Paper Titles

Compressive Properties of Electroless Ni-P Coating Reinforced Magnesium Alloy Foams
p.123

Reinforcing Adhesives Using Carbon Nanotubes for the Carbon Fibre Reinforced Plastic Composite and Metal Joint
p.129

EPDM/SBR Blends for Skim Compound of Steel Cord Conveyor Belt: Mechanical Properties, Thermal Stability and Adhesion Level
p.135

3-Dimensional Microstructure Investigation of High Temperature Corrosion of Boiler Tube Material
p.147

Analysis and Correction of Defects for Deep Drawing Process of Stainless Sink by Use of Finite Element Simulation
p.153

Elastic Properties of Polymer Modified Steel Fibre Reinforced High Strength Concrete
p.163

The Technique of Single-Component Synchronous Grouting Allocation to Resist Floating in High Pressure Water-Rich Formation
p.171

Eco-Friendly Innovation of Non-Fired Ceramic Tiles from Rice Husk Ash and Recycled Glass Cullet
p.177

Influence of Boric Acid Additive on Physical Properties of Utilizing Wastes for Producing Eco-Friendly Fired Clay Tiles
p.183

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vol. 889Eco-Friendly Innovation of Non-Fired Ceramic Tiles...

Eco-Friendly Innovation of Non-Fired Ceramic Tiles from Rice Husk Ash and Recycled Glass Cullet

Article Preview

Abstract:

The paper presents an experimental study on the production of non-fired ceramic tiles from rice husk ash (RHA) and green glass cullet (GGC) composites as a novel eco-friendly material. Eighteen mixture formulations were constructed as compared to control formula, specimens were uniaxially pressed at 10 MPa and then cured at room temperature for 7 and 28 days. Non-fired tiles (formula A4, B11, and C17) containing 20% GGC were mixed with 0%, 5%, and 10% RHA. The modulus of rupture can be increased by 87.23%, 48.8%, and 19.4%, respectively, at 28 days of curing as compared to control formula. These results were also coherent with microstructure characterization by scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Furthermore, formula A4 and C17 were selected to compare energy costs with wall tiles fired at 950^°C. They were the same amount of energy-saving costs by 5.19 USD/m². From these results, the new eco-friendly products can produce with a combination of RHA and GGC wastes which can enhance the physical properties due to the pozzolanic reaction. Moreover, the proposed non-fired ceramic tiles can conserve energy and reduce manufacturing costs.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Composite Materials and Material Engineering V

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 889)

Pages:

177-182

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.889.177

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

June 2021

Authors:

Purinut Maingam*, Ubolrat Wangrakdiskul, Natthakitta Piyarat

Keywords:

Energy Conservation, Glass Cullet, Non-Fired Ceramic Tiles, Non-Firing, Rice Husk Ash

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

* - Corresponding Author

[1] J. Peng, Y. Zhao, L. Jiao, W. Zheng and L. Zeng: Energy Procedia Vol. 16 (2012), pp.467-476.

[2] J. Torkaman, A. Ashori and A.S. Momtazi: Constr. Build. Mater. Vol. 50 (2014), pp.432-436.

[3] M.M. Tun, D. Juchelkova, M.M. Win, A.M. Thu and T. Puchor: Resources Vol. 8 (2019), p.81.

DOI: 10.3390/resources8020081

[4] S.D. Nagrale, H. Hajare and P.R. Modak: Carbon Vol. 2 (2012), p.42.

[5] F. Pahlevani and V. Sahajwalla: J. Clean. Prod. Vol. 191 (2018), pp.192-206.

[6] Information on http://www.pcd.go.th.

[7] H. Hamisi, E. Park, B.H. Choi, Y.T. An and J. Lee: Int J Mater Sci Appl Vol. 3 (2014), p.143.

[8] V. Kimambo, J. Yoeza, N. Philip and E. Hellen: Int J Sci Technol Soc Vol. 2 (2014), p.201.

[9] S.R. Braganca and C.P. Bergmann: Mater Res Vol. 8 (2005), pp.39-44.

[10] U. Wangrakdiskul, P. Maingam and N. Piyarat: Key Eng. Mater. Vol. 856 (2020), pp.376-383.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.856.376

[11] S.K. Amin, E.M. Abdel Hamid, S.A. El-Sherbiny, H.A. Sibak and M.F. Abadir: HBRC journal Vol. 14 (2018), pp.309-315.

DOI: 10.1016/j.hbrcj.2017.02.002

[12] J. Zhou, Z. Shu, L.I. Tiantian, Y.U. Dongxue, Z. Sheng and Y. Wang: Ceram. Int. Vol. 41 (2015), pp.9193-9198.

[13] U. Wangrakdiskul, P. Khonkaew and T. Wongchareonsin: International Journal of Advanced Culture Technology Vol. 3 (2015), pp.15-24.

[14] D. Eliche-Quesada, J.A. Sandalio-Pérez, S. Martínez-Martínez, L. Pérez-Villarejo and P.J. Sánchez-Soto: Ceram. Int. Vol. 44 (2018), pp.4400-4412.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ceramint.2017.12.039

[15] U. Wangrakdiskul and R. Neamlut: Materials Science Forum Vol. 917 (2018), pp.303-310.

[16] M.M. Younes, H.A. Abdel-Rahman and M.M. Khattab: J. Build. Eng. Vol. 20 (2018), pp.42-50.

[17] ASTM, C. Standard specification for coal fly ash and raw or calcined natural pozzolan for use in concrete. ASTM Int (2012), 4.

DOI: 10.1520/c0618-15

[18] N. Phonphuak, S. Kanyakam and P. Chindaprasirt: J. Clean. Prod. Vol. 112 (2016), p.3057.

[19] J. Lu, Z. Duan and C.S. Poon: Constr. Build. Mater. Vol. 131 (2017), pp.793-799.

[20] G.A. Habeeb and H.B. Mahmud: Mater. Res. Vol. 13 (2010), pp.185-190.

[21] ISO 13006/2012. Ceramic Tiles–Definitions, Classification, Characteristics and Marking, Annex K and L (2012), 38-43.

[22] R. Kumar and B. Bhattacharjee: Cement and concrete research Vol. 33 (2003), pp.155-164.

[23] A. Shayan and A. Xu: Cement and concrete research Vol. 34 (2004), pp.81-89.

[24] A. Siddika, M.A. Al Mamun and M.H. Ali: Innov. Infrastruct. Solut. Vol. 3 (2018), p.18.