Feasibility Analysis of Ecological Compensation for Coal Resource Type City Based on Economic Externalities

Article Preview

Abstract:

The economic growth mode of coal resource type cities in China is in an extensive operating way, and resulting in tremendous waste of resources and environmental pollution intensifies. This article analyzed the use of economic theory of externalities of coal mining activities from the point of some relevant environmental economics principles, proposed the urban ecological compensation connotation of coal resource type city, and analyzed the feasibility of the implementation of ecological compensation from economic viewpoint. In this research£¬not only laid a foundation for ecological compensation goals, principles, methods and compensation standards, but also provided an economic reference for building ecological compensation mechanism of coal resource type city.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Advanced Materials Research (Volumes 955-959)

Pages:

1706-1709

Citation:

Online since:

June 2014

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] Gert Van Hecken , Johan Bastiaensen. Payments for ecosystem services: justified or not?[J]. Environmental science and policy. 2010, 13: 785-792.

DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2010.09.006

Google Scholar

[2] The Research Group on Eco-compensation mechanism and policies in China. Eco-compensation Mechanisms and Policies in China[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2007. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[3] Quan Dong. The biological conditions and ecological supports necessary for the development of human societies. [J]. Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology, 1999, 10(2): 233-240. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[4] Weiguang Xie. Journal of Anhui agricultural Science, 2008, 36(14): 6018-6019. (In Chinese).

Google Scholar

[5] Paul Krugman and Robin Wells. Economics[M]. New York: Worth Publishers, (2006).

Google Scholar

[6] William J. Baumol. The Theory of Environmental Policy[M]. Beijing: Economic Science Press, (2004).

Google Scholar

[7] K.J.B. Upstream–downstream transactions and watershed externalities: Experimental evidence fro m Kenya[J]. Ecological Economics, 2009, 68(6): 1813-1824.

DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2008.12.002

Google Scholar