Elastic Interdigital Transducers for Lamb Wave Generations

Article Preview

Abstract:

During recent years structural health monitoring (SHM) systems have gained growing attention. Widely applied methods in SHM are methods based on the ultrasonic Lamb waves (LWs) which are also known as plate waves. LWs may be generated and sensed using different types of transducers and their selection is essential for the SHM systems performance. Among transducers used for generation and sensing of such waves, Interdigital Transducers (IDTs) are ones of the most promising types. Their main advantages are: mode selectivity, high excitation strength, wave directivity, small sizes and relatively low cost. In most cases IDTs are made of piezoceramics or piezoelectric polymers what makes them stiff and fragile. Contrary to the piezoceramic transducers, the ones based on piezocomposites (i.e.: macro-fiber composite) are flexible with the comparable efficiency of piezoelectric effects. The MFC transducers are usually optimized as actuators and they are not designed to any specific frequency. It appears, however, that sparse comb-like electrodes used in interdigital transducers create very interesting properties of mode selectivity. In the paper, after the introduction and short discussion about advantages and disadvantages of the IDTs, a novel type of the interdigital transducer, based on elastic macro-fiber composite, is presented. Next, the results of the numerical and experimental tests of the MFC based IDT designed for the A0 mode excitation in a 4mm-thick aluminium plate is presented. In the final part of the paper advantages and disadvantages of the investigated transducer are discussed.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Solid State Phenomena (Volume 198)

Pages:

307-312

Citation:

Online since:

March 2013

Export:

Price:

[1] Raghavan A, Cesnik CES. Review of Guided-wave Structural Health Monitoring. The shock and vibration digest 2007; 39(2), 91-114.

DOI: 10.1177/0583102406075428

Google Scholar

[2] Bent AA, Hagood NW. Piezoelectric Fiber Composites with Interdigitated Electrodes. Journal of Intelligent Material Systems and Structures 1997; 11(8); 903-919.

DOI: 10.1177/1045389x9700801101

Google Scholar

[3] Williams BR, Park G, Inman DJ, Wilkie KW. An Overview of Composite Actuators with Piezoceramic Fibers. 20th International Modal Analysis Conference. Los Angeles 2002; 421-427.

Google Scholar

[4] Badcock RA, Birt EA. The use of 0–3 piezocomposite embedded Lamb wave sensors for detection of damage in advanced fibre composites. Smart Materials and Structures 2000; 9; 291-297.

DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/9/3/307

Google Scholar

[5] Schulz MJ, Pai PF, Imman DJ. Health monitoring and active control of composite structures using piezoceramic patches. Composites, Part B 1999; 30; 713-725.

DOI: 10.1016/s1359-8368(99)00034-7

Google Scholar

[6] Collet M, Ruzzene M, Cunefare KA. Generation of Lamb waves through surface mounted macro-fiber composite transducers. Smart Materials and Structures 2011; 20; 1-14.

DOI: 10.1088/0964-1726/20/2/025020

Google Scholar

[7] Brunner AJ, Barbezat M, Huber Ch, Flueler PH. The potential of active fiber composites made from piezoelectric fibers for actuating and sensing applications in structural health monitoring. Materials and Structures 2005; 38; 561-567.

DOI: 10.1007/bf02479548

Google Scholar

[8] Gentilman R, McNeal K, Schmidt G, Pizzochero A, Rosetti G Jr. Enchanced performances active fibercomposites. Smart Structures and Materials: Industrial and Commercial Applications of Smart Structures Technologies 2003; 5054; 350-359.

DOI: 10.1117/12.483898

Google Scholar

[9] High, JW, Wilkie KW. Method of fabricating NASA-ftandard Macro-Fiber Composite piezoelectric actuator 2003; NASA/TM-2003-212427 ARL-TR-2833.

Google Scholar

[10] Bellan F, Bulletti A, Capineri L, Masotti L, Yaralioglu GG, Degertekin LF, Khuri-Yakub BT, Guasti F, Rosi E. A new design and manufacturing process for embedded Lamb waves interdigital transducers based on piezopolymer film. A Sensors and Actuators 2005; 123-124; 379-387.

DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2005.05.013

Google Scholar

[11] Wilcox PD, Cawley P, Lowe MJS. Acoustic fields from PVDF interdigital transducers. IEE Proceedings Science, Measurement and Technology 1998; 145(5); 250-259.

DOI: 10.1049/ip-smt:19982213

Google Scholar

[12] Luginbuhl P, Collins SD, Racine G, Gretillat MA, de Rooij NF, Brooks KG, Setter N. Microfabricated Lamb Wave Device Based on PZT Sol-Gel Thin Film for Mechanical Transport of Solid Particles and Liquids. Journal Of Microelectromechanical Systems 1997; 6(4); 337-346.

DOI: 10.1109/84.650131

Google Scholar

[13] Hayward G, Hailu B, Farlow R, Gachagan A, McNab A. The design of embedded transducers for structural health monitoring applications. Proceedings of the SPIE 2001; 4327; 312-323.

DOI: 10.1117/12.436543

Google Scholar

[14] Na JK, Blackshire JL, Kuhra S. Design, fabrication and characterization of single-element interdigital transducers for NDT applications. Sensors and Actuators A 2008; 148; 359-365.

DOI: 10.1016/j.sna.2008.08.018

Google Scholar

[15] Na JK, Blackshire JL. Interaction of Rayleigh surface waves with a tightly closed fatigue crack. NDT&E International 2010; 43; 432-439.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ndteint.2010.04.003

Google Scholar

[16] Jin J, Quek ST, Wang Q. Design of interdigital transducers for crack detection in plates. Ultrasonics 2005; 43; 481-493. x.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ultras.2004.09.005

Google Scholar