Effect of Color Shading-Nets on the Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Chieh-Qua Seedling

Article Preview

Abstract:

With uncovered net as a control, the effect of color shading-nets (red net, blue net and silver net) and ordinary black net on growth and physiological characteristics of Chieh-qua (Benincasa hispida Cogn.var. chieh-qua How.) seedling were studied. The result showed that, shading-net covering reduced light intensity and temperature, and increased air humidity of the seedling environment, compared with the control. Shading-net covering increased plant height, stem diameter, leaf area and biomass of Chieh-qua seedling, among which covering of blue and silver shading-nets were superior to the others. Root/shoot ratio and strong seedling index were the biggest under blue net treatment, thus it indicated that blue net covering promoted seedling haleness. Specific leaf weight of Chieh-qua seedling was reduced by covering shading-net. In addition to silver net, leaf chlorophyll and carotenoids content were significantly increased by another 3 covering shading-nets. Relative conductivity (RC), malondialdehyde (MDA) content, superoxidase dismutase (SOD) and peroxydase (POD) activity of Chieh-qua seedling leaf were significantly reduced by shading-net covering. This indicated that shading-net covering in seeding nursery alleviated the stress of intensive light and high temperature, and thus increased the integrated seedling quality. Blue shading-net performed the best among all covering shading-nets.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

197-201

Citation:

Online since:

October 2011

Export:

Price:

[1] Y. Shahak, E. Gal, Y. Offir and D. Ben-Yakir. Acta Horticulturae Vol. 797 (2008), pp.75-80.

DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2008.797.8

Google Scholar

[2] N.C. Rajapakse and Y. Shahak. in: Light and plant development, edtied by G. W. Hitelam and K. Halliday/ Blackwell Publishing, UK(2007), 290-312.

Google Scholar

[3] Y. Shahak, E. E. Gussakovsky, E. Gal and R. Ganelevin. Acta Horticulturae Vol. 659 (2004), pp.143-151.

DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.2004.659.17

Google Scholar

[4] Y. Shahak. Acta Horticulturae Vol. 770 (2008), pp.161-168.

Google Scholar

[5] Q.Y. Yan, S.W. Song, H.C. Liu, F. Dong, G.W. Sun and R.Y. Chen. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University Vol. 30 (2011), pp.44-48.

Google Scholar

[6] Q.Y. Yan, H.C. Liu, R.Y. Chen and S.W. Song. Guangdong Agricultural Science (2010), pp.48-50.

Google Scholar

[7] Q.Y. Yan, H.C. Liu, S.W. Song, F. Dong, G.W. Sun and R.Y. Chen. Greenhouse & Horticulture (2010), pp.22-23.

Google Scholar

[8] M. Oren-Shamir, E. E. Gussakovsky, E. Spiegel, A. Nissim-Levi, K. Ratner, R. Ovadia, Y. E. Giller, and Y. Shahak. Journal of Horticultural Science & Biotechnology Vol. 76 (2001), pp.353-361.

DOI: 10.1080/14620316.2001.11511377

Google Scholar

[9] H.K. Lichtenthaler: Chlorophylls and carotenoids—pigments of photosynthesis biomembranes, Academic Press, New York (1987).

Google Scholar

[10] S. Lutts, J.M. Kinet and J. Bouharmont. Annals of Botany Vol. 78 (1996), pp.389-398.

Google Scholar

[11] R.L. Heath and L. Packer. Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics Vol. 125 (1968), pp.189-198.

Google Scholar

[12] W.F. Beyer and I. Fridovich. Analytical Biochemistry Vol. 161 (1987), pp.559-566.

Google Scholar

[13] M. Kar and D. Mishra. Plant Physiology Vol. 57 (1976), pp.315-319.

Google Scholar