Paper Titles

Cyclic Response of Steel Cladding Details with Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Shims
p.787

Bidirectional Behaviour of Unstiffened and Stiffened Direct-Welded Connections for Square CFST Columns
p.794

Experimental Study and Numerical Assessment of the Flexural Behaviour of Square and Rectangular CFST Members under Monotonic and Cyclic Loading
p.804

Theoretical Study on Steel Reinforced Concrete Hybrid Walls with Centered and Staggered Openings
p.812

Influence of Composite Slab on the Nonlinear Response of Extended End-Plate Beam-to-Column Joints
p.818

Analytical Methodology to Predict the Beam Overstrength Considering the Composite Slab Effects
p.826

Ductility and Behaviour Factor of RC Frame - Perforated SPSW Dual Systems
p.835

Seismic Response of Composite Eccentrically Braced Frames with Short Dissipative Element
p.846

The Effect of Consecutive Earthquakes on a Composite Structure Utilising RBRFs
p.854

HomeKey Engineering MaterialsKey Engineering Materials Vol. 763Influence of Composite Slab on the Nonlinear...

Influence of Composite Slab on the Nonlinear Response of Extended End-Plate Beam-to-Column Joints

Article Preview

Abstract:

Extended stiffened end-plate connections are widely used in seismic area due to their good performance in terms of both resistance and ductility. The most of existing studies focused on the all-steel behavior of these joints, disregarding the composite action of the concrete slab that is generally disconnected. However, the presence of the concrete slab can have beneficial effects on the structural stiffness for both gravity and lateral loads. Hence, most of the building frames are usually designed considering steel-concrete composite solution. However, the slab can strongly influence the hierarchy between beam and column and the ductility of the joint. In this paper the influence of composite deck on the response of extended stiffened end-plate joins has been investigated by means of finite element analyses (FEAs). In particular, the following details have been investigated: (i) all steel joints without slab; (ii) steel joint with disconnected slab; (iii) composite joint.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Behaviour of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas

Info:

Periodical:

Key Engineering Materials (Volume 763)

Pages:

818-825

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.763.818

Citation:

Cite this paper

Online since:

February 2018

Authors:

Roberto Tartaglia, Mario D'Aniello*, Gian Andrea Rassati, James A. Swanson, Raffaele Landolfo

Keywords:

Beam-to-Column Joint, Composite, Extended End-Plate Connection, Finite Element Analysis (FEA), Prequalification

Export:

RIS, BibTeX

Price:

Permissions:

Request Permissions

* - Corresponding Author

[1] ANSI/AISC 358-16 (2016), Prequalified Connections for Special and Intermediate Steel Moment Frames for Seismic Applications, Chicago, IL, USA.

DOI: 10.1061/40889(201)5

[2] EN 1998-1, Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance - Part 1: General Rules, Seismic Actions and Rules for Buildings. CEN, (2005).

DOI: 10.1002/9783433609194.ch3

[3] EN 1993: 1–8, Design of Steel Structures - Part 1–8: Design of Joints. CEN, (2005).

[4] J. Aribert, A. Ciutina, D. Dubina, Seismic response of composite structures including actual behaviour of beam-to-column joints, Composite Construction Steel Concrete. (2006)V: 708–17.

DOI: 10.1061/40826(186)66

[5] R.T. Leon, Analysis and design problems for PR composite frames subjected to seismic loads, Eng. and struct. 20(4-6) (1998) 364-71.

DOI: 10.1016/s0141-0296(97)00149-1

[6] GE. Thermou, AS. Elnashai, A. Plumier, C. Doneux, Seismic design and performance of composite frames, J. Constr. Steel Res. 60 (2004) 31–57.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2003.08.006

[7] A. Ciutina, D. Dubina and G. Danku, Influence of steel-concrete interaction in dissipative zones of frames: I – Experimental study, Steel and Compos. Struct. 15(3), (2013) 281-000.

DOI: 10.12989/scs.2013.15.3.299

[8] S-J. Lee, L-W. Lu, Cyclic tests of full-scale composite joint subassemblages, J. Struct. Eng. 115(8) (1989)1977–98.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9445(1989)115:8(1977)

[9] J. Lee and G.L. Fenves, Plastic-Damage Model for cyclic loading of concrete structures. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 124(8) (1998) 892-900.

DOI: 10.1061/(asce)0733-9399(1998)124:8(892)

[10] R. Simões, L. da Silva, Cyclic behaviour of end-plate beam-to-column composite joints. Steel and Composite Structures. 1(3) (2001) 355–76.

DOI: 10.12989/scs.2001.1.3.355

[11] C. Amadio, M. Bella, V. Bertoni, L. Macorini, Numerical modeling and seismic assessment of steel and steel-concrete composite frames, the line 5 of the ReLUIS-DPC 2005–2008 Project, 409–448. Napoli, Italy: Doppiavoce.

DOI: 10.1201/9780203861592.ch31

[12] C. Amadio, C. Bedon, M. Fasan, M.R. Pecce, Refined numerical modelling for the structural assessment of steel-concrete composite beam-to-column joints under seismic loads, Eng. Struct. 138 (2017) 394–409.

DOI: 10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.02.037

[13] A. Braconi, OS. Bursi, G. Fabbrocino, W. Salvatore, F. Taucer, R. Tremblay, Seismic performance of a 3D full-scale high-ductility steel–concrete composite moment-resisting structure— Part II: test results and analytical validation. Earthq. Eng. Struct. D. 37 (2008).

DOI: 10.1002/eqe.843

[14] G. Danku, D. Dubina, and A. Ciutina, Influence of steel-concrete interaction in dissipative zones of frames: II - Numerical study, Steel and Compos. Struct. 15(3) (2013) 305-000.

DOI: 10.12989/scs.2013.15.3.323

[15] W. Salvatore, OS. Bursi, D. Lucchesi, Design, testing and analysis of high ductile partial-strength steel–concrete composite beam-to-column joints. Computers and Structures. 83(28–30) (2005) 2334–52.

DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2005.03.028

[16] G. Vasdravellis, M. Valente, CA. Castiglioni, Behavior of exterior partial-strength composite beam-to-column connections: experimental study and numerical simulations, J. Constr. Steel Res. 65 (2009) 23–35.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2008.01.034

[17] EQUALJOINTS – European pre-QUALified steel JOINTS: RFSR-CT-2013-00021. Research Fund for Coal and Steel (RFCS) research programme.

[18] EN 1993: 1–1, Design of Steel Structures - Part 1–1: General rules and rules for buildings. CEN, (2005).

[19] M. D'Aniello, R. Tartaglia, S. Costanzo and R. Landolfo, Seismic design of extended stiffened end-plate joints in the framework of Eurocodes, J. Constr. Steel Res. 128 (2017) 512–527.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.09.017

[20] EN 1994: 1–1, Design of composite steel and concrete structures - Part 1–1: General rules and rules for buildings. CEN, (2005).

DOI: 10.1680/dgte4.31517

[21] Dassault, Abaqus 6. 14 - Abaqus Analysis User's Manual, Dassault Systèmes Simulia Corp (2014).

[22] M. Pavlović, C. Heistermann, M. Veljković, D. Pak, M. Feldmann, C. Rebelo, L. Simões da Silva, Connections in towers for wind converters, part I: Evaluation of down-scaled experiments. J. Constr. Steel Res. (2015).

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2015.09.002

[23] M. D'Aniello, D. Cassiano and R. Landolfo, Monotonic and cyclic inelastic tensile response of European preloadable gr. 10. 9 bolt assemblies, J. Constr. Steel Res., 124 (2016) 77-90.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jcsr.2016.05.017

[24] M. D'Aniello, D. Cassiano and R. Landolfo, Simplified criteria for finite element modelling of European preloadable bolts, Steel and Composite Structures 24(6) (2017) 643-658.

[25] A. Hillerborg, M. Modeer, and P-E. Petersson, Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements. Cement and Concrete Research. 6, (1976).

DOI: 10.1016/0008-8846(76)90007-7

[26] EN 1992: 1–1, Design of Concrete Structures - Part 1–1: General rules and rules for buildings. CEN, (2005).