Tribological and Thermal Behavior of Laser Implanted Tool Surfaces for Hot Stamping AlSi Coated 22MnB5 Sheets

Article Preview

Abstract:

In the automotive industry, the development of electrically powered vehicles has become a major forward-looking topic. For improving the range and thus the efficiency of electric cars, lightweight construction has gained even more importance. In this regard, hot stamping has been established as a suitable and resource efficient process to manufacture high-strength and lightweight body-in-white components. This method combines hot forming and quenching of boron-manganese steel 22MnB5 in a single process step. As a result, complex structures with thin sheet thicknesses and high ultimate tensile strength up to 1500 MPa are generated. However, the use of lubricants is not possible at elevated temperatures, which subsequently leads to high thermo-mechanical tool stresses. As a side effect, high friction and severe wear occur during the forming process, which affect the resulting part quality and maximum tool life. Therefore, the aim of this study is to improve the tribological performance of hot stamping tools by using a laser implantation process. This technique is based on manufacturing highly wear resistant, separated and elevated structures in micrometer range by embedding hard ceramic particles into the tool material via pulsed laser radiation. As a result, highly stressed areas on the tool surface can be modified locally, which in turn influence the tribological and thermal behavior during the forming process. In this regard, laser implanted and conventionally tool surfaces were investigated under hot stamping conditions. A modified pin-on-disk test was used to analyze the friction coefficient and occuring wear mechanisms. Furthermore, quenching tests as well as hardness measurements were carried out to gain in-depth knowledge about the cooling behavior of the modified tool surfaces and its impact to the resulting mechanical part properties.

You might also be interested in these eBooks

Info:

Periodical:

Pages:

69-74

Citation:

Online since:

February 2022

Export:

Price:

* - Corresponding Author

[1] H. Karbasian, A.E. Tekkaya, A review on hot stamping, Journal of Materials Processing Technology. 210 (2010) 2103-2118.

DOI: 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2010.07.019

Google Scholar

[2] S. Bruschi, A. Ghiotti, Hot Stamping, Comprehensive Materials Processing. 13 (2014) 27-54.

DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-096532-1.00303-4

Google Scholar

[3] K. Mori, P.F. Bariani, B.-A. Behrens, A. Brosius, S. Bruschi, T. Maeno, M. Merklein, J. Yanagimoto, Hot stamping of ultra-high strength steel parts, CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 66 (2017) 755-777.

DOI: 10.1016/j.cirp.2017.05.007

Google Scholar

[4] M. Vilaseca, J. Pujante, G. Ramírez, D. Casellas, Investigation into adhesive wear of coated and uncoated hot stamping production tools, Wear 308 (2013) 148-154.

DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2013.07.003

Google Scholar

[5] A. Mousavi, M. Schomäc er, A. rosius, Macro and micro structuring of deep drawing's tools for lubricant free forming, Procedia Engineering. 81 (2014) 1890-1895.

DOI: 10.1016/j.proeng.2014.10.252

Google Scholar

[6] F. Spranger, M. de Oliveira Lopes, S. Schirdewahn, M. Merklein, K. Hilgenberg, Microstructural evolution and geometrical properties of TiB2 metal matrix composite protrusions on hot working tool steel surfaces manufactured by laser implantation, The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology. 106 (2020) 481-501.

DOI: 10.1007/s00170-019-04630-0

Google Scholar

[7] R.G. Munro, Material Properties of Titanium Diboride, Journal of the National Institute of Standards and Technology. 105 (2000) 709-720.

Google Scholar

[8] P. Schwingenschlögl, M. Merklein, Tribological Behavior of Different Tool Steels and Surface Properties under Hot Stamping Conditions, Key Engineering Materials 767 (2018) 212-219.

DOI: 10.4028/www.scientific.net/kem.767.212

Google Scholar

[9] J. Zhou, B. Wang, M. Huang, D. Cui, Effect of hot stamping parameters on the mechanical properties and microstructure of cold rolled 22MnB5 steel strips, International Journal of Minerals, Metallurgy and Materials. 21 (2014) 544-555. 0 200 300 400 °C 600 0 18 20 22 24 26 s 30 Temperature Time MStart a) 0 450 HV10 550 Hardness Hardness martensitic microstructure 22MnB5 b) Height [µm]: 30 Distance [µm]: 350 Unmodified Height [µm]: 30 Distance [µm]: 750 p = 20 MPa Ty = 930 C ty = 360 s t0 = 1.5 mm Blank = 22MnB5 + AlSi.

DOI: 10.1007/s12613-014-0940-7

Google Scholar