemiptera): II. The Genus Megamelus Fieber (Delphacidae)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  31 May 2012

G. G. E. Scudder
G. G. E. Scudder
Affiliation:
Department of Zoology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, B.C.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The occurrence of the genus Megamelus Fieb. in Canada and Alaska is reviewed. Seven species are shown to be present in the area and these are described, the genitalia illustrated and distribution documented: four species are recorded in Canada for the first time. It is shown that previous records of M. notula (Germ.), M. davisi (V-D.) and M. inflatus Metc. in Canada are in error.

Type
Articles
Information
The Canadian Entomologist , Volume 96 , Issue 6 , June 1964 , pp. 813 - 820
Copyright
Copyright © Entomological Society of Canada 1964

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Beamer, R. H. 1955. A revision of the genus Megamelus in America North of Mexico (Homoptera, Fulgoridae, Delphacinae). J. Kansas ent. Soc. 28: 29–46.Google Scholar
Kontkanen, P. 1958. Notes on some Fulgorids collected in Canada by Professor Haken Lindberg during the summer of 1956 (Homoptera, Fulgoroidea). Ann. ent. fenn. 24: 141–145.Google Scholar
Le Quesne, W. J. 1960a. Some modifications in the British list of Delphacidae (Hem.), including a new genus and a new species. Entomologist 93: 13–19, 29–35, 54–60.Google Scholar
Le Quesne, W. J. 1960b, Hemiptera, Fulgoromorpha. Handbook for the Identification of British Insects, R. ent. Soc. Lond. 2(3): 1–68.Google Scholar
Moore, G. A. 1950. Check-list of Hemiptera of the Province of Quebec. Contr. Inst. Biol. Univ. Montreal 26: 1–49.Google Scholar